AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Machine learning approach for estimating the human-related VOC emissions in a university classroom

Jialong Liu1Rui Zhang1Jianyin Xiong1,2,3( )
School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Indoor air quality becomes increasingly important,partly because the COVID-19 pandemic increases the time people spend indoors. Research into the prediction of indoor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is traditionally confined to building materials and furniture. Relatively little research focuses on estimation of human-related VOCs,which have been shown to contribute significantly to indoor air quality,especially in densely-occupied environments. This study applies a machine learning approach to accurately estimate the human-related VOC emissions in a university classroom. The time-resolved concentrations of two typical human-related (ozone-related) VOCs in the classroom over a five-day period were analyzed,i.e.,6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (6-MHO),4-oxopentanal (4-OPA). By comparing the results for 6-MHO concentration predicted via five machine learning approaches including the random forest regression (RFR),adaptive boosting (Adaboost),gradient boosting regression tree (GBRT),extreme gradient boosting (XGboost),and least squares support vector machine (LSSVM),we find that the LSSVM approach achieves the best performance,by using multi-feature parameters (number of occupants,ozone concentration,temperature,relative humidity) as the input. The LSSVM approach is then used to predict the 4-OPA concentration,with mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) less than 5%,indicating high accuracy. By combining the LSSVM with a kernel density estimation (KDE) method,we further establish an interval prediction model,which can provide uncertainty information and viable option for decision-makers. The machine learning approach in this study can easily incorporate the impact of various factors on VOC emission behaviors,making it especially suitable for concentration prediction and exposure assessment in realistic indoor settings.

References

 

Abouleish MZ (2021). Indoor air quality and COVID-19. Public Health, 191: 1–2.

 

Amann A, Costello BD, Miekisch W, et al. (2014). The human volatilome: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath, skin emanations, urine, feces and saliva. Journal of Breath Research, 8: 034001.

 

Anderson SE, Franko J, Jackson LG, et al. (2012). Irritancy and allergic responses induced by exposure to the indoor air chemical 4-oxopentanal. Toxicological Sciences, 127: 371–381.

 

Breiman L (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45: 5–32.

 

Bu Z, Dong C, Mmereki D, et al. (2021). Modeled exposure to phthalates via inhalation and dermal pathway in children’s sleeping environment: A preliminary study and its implications. Building Simulation, 14: 1785–1794.

 
Chen T, Guestrin C (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
 

Chen S, Mihara K, Wen J (2018). Time series prediction of CO2, TVOC and HCHO based on machine learning at different sampling points. Building and Environment, 146: 238–246.

 

Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20: 273–297.

 

Cui P, Chen W, Wang J, et al. (2022). Numerical studies on issues of Re-independence for indoor airflow and pollutant dispersion within an isolated building. Building Simulation, 15: 1259–1276.

 
Domingo C, Watanabe O (2000). MadaBoost: A modification of AdaBoost. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory (COLT’00).
 

Friedman JH (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29: 1189–1232.

 

Fruekilde P, Hjorth J, Jensen NR, et al. (1998). Ozonolysis at vegetation surfaces a source of acetone, 4-oxopentanal, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, and geranyl acetone in the troposphere. Atmospheric Environment, 32: 1893–1902.

 

Galanti T, Guidetti G, Mazzei E, et al. (2021). Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63: e426–e432.

 

Géron A (2022). Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow, 3rd edn. Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly Media.

 

He Z, Xiong J, Kumagai K, et al. (2019). An improved mechanism-based model for predicting the long-term formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products with exposed edges and seams. Environment International, 132: 105086.

 

Hu Y, Xu L, Liang W (2023). A preliminary study on volatile organic compounds and odor in university dormitories: Situation, contribution, and correlation. Building Simulation, 16: 379–391.

 

Jarvis J, Seed MJ, Elton R, et al. (2005). Relationship between chemical structure and the occupational asthma hazard of low molecular weight organic compounds. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62: 243–250.

 

Kallio J, Tervonen J, Räsänen P, et al. (2021). Forecasting office indoor CO2 concentration using machine learning with a one-year dataset. Building and Environment, 187: 107409.

