AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article

Advances in targeted nanotherapeutics: From bioconjugation to biomimicry

Danielle M. Valcourt1Jenna Harris2Rachel S. Riley1Megan Dang1Jianxin Wang1Emily S. Day1,2,3( )
161 Colburn LabDepartment of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of DelawareNewarkDE19716USA
201 DuPont HallDepartment of Materials Science & EngineeringUniversity of DelawareNewarkDE19716USA
4701 Ogletown Stanton RoadHelen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research InstituteNewarkDE19713USA
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Since the emergence of cancer nanomedicine, researchers have had intense interest in developing nanoparticles (NPs) that can specifically target diseased sites while avoiding healthy tissue to mitigate the off-target effects seen with conventional treatments like chemotherapy. Initial endeavors focused on the bioconjugation of targeting agents to NPs, and more recently, researchers have begun to develop biomimetic NP platforms that can avoid immune recognition to maximally accumulate in tumors. In this review, we describe the advantages and limitations of each of these targeting strategies. First, we review developments in bioconjugation strategies, where NPs are coated with biomolecules such as antibodies, aptamers, peptides, and small molecules to enable cell-specific binding. While bioconjugated NPs offer many exciting features and have improved pharmacokinetics and biodistribution relative to unmodified NPs, they are still recognized by the body as "foreign", resulting in their clearance by the mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS). To overcome this limitation, researchers have recently begun to investigate biomimetic approaches that can hide NPs from immune recognition and reduce clearance by the MPS. These biomimetic NPs fall into two distinct categories: synthetic NPs that present naturally occurring structures, and NPs that are completely disguised by natural structures. Overall, bioconjugated and biomimetic NPs have substantial potential to improve upon conventional treatments by reducing off-target effects through site-specific delivery, and they show great promise for future standards of care. Here, we provide a summary of each strategy, discuss considerations for their design moving forward, and highlight their potential clinical impact on cancer therapy.

References

1

Wang, Z. L.; Qiao, R. R.; Tang, N.; Lu, Z. W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z. X.; Xue, X. D.; Huang, Z. Y.; Zhang, S. R.; Zhang, G. X. et al. Active targeting theranostic iron oxide nanoparticles for MRI and magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound ablation of lung cancer. Biomaterials 2017, 127, 25–35.

2

El–Sayed, I. H.; Huang, X.; El–Sayed, M. A. Selective laser photo–thermal therapy of epithelial carcinoma using anti–EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles. Cancer Lett. 2006, 239, 129–135.

3

Damodaran, S.; Olson, E. M. Targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 pathway in breast cancer. Hosp. Pract. 2012, 40, 7–15.

4

Dehaini, D.; Fang, R. H.; Zhang, L. F. Biomimetic strategies for targeted nanoparticle delivery. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2016, 1, 30–46.

5

Byrne, J. D.; Betancourt, T.; Brannon–Peppas, L. Active targeting schemes for nanoparticle systems in cancer therapeutics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1615–1626.

6

Wang, M.; Thanou, M. Targeting nanoparticles to cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 62, 90–99.

7

Riley, R. S.; Day, E. S. Gold nanoparticle–mediated photothermal therapy: Applications and opportunities for multimodal cancer treatment. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 9, e1449.

8

Kumar, A.; Ma, H. L.; Zhang, X.; Huang, K. Y.; Jin, S. B.; Liu, J.; Wei, T.; Cao, W. P.; Zou, G. Z.; Liang, X. –J. Gold nanoparticles functionalized with therapeutic and targeted peptides for cancer treatment. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1180–1189.

9

Dam, D. H. M.; Culver, K. S. B.; Odom, T. W. Grafting aptamers onto gold nanostars increases in vitro efficacy in a wide range of cancer cell types. Mol. Pharm. 2014, 11, 580–587.

10

Lowery, A. R.; Gobin, A. M.; Day, E. S.; Halas, N. J.; West, J. L. Immunonanoshells for targeted photothermal ablation of tumor cells. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2006, 1, 149–154.

