AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Nano Research Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article

Recent progress and perspective in additive manufacturing of EMI shielding functional polymer nanocomposites

Amirjalal Jalali1,2, Ruiyan Zhang3, Reza Rahmati2, Mohammadreza Nofar4, Mohini Sain1( ), Chul B. Park2( )
Center for Biocomposites & Biomaterials Processing, John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B3, Canada
Microcellular Plastics Manufacturing Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada
State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Materials, School of Materials and New Energy, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
Metallurgical & Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

This review summarizes the latest advancement in additive manufacturing of functional polymer nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding application.

Abstract

Because of rapid progress in the electronics industry, the market has faced a huge demand for novel materials in the field of electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding. Conductive functional polymer composites have demonstrated great potential to fulfill this requirement. To synthesize the polymeric composites, functional conductive nanoadditives such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, and MXene are commonly added to polymeric matrices, and the conductive polymer nanocomposites exhibit promising electrical conductivity as well as EMI shielding performance. Additive manufacturing (AM), also referred to as three-dimensional (3D) printing, has been increasingly employed to fabricate complicated geometry components in the medical, aerospace, and automotive industries. AM has also been used to fabricate advanced EMI shielding materials for sensors, supercapacitors, energy storage devices, and flexible electronics. This review aims at introducing the different 3D printing methods applied for the fabrication of EMI shielding polymer nanocomposites. The impact of the AM process on the functionality of the samples is also reviewed. Additionally, the influence of the nanofiller type and amount on the microstructure and performance of the fabricated nanocomposites is discussed. Finally, the prospects and recommended works for future study are outlined.

Keywords

additive manufacturingstretchable electronicselectromagnetic interference (EMI) shieldingfunctional polymer nanocomposites

References

[1]

Abbasi, H.; Antunes, M.; Velasco, J. I. Recent advances in carbon-based polymer nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 103, 319–373.
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]

Liu, S.; Qin, S. H.; Jiang, Y.; Song, P. G.; Wang, H. Lightweight high-performance carbon-polymer nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2021, 145, 106376.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]

Wei, L. F.; Ma, J. Z.; Ma, L.; Zhao, C. X.; Xu, M. L.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, W. B.; Zhang, L.; He, X.; Park, C. B. Computational optimizing the electromagnetic wave reflectivity of double-layered polymer nanocomposites. Small Methods 2022, 6, 2101510.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]

Wang, X. Y.; Ma, L.; Zhao, Q. W.; Hyun, B. G.; Liu, H. S.; Yu, L.; Wang, J.; Park, C. B. Flexible poly(ether-block-amide)/carbon nanotube composites for electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 7598–7608.
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]

Wang, G. L.; Wang, L.; Mark, L. H.; Shaayegan, V.; Wang, G. Z.; Li, H. P.; Zhao, G. Q.; Park, C. B. Ultralow-threshold and lightweight biodegradable porous PLA/MWCNT with segregated conductive networks for high-performance thermal insulation and electromagnetic interference shielding applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 1195–1203.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]

Panahi-Sarmad, M.; Noroozi, M.; Xiao, X. L.; Park, C. B. Recent advances in graphene-based polymer nanocomposites and foams for electromagnetic interference shielding applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022, 61, 1545–1568.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]

Hong, X. H.; Chung, D. D. L. Carbon nanofiber mats for electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 2017, 111, 529–537.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]

Sang, G. L.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Y.; He, G.; Zhang, Q. F.; Yang, M. H.; Zhao, S. H.; Xu, P.; Xi, X. Q.; Yang, J. L. Ni@CNTs/Al2O3 ceramic composites with interfacial solder strengthen the segregated network for high toughness and excellent electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 4443–4455.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]

Xu, Y. T.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, C. G.; Sun, W. J.; Dai, K.; Tang, J. H.; Lei, J.; Yan, D. X.; Li, Z. M. An electrically conductive polymer composite with a co-continuous segregated structure for enhanced mechanical performance. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 11546–11554.
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]

