AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Multi-zone simulation of outdoor particle penetration and transport in a multi-story building

Byung Hee Lee1Su Whan Yee2Dong Hwa Kang3( )Myoung Souk Yeo4Kwang Woo Kim4
Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Graduate School of Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Ecoenergy Research Institute, Building of Mechanical Part & Material Testing Busan Tecno Park, 30, Gwahaksandan 1-ro 60beon-gil, Gangseo-gu, Busan 46742, Republic of Korea
Department of Architectural Engineering, College of Urban Sciences, University of Seoul, 163 Seoulsiripdae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02504, Republic of Korea
Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Show Author Information

Abstract

In areas with poor ambient air quality, indoor particle concentrations can be significantly affected by particulate matter originating outdoors. The indoor environments of multi-zone and multi-story buildings are affected differently by outdoor particles compared with single-family houses, because of the buildings’ more complicated airflow characteristics. The objective of this study is to analyze outdoor particle penetration and transport, and their impact on indoor air, in a multi-zone and multi-story building using a CONTAMW simulation. For the airflow and particle transport analysis, the building leakage, penetration coefficients, and deposition rates were determined by on-site experiments. The results of airflow simulations for cold winters show that outdoor air infiltrates through the lower part of building and exfiltrates from the upper part. The results of the particle simulation also indicated that the airflow characteristics, combined with deposition rates, cause the lower floors of a multi-story building to be exposed to higher fine particle concentrations compared with the upper floors of the building. The study demonstrated that the CONTAMW simulation can be useful in analyzing the impact of outdoor particles on indoor environments through the identification of key particle transport parameters and validated airflow simulations.

References

 
N Abdul Rahim (2000). General problems associated with air quality in developing countries. In: JL Innes, AH Haron (eds), Air Pollution and the Forests of Developing and Rapidly Industrializing Regions. Report No. 4 of the IUFRO Task Force on Environmental Change. Wallingford, UK: CABI. pp. 15–34.
 
E Abt, HH Suh, P Catalano, P Koutrakis (2000). Relative contribution of outdoor and indoor particle sources to indoor concentrations. Environmental Science & Technology, 34: 3579–3587.
 
J Alzona, BL Cohen, H Rudolph, HN Jow, JO Frohliger (1979). Indoor-outdoor relationships for airborne particulate matter of outdoor origin. Atmospheric Environment, 13: 55–60.
 
JJ Cao, SC Lee, JC Chow, Y Cheng, KF Ho, K Fung, SX Liu, JG Watson (2005), Indoor/outdoor relationships for PM2.5 and associated carbonaceous pollutants at residential homes in Hong Kong— Case study. Indoor Air, 15: 197–204.
 
CYH Chao, MP Wan, CK Cheng (2003). Penetration coefficient and deposition rate as a function of particle size in non-smoking naturally ventilated residences. Atmospheric Environment 37: 4233–4241.
 
SE Chatoutsidou, J Ondráček, O Tesar, K Tørseth, V Ždímal, M Lazaridis (2015). Indoor/outdoor particulate matter number and mass concentration in modern offices. Building and Environment, 92: 462–474.
 
X Chen, A Li (2014). An experimental study on particle deposition above near-wall heat source. Building and Environment, 81: 139–149.
 
Y Chun, J Kim, JC Choi, KO Boo, SN Oh, M Lee (2001). Characteristic number size distribution of aerosol during Asian dust period in Korea. Atmospheric Environment, 35: 2715–2721.
 
I Colbeck, ZA Nasir, Z Ali (2010). Characteristics of indoor/outdoor particulate pollution in urban and rural residential environment of Pakistan. Indoor Air, 20: 40–51.
 
DW Demetriou, HE Khalifa (2009). Evaluation of distributed environmental control systems for improving IAQ and reducing energy consumption in office buildings. Building Simulation, 2: 197–214.
 
WS Dols, SJ Emmerich, BJ Polidoro (2016). Coupling the multizone airflow and contaminant transport software CONTAM with EnergyPlus using co-simulation. Building Simulation, 9: 469–479.
 
M Elimelech, J Gregory, X Jia, RA Williams (2006). Particle Deposition & Aggregation. Woburn, MA ,USA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
 
ISO (2015a). ISO 9972: 2015. Thermal Performance of Buildings— Determination of Air Permeability Of Buildings—Fan Pressurization Method. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
 
ISO (2015b). ISO 14644-1: 2015. Cleanrooms and Associated Controlled Environments. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
 
H-W Kuo, H-Y Shen (2010). Indoor and outdoor PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in the air during a dust storm. Building and Environment, 45: 610–614.
 
ACK Lai (2004). Modeling of airborne particle exposure and effectiveness of engineering control strategies. Building and Environment, 39: 599–610.
 
