AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Perspective

Information Superbahn: Towards a Planet-Scale, Low-Entropy and High-Goodput Computing Utility

Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100149, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In a 1961 lecture to celebrate MIT’s centennial, John McCarthy proposed the vision of utility computing, including three key concepts of pay-per-use service, large computer and private computer. Six decades have passed, but McCarthy’s computing utility vision has not yet been fully realized, despite advances in grid computing, services computing and cloud computing. This paper presents a perspective of computing utility called Information Superbahn, building on recent advances in cloud computing. This Information Superbahn perspective retains McCarthy’s vision as much as possible, while making essential modern requirements more explicit, in the new context of a networked world of billions of users, trillions of devices, and zettabytes of data. Computing utility offers pay-per-use computing services through a 1) planet-scale, 2) low-entropy and 3) high-goodput utility. The three salient characteristics of computing utility are elaborated. Initial evidence is provided to support this viewpoint.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Video
JCST-2210-12898-video.mp4
Download File(s)
JCST-2210-12898-Highlights.pdf (613.9 KB)

References

[1]
McCarthy J. Time-sharing computer systems. In Management and the Computer of the Future, Greenberger M (ed.), New York: MIT Press, 1962, pp.220-248.
[2]
Xu Z, Li G, Sun N. Information Superbahn: Towards new type of cyberinfrastructure. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(1): 46-52. (in Chinese)
[3]
Mell P, Grance T. The NIST definition of cloud computing. Technical Report, NIST Special Publication, 2011. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145, Oct. 2022.
[4]
Hwang K. Cloud Computing for Machine Learning and Cognitive Applications. MIT Press, 2017.
[5]
Jonas E, Schleier-Smith J, Sreekanti V et al. Cloud programming simplified: A Berkeley view on serverless computing. arXiv:1902.03383, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.03383, Oct. 2022.
[6]
Vahdat A. Networking challenges for the next decade. In the Google Networking Research Summit Keynote Talks, Apr. 2017. http://events17.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/ONS%20Keynote%20Vahdat%202017.pdf, Oct. 2022.
[7]
Guo J, Chang Z, Wang S, Ding H, Feng Y, Mao L, Bao Y. Who limits the resource efficiency of my datacenter: An analysis of Alibaba datacenter traces. In Proc. the International Symposium on Quality of Service, Jun. 2019. DOI: 10.1145/3326285.3329074.
[8]
Xu Z, Li C. Low-entropy cloud computing systems. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2017, 47(9): 1149-1163. DOI: 10.1360/N112017-00069. (in Chinese)
[9]
Perry T S. The trillion-device world. IEEE Spectrum, 2019, 56(1): 6.
[10]
Ritter D. Cost-aware process modeling in multiclouds. Information Systems, 2022, 108: 101969. DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2021.101969.
[11]
Lee C A, Bohn R B, Michel M. The NIST cloud federation reference architecture. Technical Report, NIST Special Publication, 2020. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.500-332, Oct. 2022.
[12]
Chasins S, Cheung A, Crooks N et al. The sky above the clouds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.07147, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07147, Oct. 2022.
[13]
Xu Z, Li G. Computing for the masses. Communications of the ACM, 2011, 54(10): 129-137. DOI: 10.1145/2001269.2001298.
[14]
Reed D, Sporny M, Longley D et al. Decentralized identifiers (DIDs) v1.0: Core architecture, data model, and representations. Technical Report, W3C Working Draft, https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/, Oct. 2022.
[15]
IEA. Key world energy statistics 2021. Technical Report, IEA, 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2021/final-consumption, Oct. 2022.
[16]
Thollander P, Karlsson M, Rohdin P et al. Introduction to Industrial Energy Efficiency: Energy Auditing, Energy Management, and Policy Issues. Academic Press, 2020.
[17]
Dean J, Barroso L A. The tail at scale. Communications of the ACM, 2013, 56(2): 74-80. DOI: 10.1145/2408776.2408794.
[18]
Barroso L A, Hölzle U, Ranganathan P. The Datacenter as a Computer: Designing Warehouse-Scale Machines. Springer Cham, 2019. DOI: 10.2200/S00874ED3V01Y201809CAC046.
[19]
Kerner B S. Introduction to Modern Traffic Flow Theory and Control. Berlin: Springer, 2009.
[20]
Crooks N, Pu Y, Alvisi L et al. Seeing is believing: A client-centric specification of database isolation. In Proc. the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Jul. 2017, pp.73-82. DOI: 10.1145/3087801.3087802.
[21]
Little J D C. Little’s Law as viewed on its 50th anniversary. Operations Research, 2011, 59(3): 536-549. DOI: 10.1287/opre.1110.0940.
[22]
Burns B, Grant B, Oppenheimer D et al. Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes: Lessons learned from three container-management systems over a decade. ACM Queue, 2016, 14(1): 70-93. DOI: 10.1145/2898442.2898444.
[23]
Kuppe M A, Lamport L, Ricketts D. The TLA+ toolbox. arXiv:1912.10633, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.10633, Oct. 2022.
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Pages 103-114
Cite this article:
Xu Z-W, Li Z-Y, Yu Z-S, et al. Information Superbahn: Towards a Planet-Scale, Low-Entropy and High-Goodput Computing Utility. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2023, 38(1): 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-022-2898-7

444

Views

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

2

Scopus

1

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 10 October 2022
Revised: 07 November 2022
Accepted: 02 December 2022
Published: 28 February 2023
© Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2023
Return