11

Loo, C.; Lowery, A.; Halas, N.; West, J.; Drezek, R. Immunotargeted nanoshells for integrated cancer imaging and therapy. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 709–711.

12

Brannon–Peppas, L.; Blanchette, J. O. Nanoparticle and targeted systems for cancer therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 206–212.

13

Hou, Y.; Zhou, J.; Gao, Z. Y.; Sun, X. Y.; Liu, C. Y.; Shangguan, D. H.; Yang, W. S.; Gao, M. Y. Proteaseactivated ratiometric fluorescent probe for pH mapping of malignant tumors. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3199–3205.

14

Jeong, S.; Park, J. Y.; Cha, M. G.; Chang, H. J.; Kim, Y. I.; Kim, H. –M.; Jun, B. –H.; Lee, D. S.; Lee, Y. –S.; Jeong, J. M. et al. Highly robust and optimized conjugation of antibodies to nanoparticles using quantitatively validated protocols. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 2548–2555.

15

Kumar, S.; Aaron, J.; Sokolov, K. Directional conjugation of antibodies to nanoparticles for synthesis of multiplexed optical contrast agents with both delivery and targeting moieties. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 314–320.

16

Joshi, P. P.; Yoon, S. J.; Hardin, W. G.; Emelianov, S.; Sokolov, K. V. Conjugation of antibodies to gold nanorods through Fc portion: Synthesis and molecular specific imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 2013, 24, 878–888.

17

Parolo, C.; de la Escosura–Muñiz, A.; Polo, E.; Grazú, V.; de la Fuente, J. M.; Merkoçi, A. Design, preparation, and evaluation of a fixed–orientation antibody/gold–nanoparticle conjugate as an immunosensing label. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 10753–10759.

18
Moynihan, T. J. HER2–positive breast cancer: What is it? https://www.mayoclinic.org/breast–cancer/expert–answers/faq–20058066 (accessed Mar 14, 2018).
19

Master, A. M.; Sen Gupta, A. EGF receptor–targeted nanocarriers for enhanced cancer treatment. Nanomedicine 2012, 7, 1895–1906.

20

Billingsley, M. M.; Riley, R. S.; Day, E. S. Antibodynanoparticle conjugates to enhance the sensitivity of ELISAbased detection methods. PLoS One 2017, 12, e0177592.

21

Bae, K. H.; Lee, K.; Kim, C.; Park, T. G. Surface functionalized hollow manganese oxide nanoparticles for cancer targeted siRNA delivery and magnetic resonance imaging. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 176–184.

22

Palanca–Wessels, M. C.; Booth, G. C.; Convertine, A. J.; Lundy, B. B.; Berguig, G. Y.; Press, M. F.; Stayton, P. S.; Press, O. W. Antibody targeting facilitates effective intratumoral siRNA nanoparticle delivery to HER2–overexpressing cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 9561–9575.

23

Dilnawaz, F.; Singh, A.; Mohanty, C.; Sahoo, S. K. Dual drug loaded superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 3694–3706.

24

Riley, R. S.; Day, E. S. Frizzled7 antibody–functionalized nanoshells enable multivalent binding for Wnt signaling inhibition in triple negative breast cancer cells. Small 2017, 13, 1700544.

25

Scott, A. M.; Wolchok, J. D.; Old, L. J. Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 278–287.

26

Jiang, W.; Kim, B. Y. S.; Rutka, J. T.; Chan, W. C. W. Nanoparticle–mediated cellular response is size–dependent. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 145–150.

27

Schardt, J. S.; Oubaid, J. M.; Williams, S. C.; Howard, J. L.; Aloimonos, C. M.; Bookstaver, M. L.; Lamichhane, T. N.; Sokic, S.; Liyasova, M. S.; O'Neill, M. et al. Engineered multivalency enhances affibody–based HER3 inhibition and downregulation in cancer cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2017, 14, 1047–1056.

