Example-based dynamic façade design using the façade daylighting performance improvement (FDPI) indicator
), Abstract
It remains challenging to conduct an efficient dynamic façade design. In this article authors try to address this issue introducing the façade daylighting performance improvement (FDPI) indicator aimed to evaluate the performance of a dynamic (adaptive) façade from its daylighting performance point of view. To illustrate the FDPI application the authors introduced the preliminary dynamic façade concept for an office building located in Tel Aviv (Hot-summer Mediterranean Climate Csa) with further shape modification based on the daylighting performance analysis compared to the three alternatives representative of different typologies of dynamic façades. Al Bahr, One Ocean and The University of Southern Denmark façade systems were simulated under the same weather and building conditions of the preliminary dynamic façade concept and were considered as a benchmark for the study. The final dynamic façade concept elaborated by the authors in the preliminary comparative workflow showed noticeable daylight performance improvement with respect to the case studies comparative scenarios. The FDPI metric allowed to estimate a daylighting performance improvement of 43% of the final dynamic façade concept over the case study dynamic façade that showed the best performance in the daylighting simulations.
Keywords
References
Akimov L, De Michele G, Filippi Oberegger U, et al. (2021a). Evaluation of EN15193-1 on energy requirements for artificial lighting against Radiance-based DAYSIM. Journal of Building Engineering, 40: 102698.
Akimov L, De Mei K, de Martino di Montegiordano D, et al. (2021c). The material-efficient design of bridges with the use of FRP. Cham: Springer.
Al Horr Y, Arif M, Kaushik A, et al. (2016). Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature. Building and Environment, 105: 369–389.
Alexander MG (2016). Marine Concrete Structures: Design, Durability and Performance. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Alrubaih MS, Zain MFM, Alghoul MA, et al. (2013). Research and development on aspects of daylighting fundamentals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21: 494–505.
Attia S (2018a). Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB): Concepts, Frameworks and Roadmap for Project Analysis and Implementation. Hull, Canada: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Attia S (2018b). Regenerative and Positive Impact Architecture: Learning from Case Studies. New York: Springer.
Attia S (2018c). Evaluation of adaptive facades: The case study of Al Bahr Towers in the UAE. QScience Connect, 2017(2): 6.
Attia S, Bilir S, Safy T, et al. (2018). Current trends and future challenges in the performance assessment of adaptive façade systems. Energy and Buildings, 179: 165–182.
Attia S, Garat S, Cools M (2019). Development and validation of a survey for well-being and interaction assessment by occupants in office buildings with adaptive facades. Building and Environment, 157: 268–276.
Badenko VL, Bolshakov NS, Tishchenko EB, et al. (2021). Integration of digital twin and BIM technologies within factories of the future. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 101: 10114.
Baranova D, Sovetnikov D, Borodinecs A (2018). The extensive analysis of building energy performance across the Baltic Sea region. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 24: 982–993.
Battisti A, Persiani SGL, Crespi M (2019). Review and mapping of parameters for the early stage design of adaptive building technologies through life cycle assessment tools. Energies, 12: 1729.
Beute F, de Kort YAW (2014). Salutogenic effects of the environment: Review of health protective effects of nature and daylight. Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being, 6: 67–95.
Burggräf P, Dannapfel M, Schneidermann D, et al. (2019). Integrated factory modelling: Using BIM to disrupt the interface between manufacturing and construction in factory planning. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 192: 143–155.
Cantin F, Dubois MC (2011). Daylighting metrics based on illuminance, distribution, glare and directivity. Lighting Research & Technology, 43: 291–307.
Chaloeytoy K, Ichinose M, Chien SC (2020). Determination of the simplified daylight glare probability (DGPs) criteria for daylit office spaces in Thailand. Buildings, 10: 180.
Cuce E, Riffat SB (2015). A state-of-the-art review on innovative glazing technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 695–714.
El-Arnaouty H, Azab N, Omar O (2020). Health and wellbeing re-visited; an exploratory study towards a “healthy & wellbeing” university campus. Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ), 25(1): 1.
