Home Building Simulation Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Multi-objective optimization of building design for life cycle cost and CO2 emissions: A case study of a low-energy residential building in a severe cold climate

Qingwen Xue1,2,3, Zhaojun Wang1,3(), Qingyan Chen2
School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Key Laboratory of Cold Region Urban and Rural Human Settlement Environment Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin, 150090, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Currently, building construction and operation are responsible for 36% of global final energy usage and nearly 40% of energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. From the sustainable development perspective, it is crucial to consider the impact of construction material on the achievement of life cycle benefits. This study proposed a simulation-based multi-objective optimization method to minimize both life cycle cost and CO2 emissions of buildings. We built an energy simulation model with hybrid ventilation and light-dimming control in EnergyPlus based on an operational passive residential building in a severe cold climate. Next, this investigation selected insulation thickness, window type, window-to-wall ratio, overhang depth and building orientation as design variables. The study ran parametric simulations to establish a database and then used artificial neural network models to correlate the design variables and the objective functions. Finally, we used the multi-objective optimization algorithm NSGA-II to search for the optimal design solutions. The results showed potential reductions of 10.9%–18.9% in life cycle cost and 13.5%–22.4% in life cycle CO2 emissions compared with the initial design. The results indicated that the optimization approach in this study would improve building performance. The optimal values of the design variables obtained in this study can guide designers in meeting economic and environmental targets in passive buildings.

Keywords

passive buildingartificial neural networklife cycle CO2 emissionsnatural ventilationmulti-criteria optimization

References

 

Almeida RMSF, de Freitas VP (2016). An insulation thickness optimization methodology for school buildings rehabilitation combining artificial neural networks and life cycle cost. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22: 915–923.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Alsayed MF, Tayeh RA (2019). Life cycle cost analysis for determining optimal insulation thickness in Palestinian buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 22: 101–112.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ameur M, Kharbouch Y, Mimet A (2020). Optimization of passive design features for a naturally ventilated residential building according to the bioclimatic architecture concept and considering the northern Morocco climate. Building Simulation, 13: 677–689.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ascione F, Bianco N, De Stasio C, et al. (2016). Multi-stage and multi- objective optimization for energy retrofitting a developed hospital reference building: A new approach to assess cost-optimality. Applied Energy, 174: 37–68.

Crossref Google Scholar
 
ASHRAE (2017). Standard 55-2017. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta, GA, USA: Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
 

Azari R, Garshasbi S, Amini P, et al. (2016). Multi-objective optimization of building envelope design for life cycle environmental performance. Energy and Buildings, 126: 524–534.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Baba FM, Ge H (2020). Overheating risk of a single-family detached house built at different ages under current and future climate in Canada. E3S Web of Conferences, 172: 02004.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Bichiou Y, Krarti M (2011). Optimization of envelope and HVAC systems selection for residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 43: 3373–3382.

Crossref Google Scholar
 
Boermans T, Bettgenhäuser K, Hermelink A (2011). Cost Optimal Building Performance Requirements. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.
 
BS EN (2011). BS EN 15978. Sustainability of Construction Works. Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings. Calculation Method.
 
BS EN (2017). BS EN 15459-1. Energy Performance of Buildings. Economic Evaluation Procedure for Energy Systems in Buildings.
 
Building Energy Research Center (2016). China Building Energy Use 2016. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese)
 

Cabeza LF, Barreneche C, Miró L, et al. (2013). Low carbon and low embodied energy materials in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23: 536–542.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Carreras J, Boer D, Guillén-Gosálbez G, et al. (2015). Multi-objective optimization of thermal modelled cubicles considering the total cost and life cycle environmental impact. Energy and Buildings, 88: 335–346.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Carreras J, Pozo C, Boer D, et al. (2016). Systematic approach for the life cycle multi-objective optimization of buildings combining objective reduction and surrogate modeling. Energy and Buildings, 130: 506–518.

Crossref Google Scholar
 
Carreras J, Boer D, Cabeza LF, et al. (2017). Reducing the life cycle environmental impact of buildings following a simulation- optimization approach. In: Kopanos G, Liu P, Georgiadis M (eds), Advances in Energy Systems Engineering. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42803-1_28
Crossref
 

Caudill M, Butler C (1993). Understanding Neural Networks: Computer Explorations—Volume 1 Basic Networks. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.

 

de Dear RJ, Brager GS (2002). Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: Revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy and Buildings, 34: 549–561.

Crossref Google Scholar
Deb2001

Deb K (2001). Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

 

Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6: 182–197.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Delgarm N, Sajadi B, Delgarm S (2016). Multi-objective optimization of building energy performance and indoor thermal comfort: A new method using artificial bee colony (ABC). Energy and Buildings, 131: 42–53.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Dylewski R, Adamczyk J (2016). The environmental impacts of thermal insulation of buildings including the categories of damage: A Polish case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137: 878–887.

Crossref Google Scholar
 
EU Commission (2012). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 of 16 January 2012 supplementing Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings.
 

Ferrara M, Sirombo E, Fabrizio E (2018). Automated optimization for the integrated design process: The energy, thermal and visual comfort nexus. Energy and Buildings, 168: 413–427.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Garshasbi S, Kurnitski J, Mohammadi Y (2016). A hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Monte Carlo simulation approach to predict hourly energy consumption and generation by a cluster of Net Zero Energy Buildings. Applied Energy, 179: 626–637.