Geetha, S.; Kumar, K. K. S.; Rao, C. R. K.; Vijayan, M.; Trivedi, D. C. EMI shielding: Methods and materials—A review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 2073–2086.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]

Chung, D. D. L. Materials for electromagnetic interference shielding. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2000, 9, 350–354.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]

Zhao, B.; Hamidinejad, M.; Wang, S.; Bai, P. W.; Che, R. C.; Zhang, R.; Park, C. B. Advances in electromagnetic shielding properties of composite foams. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 8896–8949.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Pandey, R.; Tekumalla, S.; Gupta, M. Chapter 21—EMI shielding of metals, alloys, and composites. In Materials for Potential EMI Shielding Applications; Joseph, K.; Wilson, R.; George, G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2020; pp 341–355.
[14]

Lee, S. H.; Yu, S.; Shahzad, F.; Hong, J.; Noh, S. J.; Kim, W. N.; Hong, S. M.; Koo, C. M. Low percolation 3D Cu and Ag shell network composites for EMI shielding and thermal conduction. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 182, 107778.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]

Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B. L.; Li, K.; Zhao, G. L.; Guo, S. M. Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of high entropy AlCoCrFeNi alloy powder laden composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 734, 220–228.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]

Yao, Y. Y.; Jin, S. H.; Zou, H. M.; Li, L. J.; Ma, X. L.; Lv, G.; Gao, F.; Lv, X. J.; Shu, Q. H. Polymer-based lightweight materials for electromagnetic interference shielding: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 6549–6580.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]

Li, J. L.; Liu, X. X.; Feng, Y.; Yin, J. H. Recent progress in polymer/two-dimensional nanosheets composites with novel performances. Progr. Polym. Sci. 2022, 126, 101505.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]

Pang, H.; Xu, L.; Yan, D. X.; Li, Z. M. Conductive polymer composites with segregated structures. Progr. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 1908–1933.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]

Wang, M.; Tang, X. H.; Cai, J. H.; Wu, H.; Shen, J. B.; Guo, S. Y. Construction, mechanism and prospective of conductive polymer composites with multiple interfaces for electromagnetic interference shielding: A review. Carbon 2021, 177, 377–402.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]

Xu, Y. F.; Wang, X. J.; Hao, Q. A mini review on thermally conductive polymers and polymer-based composites. Compos. Commun. 2021, 24, 100617.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]

Shown, I.; Ganguly, A.; Chen, L. C.; Chen, K. H. Conducting polymer-based flexible supercapacitor. Energy Sci. Eng. 2015, 3, 2–26.
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]

Pande, S.; Chaudhary, A.; Patel, D.; Singh, B. P.; Mathur, R. B. Mechanical and electrical properties of multiwall carbon nanotube/polycarbonate composites for electrostatic discharge and electromagnetic interference shielding applications. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 13839–13849.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]

Chen, J. W.; Zhu, Y. T.; Huang, J. R.; Zhang, J. X.; Pan, D.; Zhou, J. Y.; Ryu, J. E.; Umar, A.; Guo, Z. H. Advances in responsively conductive polymer composites and sensing applications. Polym. Rev. 2021, 61, 157–193.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]

Wang, J. F.; Wang, J. R.; Kong, Z.; Lv, K. L.; Teng, C.; Zhu, Y. Conducting-polymer-based materials for electrochemical energy conversion and storage. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703044.
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]

Ma, T. B.; Ma, H.; Ruan, K. P.; Shi, X. T.; Qiu, H.; Gao, S. Y.; Gu, J. W. Thermally conductive poly(lactic acid) composites with superior electromagnetic shielding performances via 3D printing technology. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2022, 40, 248–255.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]

Elsheikh, A. H.; Panchal, H.; Shanmugan, S.; Muthuramalingam, T.; El-Kassas, A. M.; Ramesh, B. Recent progresses in wood-plastic composites: Pre-processing treatments, manufacturing techniques, recyclability and eco-friendly assessment. Cleaner Eng. Technol. 2022, 8, 100450.
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]

