AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

A numerical investigation on the mixing factor and particle deposition velocity for enclosed spaces under natural ventilation

Xiaoran Liu1Fei Li1( )Hao Cai1Bin Zhou1Shanshan Shi2Jinxiang Liu1
Department of HVAC, College of Urban Construction, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210007, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The multi-zone model is widely used to predict airflow and contaminant transport in large buildings under natural or mechanical ventilation. Selecting appropriate mixing factors and particle deposition velocities for the multi-zone model can compensate for the errors resulting from the model’s well-mixing assumption. However, different room types, air change rates and ventilation modes can result in different mixing factors and particle deposition velocities. This study selected three typical room types: Z-type, L-type, and rectangle type (R-type). For each room type, the mixing factors and particle deposition velocities were investigated by the CFD model under different natural ventilation rates (0.5 h-1, 1 h-1, 3 h-1, 6 h-1, 12 h-1 and 20 h-1) and modes (door-inlet, window-inlet). The results showed that the mixing factor of the Z-type room was the highest, and the mixing factors of these rooms were 1.32, 1.28 and 1.13, respectively. In addition, the mixing factors presented a V-shaped distribution as a function of the air exchange rate under the window-inlet mode. The particle deposition velocity increased as the air change rate increased, and also demonstrated that the V-shaped curves as a function of particle size (0.05 μm, 0.1 μm, 0.5 μm, 1 μm, 2.5 μm, 5 μm) varied under different air change rates and room types. The results of mixing factors and particle deposition velocities for different room types, air change rates and ventilation modes can be used to improve the accuracy of the multi-zone model.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
12273_2018_497_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.1 MB)

References

 
ANSYS (2011). ANSYS Fluent 14.0 User’s Guide.
 
ASHRAE (2004). Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
 
J Axley (2007). Multizone airflow modeling in buildings: History and theory. HVAC&R Research, 13: 907-928.
 
M Bartak, M Cermak, JA Clarke, J Denev, F Drkal, M Lain, IA Macdonald, M Majer, P Stankov (2001). Experimental and numerical study of local mean age of air. In: Proceedings of the 7th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazll, pp. 773-779.
 
RS Brief (1960). Simple way to determine air contaminants. Air Engineering, 2: 39-41.
 
SJ Cao, D Cen, W Zhang, Z Feng (2017). Study on the impacts of human walking on indoor particles dispersion using momentum theory method. Building and Environment, 126: 195-206.
 
Q Chen (2009). Ventilation performance prediction for buildings: A method overview and recent applications. Building and Environment, 44: 848-858.
 
C Chen, B Zhao (2011). Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I/O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor. Atmospheric Environment, 45: 275-288.
 
JD Constance (1970). Mixing factor is guide to ventilation. Power, 114: 56-57.
 
H-Y Deng, Z Feng, S-J Cao (2017). Influence of air change rates on indoor CO2 stratification in terms of Richardson number and vorticity. Building and Environment, 129: 74-84.
 
PJ Drivas, PG Simmonds, FH Shair (1972). Experimental characterization of ventilation systems in buildings. Environmental Science and Technology, 6: 609-614.
 
TG Foat, J Nally, ST Parker (2017). Investigating a selection of mixing times for transient pollutants in mechanically ventilated, isothermal rooms using automated computational fluid dynamics analysis. Building and Environment, 118: 313-322.
 
AJ Gadgil, C Lobscheid, MO Abadie, , EU Finlayson (2003). Indoor pollutant mixing time in an isothermal closed room: An investigation using CFD. Atmospheric Environment, 37: 5577-5586.
 
NP Gao, JL Niu (2007). Modeling particle dispersion and deposition in indoor environments. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 3862-3876.
 
C He, L Morawska, D Gilbert (2005). Particle deposition rates in residential houses. Atmospheric Environment, 39: 3891-3899.
 
T van Hooff, PV Nielsen, Y Li (2018). Computational fluid dynamics predictions of non-isothermal ventilation flow—How can the user factor be minimized? Indoor Air, 28: 866-880.
 
T-W Kang, T-H Chang (2005). Analysis of ventilation performance using a model chamber. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, 29(7): 24-31.
 
ACK Lai, WW Nazaroff (2000). Modeling indoor particle deposition from turbulent flow onto smooth surfaces. Journal of Aerosol Science, 31: 463-476.
 