Crossref Google Scholar
 
Global ABC (2020). Global status report for buildings and construction. Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.033
Crossref
 

Guo H, Huang L, Song W, et al. (2020). Evaluation of the summer overheating phenomenon in reinforced concrete and cross laminated timber residential buildings in the cold and severe cold regions of China. Energies, 13: 6305.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Guo S, Yan D, Hu S, et al. (2021). Modelling building energy consumption in China under different future scenarios. Energy, 214: 119063.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Hajare A, Elwakil E (2020). Integration of life cycle cost analysis and energy simulation for building energy-efficient strategies assessment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61: 102293.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Han Y, Yu H, Sun C (2017). Simulation-based multiobjective optimization of timber-glass residential buildings in severe cold regions. Sustainability, 9: 2353.

Crossref Google Scholar
 
ISO (2017). ISO 21930. Sustainability in Buildings and Civil Engineering Works—Core Rules for Environmental Product Declarations of Construction Products and Services
 

Jafari A, Valentin V (2018). Selection of optimization objectives for decision-making in building energy retrofits. Building and Environment, 130: 94–103.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Kiss B, Szalay Z (2020). Modular approach to multi-objective environmental optimization of buildings. Automation in Construction, 111: 103044.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Lei YJ, Zhang SW, Li XB, et al. (2005). MATLAB Genetic Algorithm Toolbox and Application. Xi’an: Xidian University Press. (in Chinese)

 

Li DHW, Yang L, Lam JC (2013). Zero energy buildings and sustainable development implications—A review. Energy, 54: 1–10.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Li Z, Dai J, Chen H, et al. (2019). An ANN-based fast building energy consumption prediction method for complex architectural form at the early design stage. Building Simulation, 12: 665–681.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Lu S, Wang R, Zheng S (2017). Passive optimization design based on particle swarm optimization in rural buildings of the hot summer and warm winter zone of China. Sustainability, 9: 2288.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

MacHairas V, Tsangrassoulis A, Axarli K (2014). Algorithms for optimization of building design: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31: 101–112.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Marino C, Nucara A, Pietrafesa M (2017). Does window-to-wall ratio have a significant effect on the energy consumption of buildings? A parametric analysis in Italian climate conditions. Journal of Building Engineering, 13: 169–183.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Mateus R, Silva SM, de Almeida MG (2019). Environmental and cost life cycle analysis of the impact of using solar systems in energy renovation of Southern European single-family buildings. Renewable Energy, 137: 82–92.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Melo AP, Cóstola D, Lamberts R, et al. (2014). Development of surrogate models using artificial neural network for building shell energy labelling. Energy Policy, 69: 457–466.

Crossref Google Scholar
 
MOHURD (2010). Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Residential Buildings in Severe Cold and Cold Zones (JGJ 26-2010). Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. (in Chinese)
 
MOHURD (2019). Technical Standards for Near-Zero Energy Buildings (GB/T 51350-2019). Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. (in Chinese)
 

Nguyen AT, Reiter S, Rigo P (2014). A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy, 113: 1043–1058.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Płoszaj-Mazurek M, Ryńska E, Grochulska-Salak M (2020). Methods to optimize carbon footprint of buildings in regenerative architectural design with the use of machine learning, convolutional neural network, and parametric design. Energies, 13: 5289.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Sartori I, Hestnes AG (2007). Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article. Energy and Buildings, 39: 249–257.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Spentzou E, Cook MJ, Emmitt S (2018). Natural ventilation strategies for indoor thermal comfort in Mediterranean apartments. Building Simulation, 11: 175–191.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Thalfeldt M, Pikas E, Kurnitski J, et al. (2013). Facade design principles for nearly zero energy buildings in a cold climate. Energy and Buildings, 67: 309–321.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Tokarik MS, Richman RC (2016). Life cycle cost optimization of passive energy efficiency improvements in a Toronto house. Energy and Buildings, 118: 160–169.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Wang R, Lu S, Feng W, Xu B (2021). Tradeoff between heating energy demand in winter and indoor overheating risk in summer constrained by building standards. Building Simulation, 14: 987–1003.

Crossref Google Scholar
 
Weise T (2009). Global optimization algorithms—Theory and application. Available at http://www.itweise.de.
 

Yang X, Zhang S, Xu W (2019). Impact of zero energy buildings on medium-to-long term building energy consumption in China. Energy Policy, 129: 574–586.

Crossref Google Scholar
 

Zhai Y, Wang Y, Huang Y, et al. (2019). A multi-objective optimization methodology for window design considering energy consumption, thermal environment and visual performance. Renewable Energy, 134: 1190–1199.

Crossref Google Scholar
 
Zhang Y, Korolija I (2010). Performing complex parametric simulations with jEPlus. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, Shanghai, China.
 

Zhao M, Künzel HM, Antretter F (2015). Parameters influencing the energy performance of residential buildings in different Chinese climate zones. Energy and Buildings, 96: 64–75.

Crossref Google Scholar
Building Simulation
Volume 15 Issue 1,
January 2022
Pages 83-98
DOI: 10.1007/s12273-021-0796-5
Cite this article:
Xue Q, Wang Z, Chen Q. Multi-objective optimization of building design for life cycle cost and CO2 emissions: A case study of a low-energy residential building in a severe cold climate. Building Simulation, 2022, 15(1): 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0796-5
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Return