AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Regular Paper

CrowdOLA: Online Aggregation on Duplicate Data Powered by Crowdsourcing

School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Recently there is an increasing need for interactive human-driven analysis on large volumes of data. Online aggregation (OLA), which provides a quick sketch of massive data before a long wait of the final accurate query result, has drawn significant research attention. However, the direct processing of OLA on duplicate data will lead to incorrect query answers, since sampling from duplicate records leads to an over representation of the duplicate data in the sample. This violates the prerequisite of uniform distributions in most statistical theories. In this paper, we propose CrowdOLA, a novel framework for integrating online aggregation processing with deduplication. Instead of cleaning the whole dataset, CrowdOLA retrieves block-level samples continuously from the dataset, and employs a crowd-based entity resolution approach to detect duplicates in the sample in a pay-as-you-go fashion. After cleaning the sample, an unbiased estimator is provided to address the error bias that is introduced by the duplication. We evaluate CrowdOLA on both real-world and synthetic workloads. Experimental results show that CrowdOLA provides a good balance between efficiency and accuracy.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
jcst-33-2-366-Highlights.pdf (375.6 KB)

References

[1]
Hellerstein J M, Haas P J, Wang H J. Online aggregation. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, May 1997, pp.171-182.
[2]

Doulkeridis C, Nørvåg K. A survey of large-scale analytical query processing in MapReduce. VLDB J., 2014, 23(3): 355-380.

[3]

Elmagarmid A K, Ipeirotis P G, Verykios V S. Duplicate record detection: A survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2007, 19(1): 1-16.

[4]
Charikar M, Chaudhuri S, Motwani R, Narasayya V R. Towards estimation error guarantees for distinct values. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, May 2000, pp.268-279.
[5]
Wang J, Krishnan S, Franklin M J, Goldberg K, Kraska T, Milo T. A sample-and-clean framework for fast and accurate query processing on dirty data. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, June 2014, pp.469-480.
[6]
Haas P J. Large-sample and deterministic confidence intervals for online aggregation. In Proc. the 9th Int. Conf. Scientific and Statistical Database Management, August 1997, pp.51-63.
[7]
Haas P J, Hellerstein J M. Ripple joins for online aggregation. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, June 1999, pp.287-298.
[8]
Jermaine C, Dobra A, Arumugam S, Joshi S, Pol A. A disk-based join with probabilistic guarantees. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, June 2005, pp.563-574.
[9]
Luo G, Ellmann C J, Haas P J, Naughton J F. A scalable hash ripple join algorithm. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, June 2002, pp.252-262.
[10]
Condie T, Conway N, Alvaro P, Hellerstein J M, Gerth J, Talbot J, Elmeleegy K, Sears R. Online aggregation and continuous query support in MapReduce. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, June 2010, pp.1115-1118.
[11]
Shi Y, Meng X, Wang F, Gan Y. You can stop early with COLA: Online processing of aggregate queries in the cloud. In Proc. the 21st Int. Conf. Information and Knowledge Management, October 2012, pp.1223-1232.
[12]

Pansare N, Borkar V R, Jermaine C, Condie T. Online aggregation for large MapReduce jobs. PVLDB, 2011, 4(11): 1135-1145.

[13]
Zeng K, Agarwal S, Stoica I. iOLAP: Managing uncertainty for efficient incremental OLAP. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, July 2016, pp.1347-1361.
[14]

Köpcke H, Rahm E. Frameworks for entity matching: A comparison. Data Knowl. Eng., 2010, 69(2): 197-210.

[15]
Hernández M A, Stolfo S J. The merge/purge problem for large databases. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, May 1995, pp.127-138.
[16]
McCallum A, Nigam K, Ungar L H. Efficient clustering of high-dimensional data sets with application to reference matching. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, August 2000, pp.169-178.
[17]
Ananthakrishna R, Chaudhuri S, Ganti V. Eliminating fuzzy duplicates in data warehouses. In Proc. the 28th Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, August 2002, pp.586-597.
[18]

Bhattacharya I, Getoor L. Collective entity resolution in relational data. TKDD, 2007, 1(1): 5.

[19]

Altowim Y, Kalashnikov D V, Mehrotra S. Progressive approach to relational entity resolution. PVLDB, 2014, 7(11): 999-1010.

[20]

Whang S E, Marmaros D, Garcia-Molina H. Pay-as-yougo entity resolution. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2013, 25(5): 1111-1124.

[21]

Gruenheid A, Dong X L, Srivastava D. Incremental record linkage. PVLDB, 2014, 7(9): 697-708.

[22]

Whang S E, Garcia-Molina H. Incremental entity resolution on rules and data. VLDB J., 2014, 23(1): 77-102.

[23]
Li G, Wang J, Zheng Y, Franklin M J. Crowdsourced data management: A survey. In Proc. the 33rd IEEE Int. Conf. Data Engineering, April 2017, pp.39-40.
[24]
Zheng Y, Cheng R, Maniu S, Mo L. On optimality of jury selection in crowdsourcing. In Proc. the 18th Int. Conf. Extending Database Technology, March 2015, pp.193-204.
[25]

Zheng Y, Li G, Li Y, Shan C, Cheng R. Truth inference in crowdsourcing: Is the problem solved? PVLDB, 2017, 10(5): 541-552.

[26]

Zheng Y, Li G, Cheng R. DOCS: Domain-aware crowdsourcing system. PVLDB, 2016, 10(4): 361-372.

[27]
Zheng Y, Wang J, Li G, Cheng R, Feng J. QASCA: A quality-aware task assignment system for crowdsourcing applications. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, May 31-June 4, 2015, pp.1031-1046.
[28]

Xiong H, Zhang D, Chen G, Wang L, Gauthier V, Barnes L E. iCrowd: Near-optimal task allocation for piggyback crowdsensing. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 2016, 15(8): 2010-2022.

[29]
Hu H, Zheng Y, Bao Z, Li G, Feng J, Cheng R. Crowdsourced POI labelling: Location-aware result inference and task assignment. In Proc. the 32nd IEEE Int. Conf. Data Engineering, May 2016, pp.61-72.
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Pages 366-379
Cite this article:
Zhang A-Z, Li J-Z, Gao H, et al. CrowdOLA: Online Aggregation on Duplicate Data Powered by Crowdsourcing. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2018, 33(2): 366-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-018-1824-5

324

Views

5

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

4

Scopus

1

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 26 February 2017
Revised: 29 January 2018
Published: 23 March 2018
©2018 LLC & Science Press, China
Return