28

Prakash, J. S.; Rajamanickam, K. Aptamers and their significant role in cancer therapy and diagnosis. Biomedicines 2015, 3, 248–269.

29

Wu, X.; Chen, J.; Wu, M.; Zhao, J. X. Aptamers: Active targeting ligands for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Theranostics 2015, 5, 322–344.

30

Hicke, B. J.; Stephens, A. W.; Gould, T.; Chang, Y. –F.; Lynott, C. K.; Heil, J.; Borkowski, S.; Hilger, C. –S.; Cook, G.; Warren, S. et al. Tumor targeting by an aptamer. J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 668–678.

31

Valetti, S.; Mura, S.; Noiray, M.; Arpicco, S.; Dosio, F.; Vergnaud, J.; Desmaële, D.; Stella, B.; Couvreur, P. Peptide conjugation: Before or after nanoparticle formation? Bioconjug. Chem. 2014, 25, 1971–1983.

32

Choi, H. S.; Liu, W. H.; Liu, F. B.; Nasr, K.; Misra, P.; Bawendi, M. G.; Frangioni, J. V. Design considerations for tumour–targeted nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 42–47.

33

Nasongkla, N.; Bey, E.; Ren, J. M.; Ai, H.; Khemtong, C.; Guthi, J. S.; Chin, S. F.; Sherry, A. D.; Boothman, D. A.; Gao, J. M. Multifunctional polymeric micelles as cancertargeted, MRI–ultrasensitive drug delivery systems. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2427–2430.

34

Xiong, X. B.; Lavasanifar, A. Traceable multifunctional micellar nanocarriers for cancer–targeted co–delivery of MDR–1 siRNA and doxorubicin. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 5202–5213.

35

Milane, L.; Duan, Z. F.; Amiji, M. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/lonidamine loaded EGFR–targeted nanoparticles for the treatment of multi–drug resistant cancer. PLoS One 2011, 6, e24075.

36

Milane, L.; Duan, Z. F.; Amiji, M. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of lonidamine/paclitaxel loaded, EGFR–targeted nanoparticles in an orthotopic animal model of multi–drug resistant breast cancer. Nanomedicine 2011, 7, 435–444.

37

Reddy, G. R.; Bhojani, M. S.; McConville, P.; Moody, J.; Moffat, B. A.; Hall, D. E.; Kim, G.; Koo, Y. E. L.; Woolliscroft, M. J.; Sugai, J. V. et al. Vascular targeted nanoparticles for imaging and treatment of brain tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 6677–6686.

38

Sanna, V.; Nurra, S.; Pala, N.; Marceddu, S.; Pathania, D.; Neamati, N.; Sechi, M. Targeted nanoparticles for the delivery of novel bioactive molecules to pancreatic cancer cells. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 5209–5220.

39

Aina, O. H.; Sroka, T. C.; Chen, M. L.; Lam, K. S. Therapeutic cancer targeting peptides. Biopolymers 2002, 66, 184–199.

40

Juliano, R. L.; Alam, R.; Dixit, V.; Kang, H. M. Celltargeting and cell–penetrating peptides for delivery of therapeutic and imaging agents. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2009, 1, 324–336.

41

Zwicke, G. L.; Mansoori, G. A.; Jeffery, C. J. Utilizing the folate receptor for active targeting of cancer nanotherapeutics. Nano Rev. 2012, 3, 18496.

42

Bazak, R.; Houri, M.; El Achy, S.; Kamel, S.; Refaat, T. Cancer active targeting by nanoparticles: A comprehensive review of literature. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 141, 769–784.

43

Wang, C.; Cheng, L.; Liu, Z. Drug delivery with upconversion nanoparticles for multi–functional targeted cancer cell imaging and therapy. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1110–1120.

44

Liu, T.; Zeng, L. L.; Jiang, W. T.; Fu, Y. T.; Zheng, W. J.; Chen, T. F. Rational design of cancer–targeted selenium nanoparticles to antagonize multidrug resistance in cancer cells. Nanomedicine 2015, 11, 947–958.