JT Lee, DC Shin, Y Chung (1999). Air pollution and daily mortality in Seoul and Ulsan, Korea. Environmental Health Perspectives, 107: 149–154.
 
SC Lee, M Chang (2000). Indoor and outdoor air quality investigation at schools in Hong Kong. Chemosphere, 41: 109–113.
 
MP Ligocki, LG Salmon, T Fall, MC Jones, WW Nazaroff, GR Cass (1993). Characteristics of airborne particles inside southern California museums. Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, 27: 697–711.
 
TS Lim, JK Cho, BS Kim (2011). Predictions and measurements of the stack effect on indoor airborne virus transmission in a high-rise hospital building. Building and Environment, 46: 2413–2424.
 
LJS Liu, M Box, D Kalman, J Kaufman, J Koenig, T Larson, T Lumley, L Sheppard, L Wallace (2003). Exposure assessment of particulate matter for susceptible populations in Seattle. Environmental Healthy Perspectives, 111: 909–918.
 
X Liu, ZJ Zhai (2009). Prompt tracking of indoor airborne contaminant source location with probability-based inverse multi-zone modeling. Building and Environment, 44: 1135–1143.
 
CM Long, HH Suh, PJ Catalano, P Koutrakis (2001). Using time- and size-resolved particulate data to quantify indoor penetration and deposition behavior. Environmental Science & Technology, 35: 2089–2099.
 
X Ma, X Shao, X Li, Y Lin (2012). An analytical expression for transient distribution of passive contaminant under steady flow field. Building and Environment, 52: 98–106.
 
RS Miller (2011). Elevator shaft pressurization for smoke control in tall buildings: The Seattle approach. Building and Environment, 46: 2247–2254.
 
H-J Oh, N-N Jeong, W-B Chi, J-H Seo, S-M Jun, J-R Sohn (2015). Characterization of particulate matter concentrations and bioaerosol on each floor at a building in Seoul, Korea. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22:16040–16050.
 
H Ozkaynak, J Xue, J Spengler, L Wallace, E Pellizzari, P Jenkins (1996). Personal exposure to airborne particles and metals: Results from the particle team study in Riverside, California. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 6: 57–78.
 
CA Pope, DV Bates, ME Raizenne (1995). Health effects of particulate air pollution: Time for reassessment? Environmental Health Perspectives, 103: 472–280.
 
DH Rim, A Persily, S Emmerich, WS Dols, L Wallace (2013). Multi-zone modeling of size-resolved outdoor ultrafine particle entry into a test house. Atmospheric Environment, 69: 219–230.
 
L Rojas-Bracho, HH Suh, P Oyola, P Koutrakis (2002). Measurements of children’s exposures to particles and nitrogen dioxide in Santiago, Chile. The Science of the Total Environment, 287: 249–264.
 
MD Sohn, MG Apte, RG Sextro, ACK Lai (2007). Predicting size-resolved particle behavior in multizone buildings. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 1473–1482.
 
B Stephens (2015). Building design and operational choices that impact indoor exposures to outdoor particulate matter inside residences. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 21: 3–13.
 
TL Thatcher, DW Layton (1995). Deposition, resuspension, and penetration of particles within a residence. Atmospheric Environment, 29: 1487–1497.
 
TCW Tung, CYH Chao, J Burnett (1999). A methodology to investigate the particulate penetration coefficient through building shell. Atmospheric Environment, 33: 881–893.
 
LA Wallace, H Mitchell, GT O’Connor, L Neas, M Lippmann, et al. (2003). Particle concentrations in inner-city homes of children with Asthma: The effect of smoking, cooking, and outdoor pollution. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111: 1265–1272.
 
GN Walton (1989). AIRNET—A computer program for building airflow network modeling. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
 
GN Walton, WS Dols (2005). CONTAMW User Guide and Program Documentation. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
 
X Wang, X Bi, G Sheng, J Fu (2006). Hospital indoor PM10/PM2.5 and associated trace elements in Guangzhou, China. Science of the Total Environment, 366: 124–135.
 
R Williams, J Suggs, A Rea, L Sheldon, C Rodes, J Thornburg (2003). The Research Triangle Park particulate matter panel study: Modeling ambient source contribution to personal and residential PM mass concentrations. Atmospheric Environment, 37: 5365–5378.
 
Y Zhou, Q Deng (2014). Numerical simulation of inter-floor airflow and impact on pollutant transport in high-rise buildings due to buoyancy-driven natural ventilation. Indoor and Built Environment, 23: 246–258.
Building Simulation
Pages 525-534
Cite this article:
Lee BH, Yee SW, Kang DH, et al. Multi-zone simulation of outdoor particle penetration and transport in a multi-story building. Building Simulation, 2017, 10(4): 525-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0340-1

572

Views

27

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

34

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 30 June 2016
Revised: 30 October 2016
Accepted: 31 October 2016
Published: 20 December 2016
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Return