AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Technical Note

Comparing Computer Run Time of Building Simulation Programs

Tianzhen Hong( )Fred BuhlPhilip HavesStephen SelkowitzMichael Wetter
Building Technologies Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

This paper presents an approach for comparing the computer run time of building simulation programs. The computing run time of a simulation program depends on several key factors, including the calculation algorithm and modeling capabilities of the program, the run period, the simulation time step, the complexity of the energy models, the run control settings, and the software and hardware configurations of the computer used to run the simulation. To demonstrate this approach, we ran simulations for several representative DOE-2.1E and EnergyPlus energy models. We then compared and analyzed the computer run times of these energy models.

References

 
DB Crawley, JW Hand, M Kummert, BT Griffith (2005). Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference and Exhibition, Montreal, Canada, pp. 231-238.
 
J Huang (2007). Scorecards of the commercial building prototypes, LBNL report, Berkeley, California.
Building Simulation
Pages 210-213
Cite this article:
Hong T, Buhl F, Haves P, et al. Comparing Computer Run Time of Building Simulation Programs. Building Simulation, 2008, 1(3): 210-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-008-8123-y

576

Views

11

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 09 July 2008
Accepted: 23 July 2008
Published: 28 August 2008
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

© Tsinghua Press and Springer-Verlag 2008

Return