45

Yu, B.; Li, X. L.; Zheng, W. J.; Feng, Y. X.; Wong, Y. –S.; Chen, T. F. PH–responsive cancer–targeted selenium nanoparticles: A transformable drug carrier with enhanced theranostic effects. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 5409–5418.

46

Zhang, Q.; Wang, X. L.; Li, P. Z.; Nguyen, K. T.; Wang, X. J.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, H. C.; Tan, N. S.; Zhao, Y. L. Biocompatible, uniform, and redispersible mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer–targeted drug delivery in vivo. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2450–2461.

47

Huang, Y. Y.; He, L. Z.; Liu, W.; Fan, C. D.; Zheng, W. J.; Wong, Y. S.; Chen, T. F. Selective cellular uptake and induction of apoptosis of cancer–targeted selenium nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 7106–7116.

48

Valencia, P. M.; Pridgen, E. M.; Rhee, M.; Langer, R.; Farokhzad, O. C.; Karnik, R. Microfluidic platform for combinatorial synthesis and optimization of targeted nanoparticles for cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 10671–10680.

49

Assanhou, A. G.; Li, W. Y.; Zhang, L.; Xue, L. J.; Kong, L. Y.; Sun, H. B.; Mo, R.; Zhang, C. Reversal of multidrug resistance by co–delivery of paclitaxel and lonidamine using a tpgs and hyaluronic acid dual–functionalized liposome for cancer treatment. Biomaterials 2015, 73, 284–295.

50

Xiao, B.; Han, M. K.; Viennois, E.; Wang, L. X.; Zhang, M. Z.; Si, X. Y.; Merlin, D. Hyaluronic acid–functionalized polymeric nanoparticles for colon cancer–targeted combination chemotherapy. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 17745–17755.

51

Dai, Q.; Walkey, C.; Chan, W. C. W. Polyethylene glycol backfilling mitigates the negative impact of the protein corona on nanoparticle cell targeting. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5093–5096.

52

Zhou, H.; Fan, Z. Y.; Deng, J. J.; Lemons, P. K.; Arhontoulis, D. C.; Bowne, W. B.; Cheng, H. Hyaluronidase in nanocarrier PEG shell for enhanced tumor penetration and highly efficient antitumor efficacy. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 3268–3277.

53

Wilhelm, S.; Tavares, A. J.; Dai, Q.; Ohta, S.; Audet, J.; Dvorak, H. F.; Chan, W. C. W. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16014.

54

Hauert, S.; Berman, S.; Nagpal, R.; Bhatia, S. N. A computational framework for identifying design guidelines to increase the penetration of targeted nanoparticles into tumors. Nano Today 2013, 8, 566–576.

55

Kroll, A. V.; Fang, R. H.; Zhang, L. F. Biointerfacing and applications of cell membrane–coated nanoparticles. Bioconjug. Chem. 2017, 28, 23–32.

56

Verhoef, J. J.; Anchordoquy, T. J. Questioning the use of pegylation for drug delivery. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2013, 3, 499–503.

57

Rodriguez, P. L.; Harada, T.; Christian, D. A.; Pantano, D. A.; Tsai, R. K.; Discher, D. E. Minimal "self" peptides that inhibit phagocytic clearance and enhance delivery of nanoparticles. Science 2013, 339, 971–975.

58

Zhang, Z. H.; Chen, J.; Ding, L. L.; Jin, H.; Lovell, J. F.; Corbin, I. R.; Cao, W. G.; Lo, P. C.; Yang, M.; Tsao, M. S. et al. HDL–mimicking peptide–lipid nanoparticles with improved tumor targeting. Small 2010, 6, 430–437.

59

Li, J. H.; Ai, Y. W.; Wang, L. H.; Bu, P. C.; Sharkey, C. C.; Wu, Q. H.; Wun, B.; Roy, S.; Shen, X. L.; King, M. R. Targeted drug delivery to circulating tumor cells via platelet membrane–functionalized particles. Biomaterials 2016, 76, 52–65.

