AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Cluster analysis for occupant-behavior based electricity load patterns in buildings: A case study in Shanghai residences

Song Pan1Xinru Wang1Yixuan Wei2Xingxing Zhang3( )Csilla Gal3Guangying Ren4Da Yan5( )Yong Shi2Jinshun Wu1Liang Xia2Jingchao Xie1Jiaping Liu1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Green Built Environment and Energy Efficient Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Research Centre for Fluids and Thermal Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China
Department of Energy, Forests and Built Environments, Dalarna University, Falun, 79188, Sweden
Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PX, UK
Building Energy Conservation Research Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In building performance simulation, occupant behavior contributes to large uncertainties, which often lead to considerable discrepancies between actual energy consumption and simulation results. This paper aims to extract occupant-behavior related electricity load patterns using classical K-means clustering approach at the initial investigation stage. Smart-metering data from a case study in Shanghai, China, was used for the load pattern analysis. The electricity load patterns of occupants were examined on a daily/weekly/seasonal basis. According to their load patterns, occupants were categorized as (a) white-collar workers, (b) poor or older families and (c) rich or young families. The daily patterns indicated that electricity use was much more random and fluctuated over a wide range. Most households of the monitored communities consumed relatively-low electricity; the characteristic double peak with higher level of consumption in the morning and evening were only apparent in a relatively small subset of residents (mostly white-collar workers). The weekly analysis found that significant load shifting towards weekend days occurred in the poor or old family group. The electricity saving potential was greatest in the white-collar workers and the rich or young family groups. This study concludes with recommendations to stakeholders utilizing our load profiling results. The research provides a rare insight into the electricity-use-related occupant behaviors of Shanghai residents through the case study of two communities. The findings of the study are also presented in a meaningful way so that they can directly aid the decision-making of governments and other stakeholders interested in energy efficiency. The research results are also relevant to the building energy simulation community as they are derived from observations, and thus can have the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of numerical simulation results.

References

 
MS Aldenderfer, RK Blashfield (1985). Cluster Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
 
MR Anderberg (1973). Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York: Academic Press.
 
TR Ayodele, ASO Ogunjuyigbe, IA Atiba (2017). Assessment of the impact of information feedback of prepaid meter on energy consumption of city residential buildings using bottom-up load modeling approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 30: 171-183.
 
C Peng, D Yan, R Wu, C Wang, X Zhou, Y Jiang (2012). Quantitative description and simulation of human behavior in residential buildings. Building Simulation, 5: 85-94.
 
G Chicco, IS Ilie (2009). Support vector clustering of electrical load pattern data. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24:1619-1628.
 
G Chicco, R Napoli, F Piglione (2006). Comparisons among clustering techniques for electricity customer classification. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 21: 933-940.
 
S D’Oca, T Hong (2014). A data-mining approach to discover patterns of window opening and closing behavior in offices. Building and Environment, 82: 726-739.
 
T Dietz, GT Gardner, J Gilligan, PC Stern, MP Vandenbergh (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106: 18452-18456.
 
J Han, M Kamber (2006). Data Mining Concept and Techniques. San Francisco: Elsevier.
 
VH Hartkopf, VE Loftness, PAD Mill (1986). Concept of total building performance and building diagnostics. In: G Davis(ed), Building Performance: Function, Preservation, and Rehabilitation— A Symposium Sponsored by ASTM Committee E-6 on Performance of Building Constructions. Conshohocken, PA, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
 
IP Panapakidis, TA Papadopoulos, GC Christoforidis, GK Papagiannis (2014). Pattern recognition algorithms for electricity load curve analysis of buildings. Energy and Buildings, 73: 137-145.
 
Y Jian, Q Li, Z Bai, X Kong (2011). Study on influences of usage behavior of residential air handling unit on energy consumption in summer. Building Science, 27(12): 16-19. (in Chinese)
 
G Kazas, E Fabrizio, M Perino (2017). Energy demand profile generation with detailed time resolution at an urban district scale: A reference building approach and case study. Applied Energy, 193: 243-262.
 
JJ López, JA Aguado, F Martín, F Muñoz,, A Rodríguez, JE Ruiz (2011). Hopfield-K-Means clustering algorithm: A proposal for the segmentation of electricity customers. Electric Power Systems Research, 81: 716-722.
 
A Marszal-Pomianowska, P Heiselberg, OK Larsen (2016). Household electricity demand profiles: A high-resolution load model to facilitate modelling of energy flexible buildings. Energy, 103: 487-501.
 
PA Mathew, LN Dunn, MD Sohn, A Mercado, C Custudio, T Walter (2015). Big-data for building energy performance: Lessons from assembling a very large national database of building energy use. Applied Energy, 140: 85-93.
 
A Mutanen, M Ruska, S Repo, P Järventausta (2011). Customer classification and load profiling method for distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 26: 1755-1763.
 
TG Nikolaou, DS Kolokotsa, GS Stavrakakis, IO Skias (2012). On the application of clustering techniques for office buildings. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3: 2196-2210.
 
L Philip, A Bogacka, R Grigoriou, S Xu (2014). Assessing the use and value of energy monitors in Great Britain. VaasaETT Report.
 
CF Reinhart (2004). Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy, 77: 15-28.
 
M Sunikka-Blank, R Galvin (2012). Introducing the Prebound Effect: The gap between performance and actual energy consumption. Building Research & Information, 40: 260-227.
 
GJ Tsekouras, ND Hatziargyriou, EN Dialynas (2007). Two-stage pattern recognition of load curves for classification of electricity customers. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 22: 1120-1128.
 
C Wang, D Yan, H Sun, Y Jiang (2016). A generalized probabilistic formula relating occupant behavior to environmental conditions. Building and Environment, 95: 53-62.
 
D Yan, T Hong (2013). IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and Simulation of Occupant Behavior in Buildings. Available at http://annex66.org. Accessed 21 Feb 21 2017.
 
X Zhang, J Shen, T Yang, L Tang, L Wang, Y Liu, P Xu (2016). Smart meter and in-home display for energy savings in residential buildings: A pilot investigation in Shanghai, China. Intelligent Buildings International, .
 
J Zhao, B Lasternas, KP Lam, R Yun, V Loftness (2014). Occupant behavior and schedule modeling for building energy simulation through office appliance power consumption data mining. Energy and Buildings, 82: 341-355.
Building Simulation
Pages 889-898
Cite this article:
Pan S, Wang X, Wei Y, et al. Cluster analysis for occupant-behavior based electricity load patterns in buildings: A case study in Shanghai residences. Building Simulation, 2017, 10(6): 889-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0377-9

580

Views

52

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

62

Scopus

2

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 29 November 2016
Revised: 25 April 2017
Accepted: 28 April 2017
Published: 19 May 2017
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017
Return