AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Comparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 125I seed implantation combined with chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone efficacy in treating unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Yanfen Zheng1Rui Huang1Wenxue Zou1Chao Liu2Hongxin Niu3( )Jinbo Yue2 ( )
Department of Graduate, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
Department of Interventional Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

The prognosis for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still poor, and the best therapeutic option is still unknown. The common treatments for LAPC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), 125I seed implantation combined with chemotherapy (125IC), and chemotherapy alone (CA), were studied. In addition, we looked into the impact of radiation dose on the survival of patients receiving chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

This study included 202 patients with unresectable LAPC who were separated into three groups based on treatment methods: CCRT, 125IC, and CA. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. The differences between groups were analyzed using the chi-square test and the Fisher exact test. All three groups were compared at the same time and then in pairs. To investigate the impact of radiation dose on survival, patients with CCRT were divided into groups based on radiation dose (<54.9 Gy/≥54.9 Gy) or biological effective dose (BED) of radiotherapy (<65.32 Gy/≥65.32 Gy). Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed to explore the factors associated with prognosis.

Results

Patients who received CCRT had a superior OS rate than those who received 125IC or CA (p = 0.009). Multivariate analyses showed that ECOG score 2 (p<0.001) and 125IC (p=0.012) treatment method were substantially associated with poor OS, while being male (p=0.005) and ECOG score 2 (p<0.001) were significantly associated with poor PFS. When comparing the effects of radiation dose on survival, concurrent chemotherapy with high-dose radiotherapy (CCHRT) was found to have a better OS rate (p=0.003) than concurrent chemotherapy with low-dose irradiation (CCLRT). PFS, on the other hand, did not differ statistically in any of the groups (p>0.05). Multivariate analyses showed that age ≥ 64.5 years (p=0.038), ECOG score 2(p=0.001), and CCLRT (p=0.001) were significantly associated with poor OS, while being male (p=0.023) was associated with poor PFS.

Conclusions

Patients who received CCRT for unresectable LAPC had a greater OS rate than those who received 125IC or CA. Within permitted bounds, CCHRT outperformed CCLRT in terms of OS.

References

1

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68: 394-424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492

2

Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol. 2019; 10: 10-27. doi:10.14740/wjon1166

3

Low G, Panu A, Millo N, Leen E. Multimodality imaging of neoplastic and nonneoplastic solid lesions of the pancreas. Radiographics. 2011; 31: 993-1015. doi:10.1148/rg.314105731

4

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71: 7-33. doi:10.3322/caac.21654

5

Tezuka S, Ueno M, Oishi R, et al. Modified FOLFIRINOX versus sequential chemotherapy (FOLFIRI/FOLFOX) as a second-line treatment regimen for unresectable pancreatic cancer: a real-world analysis. Cancer Med. 2022; 11: 1088-1098. doi:10.1002/cam4.4512

6

Roth MT, Berlin JD. Current concepts in the treatment of resectable pancreatic cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018; 20: 39. doi:10.1007/s11912-018-0685-y

7

Choi YJ, Byun Y, Kang JS, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer according to the neoadjuvant chemo-regimens: gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX. Gut Liver. 2021; 15: 466-475. doi:10.5009/gnl20070

8

Choi Y, Oh DY, Kim K, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 48: 1045-1055. doi:10.4143/crt.2015.226

9

Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Treatment of locally unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas: comparison of combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy plus radiotherapy) to chemotherapy alone. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988; 80: 751-755.

10

Loehrer PJ Sr, Feng Y, Cardenes H, et al. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4105-4112, doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8904

11

Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, et al. Phase Ⅲ trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008; 19: 1592-1599. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn281

12

Hammel P, Huguet F, van Laethem JL, et al. Effect of chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: the LAP07 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016; 315: 1844-1853. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.4324

13

Ng IW, Soon YY, Chen D, Tey JCS. Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018; 14: 392-401. doi:10.1111/ajco.12996

14

Schuricht AL, Spitz F, Barbot D, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy in the combined-modality management of pancreatic cancer. Am Surg. 1998; 64(11): 1043-1049.