60

Rohovie, M. J.; Nagasawa, M.; Swartz, J. R. Virus–like particles: Next–generation nanoparticles for targeted therapeutic delivery. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2017, 2, 43–57.

61

Dehaini, D.; Wei, X.; Fang, R. H.; Masson, S.; Angsantikul, P.; Luk, B. T.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, M.; Jiang, Y.; Kroll, A. V. et al. Erythrocyte–platelet hybrid membrane coating for enhanced nanoparticle functionalization. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606209.

62

Zhu, J. Y.; Zheng, D. W.; Zhang, M. K.; Yu, W. Y.; Qiu, W. X.; Hu, J. J.; Feng, J.; Zhang, X. Z. Preferential cancer cell self–recognition and tumor self–targeting by coating nanoparticles with homotypic cancer cell membranes. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 5895–5901.

63

Hu, C. M. J.; Fang, R. H.; Wang, K. C.; Luk, B. T.; Thamphiwatana, S.; Dehaini, D.; Nguyen, P.; Angsantikul, P.; Wen, C. H.; Kroll, A. V. et al. Nanoparticle biointerfacing by platelet membrane cloaking. Nature 2015, 526, 118–121.

64

Hu, C. –M. J.; Zhang, L.; Aryal, S.; Cheung, C.; Fang, R. H.; Zhang, L. F. Erythrocyte membrane–camouflaged polymeric nanoparticles as a biomimetic delivery platform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 10980–10985.

65

Luk, B. T.; Zhang, L. F. Cell membrane–camouflaged nanoparticles for drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2015, 220, 600–607.

66
McMahon, K. M.; Foi, L.; Angeloni, N. L.; Giles, F. J.; Gordon, L. I.; Thaxton, C. S. Synthetic high–density lipoprotein–like nanoparticles as cancer therapy. In Nanotechnology–Based Precision Tools for the Detection and Treatment of Cancer; Mirkin, C. A.; Meade, T. J.; Petrosko, S. H.; Stegh, A. H., Eds.; Springer: Switzerland, 2015; Vol. 166, pp 129–150.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16555-4_6
67

Marrache, S.; Dhar, S. Biodegradable synthetic high–density lipoprotein nanoparticles for atherosclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 9445–9450.

68

McMahon, K. M.; Mutharasan, R. K.; Tripathy, S.; Veliceasa, D.; Bobeica, M.; Shumaker, D. K.; Luthi, A. J.; Helfand, B. T.; Ardehali, H.; Mirkin, C. A. et al. Biomimetic high density lipoprotein nanoparticles for nucleic acid delivery. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1208–1214.

69

Simberg, D.; Duza, T.; Park, J. H.; Essler, M.; Pilch, J.; Zhang, L. L.; Derfus, A. M.; Yang, M.; Hoffman, R. M.; Bhatia, S. et al. Biomimetic amplification of nanoparticle homing to tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 932–936.

70

Wei, X. L.; Gao, J.; Fang, R. H.; Luk, B. T.; Kroll, A. V; Dehaini, D.; Zhou, J. R.; Kim, H. W.; Gao, W. W.; Lu, W. Y. et al. Nanoparticles camouflaged in platelet membrane coating as an antibody decoy for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia. Biomaterials 2016, 111, 116–123.

71

Luk, B. T.; Fang, R. H.; Hu, C. M. J.; Copp, J. A.; Thamphiwatana, S.; Dehaini, D.; Gao, W. W.; Zhang, K.; Li, S. L.; Zhang, L. F. Safe and immunocompatible nanocarriers cloaked in RBC membranes for drug delivery to treat solid tumors. Theranostics 2016, 6, 1004–1011.

72

Lai, P. –Y.; Huang, R. –Y.; Lin, S. –Y.; Lin, Y. –H.; Chang, C. –W. Biomimetic stem cell membrane–camouflaged iron oxide nanoparticles for theranostic applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 98222–98230.