 

Khazaei B, Shiehbeigi A, Ali Kani ARHM (2019). Modeling indoor air carbon dioxide concentration using artificial neural network. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16: 729–736.

 

Khosravi A, Nahavandi S, Creighton D (2013). Prediction intervals for short-term wind farm power generation forecasts. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 4: 602–610.

 

Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, et al. (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 11: 231–252.

 

Kropat G, Bochud F, Jaboyedoff M, et al. (2015). Predictive analysis and mapping of indoor radon concentrations in a complex environment using kernel estimation: An application to Switzerland. Science of the Total Environment, 505: 137–148.

 

Lakey PJ, Wisthaler A, Berkemeier T, et al. (2017). Chemical kinetics of multiphase reactions between ozone and human skin lipids: Implications for indoor air quality and health effects. Indoor Air, 27: 816–828.

 

Lakey PSJ, Morrison GC, Won Y, et al. (2019). The impact of clothing on ozone and squalene ozonolysis products in indoor environments. Communications Chemistry, 2: 1–8.

 

Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, et al. (2018). The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet, 391: 462–512.

 

Li Z, Tong X, Ho JMW, et al. (2021). A practical framework for predicting residential indoor PM2.5 concentration using land-use regression and machine learning methods. Chemosphere, 265: 129140.

 

Little JC, Hodgson AT, Gadgil AJ (1994). Modeling emissions of volatile organic compounds from new carpets. Atmospheric Environment, 28: 227–234.

 

Liu Z, Ye W, Little JC (2013). Predicting emissions of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds from building materials: a review. Building and Environment, 64: 7–25.

 

NASEM (2022). Why Indoor Chemistry Matters. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

 

Nishihama Y, Jung CR, Nakayama SF, et al. (2021). Indoor air quality of 5,000 households and its determinants. Part A: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10-2.5) concentrations in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Environmental Research, 198: 111196.

 

Park S, Kim M, Kim M, et al. (2018). Predicting PM10 concentration in Seoul metropolitan subway stations using artificial neural network (ANN). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 341: 75–82.

 

Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12: 2825-2830.

 

Pham DM, Boussouira B, Moyal D, et al. (2015). Oxidization of squalene, a human skin lipid: a new and reliable marker of environmental pollution studies. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 37: 357–365.

 

Reichstein M, Camps-Valls G, Stevens B, et al. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, 566: 195–204.

 

Sagi O, Rokach L (2018). Ensemble learning: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8: e1249.

 

Salthammer T, Mentese S, Marutzky R (2010). Formaldehyde in the indoor environment. Chemical Reviews, 110: 2536–2572.

 

Skön J, Johansson M, Raatikainen M, et al. (2012). Modelling indoor air carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration using neural network. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 6: 737–741.

 

Song Y, Qin S, Qu J, et al. (2015). The forecasting research of early warning systems for atmospheric pollutants: a case in Yangtze River Delta region. Atmospheric Environment, 118: 58–69.

 

Taheri S, Razban A (2021). Learning-based CO2 concentration prediction: Application to indoor air quality control using demand-controlled ventilation. Building and Environment, 205: 108164.

 

Tang X, Misztal PK, Nazaroff WW, et al. (2015). Siloxanes are the most abundant volatile organic compound emitted from engineering students in a classroom. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2: 303–307.

 

Tang X, Misztal PK, Nazaroff WW, et al. (2016). Volatile organic compound emissions from humans indoors. Environmental Science & Technology, 50: 12686–12694.

 

Tian E, Yu Q, Gao Y, et al. (2021). Ultralow resistance two-stage electrostatically assisted air filtration by polydopamine coated PET coarse filter. Small, 17: e2102051.

 
Wang HF, Hu DJ (2005). Comparison of SVM and LS-SVM for regression. In: Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain, Beijing, China.
 

Wang H, Xiong J, Wei W (2022). Measurement methods and impact factors for the key parameters of VOC/SVOC emissions from materials in indoor and vehicular environments: A review. Environment International, 168: 107451.

 

Wei W, Ramalho O, Malingre L, et al. (2019). Machine learning and statistical models for predicting indoor air quality. Indoor Air, 29: 704–726.

 

Weschler CJ (2009). Changes in indoor pollutants since the 1950s. Atmospheric Environment, 43: 153–169.

