AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Designerly optimization of devices (as reflectors) to improve daylight and scrutiny of the light-well's configuration

Ali GoharianMohammadjavad Mahdavinejad( )Mohammadreza BemanianKhosro Daneshjoo
Department of Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Show Author Information

Abstract

One of the most effective ways of transmitting daylight into deep-plan buildings is to generate light-well for spaces away from the facade and window-less spaces. Among the limited methods of improving daylight efficiency in light-wells are reflectors that, as a surplus member of the wells, can aid in this improvement. A scrutiny of the light-well's configuration can give a correct perception of the performance of the well's walls with increasing the reflection coefficient to the designers in deciding where to install the openings, selecting the transmittance coefficient of glass, etc. In this paper, the main focus is designing and optimizing daylight assist devices on light-wells that can hierarchically reflect light from the sky to the bottom of the well (Device 1) and then emit into the desired space (Device 2). The research highlights that it is necessary to find a proper strategy for the devices regarding to the optimization process. The research design results in a comprehensive standard solution for different latitudes. The simulations were performed by Honeybee Plus version 0.0.06 and Honeybee-Ladybug version 0.0.69-0.0.66, which has the ability to simulate annual daylight performance at certain periods. Due to the maximum and minimum altitudes at any latitude, the study required time-criteria throughout the year. As a result, a cross-sectional study was carried out at two critical times: the first period (P1) and the second period (P2). Daylight metrics for analyzing configuration as well as evaluating devices are E'max, avg (illumination) and SHA (hour/m2). The DA'300 and DA'max2000 metrics were selected to measure daylight efficiency and glare risk, respectively, and the sDA is for the amount of floor area that uses enough daylight. Also, to better percept how to prepare improved-daylight at lower levels (especially for the performance of devices), the daylight autonomy has been reduced from 50% to 40% and a metric such as sDA't40 has been created.

References

 

Abhyankar SS (1988). What is the difference between a parabola and a hyperbola? The Mathematical Intelligencer, 10: 36–43.

 

Acosta I, Campano MÁ, Domínguez S, et al. (2019). Minimum daylight autonomy: A new concept to link daylight dynamic metrics with daylight factors. Leukos, 15: 251–269.

 

Ahadi AA, Saghafi MR, Tahbaz M (2017). The study of effective factors in daylight performance of light-Wells with dynamic daylight metrics in residential buildings. Solar Energy, 155: 679–697.

 

Ahadi AA, Saghafi MR, Tahbaz M (2018). The optimization of light-wells with integrating daylight and stack natural ventilation systems in deep-plan residential buildings: A case study of Tehran. Journal of Building Engineering, 18: 220–244.

 

Ahmed BMA, Nassar KM, Asr A (2014). Parametric study of light- well design for day-lighting analysis under clear skies. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6: 81–85.

 
Architectural Energy Corporation (2006). Daylighting Metric Development Using Daylight Autonomy Calculations in the Sensor Placement Optimization Tool: Development Report and Case Studies. Boulder, CO, USA: Architectural Energy Corporation.
 
Ashdown I, Bedocs L, Carroll W, et al. (2006). Test Cases to Assess the Accuracy of Lighting Computer Programs. International Commission on Illumination, CIE 171.
 

Balzer J, Werling S (2010). Principles of shape from specular reflection. Measurement, 43: 1305–1317.

 

Bourgeois D, Reinhart CF, Ward G (2008). Standard daylight coefficient model for dynamic daylighting simulations. Building Research & Information, 36: 68–82.

 

Brembilla E, Hopfe CJ, Mardaljevic J (2018). Influence of input reflectance values on climate-based daylight metrics using sensitivity analysis. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 11: 333–349.

 

Brunetti GL (2021). Utilization of irradiance ratios for calculating the effect of reflections from obstructions in building energy simulation. Building Simulation, 14: 945–967.

 

Bugeat A, Beckers B, Fernández E (2020). Improving the daylighting performance of residential light wells by reflecting and redirecting approaches. Solar Energy, 207: 1434–1444.

