AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Feasibility of utilizing numerical viscosity from coarse grid CFD for fast turbulence modeling of indoor environments

Haidong Wang1Zhiqiang (John) Zhai1( )Xiang Liu2
Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder, UCB 428, ECOT 441, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Nexant Inc., 101 2nd St. Suite 1000, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a useful tool in building indoor environment study. However, the notorious computational effort of CFD is a significant drawback that restricts its applications in many areas and stages. Factors such as grid resolution and turbulence modeling are the main reasons that lead to large computing cost of this method. This study investigates the feasibility of utilizing inherent numerical viscosity induced by coarse CFD grid, coupled with simplest turbulence model, to greatly reduce the computational cost while maintaining reasonable modeling accuracy of CFD. Numerical viscosity introduced from space discretization in a carefully specified coarse grid resolution may have similar magnitude as turbulence viscosity for typical indoor airflows. This presents potentials of substituting sophisticated turbulence models with inherent numerical viscosity models from coarse grid CFD that are often used in fast CFD analysis. Case studies were conducted to validate the analytical findings, by comparing the coarse grid CFD predictions with the grid-independent CFD solutions as well as experimental data obtained from literature. The study shows that a uniform coarse grid can be applied, along with a constant turbulence viscosity model, to reasonably predict general airflow patterns in typical indoor environments. Although such predictions may not be as precise as fine-grid CFDs with well validated complex turbulence models, the accuracy is acceptable for indoor environment study, especially at an early stage of a project. The computing speed is about 100 times faster than a fine-grid CFD, which makes it possible to simulate a complicated 3-dimensional building in real-time (or near real-time) with personal computer.

References

 
EDSL (2008). A-Tas Theory Manual. Milton Keynes, UK: EDSL Ltd.
 
CHAM (2011). PHOENICS Documentation. London: CHAM Ltd.
 
Q Chen, W Xu (1998). A zero-equation turbulence model for indoor airflow simulation. Energy and Buildings, 28: 137-144.
 
DesignBuilder (2009). Design Builder Simulation and CFD Training Guide. London: DesignBuilder Software Ltd.
 
E Djunaedy (2005). External coupling between building energy simulation and computational fluid dynamics. PhD Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
 
BP Leonard (1979). A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 19: 59-98.
 
PV Nielsen (1974). Flow in air conditioned rooms (English Translation, 1976). PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
 
PV Nielsen (1990). Specification of a two-dimensional test case. International Energy Agency, Annex 20. Institut for Bygningsteknik, Aalborg Universitet.
 
PJ Roache (1998). Basic computational methods for compressible flow (Chapter 5). In: PJ Roache (Ed), Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics. Albuquerque, NM, USA: Hermosa Publisher.
 
FG Schmitt (2007). About Boussinesq's turbulent viscosity hypothesis: Historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 335: 617-627.
 
H Wang, Z Zhai (2012a). Analyzing grid independency and numerical viscosity of computational fluid dynamics for indoor environment applications. Building and Environment, 52: 107-118.
 
H Wang, Z Zhai (2012b). Application of coarse-grid computational fluid dynamics on indoor environment modeling: Optimizing the trade-off between grid resolution and simulation accuracy. HVAC&R Research, 18: 915-933.
 
L Wang, Q Chen (2007). Validation of a coupled multizone-CFD program for building airflow and contaminant transport simulations. HVAC&R Research, 13: 267-281.
 
LL Wang, WS Dols, Q Chen (2010). Using CFD capabilities of CONTAM 3.0 for simulating airflow and contaminant transport in and around buildings. HVAC&R Research, 16: 749-763.
 
DC Wilcox (1993). Turbulence Modeling for CFD. La Cañada, CA, USA: DCW Industries.
 
V Yakhot, SA Orszag (1986). Renormalization-group analysis of turbulence. Physical Review Letters, 57: 1722-1724.
 
Q Chen, LR Glicksman, X Yuan, S Hu, Y Hu, X Yang (1999). Performance evaluation and development of design guidelines for displacement ventilation. Final Report for ASHRAE RP-949.
 
Z Zhai, Q Chen (2005). Performance of coupled building energy and CFD simulations. Energy and Buildings, 37: 333-344.
 
Z Zhai, H Wang (2011). Optimizing the trade-off between grid resolution and simulation accuracy: Coarse grid CFD modeling. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
 
Z Zhai, Z Zhang, W Zhang, Q Chen (2007). Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD: Part 1—Summary of prevalent turbulence models. HVAC&R Research, 13: 853-870.
Building Simulation
Pages 155-164
Cite this article:
Wang H, Zhai Z(, Liu X. Feasibility of utilizing numerical viscosity from coarse grid CFD for fast turbulence modeling of indoor environments. Building Simulation, 2014, 7(2): 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0163-2

567

Views

13

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

17

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 15 December 2012
Revised: 15 November 2013
Accepted: 18 November 2013
Published: 21 December 2013
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Return