 

WHO (2007). Indoor air pollution: National burden of disease estimates. World Health Organization.

 

Wisthaler A, Weschler CJ (2010). Reactions of ozone with human skin lipids: sources of carbonyls, dicarbonyls, and hydroxycarbonyls in indoor air. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107: 6568–6575.

 

Wolkoff P, Larsen ST, Hammer M, et al. (2013). Human reference values for acute airway effects of five common ozone-initiated terpene reaction products in indoor air. Toxicology Letters, 216: 54–64.

 

Xiong J, Yao Y, Zhang Y (2011). C-history method: rapid measurement of the initial emittable concentration, diffusion and partition coefficients for formaldehyde and VOCs in building materials. Environmental Science & Technology, 45: 3584–3590.

 

Xiong J, He Z, Tang X, et al. (2019). Modeling the time-dependent concentrations of primary and secondary reaction products of ozone with squalene in a university classroom. Environmental Science & Technology, 53: 8262–8270.

 

Xu Y, Du P, Wang J (2017). Research and application of a hybrid model based on dynamic fuzzy synthetic evaluation for establishing air quality forecasting and early warning system: A case study in China. Environmental Pollution, 223: 435–448.

 

Xu C, Xu D, Liu Z, et al. (2020). Estimating hourly average indoor PM2.5 using the random forest approach in two megacities, China. Building and Environment, 180: 107025.

 

Yang X, Chen Q, Zhang JS, et al. (2001). Numerical simulation of VOC emissions from dry materials. Building and Environment, 36: 1099–1107.

 

Yang T, Xiong J, Tang X, et al. (2018a). Predicting indoor emissions of cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes from the use of personal care products by university students. Environmental Science & Technology, 52: 14208–14215.

 

Yang X, Ma X, Kang N, et al. (2018b). Probability interval prediction of wind power based on KDE method with rough sets and weighted Markov chain. IEEE Access, 6: 51556–51565.

 

Yasin H, Caraka R, Hoyyi A, et al. (2016). Prediction of crude oil prices using support vector regression (SVR) with grid search–cross validation algorithm. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 12: 3009–3020.

 

Yuchi W, Gombojav E, Boldbaatar B, et al. (2019). Evaluation of random forest regression and multiple linear regression for predicting indoor fine particulate matter concentrations in a highly polluted city. Environmental Pollution, 245: 746–753.

 

Zhang Y, Wang J, Wang X (2014). Review on probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32: 255–270.

 

Zhang Y, Xiong J, Mo J, et al. (2016). Understanding and controlling airborne organic compounds in the indoor environment: mass transfer analysis and applications. Indoor Air, 26: 39–60.

 

Zhang M, Xiong J, Liu Y, et al. (2021a). Physical-chemical coupling model for characterizing the reaction of ozone with squalene in realistic indoor environments. Environmental Science & Technology, 55: 1690–1698.

 

Zhang R, Wang H, Tan Y, et al. (2021b). Using a machine learning approach to predict the emission characteristics of VOCs from furniture. Building and Environment, 196: 107786.

 

Zhang R, Tan Y, Wang Y, et al. (2022). Predicting the concentrations of VOCs in a controlled chamber and an occupied classroom via a deep learning approach. Building and Environment, 207: 108525.

 

Zhao L, Zhou H, Jin Y, et al. (2022). Experimental and numerical investigation of TVOC concentrations and ventilation dilution in enclosed train cabin. Building Simulation, 15: 831–844.

 

Zhou X, Liu Y, Liu J (2018). Alternately airtight/ventilated emission method: A universal experimental method for determining the VOC emission characteristic parameters of building materials. Building and Environment, 130: 179–189.

Building Simulation
Pages 915-925
Cite this article:
Liu J, Zhang R, Xiong J. Machine learning approach for estimating the human-related VOC emissions in a university classroom. Building Simulation, 2023, 16(6): 915-925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-022-0976-y

429

Views

6

Crossref

6

Web of Science

7

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 30 September 2022
Revised: 17 November 2022
Accepted: 06 December 2022
Published: 13 March 2023
© Tsinghua University Press 2023
Return