Fakourian F, Asefi M (2019). Environmentally responsive kinetic façade for educational buildings. Journal of Green Building, 14: 165–186.
Favoino F, Goia F, Perino M, et al. (2014). Experimental assessment of the energy performance of an advanced responsive multifunctional façade module. Energy and Buildings, 68: 647–659.
Freewan AAY (2014). Impact of external shading devices on thermal and daylighting performance of offices in hot climate regions. Solar Energy, 102: 14–30.
Galatioto A, Beccali M (2016). Aspects and issues of daylighting assessment: A review study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 66: 852–860.
González J, Fiorito F (2015). Daylight design of office buildings: optimisation of external solar shadings by using combined simulation methods. Buildings, 5: 560–580.
Guenther A, Kniel K, Härtig F, et al. (2013). Introduction of a new bevel gear measurement standard. CIRP Annals, 62: 515–518.
Hosseini SM, Mohammadi M, Rosemann A, et al. (2018). Quantitative investigation through climate-based daylight metrics of visual comfort due to colorful glass and orosi windows in Iranian architecture. Journal of Daylighting, 5: 21–33.
Hosseini SM, Mohammadi M, Rosemann A, et al. (2019a). A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort: Review. Building and Environment, 153: 186–204.
Hosseini SM, Mohammadi M, Guerra-Santin O (2019b). Interactive kinetic façade: Improving visual comfort based on dynamic daylight and occupant’s positions by 2D and 3D shape changes. Building and Environment, 165: 106396.
Hviid CA, Nielsen TR, Svendsen S (2008). Simple tool to evaluate the impact of daylight on building energy consumption. Solar Energy, 82: 787–798.
Jakubiec JA, Reinhart CF (2012). The ‘adaptive zone’—A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces. Lighting Research & Technology, 44: 149–170.
Jin Q, Overend M (2014). Sensitivity of façade performance on early-stage design variables. Energy and Buildings, 77: 457–466.
Kasinalis C, Loonen RCGM, Cóstola D, et al. (2014). Framework for assessing the performance potential of seasonally adaptable facades using multi-objective optimization. Energy and Buildings, 79: 106–113.
Kassem M, Mitchell D (2015). Bridging the gap between selection decisions of facade systems at the early design phase: Issues, challenges and solutions. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 3: 165–183.
Kim H, Clayton MJ (2020). A multi-objective optimization approach for climate-adaptive building envelope design using parametric behavior maps. Building and Environment, 185: 107292.
Kirimtat A, Koyunbaba BK, Chatzikonstantinou I, et al. (2016). Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53: 23–49.
Knippers J, Jungjohann H, Scheible F, et al. (2013). Bio-inspirierte kinetische fassade für den themenpavillon “one ocean” EXPO 2012 in yeosu, Korea. Bautechnik, 90: 341–347.
Krarti M (2016). Energy Audit of Building Systems: An Engineering Approach, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lee K, Han K, Lee J (2017). The impact of shading type and azimuth orientation on the daylighting in a classroom–focusing on effectiveness of façade shading, comparing the results of DA and UDI. Energies, 10: 635.
Le-Thanh L, Le-Duc T, Ngo-Minh H, et al. (2021). Optimal design of an Origami-inspired kinetic façade by balancing composite motion optimization for improving daylight performance and energy efficiency. Energy, 219: 119557.
Li DHW, Cheung GHW, Lau CCS (2006). A simplified procedure for determining indoor daylight illuminance using daylight coefficient concept. Building and Environment, 41: 578–589.
Li DHW (2010). A review of daylight illuminance determinations and energy implications. Applied Energy, 87: 2109–2118.
Loonen RCGM, Trčka M, Cóstola D, et al. (2013). Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25: 483–493.
Loonen RCGM, Favoino F, Hensen JLM, et al. (2017). Review of current status, requirements and opportunities for building performance simulation of adaptive facades. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10: 205–223.
Mahmoud AHA, Elghazi Y (2016). Parametric-based designs for kinetic facades to optimize daylight performance: comparing rotation and translation kinetic motion for hexagonal facade patterns. Solar Energy, 126: 111–127.
