AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Regular Paper

Energy-Efficient Minimum Mobile Charger Coverage for Wireless Sensor Networks

Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia 19122, U.S.A.

A preliminary version of the paper was published in the Proceedings of MASS 2021.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Sustaining an operational wireless sensor network (WSN) is challenging due to the persistent need of the battery-powered sensors to be charged from time to time. The procedure of exploiting mobile chargers (MCs) that traverse to the fixed sensors of the network and wirelessly transfer energy in an efficient matter has been considered widely as a promising way to tackle this challenge. An optimization problem, called the mobile charger coverage problem, arises naturally to keep all of the sensors alive with an objective of determining both the minimum number of MCs required meeting the sensor recharge frequency and the schedule of these MCs. It is shown that this optimization problem becomes NP-hard in high-dimensional spaces. Moreover, the special case of the homogeneous recharge frequency of the sensors has already been proven to have a tractable algorithm if we consider whether the 1-dimensional space is a line or a ring. In this work, we seek to find a delicate border between the tractable and the intractable problem space. Specifically, we study the special case of heterogeneous sensors that take frequencies of 1's and 2's (lifetime of 1 and 0.5 time units) on a line, conjecture the special case's NP-hardness, propose a novel brute-force optimal algorithm, and present a linear-time greedy algorithm that gives a 1.5-approximation solution for the problem. Afterwards, we introduce the energy optimization problem of the MCs with the minimized number and solve it optimally. Comprehensive simulation is conducted to verify the efficiency of using our proposed algorithms that minimize the number of MCs.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
1993_ESM.pdf (861.2 KB)

References

[1]
Sawwan A, Wu J. Mobile charger coverage problem for specific heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In Proc. the 18th IEEE Int. Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Smart System, Oct. 2021, pp. 62-70. DOI: 10.1109/MASS52906.2021.00017.
[2]
Beigel R, Wu J, Zheng H. On optimal scheduling of multiple mobile chargers in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. the 1st Int. Workshop on Mobile Sensing, Computing and Communication, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1145/2633675.2633676.
[3]
Zheng H, Wu J. Cooperative wireless charging vehicle scheduling. In Proc. the 14th IEEE Int. Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems, Oct. 2017, pp. 224-232. DOI: 10.1109/MASS.2017.13.
[4]

Shu Y, Yousefi H, Cheng P, Chen J, Gu Y J, He T, Shin K G. Near-optimal velocity control for mobile charging in wireless rechargeable sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, 2015, 15(7): 1699-1713. DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2015.2473163.

[5]

Kurs A, Karalis A, Moffatt R, Joannopoulos J D, Fisher P, Soljačić M. Wireless power transfer via strongly coupled magnetic resonances. Science, 2007, 317(5834): 83-86. DOI: 10.1126/science.11432.

[6]

Xu W, Liang W, Jia X, Xu Z, Li Z, Liu Y. Maximizing sensor lifetime with the minimal service cost of a mobile charger in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, 2018, 17(11): 2564-2577. DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2018.2813376.

[7]

Ma Y, Liang W, Xu W. Charging utility maximization in wireless rechargeable sensor networks by charging multiple sensors simultaneously. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 2018, 26(4): 1591-1604. DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2018.2841420.

[8]
Wu M, Ye D, Kang J, Zhang H, Yu R. Optimal and cooperative energy replenishment in mobile rechargeable networks. In Proc. the 83rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 2016. DOI: 10.1109/VTCSpring.2016.7504382.
[9]

Liang W, Xu Z, Xu W, Shi J, Mao G, Das S K. Approximation algorithms for charging reward maximization in rechargeable sensor networks via a mobile charger. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 2017, 25(5): 3161-3174. DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2017.2723605.

[10]
Yang P, Wu T, Dai H, Rao X, Wang X, Wan P J, He X. MORE: Multi-node mobile charging scheduling for deadline constraints. ACM Trans. Sensor Networks, 2020, 17(1): Article No. 7. DOI: 10.1145/3410454.
[11]

Zhang S, Wu J, Lu S. Collaborative mobile charging. IEEE Trans. Computers, 2014, 64(3): 654-667. DOI: 10.1109/TC.2013.2297926.

[12]
Wang N, Wu J, Dai H. Bundle charging: Wireless charging energy minimization in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proc. the 39th IEEE Int. Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Jul. 2019, pp. 810-820. DOI: 10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00085.
[13]

He L, Kong L, Gu Y, Pan J, Zhu T. Evaluating the on-demand mobile charging in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, 2014, 14(9): 1861-1875. DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2014.2368557.

[14]

Xu W, Liang W, Lin X. Approximation algorithms for min-max cycle cover problems. IEEE Trans. Computers, 2013, 64(3): 600-613. DOI: 10.1109/TC.2013.2295609.

[15]
Xu W, Liang W, Jia X, Xu Z. Maximizing sensor lifetime in a rechargeable sensor network via partial energy charging on sensors. In Proc. the 13th Annual IEEE Int. Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking, Jun. 2016. DOI: 10.1109/SAHCN.2016.7733001.
[16]

Banoth S P, Donta P K, Amgoth T. Dynamic mobile charger scheduling with partial charging strategy for WSNs using deep-Q-networks. Neural Computing and Applications, 2021, 33(22): 15267-15279. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06146-9.

[17]
Tseng F H, Cho H H, Lai C F. Mobile charger planning for wireless rechargeable sensor network based on ant colony optimization. In Proc. the 11th International Conference on Computer Science and Its Applications and the 14th KIPS International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Technologies and Applications, Dec. 2019, pp. 387-394. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-9343-7_53.
[18]

Zhang S, Qian Z, Wu J, Kong F, Lu S. Optimizing itinerary selection and charging association for mobile chargers. IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, 2016, 16(10): 2833-2846. DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2016.2641446.

[19]

Sangare F, Xiao Y, Niyato D, Han Z. Mobile charging in wireless-powered sensor networks: Optimal scheduling and experimental implementation. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology, 2017, 66(8): 7400-7410. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2017.2668990.

[20]
Lin C, Guo C, Dai H, Wang L, Wu G. Near optimal charging scheduling for 3-D wireless rechargeable sensor networks with energy constraints. In Proc. the 39th IEEE Int. Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Jul. 2019, pp. 624-633. DOI: 10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00068.
[21]
Wang C, Li J, Ye F, Yang Y. Multi-vehicle coordination for wireless energy replenishment in sensor networks. In Proc. the 27th IEEE Int. Symp. Parallel and Distributed Processing, May 2013, pp. 1101-1111. DOI: 10.1109/IPDPS.2013.22.
[22]

Dai H, Wu X, Chen G, Xu L, Lin S. Minimizing the number of mobile chargers for large-scale wireless rechargeable sensor networks. Computer Communications, 2014, 46: 54-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2014.03.001.

[23]
Madhja A, Nikoletseas S, Raptis T P. Efficient, distributed coordination of multiple mobile chargers in sensor networks. In Proc. the 16th ACM Int. Conference on Modeling, Analysis Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, Nov. 2013, pp. 101-108. DOI: 10.1145/2507924.2507938.
[24]

Galvin R. Energy consumption effects of speed and acceleration in electric vehicles: Laboratory case studies and implications for drivers and policymakers. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 53: 234-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.020.

Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Pages 869-887
Cite this article:
Sawwan A, Wu J. Energy-Efficient Minimum Mobile Charger Coverage for Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 37(4): 869-887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-022-1993-0

443

Views

2

Crossref

0

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 25 October 2021
Revised: 30 May 2022
Accepted: 22 June 2022
Published: 25 July 2022
©Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2022
Return