AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Multi-sensor information fusion based control for VAV systems using thermal comfort constraints

Xu ZhuTaotao ShiXinqiao JinZhimin Du( )
School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The conventional control methods of variable air volume (VAV) air conditioning systems usually assume that the indoor air is well mixed, and consider each building zone as one node with homogeneous temperature distribution. The average temperature is subsequently used as the controlled parameter in the VAV cascade control process, which might cause uneven temperature distribution and unsatisfactory thermal comfort. This paper presents a coupled simulation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and building energy simulation (BES) for the VAV system in an office building located in Shanghai for the purpose of simulating the building, the VAV control system, and indoor thermal environment simultaneously. An external interface is developed to integrate the CFD and BES models based on quasi-dynamic coupling approach. Based upon the developed co-simulation platform, the novel VAV control method is further proposed by fusing information from multiple sensors. By adding two temperature sensors to constrain the thermal comfort of the occupied zone, the supply air temperature setpoint of the VAV terminal unit can be reset in real time. The novel control method is embedded into the co-simulation platform and compared with the conventional VAV control approach. The results illustrate that the temperature distribution under the proposed method is more uniform. At most times of the typical test day, the air diffusion performance indexes (ADPIs) for the proposed method are above 80%, while the ADPIs for the conventional control method are between 60% and 80%. Due to multi-sensor information fusion, the proposed VAV control approach has better ability to ensure the indoor thermal comfort.

References

 
Axley J (2007). Multizone airflow modeling in buildings: History and theory. HVAC&R Research, 13: 907-928.
 
Ascione F, Bellia L, Capozzoli A (2013). A coupled numerical approach on museum air conditioning: Energy and fluid-dynamic analysis. Applied Energy, 103: 416-427.
 
Asadi E, da Silva MG, Antunes CH, Dias L (2012). A multi-objective optimization model for building retrofit strategies using TRNSYS simulations, GenOpt and MATLAB. Building and Environment, 56: 370-378.
 
Barbason M, Reiter S (2014). Coupling building energy simulation and computational fluid dynamics: Application to a two-storey house in a temperate climate. Building and Environment, 75: 30-39.
 
Chen Q (1995). Comparison of different k-ε models for indoor air flow computations. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 28: 353-369.
 
Chen H, Li Z, Wang X, Lin B (2018). A graph- and feature-based building space recognition algorithm for performance simulation in the early design stage. Building Simulation, 11: 281-292.
 
Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkelmann FC, Buhl WF, Huang YJ, et al. (2001). EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 33: 319-331.
 
Crawley DB, Hand JW, Kummert M, Griffith BT (2008). Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment, 43: 661-673.
 
Cho YH, Liu M (2009). Minimum airflow reset of single duct VAV terminal boxes. Building and Environment, 44: 1876-1885.
 
Cho YH, Liu M (2010). Correlation between minimum airflow and discharge air temperature. Building and Environment, 45: 1601-1611.
 
Del Hoyo Arce I, López SH, Perez SL, Rämä M, Klobut K, et al. (2018). Models for fast modelling of district heating and cooling networks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82: 1863-1873.
 
Djunaedy E, Hensen JLM, Loomans MGLC (2005). External coupling between CFD and energy simulation: Implementation and validation. ASHRAE Transactions, 111(1): 612-624.
 
Du Z, Jin X (2007). Detection and diagnosis for sensor fault in HVAC systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 48: 693-702.
 
Du Z, Xu P, Jin X, Liu Q (2015). Temperature sensor placement optimization for VAV control using CFD-BES co-simulation strategy. Building and Environment, 85: 104-113.
 
Fan B, Jin X, Du Z (2011). Optimal control strategies for multi-chiller system based on probability density distribution of cooling load ratio. Energy and Buildings, 43: 2813-2821.
 
Fan Y, Ito K (2012). Energy consumption analysis intended for real office space with energy recovery ventilator by integrating BES and CFD approaches. Building and Environment, 52: 57-67.
 
Fanger PO (1970). Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press.
 
Harish VSKV, Kumar A (2016). A review on modeling and simulation of building energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56: 1272-1292.
 
Jin X (1999). Study on simulation of VAV air-conditioning system and online optimal control, PhD Dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.
 
Jin X, Ren H, Xiao X (2005). Prediction-based online optimal control of outdoor air of multi-zone VAV air conditioning systems. Energy and Buildings, 37: 939-944.
 