Manzan M, Padovan R (2015). Multi-criteria energy and daylighting optimization for an office with fixed and moveable shading devices. Advances in Building Energy Research, 9: 238–252.
Michael A, Heracleous C (2017). Assessment of natural lighting performance and visual comfort of educational architecture in Southern Europe: the case of typical educational school premises in Cyprus. Energy and Buildings, 140: 443–457.
Nabil A, Mardaljevic J (2005). Useful daylight illuminance: A new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Lighting Research & Technology, 37: 41–57.
Nabil A, Mardaljevic J (2006). Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors. Energy and Buildings, 38: 905–913.
Ne’Eman E (1974). Visual aspects of sunlight in buildings. Lighting Research & Technology, 6: 159–164.
Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11: 1633–1644.
Pilechiha P, Mahdavinejad M, Pour Rahimian F, et al. (2020). Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency. Applied Energy, 261: 114356.
Rafsanjani H, Ahn C, Alahmad M (2015). A review of approaches for sensing, understanding, and improving occupancy-related energy-use behaviors in commercial buildings. Energies, 8: 10996–11029.
Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O (2001). Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy and Buildings, 33: 683–697.
Reinhart CF, Andersen M (2006). Development and validation of a Radiance model for a translucent panel. Energy and Buildings, 38: 890–904.
Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z (2006). Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. LEUKOS, 3: 7–31.
Sadegh SO, Haile SG, Jamshidzehi Z (2022). Development of two-step biomimetic design and evaluation framework for performance-oriented design of multi-functional adaptable building envelopes. Journal of Daylighting, 9: 13–27.
Shi X, Abel T, Wang L (2020). Influence of two motion types on solar transmittance and daylight performance of dynamic façades. Solar Energy, 201: 561–580.
Struck C, de Wilde PJCJ, Hopfe CJ, et al. (2009). An investigation of the option space in conceptual building design for advanced building simulation. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23: 386–395.
Tabadkani A, Valinejad Shoubi M, Soflaei F, et al. (2019). Integrated parametric design of adaptive facades for user’s visual comfort. Automation in Construction, 106: 102857.
Tabadkani A, Roetzel A, Li H, et al. (2021). Design approaches and typologies of adaptive facades: A review. Automation in Construction, 121: 103450.
Taveres-Cachat E, Favoino F, Loonen R, et al. (2021). Ten questions concerning co-simulation for performance prediction of advanced building envelopes. Building and Environment, 191: 107570.
Tian Z, Lin P, He Y, et al. (2021). A study of luminous environment with prism daylight redirecting fenestrations in classrooms. Indoor and Built Environment, 30: 461–475.
Tzempelikos A, Shen H (2013). Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance. Building and Environment, 67: 179–192.
Uribe D, Bustamante W, Vera S (2017). Seasonal optimization of a fixed exterior complex fenestration system considering visual comfort and energy performance criteria. Energy Procedia, 132: 490–495.
Wienold J, Christoffersen J (2006). Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings, 38: 743–757.
Yang S, Wan MP, Ng BF, et al. (2021). Model predictive control for integrated control of air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation, lighting and shading systems. Applied Energy, 297: 117112.
Yitmen I, Al-Musaed A, Yücelgazi F (2022). ANP model for evaluating the performance of adaptive façade systems in complex commercial buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29: 431–455.
Yu X, Su Y (2015). Daylight availability assessment and its potential energy saving estimation—A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52: 494–503.
Zapico A, Egiluz Z, García Frómeta Y, et al. (2022). Mechanical characterization of double-skin perforated-sheet façades. Journal of Building Engineering, 56: 104750.
Zaretsky EV, Branzai EV (2017). Rolling bearing service life based on probable cause for removal—A tutorial. Tribology Transactions, 60: 300–312.
Zemitis J, Terekh M (2018). Optimization of the level of thermal insulation of enclosing structures of civil buildings. MATEC Web of Conferences, 245: 06002.
Zhang X, Zhang H, Wang Y, et al. (2022). Adaptive façades: Review of designs, performance evaluation, and control systems. Buildings, 12: 2112.
京公网安备11010802044758号