73

Parodi, A.; Quattrocchi, N.; Van De Ven, A. L.; Chiappini, C.; Evangelopoulos, M.; Martinez, J. O.; Brown, B. S.; Khaled, S. Z.; Yazdi, I. K.; Enzo, M. V. et al. Synthetic nanoparticles functionalized with biomimetic leukocyte membranes possess cell–like functions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 61–68.

74

Zhai, Y. H.; Su, J. H.; Ran, W.; Zhang, P. C.; Yin, Q.; Zhang, Z. W.; Yu, H. J.; Li, Y. P. Preparation and application of cell membrane–camouflaged nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Theranostics 2017, 7, 2575–2592.

75

Hu, Q. Y.; Sun, W. J.; Qian, C. G.; Wang, C.; Bomba, H. N.; Gu, Z. Anticancer platelet–mimicking nanovehicles. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7043–7050.

76

Toledano Furman, N. E.; Lupu–Haber, Y.; Bronshtein, T.; Kaneti, L.; Letko, N.; Weinstein, E.; Baruch, L.; Machluf, M. Reconstructed stem cell nanoghosts: A natural tumor targeting platform. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3248–3255.

77

Gao, C. Y.; Lin, Z. H.; Jurado–Sánchez, B.; Lin, X. K.; Wu, Z. G.; He, Q. Stem cell membrane–coated nanogels for highly efficient in vivo tumor targeted drug delivery. Small 2016, 12, 4056–4062.

78

Xuan, M. J.; Shao, J. X.; Dai, L. R.; He, Q.; Li, J. B. Macrophage cell membrane camouflaged mesoporous silica nanocapsules for in vivo cancer therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, 4, 1645–1652.

79

Beduneau, A.; Ma, Z.; Grotepas, C. B.; Kabanov, A.; Rabinow, B. E.; Gong, N.; Mosley, R. L.; Dou, H.; Boska, M. D.; Gendelman, H. E. Facilitated monocyte–macrophage uptake and tissue distribution of superparmagnetic iron–oxide nanoparticles. PLoS One 2009, 4, e4343.

80

Pascucci, L.; Coccè, V.; Bonomi, A.; Ami, D.; Ceccarelli, P.; Ciusani, E.; Viganò, L.; Locatelli, A.; Sisto, F.; Doglia, S. M. et al. Paclitaxel is incorporated by mesenchymal stromal cells and released in exosomes that inhibit in vitro tumor growth: A new approach for drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2014, 192, 262–270.

81

Ohno, S. I.; Takanashi, M.; Sudo, K.; Ueda, S.; Ishikawa, A.; Matsuyama, N.; Fujita, K.; Mizutani, T.; Ohgi, T.; Ochiya, T. et al. Systemically injected exosomes targeted to EGFR deliver antitumor microrna to breast cancer cells. Mol. Ther. 2013, 21, 185–191.

82

Tian, Y. H.; Li, S. P.; Song, J.; Ji, T. J.; Zhu, M. T.; Anderson, G. J.; Wei, J. Y.; Nie, G. J. A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 2383–2390.

83

Alhasan, A. H.; Patel, P. C.; Choi, C. H. J.; Mirkin, C. A. Exosome encased spherical nucleic acid gold nanoparticle conjugates as potent microRNA regulation agents. Small 2014, 10, 186–192.

84

Berleman, J.; Auer, M. The role of bacterial outer membrane vesicles for intra–and interspecies delivery. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 347–354.

85

Gujrati, V.; Kim, S.; Kim, S. H.; Min, J. J.; Choy, H. E.; Kim, S. C.; Jon, S. Bioengineered bacterial outer membrane vesicles as cell–specific drug–delivery vehicles for cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1525–1537.

86

Zhou, H.; Fan, Z. Y.; Lemons, P. K.; Cheng, H. A facile approach to functionalize cell membrane–coated nanoparticles. Theranostics 2016, 6, 1012–1022.

87

Xuan, M. J.; Shao, J. X.; Dai, L. R.; Li, J. B.; He, Q. Macrophage cell membrane camouflaged Au nanoshells for in vivo prolonged circulation life and enhanced cancer photothermal therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 9610–9618.