OM Lidwell, JE Lovelock (1946). Some methods of measuring ventilation. Journal of Hygiene (Cambridge), 44: 326-332.
 
F Li, J Liu, J Ren, X Cao, Y Zhu (2016). Numerical investigation of airborne contaminant transport under different vortex structures in the aircraft cabin. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 96: 287-295.
 
F Li, J Liu, J Ren, X Cao (2018). Predicting contaminant dispersion using modified turbulent Schmidt numbers from different vortex structures. Building and Environment, 130: 120-127.
 
C Liu, J Yang, S Ji, Y Lu, P Wu, C Chen (2018). Influence of natural ventilation rate on indoor PM2.5 deposition. Building and Environment, 144: 357-364.
 
DM Lorenzetti, WS Dols, AK Persily, MD Sohn (2013). A stiff, variable time step transport solver for CONTAM. Building and Environment, 67: 260-264.
 
MP Michaelides, V Reppa, M Christodoulou, CG Panayiotou, MM Polycarpou (2014). Contaminant event monitoring in multi-zone buildings using the state-space method. Building and Environment, 71: 140-152.
 
WW Nazaroff (2004). Indoor particle dynamics. Indoor Air, 14(Suppl 7): 175-183.
 
J Ndione, H Yoshino, A Mochida (2008). New Method of Coupling Multizone and CFD for Building Simulation. Journal of Asian Architecture & Building Engineering, 7: 125-129.
 
S Shi, C Chen, B Zhao (2015). Air infiltration rate distributions of residences in Beijing. Building and Environment, 92: 528-537.
 
S Shi, C Chen, B Zhao (2016). Modifications of exposure to ambient particulate matter: Tackling bias in using ambient concentration as surrogate with particle infiltration factor and ambient exposure factor. Environmental Pollution, 94: 1024-1029.
 
L Wang, Q Chen (2008a). Applications of a Coupled Multizone-CFD Model to Calculate Airflow and Contaminant Dispersion in Built Environments for Emergency Management. HVAC&R Research, 14: 925-939.
 
L Wang, Q Chen (2008b). Evaluation of some assumptions used in multizone airflow network models. Building and Environment, 43: 1671-1677.
 
LL Wang, WS Dols, Q Chen (2010). Using CFD capabilities of CONTAM 3.0 for simulating airflow and contaminant transport in and around buildings. HVAC&R Research, 16: 749-763.
 
R You, B Zhao, C Chen (2012). Developing an empirical equation for modeling particle deposition velocity onto inclined surfaces in indoor environments. Aerosol Science and Technology, 46: 1090-1099.
 
Z Zhai, Q Jin (2018). Identifying decaying contaminant source location in building HVAC system using the adjoint probability method. Building Simulation, 11: 1029-1038.
 
Z Zhang, W Zhang, ZJ Zhai, QY Chen (2007). Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD: Part-2: Comparison with experimental data from literature. HVAC&R Research, 13: 871-886.
 
TT Zhang, K Lee, QY Chen (2009). A simplified approach to describe complex diffusers in displacement ventilation for CFD simulations. Indoor Air, 19: 255-267.
 
B Zhao, J Wu (2007). Particle deposition in indoor environments: analysis of influencing factors. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 147: 439-448.
 
B Zhao, C Yang, X Yang, S Liu (2008). Particle dispersion and deposition in ventilated rooms: Testing and evaluation of different Eulerian and Lagrangian models. Building and Environment, 43: 388-397.
 
B Zhao, C Chen, Z Tan (2009). Modeling of ultrafine particle dispersion in indoor environments with an improved drift flux model. Journal of Aerosol Science, 40: 29-43.
 
K Zhong (2004). Investigation on the relationships of indoor and outdoor air pollutant concentrations during the evolution process. PhD Thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China. (In Chinese)
Building Simulation
Pages 465-473
Cite this article:
Liu X, Li F, Cai H, et al. A numerical investigation on the mixing factor and particle deposition velocity for enclosed spaces under natural ventilation. Building Simulation, 2019, 12(3): 465-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0497-x

653

Views

17

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

14

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 03 August 2018
Revised: 28 October 2018
Accepted: 12 November 2018
Published: 09 January 2019
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019
Return