 

Bugin LAK, Fagundes CVM, Bruscato UM, et al. (2020). Exploration of data-driven midsole algorithm design based in biomechanics data and Voronoi 3D to digital manufacturing. Design & Tecnologia, 10(21): 1–10.

 

Carlucci S, Causone F, de Rosa F, et al. (2015). A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47: 1016–1033.

 

Christensen PH, Laur DM, Fong J, et al. (2003). Ray differentials and multiresolution geometry caching for distribution ray tracing in complex scenes. Computer Graphics Forum, 22: 543–552.

 
Dendrinos D (2017). The Dynamics of Shadows at and below the Tropic of Cancer. School of Architecture and Urban Design, University of Kansas, USA.
 

Du J, Sharples S (2011). The variation of daylight levels across atrium walls: Reflectance distribution and well geometry effects under overcast sky conditions. Solar Energy, 85: 2085–2100.

 

Fathalian A, Kargarsharifabad H (2018). Actual validation of energy simulation and investigation of energy management strategies (Case Study: An office building in Semnan, Iran). Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 12: 510–516.

 

Freewan AAY, Gharaibeh AA, Jamhawi MM (2014). Improving daylight performance of light Wells in residential buildings: Nourishing compact sustainable urban form. Sustainable Cities and Society, 13: 32–40.

 

Geller KN, Newstein H (1972). Computer augmented physics lab. American Journal of Physics, 40: 234–240.

 

Ghasri M, Maghrebi M, Rashidi TH, et al. (2016). Hazard-based model for concrete pouring duration using construction site and supply chain parameters. Automation in Construction, 71: 283–293.

 

Goharian A, Mahdavinejad M (2020). A novel approach to multi- apertures and multi-aspects ratio light pipe. Journal of Daylighting, 7: 186–200.

 

Guimarães-Costa N, Cunha MP (2008). The atrium effect of website openness on the communication of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15: 43–51.

 
Harris CM (2006). Dictionary of Architecture and Construction, 4th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
 

Haverkort AJ (1990). Ecology of potato cropping systems in relation to latitude and altitude. Agricultural Systems, 32: 251–272.

 
IESNA (2012). Lighting Measurement 83: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE). Illuminating Engineering Society (IES).
 

Ishac M, Nadim W (2021). Standardization of optimization methodology of daylighting and shading strategy: a case study of an architectural design studio – the German University in Cairo, Egypt. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 14: 52–77.

 
Jacobs A (2010). Understanding rtcontrib. Tutorial on the Radsite website. Available at https://www.radiance-online.org/learning/tutorials.
 

Kazanasmaz T, Grobe LO, Bauer C, et al. (2016). Three approaches to optimize optical properties and size of a South-facing window for spatial Daylight Autonomy. Building and Environment, 102: 243–256.

 

Kharvari F (2020a). A field-validated multi-objective optimization of the shape and size of windows based on daylighting metrics in hot-summer Mediterranean and dry summer continental climates. Journal of Daylighting, 7: 222–237.

 

Kharvari F (2020b). An empirical validation of daylighting tools: Assessing radiance parameters and simulation settings in Ladybug and Honeybee against field measurements. Solar Energy, 207: 1021–1036.

 

Koch R, May S, Murmann P, Nüchter A (2017). Identification of transparent and specular reflective material in laser scans to discriminate affected measurements for faultless robotic SLAM. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 87: 296–312.

 

Kristl Ž, Krainer A (1999). Light wells in residential building as a complementary daylight source. Solar Energy, 65: 197–206.

 
Kristl Ž (2000). Diffuse surface light wells and daylighting of deep spaces. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ISES-Europe Solar Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark.
 

Kurnia KA, Azizah DN, Mangkuto RA, et al. (2017). Visual comfort assessment using high dynamic range images under daylight condition in the main library building of institut teknologi bandung. Procedia Engineering, 170: 234–239.

 
Larson GW (1998). Rendering with Radiance: A Practical Tool for Global Illumination. ACM Siggraph 98, Course 33.
 

