AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Prediction of carbon monoxide concentration and optimization of the smoke exhaust system in a busbar corridor

Ying Zhang1Angui Li1( )Jiang Hu2Ran Gao1
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China
Lianyugang Architecture Design and Research Institute Corp. Ltd, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Fire in underground structures can result in devastating consequences in terms of both economic damage and loss of life. Hydro-electric plants are typically underground windowless structures. In an underground hydropower station, the busbar corridor connects the busbar layer in the main power plant with the main transformer chamber. This structure forms the channel that is crucial for electrical power transmission. In this paper, a computational method, Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), was carried out on a model of a two-story busbar corridor structure based on actual fire test results as a validation case. Twenty-four prediction conditions were taken into account to evaluate the original design of the exhausting system and optimize the busbar corridor modeled smoke control scheme. In those predictions five factors were varied: the heat release rate (HRR), the story height, the air change rate (ACH), the exhaust outlet positions and the airflow inlet positions. Since toxic compounds, especially carbon monoxide, endanger evacuating people in fire scenarios, the carbon monoxide (CO) concentration was reported and used throughout this study as an indicator of the safety of occupants in the corridor. Of the five varied factors it was found that the story height and the airflow inlets with natural ventilation influenced the smoke suppression and control. For the story height of 6.0 m, the filling time is 52 s more than the story height of 4.5 m. The CO concentration of opening set upstairs only is twice as much of the design condition. Opening set downstairs only can exhaust smoke faster for occupied area.

References

 
E Blanchard, P Boulet, S Desanghere, E Cesmat, R Meyrand, JP Garo, JP Vantelon (2012). Experimental and numerical study of fire in a midscale test tunnel. Fire Safety Journal, 47: 18-31.
 
F Chen, JC Leong (2011). Smoke flow phenomena and turbulence characteristics of tunnel fires. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35: 4554-4566.
 
D Dieken (2009). Fire Safety in Modern Hydroelectric Stations. Available: http://www.powermag.com/o_and_m/Fire-Safety-in-Modern-Hydroelectric-Stations_1798.html. Accessed 1 Apr. 2009.
 
CG Fan, J Ji, ZH Gao, JY Han, JH Sun (2013). Experimental study of air entrainment mode with natural ventilation using shafts in road tunnel fires. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 56: 750-757.
 
K Fridolf, D Nilsson, H Frantzich (2013). Fire evacuation in underground transportation systems: A review of accidents and empirical research. Fire Technology, 49: 451-475.
 
RG Gann (2004). Sublethal effects of fire smoke. Fire Technology, 40: 95-99.
 
R Gao, A Li, X Hao, W Lei, Y Zhao, B Deng (2012a). Fire-induced smoke control via hybrid ventilation in a huge transit terminal subway station. Energy and Buildings, 45: 280-289.
 
R Gao, A Li, W Lei, Y Zhao, Y Zhang, B Deng (2012b). Study of a proposed tunnel evacuation passageway formed by opposite-double air curtain ventilation. Safety Science, 50: 1549-1557.
 
LH Hu, NK Fong, LZ Yang, WK Chow, YZ Li, R Huo (2007). Modeling fire-induced smoke spread and carbon monoxide transportation in a long channel: Fire Dynamics Simulator comparisons with measured data. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 140: 293-298.
 
LH Hu, F Tang, D Yang, S Liu, R Huo (2010). Longitudinal distributions of CO concentration and difference with temperature field in a tunnel fire smoke flow. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 53: 2844-2855.
 
H Ingason, YZ Li (2010). Model scale tunnel fire tests with longitudinal ventilation. Fire Safety Journal, 45: 371-384.
 
S Jain, , S Kumar (2011). Numerical studies on evaluation of smoke control system of underground metro rail transport system in India having jet injection system: A case study. Building Simulation, 4: 205-216.
 
J Ji, CG Fan, W Zhong, XB Shen, JH Jun (2012). Experimental investigation on influence of different transverse fire locations on maximum smoke temperature under the tunnel ceiling. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 55: 4817-4826.
 
JS Ko, CH Yoon, SW Yoon, J Kim (2010). Determination of the applicable exhaust airflow rate through a ventilation shaft in the case of road tunnel fires. Safety Science, 48: 722-728.
 
K McGrattan, S Hostikka, J Floyd, H Baum, R Rehm, W Mell, R McDermott (2010). Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5) Technical Reference Guide. NIST Special Publication 1018-5. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
 
NEPA92B (2009). Guide for Smoke Management System in Malls, Atria and Large Area. Quincy, MA, USA: National Fire Protection Association.
 
JS Roh, HS Ryou, DH Kim, WS Jung, YJ Jang (2007). Critical velocity and burning rate in pool fire during longitudinal ventilation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 22: 262-271.
 
CL Shi, WZ Lu, WK Chow, R Huo (2007). An investigation on spill plume development and natural filling in large full-scale atrium under retail shop fire. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 50: 513-529.
 
J Smagorinsky (1963). General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Monthly Weather Review, 91: 99-164.
 
C Vianello, B Fabiano, E Palazzi, G Maschio (2012). Experimental study on thermal and toxic hazards connected to fire scenarios in road tunnels. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 25: 718-729.
 
B Wang (2011). Comparative research on FLUENT and FDS's numerical simulation of smoke spread in subway platform fire. Procedia Engineering, 26: 1065-1075.
 
Y Wang, J Jiang, D Zhu (2009). Full-scale experiment research and theoretical study for fires in tunnels with roof openings. Fire Safety Journal, 44: 339-348.
 
Xcel Energy Cabin Creek Fire (2007). Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcel_Energy_Cabin_Creek_Fire. Accessed 25 Jul. 2012.
 
D Yang, R Huo, XL Zhang, XY Zhao (2011). Comparison of the distribution of carbon monoxide concentration and temperature rise in channel fires: Reduced-scale experiments. Applied Thermal Engineering, 31: 528-536.
 
L Yi, WK Chow, YZ Li, R Huo (2005). A simple two-layer zone model on mechanical exhaust in an atrium. Building and Environment, 40: 869-880.
 
SW Yoon, DH Rie, HY Kim (2009). Smoke control of a fire in a tunnel with vertical shaft. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22: 954-957.
 
J Zhang, X Zhou, Q Xu, L Yang (2012). The inclination effect on CO generation and smoke movement in an inclined tunnel fire. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 29: 78-84.
Building Simulation
Pages 639-648
Cite this article:
Zhang Y, Li A, Hu J, et al. Prediction of carbon monoxide concentration and optimization of the smoke exhaust system in a busbar corridor. Building Simulation, 2014, 7(6): 639-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-014-0173-8

558

Views

10

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

8

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 07 August 2013
Revised: 06 November 2013
Accepted: 31 December 2013
Published: 23 April 2014
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Return