88

Chen, Z.; Zhao, P. F.; Luo, Z. Y.; Zheng, M. B.; Tian, H.; Gong, P.; Gao, G. H.; Pan, H.; Liu, L. L.; Ma, A. Q. et al. Cancer cell membrane–biomimetic nanoparticles for homologous–targeting dual–modal imaging and photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 10049–10057.

89

Sun, H. P.; Su, J. H.; Meng, Q. S.; Yin, Q.; Chen, L. L.; Gu, W. W.; Zhang, P. C.; Zhang, Z. W.; Yu, H. J.; Wang, S. L. et al. Cancer–cell–biomimetic nanoparticles for targeted therapy of homotypic tumors. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9581–9588.

90

Fang, R. H.; Hu, C. M. J.; Luk, B. T.; Gao, W. W.; Copp, J. A.; Tai, Y. Y.; O'Connor, D. E.; Zhang, L. F. Cancer cell membrane–coated nanoparticles for anticancer vaccination and drug delivery. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2181–2188.

91

Kennedy, L. C.; Bear, A. S.; Young, J. K.; Lewinski, N. A.; Kim, J.; Foster, A. E.; Drezek, R. A. T cells enhance gold nanoparticle delivery to tumors in vivo. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 283.

92

Sadhukha, T.; O'Brien, T. D.; Prabha, S. Nano–engineered mesenchymal stem cells as targeted therapeutic carriers. J. Control. Release 2014, 196, 243–251.

93

Choi, M. –R.; Stanton–Maxey, K. J.; Stanley, J. K.; Levin, C. S.; Bardhan, R.; Akin, D.; Badve, S.; Sturgis, J.; Robinson, J. P.; Bashir, R. et al. A cellular trojan horse for delivery of therapeutic nanoparticles into tumors. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 3759–3765.

94

Roger, M.; Clavreul, A.; Venier–Julienne, M. C.; Passirani, C.; Sindji, L.; Schiller, P.; Montero–Menei, C.; Menei, P. Mesenchymal stem cells as cellular vehicles for delivery of nanoparticles to brain tumors. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 8393–8401.

95

Pang, L.; Qin, J.; Han, L. M.; Zhao, W. J.; Liang, J. M.; Xie, Z. Y.; Yang, P.; Wang, J. X. Exploiting macrophages as targeted carrier to guide nanoparticles into glioma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 37081–37091.

96

Steinfeld, U.; Pauli, C.; Kaltz, N.; Bergemann, C.; Lee, H. H. T lymphocytes as potential therapeutic drug carrier for cancer treatment. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 311, 229–236.

97

Tan, S. W.; Wu, T. T.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Z. P. Cell or cell membrane–based drug delivery systems. Theranostics 2015, 5, 863–881.

98

Stephan, M. T.; Moon, J. J.; Um, S. H.; Bershteyn, A.; Irvine, D. J. Therapeutic cell engineering with surfaceconjugated synthetic nanoparticles. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 1035–1041.

99

Cheng, H.; Kastrup, C. J.; Ramanathan, R.; Siegwart, D. J.; Ma, M. L.; Bogatyrev, S. R.; Xu, Q. B.; Whitehead, K. A.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D. G. Nanoparticulate cellular patches for cell–mediated tumoritropic delivery. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 625–631.

100

de Almeida, C. E. B.; Nascimento Alves, L.; Rocha, H. F.; Cabral–Neto, J. B.; Missailidis, S. Aptamer delivery of siRNA, radiopharmaceutics and chemotherapy agents in cancer. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 525, 334–342.

101

Chen, S. Y.; Zhao, X. R.; Chen, J. Y.; Chen, J.; Kuznetsova, L.; Wong, S. S.; Ojima, I. Mechanism–based tumor–targeting drug delivery system. validation of efficient vitamin receptor–mediated endocytosis and drug release. Bioconjug. Chem. 2010, 21, 979–987.

