AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Numerical modeling of all-day albedo variation for bifacial PV systems on rooftops and annual yield prediction in Beijing

Xiaoxiao Su1Chenglong Luo1( )Xinzhu Chen1Jie Ji2Yanshun Yu1Yuandan Wu1,3Wu Zou3
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
Institute of Energy Research, Jiangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanchang 330096, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Bifacial PV modules capture solar radiation from both sides, enhancing power generation by utilizing reflected sunlight. However, there are difficulties in obtaining ground albedo data due to its dynamic variations. To address this issue, this study established an experimental testing system on a rooftop and developed a model to analyze dynamic albedo variations, utilizing specific data from the environment. The results showed that the all-day dynamic variations in ground albedo ranged from 0.15 to 0.22 with an average of 0.16. Furthermore, this study evaluates the annual performance of a bifacial PV system in Beijing by considering the experimental conditions, utilizing bifacial modules with a front-side efficiency of 21.23% and a bifaciality factor of 0.8, and analyzing the dynamic all-day albedo data obtained from the numerical module. The results indicate that the annual radiation on the rear side of bifacial PV modules is 278.90 kWh/m², which accounts for only 15.50% of the front-side radiation. However, when using the commonly default albedo value of 0.2, the rear-side radiation is 333.01 kWh/m², resulting in an overestimation of 19.40%. Under dynamic albedo conditions, the bifacial system is predicted to generate an annual power output of 412.55 kWh/m2, representing a significant increase of approximately 12.37% compared to an idealized monofacial PV system with equivalent front-side efficiency. Over a 25-year lifespan, the bifacial PV system is estimated to reduce carbon emissions by 8393.91 kgCO2/m2, providing an additional reduction of 924.31 kgCO2/m2 compared to the idealized monofacial PV system. These findings offer valuable insights to promote the application of bifacial PV modules.

References

 
Aghaei M, Korevaar M, Babal P, et al. (2022). Bifacial photovoltaic technology: Recent advancements, simulation and performance measurement. In: Aghaei M (ed), Solar Radiation—Measurement, Modeling and Forecasting Techniques for Photovoltaic Solar Energy Applications. IntechOpen. http://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105152.
 

Aksoy MH, Çalik MK (2022). Performance investigation of bifacial photovoltaic panels at different ground conditions. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 10: 704–718.

 

Alam M, Gul MS, Muneer T (2023). Performance analysis and comparison between bifacial and monofacial solar photovoltaic at various ground albedo conditions. Renewable Energy Focus, 44: 295–316.

 

Branker K, Pathak MJM, Pearce JM (2011). A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15: 4470–4482.

 

Cha H, Bhang B, Park S, et al. (2018). Power prediction of bifacial Si PV module with different reflection conditions on rooftop. Applied Sciences, 8: 1752.

 
Corso R, Leonardi M, Scuto A, et al. (2022). Modeling of bifacial photovoltaic systems including temperature, albedo and perimeter effects: Comparison with data. In: Proceedings of 2022 AEIT International Annual Conference (AEIT), Rome, Italy.
 

Ganesan K, Winston DP, Sugumar S, et al. (2023). Performance analysis of n-type PERT bifacial solar PV module under diverse albedo conditions. Solar Energy, 252: 81–90.

 

Ghenai C, Ahmad FF, Rejeb O, et al. (2022). Artificial neural networks for power output forecasting from bifacial solar PV system with enhanced building roof surface Albedo. Journal of Building Engineering, 56: 104799.

 
Ghunaim ES (2022). Improving the performance of bifacial modules by adding reflection material. In: Proceedings of 2022 11th International Conference on Power Science and Engineering (ICPSE), Eskisehir, Turkey.
 
Gostein M, Pelaez SA, Deline C, et al. (2021). Measuring irradiance for bifacial PV systems. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
 
Graditi G, Ferlito S, Adinolfi G, et al. (2014). Performance estimation of a thin-film photovoltaic plant based on an Artificial Neural Network model. In: Proceedings of 2014 5th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC), Hammamet, Tunisia.
 
Grommes EM, Ost JM, Blieske U (2020). The impact of albedo measurements on power density calculations of bifacial modules. In: Proceedings of EUPVSEC 20.
 
IEA (2023). Snapshot of Global PV Markets – 2023. International Energy Agency. Available at https://iea-pvps.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/IEA_PVPS_Snapshot_2023.pdf.
 

Ineichen P, Guisan O, Perez R (1990). Ground-reflected radiation and albedo. Solar Energy, 44: 207–214.

 

Jacobson MZ, Jadhav V (2018). World estimates of PV optimal tilt angles and ratios of sunlight incident upon tilted and tracked PV panels relative to horizontal panels. Solar Energy, 169: 55–66.

 

Janssen GJM, Van Aken BB, Carr AJ, et al. (2015). Outdoor performance of bifacial modules by measurements and modelling. Energy Procedia, 77: 364–373.

 

Jhumka H, Yang S, Gorse C, et al. (2023). Assessing heat transfer characteristics of building envelope deployed BIPV and resultant building energy consumption in a tropical climate. Energy and Buildings, 298: 113540.