15

Li Q, Liang Y, Zhao Y, Gai B. Interpretation of adverse reactions and complications in Chinese expert consensus of Iodine-125 brachytherapy for pancreatic cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019; 15: 751-754. doi:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_884_18

16

Lv WF, Lu D, Xiao JK, et al. The side effects and complications of percutaneous iodine-125 seeds implantation under CT-guide for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96:e9535. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000009535

17

Li YF, Liu ZQ, Zhang YS, et al. Implantation of radioactive (125)I seeds improves the prognosis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients: a retrospective study. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci. 2016; 36: 205-210. doi:10.1007/s11596-016-1567-x

18

Moertel CG, Frytak S, Hahn RG, et al. Therapy of locally unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized comparison of high dose (6000 rads) radiation alone, moderate dose radiation (4000 rads+ 5-fluorouracil), and high dose radiation+5-fluorouracil: The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Cancer. 1981; 48: 1705-1710. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19811015)48:8<1705::aid-cncr2820480803>3.0.co;2-4

19

Chung SY, Chang JS, Lee BM, Kim KH, Lee KJ, Seong J. Dose escalation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2017; 123: 438-445. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.010

20

Huguet F, André T, Hammel P, et al. Impact of chemoradiotherapy after disease control with chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in GERCOR phase Ⅱ and Ⅲ studies. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 326-331. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.5663

21

Herman JM, Chang DT, Goodman KA, et al. Phase 2 multi-institutional trial evaluating gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2015; 121: 1128-1137. doi:10.1002/cncr.29161

22

Yu YP, Yu Q, Guo JM, Jiang HT, Di XY, Zhu Y. Effectiveness and security of CT-guided percutaneous implantation of (125)I seeds in pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Radiol. 2014; 87:20130642. doi:10.1259/bjr.20130642

23

Yang L, Li C, Wang Z, Wu J, Zhou J, Wang, R. The clinical efficacy of computed tomography-guided (125)I particle implantation combined with arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2021; 17: 720-725. doi:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_563_20

24

Bapat AA, Hostetter G, Von Hoff DD, Han H. Perineural invasion and associated pain in pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011; 11: 695-707. doi:10.1038/nrc3131

25

Lu Z, Dong TH, Si PR, et al. Continuous low-dose-rate irradiation of iodine-125 seeds inhibiting perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016; 129: 2460-2468. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.191777

26

Jia SN, Wen FX, Gong TT, et al. A review on the efficacy and safety of iodine-125 seed implantation in unresectable pancreatic cancers. Int J Radiat Biol Phys. 2020; 96: 383-389. doi:10.1080/09553002.2020.1704300

27

Sun S, Xu H, Xin J, Liu J, Guo Q, Li S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided interstitial brachytherapy of unresectable pancreatic cancer: results of a pilot trial. Endoscopy. 2006; 38: 399-403. doi:10.1055/s-2006-925253

28

Jin Z, Du Y, Li Z, Jiang Y, Chen J, Liu, Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided interstitial implantation of iodine 125-seeds combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2008; 40: 314-320. doi:10.1055/s-2007-995476

29

Wang KX, Jin ZD, Du YQ, et al. EUS-guided celiac ganglion irradiation with iodine-125 seeds for pain control in pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76: 945-952. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.032

30

Zaorsky NG, Lehrer EJ, Handorf E, Meyer JE. Dose escalation in stereotactic body radiation therapyfor pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Oncol. 2019; 42: 46-55. doi:10.1097/COC.0000000000000472

31

Koay EJ, Hanania AN, Hall WA, et al. Dose-escalated radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer: a simultaneous integrated boost approach. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020; 10: e495-e507. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2020.01.012

Precision Radiation Oncology
Pages 144-156
Cite this article:
Zheng Y, Huang R, Zou W, et al. Comparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 125I seed implantation combined with chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone efficacy in treating unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Precision Radiation Oncology, 2022, 6(2): 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1156

469

Views

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 09 February 2022
Revised: 26 April 2022
Accepted: 29 April 2022
Published: 08 June 2022
© 2022 The Authors. Precision Radiation Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Return