AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Cover Article

Photogrammetry and deep learning for energy production prediction and building-integrated photovoltaics decarbonization

Ilyass Abouelaziz1Youssef Jouane2( )
CESI LINEACT, 7 bis Av. Robert Schuman, 51100 Reims, France
CESI LINEACT, Parc Club des Tanneries 2 all Foulons, 67380 Strasbourg, France
Show Author Information

Abstract

Building-Integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) have emerged as a promising sustainable energy solution, relying on accurate energy production predictions and effective decarbonization strategies for efficient deployment. This paper presents a novel approach that combines photogrammetry and deep learning techniques to address the problem of BIPV decarbonization. The method is called BIM-AITIZATION referring to the integration of BIM data, AI techniques, and automation principles. It integrates photogrammetric data into practical BIM parameters. In addition, it enhances the precision and reliability of PV energy prediction by using artificial intelligence strategies. The primary aim of this approach is to offer advanced, data-driven energy forecasts and BIPV decarbonization while fully automating the underlying process. To achieve this, the first step is to capture point cloud data of the building through photogrammetric acquisition. This data undergoes preprocessing to identify and remove unwanted points, followed by plan segmentation to extract the plan facade. After that, a meteorological dataset is assembled, incorporating various attributes that influence energy production, including solar irradiance parameters as well as BIM parameters. Finally, machine and deep learning techniques are used for accurate photovoltaic energy predictions and the automation of the entire process. Extensive experiments are conducted, including multiple tests aimed at assessing the performance of diverse machine learning models. The objective is to identify the most suitable model for our specific application. Furthermore, a comparative analysis is undertaken, comparing the performance of the proposed model against that of various established BIPV software tools. The outcomes reveal that the proposed approach surpasses existing software solutions in both accuracy and precision. To extend its applicability, the approach is evaluated using a building case study, demonstrating its ability to generalize effectively to new building data.

References

 

Ahmed R, Sreeram V, Mishra Y, et al. (2020). A review and evaluation of the state-of-the-art in PV solar power forecasting: Techniques and optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 124: 109792.

 

Amini Toosi H, Lavagna M, Leonforte F, et al. (2022). Building decarbonization: Assessing the potential of building-integrated photovoltaics and thermal energy storage systems. Energy Reports, 8: 574–581.

 

Axaopoulos PJ, Fylladitakis ED, Gkarakis K (2014). Accuracy analysis of software for the estimation and planning of photovoltaic installations. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 5: 1–8.

 

Byrne J, Taminiau J, Kurdgelashvili L, et al. (2015). A review of the solar city concept and methods to assess rooftop solar electric potential, with an illustrative application to the city of Seoul. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 830–844.

 

de Winter JCF, Gosling SD, Potter J (2016). Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychological Methods, 21: 273–290.

 
Dourhmi M, Benlamine K, Abouelaziz I, et al. (2023). Improved hourly prediction of BIPV photovoltaic power building using artificial learning machine: A case study. In: Ben Ahmed M, Abdelhakim BA, Ane BK, Rosiyadi D (eds), Emerging Trends in Intelligent Systems & Network Security. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
 

Fathi S, Srinivasan R, Fenner A, et al. (2020). Machine learning applications in urban building energy performance forecasting: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133: 110287.

 

Fischler MA, Bolles RC (1981). Random sample consensus. Communications of the ACM, 24: 381–395.

 

Fuentes JE, Moya FD, Montoya OD (2020). Method for estimating solar energy potential based on photogrammetry from unmanned aerial vehicles. Electronics, 9: 2144.

 

González-Peña D, García-Ruiz I, Díez-Mediavilla M, et al. (2021). Photovoltaic prediction software: evaluation with real data from northern Spain. Applied Sciences, 11: 5025.

 

He Z, Zhao C, HuangY (2022). Multivariate time series deep spatiotemporal forecasting with graph neural network. Applied Sciences, 12: 5731.

 
IEA (2023). Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2023. Paris: International Energy Agency.
 
Ike S, Kurokawa K (2005). Photogrammetric estimation of shading impacts on photovoltaic systems. In: Proceedings of Conference Record of the 31st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA.
 

Li W, Samuelson H (2020). A new method for visualizing and evaluating views in architectural design. Developments in the Built Environment, 1: 100005.

 
Li F, Liu J, Li W, et al. (2022). Potential assessment of rooftop photovoltaic power generation in wide areas. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of China Electrotechnical Society.
 

Liu Z, Sun Y, Xing C, et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence powered large-scale renewable integrations in multi-energy systems for carbon neutrality transition: Challenges and future perspectives. Energy and AI, 10: 100195.

 

Markovics D, Mayer MJ (2022). Comparison of machine learning methods for photovoltaic power forecasting based on numerical weather prediction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161: 112364.

 
Météo-France (2023). Observation data from major weather stations 2013–2023. Available at https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/
 
Nair V, Hinton GE (2010). Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel.
 

Pan Y, Zhu M, Lv Y, et al. (2023). Building energy simulation and its application for building performance optimization: A review of methods, tools, and case studies. Advances in Applied Energy, 10: 100135.

 

Savvides A, Vassiliades C, Michael A, et al. (2019). Siting and building-massing considerations for the urban integration of active solar energy systems. Renewable Energy, 135: 963–974.

 
Soubki A, Fekri A, Maimouni S (2020). Forecasting solar energy in a complex urban environment Case study: Casablanca, Morocco. In: Proceedings of 2020 IEEE International conference of Moroccan Geomatics (Morgeo).
 

Szabó S, Enyedi P, Horváth M, et al. (2016). Automated registration of potential locations for solar energy production with Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and small format photogrammetry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 3820–3829.

 

Tien PW, Wei S, Darkwa J, et al. (2022). Machine learning and deep learning methods for enhancing building energy efficiency and indoor environmental quality—A review. Energy and AI, 10: 100198.

 

Torr PHS, Zisserman A (2000). MLESAC: A new robust estimator with application to estimating image geometry. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 78: 138–156.

 

Vahdatikhaki F, Salimzadeh N, Hammad A (2022). Optimization of PV modules layout on high-rise building skins using a BIM-based generative design approach. Energy and Buildings, 258: 111787.

 

Valencia-Solares ME, Gijón-Rivera M, Rivera-Solorio CI (2023). Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of the integration of phase change materials and hybrid concentrated photovoltaic thermal collectors for reduced energy consumption of a school sports center. Energy and Buildings, 293: 113198.

 
Vassiliades C, Michael A, Savvides A, et al. (2017). Environmental assessment of the integration of active solar energy systems on building envelopes in southern Europe. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environmental Protection.
 

Zazoum B (2022). Solar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods. Energy Reports, 8: 19–25.

 

Zefri Y, ElKettani A, Sebari I, et al. (2018). Thermal infrared and visual inspection of photovoltaic installations by UAV photogrammetry—Application case: Morocco. Drones, 2: 41.

 

Zhang Q, Huang Y, Chng CB, et al. (2023). Investigations on machine learning-based control-oriented modeling using historical thermal data of buildings. Building and Environment, 243: 110595.

Building Simulation
Pages 189-205
Cite this article:
Abouelaziz I, Jouane Y. Photogrammetry and deep learning for energy production prediction and building-integrated photovoltaics decarbonization. Building Simulation, 2024, 17(2): 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-023-1089-y

350

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 28 July 2023
Revised: 10 October 2023
Accepted: 19 October 2023
Published: 07 December 2023
© Tsinghua University Press 2023
Return