Feng, Y.; Xue, J. P.; Zhang, T. D.; Chi, Q. G.; Li, J. L.; Chen, Q. G.; Wang, J. J.; Chen, L. Q. Double-gradients design of polymer nanocomposites with high energy density. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 44, 73–81.
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Akpan, E. I.; Shen, X.; Wetzel, B.; Friedrich, K. 2—Design and synthesis of polymer nanocomposites. In Polymer Composites with Functionalized Nanoparticles; Pielichowski, K.; Majka, T. M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2019, pp 47–83.
[29]

Fu, S. Y.; Sun, Z.; Huang, P.; Li, Y. Q.; Hu, N. Some basic aspects of polymer nanocomposites: A critical review. Nano Mater. Sci. 2019, 1, 2–30.
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]

Bheema, R. K.; Vuba, K. K.; Etakula, N.; Etika, K. C. Enhanced thermo-mechanical, thermal and EMI shielding properties of MWNT/MAgPP/PP nanocomposites prepared by extrusion. Compos. Part C Open Access 2021, 4, 100086.
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]

Lee, S. H.; Lee, Y.; Jang, M. G.; Han, C. H.; Kim, W. N. Comparative study of EMI shielding effectiveness for carbon fiber pultruded polypropylene/poly(lactic acid)/multiwall CNT composites prepared by injection molding versus screw extrusion. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45222.
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]

Wang, G. L.; Zhao, G. Q.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Park, C. B. Injection-molded microcellular PLA/graphite nanocomposites with dramatically enhanced mechanical and electrical properties for ultra-efficient EMI shielding applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 6847–6859.
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]

Shaayegan, V.; Ameli, A.; Wang, S.; Park, C. B. Experimental observation and modeling of fiber rotation and translation during foam injection molding of polymer composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 88, 67–74.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]

Zou, K. K.; Yi, S. Q.; Li, X. Y.; Li, J.; Xu, Y. T.; Li, Z. M.; Yan, D. X.; Wang, H. L. Efficient electromagnetic interference shielding of flexible Ag microfiber sponge/polydimethylsiloxane composite constructed by blow spinning. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 220, 109281.
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]

Sharma, G. K.; James, N. R. Progress in electrospun polymer composite fibers for microwave absorption and electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl. Electr. Mater. 2021, 3, 4657–4680.
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]

El Moumen, A.; Tarfaoui, M.; Lafdi, K. Additive manufacturing of polymer composites: Processing and modeling approaches. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2019, 171, 166–182.
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]

Tan, L. J.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, K. Recent progress on polymer materials for additive manufacturing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2003062.
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]

Ligon, S. C.; Liska, R.; Stampfl, J.; Gurr, M.; Mülhaupt, R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 10212–10290.
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]

González-Henríquez, C. M.; Sarabia-Vallejos, M. A.; Rodriguez-Hernandez, J. Polymers for additive manufacturing and 4D-printing: Materials, methodologies, and biomedical applications. Progr. Polym. Sci. 2019, 94, 57–116.
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]

Singh, S.; Ramakrishna, S. Biomedical applications of additive manufacturing: Present and future. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 2, 105–115.
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Schiller, G. J. Additive manufacturing for aerospace. In 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 2015, pp 1–8.
[42]

Paolini, A.; Kollmannsberger, S.; Rank, E. Additive manufacturing in construction: A review on processes, applications, and digital planning methods. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 30, 100894.
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]

Böckin, D.; Tillman, A. M. Environmental assessment of additive manufacturing in the automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 226, 977–987.
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]

Mohammed, M. G.; Kramer, R. All-printed flexible and stretchable electronics. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604965.
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]

