AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Unsupervised learning of load signatures to estimate energy-related building features using surrogate modelling techniques

Shane Ferreira1( )Burak Gunay1Araz Ashouri1Scott Shillinglaw2
Carleton University, Ottawa, K1S 5B6, Canada
National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, K1A 0R6, Canada
Show Author Information

Abstract

Characterization of an existing building’s energy-related features is critical to inform maintenance and retrofit decisions. However, existing field-scale characterization methods tend to be labour intensive, invasive, and require high fidelity longitudinal data gathered through tightly regulated experiments. This highlights the need for a low cost, scalable, and efficient screening method. This paper puts forward a surrogate model-based approach to rapidly estimate energy-related building features. To this end, EnergyPlus models for 12 midrise office archetypes, all with a rectangular footprint, are developed. Ten thousand variants of each archetype are generated by altering envelope, causal heat gain, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning operation features. A unique load signature is derived for each variant’s heating and cooling energy use. The parameters of the load signatures are clustered, then each cluster is associated with a set of plausible energy-related features. The accuracy of the results was evaluated using five test buildings not seen by the algorithm. The method could effectively identify building features with reasonable accuracy and no significant degradation in performance across all 12 archetypes.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
bs-16-7-1273_ESM.pdf (2.6 MB)

References

 

Ascione F, Bianco N, De Stasio C, et al. (2017). Artificial neural networks to predict energy performance and retrofit scenarios for any member of a building category: A novel approach. Energy, 118: 999–1017.

 

ASHRAE (2014). ASHRAE Guideline 14-2014: Measurement of Energy, Demand, and Water Savings. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

 

Chong A, Gu Y, Jia H (2021). Calibrating building energy simulation models: A review of the basics to guide future work. Energy and Buildings, 253: 111533.

 
Crawley D (2021). EnergyPlus. 9.5.0 ed. US Department of Energy.
 
Deru M (2011). Commercial reference building models of the national building stock. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Department of Energy.
 

Edwards RE, New J, Parker LE, et al. (2017). Constructing large scale surrogate models from big data and artificial intelligence. Applied Energy, 202: 685–699.

 

Fu H, Baltazar J-C, Claridge DE (2021). Review of developments in whole-building statistical energy consumption models for commercial buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 147: 111248.

 

Gunay BH, Darwazeh D, Shillinglaw S, et al. (2021). Remote characterization of envelope performance through inverse modelling with building automation system data. Energy and Buildings, 240: 110893.

 
Liu M (1998). Calibrating AHU models using whole building cooling and heating energy consumption data. In: Proceedings of ACEEE 1998 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.
 
MathWorks (2021). MATLAB. 9.10.0.1684407 ed. Natick, MA, USA: MathWorks.
 

Nagpal S, Mueller C, Aijazi A, et al. (2019). A methodology for auto-calibrating urban building energy models using surrogate modeling techniques. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 12: 1–16.

 

Nardi I, Lucchi E, de Rubeis T, et al. (2018). Quantification of heat energy losses through the building envelope: A state-of-the-art analysis with critical and comprehensive review on infrared thermography. Building and Environment, 146: 190–205.

 

Østergård T, Jensen RL, Maagaard SE (2018). A comparison of six metamodeling techniques applied to building performance simulations. Applied Energy, 211: 89–103.

 

Ramallo-González AP, Brown M, Gabe-Thomas E, et al. (2018). The reliability of inverse modelling for the wide scale characterization of the thermal properties of buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 11: 65–83.

 

Rasooli A, Itard L (2018). In-situ characterization of walls’ thermal resistance: An extension to the ISO 9869 standard method. Energy and Buildings, 179: 374–383.

 

Rivalin L, Stabat P, Marchio D, et al. (2018). A comparison of methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis applied to the energy performance of new commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings, 166: 489–504.

 

Roman ND, Bre F, Fachinotti VD, et al. (2020). Application and characterization of metamodels based on artificial neural networks for building performance simulation: A systematic review. Energy and Buildings, 217: 109972.

 

Tardioli G, Narayan A, Kerrigan R, et al. (2020). A methodology for calibration of building energy models at district scale using clustering and surrogate techniques. Energy and Buildings, 226: 110309.

 

Westermann P, Evins R (2019). Surrogate modelling for sustainable building design—A review. Energy and Buildings, 198: 170–186.

 

Wong SL, Wan KKW, Lam TNT (2010). Artificial neural networks for energy analysis of office buildings with daylighting. Applied Energy, 87: 551–557.

 

Younes C, Shdid CA, Bitsuamlak G (2012). Air infiltration through building envelopes: A review. Journal of Building Physics, 35: 267–302.

Building Simulation
Pages 1273-1286
Cite this article:
Ferreira S, Gunay B, Ashouri A, et al. Unsupervised learning of load signatures to estimate energy-related building features using surrogate modelling techniques. Building Simulation, 2023, 16(7): 1273-1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-023-1005-5

396

Views

2

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 18 November 2022
Revised: 18 January 2023
Accepted: 14 February 2023
Published: 04 May 2023
© Crown 2023
Return