Jin X, Du Z, Xiao X (2007). Energy evaluation of optimal control strategies for central VWV chiller systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 27: 934-941.
 
Kang SH, Kim HJ, Cho YH (2014). A study on the control method of single duct VAV terminal unit through the determination of proper minimum air flow. Energy and Buildings, 69: 464-472.
 
Li Z, Chen H, Lin B, Zhu Y (2018). Fast bidirectional building performance optimization at the early design stage. Building Simulation, 11: 647-661.
 
Lam JC, Chan ALS (2001). CFD analysis and energy simulation of a gymnasium. Building and Environment, 36: 351-358.
 
Liu W, Duan R, Chen C, Lin CH, Chen Q (2015). Inverse design of the thermal environment in an airliner cabin by use of the CFD-based adjoint method. Energy and Buildings, 104: 147-155.
 
Liu S, Novoselac A (2015). Air Diffusion Performance Index (ADPI) of diffusers for heating mode. Building and Environment, 87: 215-223.
 
Ribeiro E, Jorge HM, Quintela DA (2011). HVAC system energy optimization in indoor swimming pools. In: Proceedings of the 3th International Youth Conference on Energetics (IYCE), Leiria, Portugal.
 
Strachan PA, Kokogiannakis G, MacDonald IA (2008). History and development of validation with the ESP-r simulation program. Building and Environment, 43: 601-609.
 
Salvalai G (2012). Implementation and validation of simplified heat pump model in IDA-ICE energy simulation environment. Energy and Buildings, 49: 132-141.
 
Wang S, Jin X (1998). CO2-based occupancy detection for on-line outdoor air flow control. Indoor and Built Environment, 7: 165-181.
 
Wang S (1999). Dynamic simulation of building VAV air-conditioning system and evaluation of EMCS on-line control strategies. Building and Environment, 34: 681-705.
 
Wang H, Wang H, Gao F, Zhou P, Zhai ZJ (2018). Literature review on pressure-velocity decoupling algorithms applied to built-environment CFD simulation. Building and Environment, 143: 671-678.
 
Xu W, Chen Q (2001a). A two-layer turbulence model for simulating indoor airflow: Part I. Model development. Energy and Buildings, 33: 613-625.
 
Xu W, Chen Q (2001b). A two-layer turbulence model for simulating indoor airflow: Part II. Applications. Energy and Buildings, 33: 627-639.
 
Yan D, Xia J, Tang W, Song F, Zhang X, et al. (2008). DeST—An integrated building simulation toolkit Part I: Fundamentals. Building Simulation, 1: 95-110.
 
Yang X, Jin X, Du Z, Fan B, Chai X (2011). Evaluation of four control strategies for building VAV air-conditioning systems. Energy and Buildings, 43: 414-422.
 
Yin J, Zhu S, MacNaughton P, Allen JG, Spengler JD (2018). Physiological and cognitive performance of exposure to biophilic indoor environment. Building and Environment, 132: 255-262.
 
Yu X, Zhang Q, Kang J, Cui F (2018). Predicting integrated thermal and acoustic performance in naturally ventilated high-rise buildings using CFD and FEM simulation. Building Simulation, 11: 507-518.
 
Zhai Z, Chen Q, Haves P, Klems JH (2002). On approaches to couple energy simulation and computational fluid dynamics programs. Building and Environment, 37: 857-864.
 
Zhai Z, Chen Q (2006). Sensitivity analysis and application guides for integrated building energy and CFD simulation. Energy and Buildings, 38: 1060-1068.
 
Zhang X, Xia J, Jiang Z, Huang J, Qin R, et al. (2008). DeST—An integrated building simulation toolkit Part II: Applications. Building Simulation, 1: 193-209.
 
Zhou H, Soh YC, Wu X (2015). Integrated analysis of CFD data with K-means clustering algorithm and extreme learning machine for localized HVAC control. Applied Thermal Engineering, 76: 98-104.
 
Zuo W, Wetter M, Tian W, Li D, Jin M, Chen Q (2016). Coupling indoor airflow, HVAC, control and building envelope heat transfer in the Modelica Buildings library. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 9: 366-381.
Building Simulation
Pages 1047-1062
Cite this article:
Zhu X, Shi T, Jin X, et al. Multi-sensor information fusion based control for VAV systems using thermal comfort constraints. Building Simulation, 2021, 14(4): 1047-1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0736-9

628

Views

17

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

18

Scopus

3

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 19 April 2020
Accepted: 30 September 2020
Published: 26 November 2020
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Return