Yu, X. W.; Gong, X. T.; Podder, C.; Ludwig, B.; Chen, I. M.; Shou, W.; Alvidrez, A.; Chen, G. D.; Huang, X.; Pan, H. Additive manufacturing of sandwich-structured conductors for applications in flexible and stretchable electronics. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2021, 23, 2100286.
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Aswathi, M. K.; Rane, A. V.; Ajitha, A. R.; Thomas, S.; Jaroszewski, M. EMI shielding fundamentals. In Advanced Materials for Electromagnetic Shielding: Fundamentals, Properties, and Applications; Jaroszewski, M.; Thomas, S.; Rane, A. V., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: London, 2018; pp 1–9.
[47]

Wang, X. Y.; Liao, S. Y.; Wan, Y. J.; Zhu, P. L.; Hu, Y. G.; Zhao, T.; Sun, R.; Wong, C. P. Electromagnetic interference shielding materials: Recent progress, structure design, and future perspective. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 44–72.
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]

Wang, Y. Y.; Jing, X. L. Intrinsically conducting polymers for electromagnetic interference shielding. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2005, 16, 344–351.
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]

Verma, P.; Saini, P.; Choudhary, V. Designing of carbon nanotube/polymer composites using melt recirculation approach: Effect of aspect ratio on mechanical, electrical and EMI shielding response. Mater. Des. 2015, 88, 269–277.
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]

Duan, H. J.; Zhu, H. X.; Yang, J. M.; Gao, J. F.; Yang, Y. Q.; Xu, L.; Zhao, G. Z.; Liu, Y. Q. Effect of carbon nanofiller dimension on synergistic EMI shielding network of epoxy/metal conductive foams. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 118, 41–48.
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]

Drakakis, E.; Kymakis, E.; Tzagkarakis, G.; Louloudakis, D.; Katharakis, M.; Kenanakis, G.; Suchea, M.; Tudose, V.; Koudoumas, E. A study of the electromagnetic shielding mechanisms in the GHz frequency range of graphene based composite layers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 398, 15–18.
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]

Watanabe, A. O.; Raj, P. M.; Wong, D.; Mullapudi, R.; Tummala, R. Multilayered electromagnetic interference shielding structures for suppressing magnetic field coupling. J. Electr. Mater. 2018, 47, 5243–5250.
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]

Kruželák, J.; Kvasničáková, A.; Hložeková, K.; Hudec, I. Progress in polymers and polymer composites used as efficient materials for EMI shielding. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 123–172.
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]

Luo, X. G.; Pu, M. B.; Guo, Y. H.; Li, X.; Zhang, F.; Ma, X. L. Catenary functions meet electromagnetic waves: Opportunities and promises. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 2001194.
Crossref Google Scholar
[55]

Kragh, H. The Lorenz–Lorentz formula: Origin and early history. Substantia 2018, 2, 7–18.
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]

Wang, H.; Li, S. N.; Liu, M. Y.; Li, J. H.; Zhou, X. Review on shielding mechanism and structural design of electromagnetic interference shielding composites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021, 306, 2100032.
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]

Chakradhary, V. K.; Juneja, S.; Akhtar, M. J. Correlation between EMI shielding and reflection loss mechanism for carbon nanofiber/epoxy nanocomposite. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101386.
Crossref Google Scholar
[58]

Saini, P.; Choudhary, V.; Singh, B. P.; Mathur, R. B.; Dhawan, S. K. Polyaniline-MWCNT nanocomposites for microwave absorption and EMI shielding. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 113, 919–926.
Crossref Google Scholar
[59]

Sun, B. B.; Sun, S. J.; He, P.; Mi, H. Y.; Dong, B. B.; Liu, C. T.; Shen, C. Y. Asymmetric layered structural design with segregated conductive network for absorption-dominated high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 416, 129083.
Crossref Google Scholar
[60]

Kumar, A.; Alegaonkar, P. S. Impressive transmission mode electromagnetic interference shielding parameters of graphene-like nanocarbon/polyurethane nanocomposites for short range tracking countermeasures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 14833–14842.
Crossref Google Scholar
[61]