 

Khan MR, Sakr E, Sun X, et al. (2019). Ground sculpting to enhance energy yield of vertical bifacial solar farms. Applied Energy, 241: 592–598.

 
Koltay P, Wenk J, Bücher K (1998). Outdoor measurements of noct and simulations of its influence on energy collection. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion.
 
Krauter S, Hanitsch R, Moreira L (1996). New optical and thermal enhanced PV-modules performing 12% better under true module rating conditions. In: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.
 
Kumari N, Singh SK, Kumar S (2022). Effect of degradations and their possible outcomes in PV cells. In: Kumar S, Gupta N, Kumar S, Upadhyay S (eds), Renewable Energy Systems: Modeling, Optimization and Applications. Beverly, MA, USA: Scrivener Publishing. pp. 469–515.
 
Lara-Fanego V, Gueymard CA, Ruiz-Arias JA, et al. (2022). Extensive evaluation and uncertainty estimation of albedo data sources. In: Proceedings of 2022 IEEE 49th Photovoltaics Specialists Conference (PVSC), Philadelphia, PA, USA.
 
Li Y, Feng Y (2022). Power prediction method of PV system based on bifacial PV modules. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2145030/v1
 

Luo C, Wu Y, Su X, et al. (2023). Influence and characteristic of shading on photovoltaic performance of bifacial modules and method for estimating bifacial gain. Building Simulation, 16: 1821–1833.

 
Marion B, MacAlpine S, Deline C, et al. (2017). A practical irradiance model for bifacial PV modules. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).
 

Martín-Chivelet N, Kapsis K, Wilson HR, et al. (2022). Building-Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) products and systems: A review of energy-related behavior. Energy and Buildings, 262: 111998.

 

Mellit A, Sağlam S, Kalogirou SA (2013). Artificial neural network-based model for estimating the produced power of a photovoltaic module. Renewable Energy, 60: 71–78.

 

Muthu V, Ramadas G (2023). A comprehensive 4E study on the performance of bifacial solar module installed on different ground surface colors: An experimental study on a specific site. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 145: 011012.

 

Nussbaumer H, Klenk M, Morf M, et al. (2019). Energy yield prediction of a bifacial PV system with a miniaturized test array. Solar Energy, 179: 316–325.

 

Omer AM (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12: 2265–2300.

 

Peng J, Lu L, Yang H (2013). Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19: 255–274.

 

Psiloglou B, Kambezidis H (2009). Estimation of the ground albedo for the Athens area, Greece. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 71: 943–954.

 

Pu Y, Wang P, Wang Y, et al. (2021). Environmental effects evaluation of photovoltaic power industry in China on life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278: 123993.

 
Rojas FA (2022). Predictive modelling of bifacial PV plants performance and diagnostic. PhD Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes, France.
 

Skoplaki E, Boudouvis A, Palyvos J (2008). A simple correlation for the operating temperature of photovoltaic modules of arbitrary mounting. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 92: 1393–1402.

 

Sun X, Khan MR, Deline C, et al. (2018). Optimization and performance of bifacial solar modules: A global perspective. Applied Energy, 212: 1601–1610.

 

Topić D, Knežević G, Fekete K (2017). The mathematical model for finding an optimal PV system configuration for the given installation area providing a maximal lifetime profit. Solar Energy, 144: 750–757.

 

Tsuchida S, Tsuno Y, Sato D, et al. (2023). Albedo-dependent bifacial gain losses in photovoltaic modules with rear-side support structures. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 13: 938–944.

 

Wang F, Cheng Z, Tan J, et al. (2017). Progress in concentrated solar power technology with parabolic trough collector system: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79: 1314–1328.

 

Wang C-H, Chen H, Jiang Z, et al. (2023). Modelling and performance evaluation of a novel passive thermoelectric system based on radiative cooling and solar heating for 24-hour power-generation. Applied Energy, 331: 120425.

 

Wei Q, Wu C, Liu X, et al. (2016). The glass-glass module using n-type bifacial solar cell with PERT structure and its performance. Energy Procedia, 92: 750–754.

 

Yakubu RO, Ankoh MT, Mensah LD, et al. (2022). Predicting the potential energy yield of bifacial solar PV systems in low-latitude region. Energies, 15: 8510.

 

Yan D, O'Brien W, Hong T, et al. (2015). Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: Current state and future challenges. Energy and Buildings, 107: 264–278.

 

Zhang S, Wang K, Xu W (2023). Study on the value of electricity emission factor for standardized calculation of building carbon emission. Building Science, 39(2): 46–57. (in Chinese)

 

Zhu J, Li M, Luo L, et al. (2023). Short-term PV power forecast methodology based on multi-scale fluctuation characteristics extraction. Renewable Energy, 208: 141–151.

Building Simulation
Pages 955-964
Cite this article:
Su X, Luo C, Chen X, et al. Numerical modeling of all-day albedo variation for bifacial PV systems on rooftops and annual yield prediction in Beijing. Building Simulation, 2024, 17(6): 955-964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1120-y

148

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 02 December 2023
Revised: 27 January 2024
Accepted: 25 February 2024
Published: 25 March 2024
© Tsinghua University Press 2024
Return