AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Cover Article

The recirculation flow after different cross-section shaped high-rise buildings with applications to ventilation assessment and drag parameterization

Keyi Chen1,2Ziwei Mo1,2( )Jian Hang1,2
School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University & Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Zhuhai 519082, China
Key Laboratory of Tropical Atmosphere-Ocean System, Ministry of Education, Zhuhai 519000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The building cross-section shape significantly affects the flow characteristics around buildings, especially the recirculation region behind the high-rise building. Eight generic building shapes including square, triangle, octagon, T-shaped, cross-shaped, #-shaped, H-shaped and L-shaped are examined to elucidate their effects on the flow patterns, recirculation length L and areas A using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach. The sizes and positions of the vortexes behind the buildings are found to be substantially affected by the building shapes and subsequently changing the recirculation flows. The recirculation length L is in the range of 1.6b – 2.6b with an average of 2b. The maximum L is found for L-shaped building (2.6b) while the shortest behind octagon building (1.6b). The vertical recirculation area Av is in the range of 1.5b2 – 3.2b2 and horizontal area Ah in 0.9b2 – 2.2b2. The L, Av and Ah generally increase with increasing approaching frontal area when the wind direction changes but subject to the dent structures of the #-shaped and cross-shaped buildings. The area-averaged wind velocity ratio (AVR), which is proposed to assess the ventilation performance, is in the range of 0.05 and 0.14, which is around a three-fold difference among the different building shapes. The drag coefficient parameterized by Ah varies significantly, suggesting that previous models without accounting for building shape effect could result in large uncertainty in the drag predictions. These findings provide important reference for improving pedestrian wind environment and shed some light on refining the urban canopy parameterization by considering the building shape effect.

References

 

Andersson B, Andersson R, Håkansson L, et al. (2012). Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

 

AIJ (2007). Guidebook for Practical Applications of CFD to Pedestrian Wind Environment around Buildings. Architectural Institute of Japan.

 

Belcher SE, Jerram N, Hunt JCR (2003). Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 488: 369–398.

 

Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, van Beeck JPAJ (2016). Pedestrian-level wind conditions around buildings: Review of wind-tunnel and CFD techniques and their accuracy for wind comfort assessment. Building and Environment, 100: 50–81.

 

Chen L, Mak CM (2021). Numerical evaluation of pedestrian-level wind comfort around “lift-up” buildings with various unconventional configurations. Building and Environment, 188: 107429.

 

Ding P, Zhou X, Wu H, et al. (2022). An efficient numerical approach for simulating airflows around an isolated building. Building and Environment, 210: 108709.

 

Du Y, Mak CM (2017). Effect of lift-up design on pedestrian level wind comfort around isolated building under different wind directions. Procedia Engineering, 205: 296–301.

 

Fan MY, Li WJ, Luo XL, et al. (2022). Parameterised drag model for the underlying surface roughness of buildings in urban wind environment simulation. Building and Environment, 209: 108651.

 

Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlünzen KH, et al. (2011). The COST 732 Best Practice Guideline for CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment: a summary. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 44: 419.

 

Hemida H, Šarkić Glumac A, Vita G, et al. (2020). On the flow over high-rise building for wind energy harvesting: An experimental investigation of wind speed and surface pressure. Applied Sciences, 10: 5283.

 

Jiang G, Yoshie R (2020). Side ratio effects on flow and pollutant dispersion around an isolated high-rise building in a turbulent boundary layer. Building and Environment, 180: 107078.

 

Kasana D, Tayal D, Choudhary D, et al. (2022). Evaluation of aerodynamic effects on a tall building with various cross-section shapes having equal area. Forces in Mechanics, 9: 100134.

 

Keshavarzian E, Jin R, Dong K, et al. (2021). Effect of building cross-section shape on air pollutant dispersion around buildings. Building and Environment, 197: 107861.

 

Kono T, Kogaki T, Kiwata T (2016). Numerical investigation of wind conditions for roof-mounted wind turbines: effects of wind direction and horizontal aspect ratio of a high-rise cuboid building. Energies, 9: 907.

 

Korycki M, Łobocki L, Wyszogrodzki A (2016). Numerical simulation of stratified flow around a tall building of a complex shape. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 16: 1143–1171.

 

Lee KY, Mak CM (2022). Effects of different wind directions on ventilation of surrounding areas of two generic building configurations in Hong Kong. Indoor and Built Environment, 31: 414–434.

 

Li Y, Chen L (2020). Study on the influence of voids on high-rise building on the wind environment. Building Simulation, 13: 419–438.

 

Liu J, Niu J (2016). CFD simulation of the wind environment around an isolated high-rise building: An evaluation of SRANS, LES and DES models. Building and Environment, 96: 91–106.

 

Liu J, Hui Y, Yang Q, et al. (2021). Flow field investigation for aerodynamic effects of surface mounted ribs on square-sectioned high-rise buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 211: 104551.

 

Meena RK, Raj R, Anbukumar S (2022). Effect of wind load on irregular shape tall buildings having different corner configuration. Sādhanā, 47: 126.

 

Ng E (2009). Policies and technical guidelines for urban planning of high-density cities - air ventilation assessment (AVA) of Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 44: 1478–1488.