Lan, C. T.; Zou, L. H.; Wang, N.; Qiu, Y. P.; Ma, Y. Multi-reflection-enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding performance of conductive nanocomposite coatings on fabrics. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 590, 467–475.
Crossref Google Scholar
[62]

Al-Saleh, M. H.; Sundararaj, U. Electromagnetic interference shielding mechanisms of CNT/polymer composites. Carbon 2009, 47, 1738–1746.
Crossref Google Scholar
[63]

Shen, B.; Li, Y.; Zhai, W. T.; Zheng, W. G. Compressible graphene-coated polymer foams with ultralow density for adjustable electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 8050–8057.
Crossref Google Scholar
[64]

Liu, Z. F.; Bai, G.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Y. F.; Du, F.; Li, F. F.; Guo, T. Y.; Chen, Y. S. Reflection and absorption contributions to the electromagnetic interference shielding of single-walled carbon nanotube/polyurethane composites. Carbon 2007, 45, 821–827.
Crossref Google Scholar
[65]

Hong, Y. K.; Lee, C. Y.; Jeong, C. K.; Lee, D. E.; Kim, K.; Joo, J. Method and apparatus to measure electromagnetic interference shielding efficiency and its shielding characteristics in broadband frequency ranges. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2003, 74, 1098–1102.
Crossref Google Scholar
[66]
Kondawar, S. B.; Modak, P. R. Chapter 2—Theory of EMI shielding. In Materials for Potential EMI Shielding Applications; Joseph, K.; Wilson, R.; George, G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2020; pp 9–25.
[67]

Arjmand, M.; Apperley, T.; Okoniewski, M.; Sundararaj, U. Comparative study of electromagnetic interference shielding properties of injection molded versus compression molded multi-walled carbon nanotube/polystyrene composites. Carbon 2012, 50, 5126–5134.
Crossref Google Scholar
[68]

Madrid, A. P. M.; Vrech, S. M.; Sanchez, M. A.; Rodriguez, A. P. Advances in additive manufacturing for bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 100, 631–644.
Crossref Google Scholar
[69]

Hart, K. R.; Frketic, J. B.; Brown, J. R. Recycling meal-ready-to-eat (MRE) pouches into polymer filament for material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21, 536–543.
Crossref Google Scholar
[70]

Beaman, J. J.; Bourell, D. L.; Seepersad, C. C.; Kovar, D. Additive manufacturing review: Early past to current practice. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2020, 142, 110812.
Crossref Google Scholar
[71]

Bourell, D.; Kruth, J. P.; Leu, M.; Levy, G.; Rosen, D.; Beese, A. M.; Clare, A. Materials for additive manufacturing. CIRP Ann. 2017, 66, 659–681.
Crossref Google Scholar
[72]

Herzog, D.; Seyda, V.; Wycisk, E.; Emmelmann, C. Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater. 2016, 117, 371–392.
Crossref Google Scholar
[73]

Frazier, W. E. Metal additive manufacturing: A review. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2014, 23, 1917–1928.
Crossref Google Scholar
[74]

Zocca, A.; Colombo, P.; Gomes, C. M.; Günster, J. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: Issues, potentialities, and opportunities. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 1983–2001.
Crossref Google Scholar
[75]

Melchels, F. P. W.; Domingos, M. A. N.; Klein, T. J.; Malda, J.; Bartolo, P. J.; Hutmacher, D. W. Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Progr. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1079–1104.
Crossref Google Scholar
[76]

Kabb, C. P.; O’Bryan, C. S.; Deng, C. C.; Angelini, T. E.; Sumerlin, B. S. Photoreversible covalent hydrogels for soft-matter additive manufacturing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 16793–16801.
Crossref Google Scholar
[77]