Liou TS, Wang MJJ (1992). Fuzzy weighted average: an improved algorithm. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49: 307–315.

 
Mardaljevic J (2011). Ambient Calculation: Crash Course. Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development. Available at https://www.radiance-online.org/community/workshops/2011-berkeley-ca/presentations/day1/JM_AmbientCalculation.pdf
 

Mayhoub MS (2014). Innovative daylighting systems' challenges: A critical study. Energy and Buildings, 80: 394–405.

 

Mills E, Borg N (1999). Trends in recommended illuminance levels: An international comparison. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 28: 155–163.

 

Mohsenin M, Hu J (2015). Assessing daylight performance in atrium buildings by using Climate Based Daylight Modeling. Solar Energy, 119: 553–560.

 

Mohsenin M, Hu J (2017). Daylight prediction in individual floors using well index. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, 10: 109–114.

 

Nabil A, Mardaljevic J (2005). Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Lighting Research & Technology, 37: 41–57.

 

Newman P, Hogan T (1981). A Review of urban density models: Toward a resolution of the conflict between populace and planner. Human Ecology, 9: 269–303.

 

Nezamdoost A, van den Wymelenberg K (2017). A daylighting field study using human feedback and simulations to test and improve recently adopted annual daylight performance metrics. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10: 471–483.

 

Pilechiha P, Mahdavinejad M, Rahimian FP, et al. (2020). Multi- objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency. Applied Energy, 261: 114356.

 

Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z (2006). Dynamic daylight per­formance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos, 3: 7–31.

 

Reinhart C, Breton PF (2009). Experimental validation of Autodesk® 3ds Max® Design 2009 and Daysim 3.0. Leukos, 6: 7–35.

 

Resch E, Bohne RA, Kvamsdal T, et al. (2016). Impact of urban density and building height on energy use in cities. Energy Procedia, 96: 800–814.

 
Richman E (2015). Requirements for Lighting Levels. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Available at https://www.scribd.com/doc/274467545/Requirements-for-Lighting-Levels-Richman-Eric-E
 
Sadeghipour Roudsari M, Pak M (2013). Ladybug: A parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. In: Proceedings of the 13th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Chambery, France.
 
Sadeghipour Roudsari M, Subramaniam S (2016). Automate Radiance Workflows through Python. In: Proceeding of the 15th International Radiance Workshop, Padua, Italy.
 

Schuster G (2005). Fermat's interferometric principle for multiple reflection tomography. Geophysical Research Letters, 32: L12303.

 

Smith AW, Rohatgi A (1993). Ray tracing analysis of the inverted pyramid texturing geometry for high efficiency silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 29: 37–49.

 

Su Y, Han H, Riffat SB, Patel N (2010). Evaluation of a lightwell design for multi-storey buildings. International Journal of Energy Research, 34: 387–392.

 
Subramaniam S, Mistrick R (2017). A more accurate approach for calculating illuminance with daylight coefficients. In: Proceedings of the IES Annual Conference, Portland, OR, USA.
 

Talaei M, Mahdavinejad M, Azari R, et al. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of building-integrated microalgae photobioreactors for energy and daylighting performance. Journal of Building Engineering, 42: 102832.

 
Tedeschi A (2014). AAD Algorithms-Aided Design, Parametric Strategies Using Grasshopper. Brienza, Italy: Le Penseur Publisher.
 

Uribe D, Bustamante W, Vera S (2018). Potential of perforated exterior louvers to improve the comfort and energy performance of an office space in different climates. Building Simulation, 11: 695–708.

Building Simulation
Pages 933-956
Cite this article:
Goharian A, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M, et al. Designerly optimization of devices (as reflectors) to improve daylight and scrutiny of the light-well's configuration. Building Simulation, 2022, 15(6): 933-956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0839-y

642

Views

3

Crossref

5

Web of Science

4

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 10 May 2021
Revised: 23 August 2021
Accepted: 26 August 2021
Published: 09 October 2021
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021
Return