 

Nie S, Zhou X, Zhou T, et al. (2009). Numerical simulation of 3D atmospheric flow around a bluff body of CAARC standard high-rise building model. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 31(6): 40–46. (in Chinese)

 
OpenFoam (2021). User Guide v2112. Available at https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/guides/latest/doc/guide-bcs-inlet-atm-atmBoundaryLayer.html. Assessed 7 Oct 2023.
 

Rukhaiyar A, Jayant B, Dahiya K, et al. (2023). CFD simulations for evaluating the wind effects on high-rise buildings having varying cross-sectional shape. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, 14: 285–300.

 
Santiago J, Coceal O, Martilli A, et al. (2007). Spatially averaged properties of turbulent flow over staggered arrays of cubes with different packing densities: analysis of the sectional drag coefficients. In: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on the Urban Environment, San Diego, USA.
 

Santiago JL, Martilli A (2010). A dynamic urban canopy parameterization for mesoscale models based on computational fluid dynamics reynolds-averaged navier–stokes microscale simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 137: 417–439.

 

Serteser N, Karadag I (2018). Design for improving pedestrian wind comfort: a case study on a courtyard around a tall building. Architectural Science Review, 61: 492–499.

 

Shao Y, Yang Y (2005). A scheme for drag partition over rough surfaces. Atmospheric Environment, 39: 7351–7361.

 

Tamura Y, Xu X, Tanaka H, et al. (2017). Aerodynamic and pedestrian-level wind characteristics of super-tall buildings with various configurations. Procedia Engineering, 199: 28–37.

 
Tanaka H, Yoshie R, Hu C (2006). Uncertainty in measurements of velocity and concentration around a building. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering.
 
Taylor PA (1988). Turbulent wakes in the atmospheric boundary layer. In: Steffen WL, Denmead OT (eds), Flow and Transport in the Natural Environment: Advances and Applications. Berlin: Springer.
 

Thordal MS, Bennetsen JC, Koss HHH (2019). Review for practical application of CFD for the determination of wind load on high-rise buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 186: 155–168.

 

Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T (2011). CFD modeling of pollution dispersion in a street canyon: comparison between LES and RANS. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99: 340–348.

 

Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T (2013). CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion in the urban environment: A review of current modeling techniques. Atmospheric Environment, 79: 716–730.

 

Tominaga Y (2015). Flow around a high-rise building using steady and unsteady RANS CFD: Effect of large-scale fluctuations on the velocity statistics. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 142: 93–103.

 

Tominaga Y, Akabayashi SI, Kitahara T, et al. (2015). Air flow around isolated gable-roof buildings with different roof pitches: Wind tunnel experiments and CFD simulations. Building and Environment, 84: 204–213.

 

Tse KT, Weerasuriya AU, Zhang X, et al. (2017). Pedestrian-level wind environment around isolated buildings under the influence of twisted wind flows. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 162: 12–23.

 

Vranešević KK, Vita G, Bordas SPA, et al. (2022). Furthering knowledge on the flow pattern around high-rise buildings: LES investigation of the wind energy potential. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 226: 105029.

 

Wang F, Liu CH, Xie J (2021a). Wake dynamics and pollutant dispersion behind a light-duty lorry. Physics of Fluids, 33: 095127.

 

Wang W, Cao Y, Okaze T (2021b). Comparison of hexahedral, tetrahedral and polyhedral cells for reproducing the wind field around an isolated building by LES. Building and Environment, 195: 107717.

 

Xu X, Yang Q, Yoshida A, et al. (2017). Characteristics of pedestrian-level wind around super-tall buildings with various configurations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 166: 61–73.

 

Yang Q, Xu X, Lin Q, et al. (2022). Generic models for predicting pedestrian-level wind around isolated square-section high-rise buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 220: 104842.

 

Yu Y, Kwok KCS, Liu XP, et al. (2017). Air pollutant dispersion around high-rise buildings under different angles of wind incidence. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 167: 51–61.

 

Zhang B, Ooka R, Kikumoto H (2020a). Analysis of turbulent structures around a rectangular prism building model using spectral proper orthogonal decomposition. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 206: 104213.

 

Zhang X, Weerasuriya AU, Lu B, et al. (2020b). Pedestrian-level wind environment near a super-tall building with unconventional configurations in a regular urban area. Building Simulation, 13: 439–456.

 

Zhang X, Weerasuriya AU, Zhang X, et al. (2020c). Pedestrian wind comfort near a super-tall building with various configurations in an urban-like setting. Building Simulation, 13: 1385–1408.

 

Zhang B, Ooka R, Kikumoto H (2021). Identification of three-dimensional flow features around a square-section building model via spectral proper orthogonal decomposition. Physics of Fluids, 33: 035151.

 

Zheng X, Montazeri H, Blocken B (2020). CFD simulations of wind flow and mean surface pressure for buildings with balconies: Comparison of RANS and LES. Building and Environment, 173: 106747.

 

Zhuang Z, Yu Y, Ye H, et al. (2014). Review on CFD simulation technology of wind environment around buildings. Building Science, 30(2): 108–114. (in Chinese)

Building Simulation
Pages 509-524
Cite this article:
Chen K, Mo Z, Hang J. The recirculation flow after different cross-section shaped high-rise buildings with applications to ventilation assessment and drag parameterization. Building Simulation, 2024, 17(4): 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1103-z

226

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 24 August 2023
Revised: 25 November 2023
Accepted: 11 December 2023
Published: 20 February 2024
© Tsinghua University Press 2024
Return