AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Performance evaluation of damper control settings for operation of multiple-zone variable air volume reheat system in different building applications and climate types

Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Choosing the right control strategies is an important task for effective operation of variable air volume reheat (VAVR) system in commercial buildings. In this design, dampers’ position inside air terminal units (ATUs) are modulated to adjust the amount of air supply volume based on thermal zones’ cooling or heating demand. A minimum air flow fraction (MAFF) is set for damper settings of ATUs to avoid under-ventilation problem in thermal zones. This study investigated the impact of MAFF value on various performance aspects of multiple-zone VAVR design in different building applications and climate types. A five-storey commercial building for three applications of school, office and retail in four climate types of tropical monsoon, hot desert, Mediterranean and humid continental have been simulated in EnergyPlus building simulation software. The results of simulations have shown that lowering MAFF value in ATUs would reduce the required reheat coil energy to maintain precise air supply temperature at part load cooling scenarios. Nonetheless, this reduction could have some implications on thermal comfort and indoor air quality level of thermal zones in a multiple-zone arrangement. It was concluded that in general it is an energy efficient control strategy to keep MAFF value to as low as 0.1 for high ventilation rate spaces like classrooms in school buildings (except for hot desert climate). On the other hand, it is advisable to not reduce MAFF value below 0.3 for low ventilation rate spaces like office areas to avoid any air quality issues in thermal zones.

References

 
ASHRAE 90.1 (2013). Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
 
Y-H Cho, M Liu (2009). Minimum airflow reset of single duct VAV terminal boxes. Building and Environment, 44: 1876-1885.
 
DOE (2016). Commercial Prototype Building Models | Building Energy Codes Program. Available at https://www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/prototype_models. Accessed 4 Sept 2016.
 
SJ Emmerich, AK Persily (1997). Literature review on CO2-based demand-controlled ventilation. ASHRAE Transactions, 103(2): 229-243.
 
EnergyPlus (2016a). EnergyPlusTM Version 8.5 Documentation: Engineering Reference. Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Department of Energy.
 
EnergyPlus (2016b). EnergyPlusTM Version 8.5 Documentation: Input Output Reference. Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Department of Energy.
 
T Hoyt, KH Lee, H Zhang, E Arens, T Webster (2009). Energy savings from extended air temperature setpoints and reductions in room air mixing. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Environmental Ergonomics. Boston, MA, USA. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/28x9d7xj.
 
ISO 7730 (2005) Ergonomics of the thermal environment—Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
 
M Krarti, CC Schroeder, E Jeanette, MJ Brandemuehl (2000). experimental analysis of measurement and control techniques of outside air intake rates in VAV systems. ASHRAE Transactions, 106(2): 234-255.
 
KH Lee, KI Chin, JH Yoon (2012). Effect of Minimum Airflow Setting of VAV Unit on Building Energy Consumption under Korean Climatic Condition. Advanced Materials Research, 450-451: 1435-1439.
 
G Liu, MR Brambley (2011). Occupancy based control strategy for variable-air-volume (VAV) terminal box systems. ASHRAE Transactions, 117(2): 244-252.
 
Z Liu, F Song, Z Jiang, X Chen, X Guan (2014). Optimization based integrated control of building HVAC system. Building Simulation, 7: 375-387.
 
J Murphy (2011). High-performance VAV Systems. ASHRAE Journal, 53(10): 18-28.
 
N Nassif (2012). A robust CO2-based demand-controlled ventilation control strategy for multi-zone HVAC systems. Energy and Buildings, 45: 72-81.
 
N Nassif (2013). Modeling and optimization of HVAC systems using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Building Simulation, 7: 237-245.
 
Y Pan, H Zhou, Z Huang, Y Zeng, W Long (2003). Measurement and simulation of indoor air quality and energy consumption in two Shanghai office buildings with variable air volume systems. Energy and Buildings, 35: 877-891.
 
K Rengarajan, F Colacino (2004). VAV Systems in Hot and Humid Climates. Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning Engineering: HPAC, 76: 56-67.
 
EM Saber, KW Tham, H Leibundgut (2016). A review of high temperature cooling systems in tropical buildings. Building and Environment, 96: 237-249.
 
ST Taylor, J Stein, G Paliaga, H Cheng (2012). Dual maximum VAV box control logic. ASHRAE Journal, 54(12): 16-24.
 
D Warden (2004). Supply air CO2 control of minimum outdoor air for multiple space systems. ASHRAE Journal, 46(10): 25-35.
 
X Xu, S Wang (2007). An adaptive demand-controlled ventilation strategy with zone temperature reset for multi-zone air-conditioning systems. Indoor and Built Environment, 16: 426-437.
 
X Xu, S Wang, Z Sun, F Xiao (2009). A model-based optimal ventilation control strategy of multi-zone VAV air-conditioning systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 29: 91-104.
 
X-B Yang, X-Q Jin, Z-M Du, B Fan, X-F Chai (2011). Evaluation of four control strategies for building VAV air-conditioning systems. Energy and Buildings, 43: 414-422.
Building Simulation
Pages 687-696
Cite this article:
Saber EM. Performance evaluation of damper control settings for operation of multiple-zone variable air volume reheat system in different building applications and climate types. Building Simulation, 2017, 10(5): 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0353-4

564

Views

4

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 08 October 2016
Revised: 16 January 2017
Accepted: 08 February 2017
Published: 27 February 2017
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Return