102

Biabanikhankahdani, R.; Alitheen, N. B. M.; Ho, K. L.; Tan, W. S. PH–responsive virus–like nanoparticles with enhanced tumour–targeting ligands for cancer drug delivery. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37891.

103

Kelley, E. G.; Albert, J. N. L.; Sullivan, M. O.; Epps, T. H., Ⅲ. Stimuli–responsive copolymer solution and surface assemblies for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7057–7071.

104

Greco, C. T.; Epps, T. H.; Sullivan, M. O. Mechanistic design of polymer nanocarriers to spatiotemporally control gene silencing. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 1582–1594.

105

Scott, A. M.; Allison, J. P.; Wolchok, J. D. Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy. Cancer Immun. 2012, 12, 14.

106

Sanna, V.; Pala, N.; Sechi, M. Targeted therapy using nanotechnology: Focus on cancer. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2014, 9, 467–483.

107

Anselmo, A. C.; Mitragotri, S. Nanoparticles in the clinic. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2016, 1, 10–29.

108

Kennedy, P. J.; Oliveira, C.; Granja, P. L.; Sarmento, B. Antibodies and associates: Partners in targeted drug delivery. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 177, 129–145.

109

Bernardi, R. J.; Lowery, A. R.; Thompson, P. A.; Blaney, S. M.; West, J. L. Immunonanoshells for targeted photothermal ablation in medulloblastoma and glioma: An in vitro evaluation using human cell lines. J. Neurooncol. 2008, 86, 165–172.

110

Park, J. –H.; von Maltzahn, G.; Xu, M. J.; Fogal, V.; Kotamraju, V. R.; Ruoslahti, E.; Bhatia, S. N.; Sailor, M. J. Cooperative nanomaterial system to sensitize, target, and treat tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 981–986.

111

Rink, J. S.; Plebanek, M. P.; Tripathy, S.; Thaxton, C. S. Update on current and potential nanoparticle cancer therapies. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2013, 25, 646–651.

112

Akin, D.; Sturgis, J.; Ragheb, K.; Sherman, D.; Burkholder, K.; Robinson, J. P.; Bhunia, A. K.; Mohammed, S.; Bashir, R. Bacteria–mediated delivery of nanoparticles and cargo into cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 441–449.

113

Luo, C. H.; Huang, C. T.; Su, C. H.; Yeh, C. S. Bacteriamediated hypoxia–specific delivery of nanoparticles for tumors imaging and therapy. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 3493–3499.

114

Wegmann, U.; Carvalho, A. L.; Stocks, M.; Carding, S. R. Use of genetically modified bacteria for drug delivery in humans: Revisiting the safety aspect. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2294.

115

Blanco, E.; Shen, H. F.; Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 941–951.

116

Balmert, S. C.; Little, S. R. Biomimetic delivery with micro–and nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 3757–3778.

117

Meyer, R. A.; Sunshine, J. C.; Green, J. J. Biomimetic particles as therapeutics. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 514–524.

118
Kelly Scientific Publications. Advanced and Targeted DrugDelivery Market Segmentation, Analysis, & Forecastto 2021. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/m3gm88/advanced_and (accessed Mar 14, 2018).
119
Grand View Research. Nanomedicine Market Size Worth$350.8 Billion by 2025. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-nanomedicine-market (accessed Mar14, 2018).
120

Huang, C. C.; Chiang, C. K.; Lin, Z. H.; Lee, K. H.; Chang, H. T. Bioconjugated gold nanodots and nanoparticles for protein assays based on photoluminescence quenching. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1497–1504.

Nano Research
Pages 4999-5016
Cite this article:
Valcourt DM, Harris J, Riley RS, et al. Advances in targeted nanotherapeutics: From bioconjugation to biomimicry. Nano Research, 2018, 11(10): 4999-5016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-018-2083-z
Part of a topical collection:

930

Views

65

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

63

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 14 March 2018
Revised: 25 April 2018
Accepted: 26 April 2018
Published: 17 May 2018
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
Return