Indoor glare significantly affects the visual comfort and health of occupants, daylighting simulation can act as an effective method to analyze daylight glare issues during building design. To address the extensive computational costs associated with calculating annual daylight glare metrics with existing methods, this study introduces an acceleration framework, which can be widely applied. The framework integrates a newly developed daylight matrix multiplication program (DMM4GPU) for Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) computation acceleration and the previously developed Accelerad program, which can accelerate the calculation of Daylight Coefficient (DC) matrices in the Two-phase Method (2-PM), the View matrices in the Three-phase Method (3-PM) and Five-phase Method (5-PM). By comparing with standard Radiance Central Processing Unit (CPU) calculations, the study validated the acceleration framework’s simulation accuracy and significantly reduced computation time in daylight glare metrics calculations. It also analyzed the impact of various simulation parameters on the framework’s performance. Results indicate that the acceleration framework’s error in calculating Daylight Glare Probability (DGP) is minimal (RMSE < 0.004), and the computation times for the 2-PM, 3-PM, and 5-PM are reduced by 94.8%, 93.9%, and 83.0%, respectively. Furthermore, this study discussed modeling techniques to avoid possible errors in the daylight GPU computations.
Acosta I, Campano MÁ, Leslie R, et al. (2019). Daylighting design for healthy environments: Analysis of educational spaces for optimal circadian stimulus. Solar Energy, 193: 584–596.
Amasuomo JOM, Alio AN (2013). Students’ perception of daylight illumination in the school workshop as a determinant for effective students’ task performance in workshop practice. Journal of Education and Learning, 2: 201–207.
Chen H, Cai B, Yang H, et al. (2022). Study on natural lighting and electrical performance of louvered photovoltaic windows in hot summer and cold winter areas. Energy and Buildings, 271: 112313.
Dai H, Peng X, Shi X, et al. (2022). Reveal training performance mystery between TensorFlow and PyTorch in the single GPU environment. Science China Information Sciences, 65: 112103.
Fang J, Zhao Y, Tian Z, et al. (2022). Analysis of dynamic louver control with prism redirecting fenestrations for office daylighting optimization. Energy and Buildings, 262: 112019.
Fernandes LL, Lee ES, Thanachareonkit A, et al. (2021). Potential annual daylighting performance of a high-efficiency daylight redirecting slat system. Building Simulation, 14: 495–510.
Jones NL (2024). Fast annual daylighting simulation and high dynamic range image processing using NumPy. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 30: 327–340.
Jones NL, Greenberg DP, Pratt KB (2012). Fast computer graphics techniques for calculating direct solar radiation on complex building surfaces. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 5: 300–312.
Kim CS, Chung SJ (2011). Daylighting simulation as an architectural design process in museums installed with toplights. Building and Environment, 46: 210–222.
Klems (1994). A new method for predicting the solar heat gain of complex fenestration systems: Ⅱ, Detailed description of the matrix layer calculation. ASHRAE Transactions, 100(1): 1073–1086.
Lari K, Bruce A, Sadatifar S, et al. (2023). Techno-economic analysis to determine the potential of perovskite-based PV blinds for buildings. Solar Energy, 265: 112052.
Lin P, Tian Z, Jonsson JC (2020). Analysis of the performance of prism daylight redirecting systems with bi-directional scattering distribution functions. Building Simulation, 13: 305–316.
Mazumdar S, Chen Q (2008). Influence of cabin conditions on placement and response of contaminant detection sensors in a commercial aircraft. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 10: 71–81.
Moore GE (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics, 38: 114–117.
Mork R, Falkenberg HK, Fostervold KI, et al. (2020). Discomfort glare and psychological stress during computer work: subjective responses and associations between neck pain and trapezius muscle blood flow. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 93: 29–42.
Nasrollahi N, Rostami E (2023). The impacts of urban canyons morphology on daylight availability and energy consumption of buildings in a hot-summer Mediterranean climate. Solar Energy, 266: 112181.
Parker SG, Bigler J, Dietrich A, et al. (2010). OptiX: A general purpose ray tracing engine. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 29: 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778803
Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O (2001). Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy and Buildings, 33: 683–697.
Shcherbakov MV, Brebels A, Shcherbakova NL, et al. (2013). A survey of forecast error measures. World Applied Sciences Journal, 24: 171–176.
Su X, Zhang L, Luo Y, et al. (2022). Energy performance of a reversible window integrated with photovoltaic blinds in Harbin. Building and Environment, 213: 108861.
Tian Z, Lei Y, Jonsson JC (2019). Daylight luminous environment with prismatic film glazing in deep depth manufacture buildings. Building Simulation, 12: 129–140.
Tian Z, Zhao Y, Fang J, et al. (2023). A study of daylight glare evaluation with prism daylighting redirecting fenestrations. Journal of Building Engineering, 71: 106428.
Tregenza PR, Waters IM (1983). Daylight coefficients. Lighting Research & Technology, 15: 65–71.
Turan I, Chegut A, Fink D, et al. (2020). The value of daylight in office spaces. Building and Environment, 168: 106503.
Van Den Wymelenberg K, Inanici M (2014). A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. Leukos, 10: 145–164.
Ward G, Mistrick R, Lee ES, et al. (2011). Simulating the daylight performance of complex fenestration systems using bidirectional scattering distribution functions within radiance. Leukos, 7: 241–261.
Ward GJ, Wang T, Geisler-Moroder D, et al. (2021). Modeling specular transmission of complex fenestration systems with data-driven BSDFs. Building and Environment, 196: 107774.
Wasilewski S, Grobe LO, Wienold J, et al. (2022a). Efficient simulation for visual comfort evaluations. Energy and Buildings, 267: 112141.
Wasilewski S, Wienold J, Andersen M (2022b). A critical comparison of annual glare simulation methods. E3S Web of Conferences, 362: 01002.
Wienold J, Christoffersen J (2006). Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings, 38: 743–757.
Wienold J, Iwata T, Sarey Khanie M, et al. (2019). Cross-validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics. Lighting Research & Technology, 51: 983–1013.
Xue P, Mak CM, Cheung HD (2014). The effects of daylighting and human behavior on luminous comfort in residential buildings: A questionnaire survey. Building and Environment, 81: 51–59.
Yang Y, Wanek J, Shahidi M (2008). Representing the retinal line spread shape with mathematical functions. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 9: 996–1002.
Yun SI, Choi A (2022). Simulation-based analysis of luminous environment of OLED lighting-integrated blinds for PV–OLED blind systems. Building and Environment, 211: 108765.
Zhao Y, Tian Z (2023). Modified climate-based daylight modeling methods for buildings. Building and Environment, 242: 110598.
Zhao Y, Tian Z (2024). A fast matrix-based method for two-phase and three-phase daylight simulations. Energy and Buildings, 304: 113866.
Zuo W, Chen Q (2010). Fast and informative flow simulations in a building by using fast fluid dynamics model on graphics processing unit. Building and Environment, 45: 747–757.
Zuo W, McNeil A, Wetter M, et al. (2014). Acceleration of the matrix multiplication of Radiance three phase daylighting simulations with parallel computing on heterogeneous hardware of personal computer. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 7: 152–163.