Park, S. H.; Su, R. T.; Jeong, J.; Guo, S. Z.; Qiu, K. Y.; Joung, D.; Meng, F. B.; Mcalpine, M. C. 3D printed polymer photodetectors. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1803980.
Crossref Google Scholar
[78]
Lucyszyn, S.; Shang, X. B.; Otter, W. J.; Myant, C. W.; Cheng, R.; Ridler, N. M. Polymer-based 3D printed millimeter-wave components for spacecraft payloads. In 2018 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2018, pp 1–3.
[79]
Najmon, J. C.; Raeisi, S.; Tovar, A. Review of additive manufacturing technologies and applications in the aerospace industry. In Additive Manufacturing for the Aerospace Industry; Froes, F.; Boyer, R., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2019; pp 7–31.
[80]

Kumar, S.; Kruth, J. P. Composites by rapid prototyping technology. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 850–856.
Crossref Google Scholar
[81]
Safari, A.; Ebrahimi, M.; Turcu, S.; Hall, A.; Brennan, R.; Hagh, N. M. Layered manufacturing for prototyping of novel transducers. In 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings, Munich, Germany, 2002, pp 1087–1096.
[82]

Chatham, C. A.; Long, T. E.; Williams, C. B. A review of the process physics and material screening methods for polymer powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Progr. Polym. Sci. 2019, 93, 68–95.
Crossref Google Scholar
[83]
Bain, E. D. Polymer powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: Recent developments in materials, processes, and applications. In Polymer-Based Additive Manufacturing: Recent Developments; Seppala, J. E.; Kotula, A. P.; Snyder, C. R., Eds.; American Chemical Society: USA, 2019; pp 7–36.
[84]

Fina, F.; Goyanes, A.; Gaisford, S.; Basit, A. W. Selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing of medicines. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 529, 285–293.
Crossref Google Scholar
[85]

Mohamed, O. A.; Masood, S. H.; Bhowmik, J. L. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: A review of current research and future prospects. Adv. Manuf. 2015, 3, 42–53.
Crossref Google Scholar
[86]

Daminabo, S. C.; Goel, S.; Grammatikos, S. A.; Nezhad, H. Y.; Thakur, V. K. Fused deposition modeling-based additive manufacturing (3D printing): Techniques for polymer material systems. Mater. Today Chem. 2020, 16, 100248.
Crossref Google Scholar
[87]

Gao, X.; Qi, S. X.; Kuang, X.; Su, Y. L.; Li, J.; Wang, D. J. Fused filament fabrication of polymer materials: A review of interlayer bond. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 37, 101658.
Crossref Google Scholar
[88]

Brenken, B.; Barocio, E.; Favaloro, A.; Kunc, V.; Pipes, R. B. Fused filament fabrication of fiber-reinforced polymers: A review. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21, 1–16.
Crossref Google Scholar
[89]

Singh, S.; Singh, G.; Prakash, C.; Ramakrishna, S. Current status and future directions of fused filament fabrication. J. Manuf. Process. 2020, 55, 288–306.
Crossref Google Scholar
[90]
Addtive Blog. FDM – Fused deposition modeling (or FFF, PJP, LDP). https://www.additive.blog/knowledge-base/3d-printers/fdm-fused-deposition-modeling-fff-pjp-lpd/ (accessed Jul 1, 2022).
[91]

Cesarano, J.; Steve G. Robocasting: A new technique for the freeform fabrication of near-net-shape ceramics. Mater. Technol. 1997, 12, 98–100.
Crossref Google Scholar
[92]

Li, L. Y.; Lin, Q. M.; Tang, M.; Duncan, A. J. E.; Ke, C. F. Advanced polymer designs for direct-ink-write 3D printing. Chem. —Eur. J. 2019, 25, 10768.
Crossref Google Scholar
[93]

Lewis, J. A. Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 2193–2204.
Crossref Google Scholar
[94]

Tagliaferri, S.; Panagiotopoulos, A.; Mattevi, C. Direct ink writing of energy materials. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 540–563.
Crossref Google Scholar
[95]

Nguyen, T. H. M.; Jeong, T. H.; Kim, S. Y.; Kim, K. B.; Ha, T. H.; Ahn, S. J.; Kim, Y. H. Porous structures prepared by a novel route: Combination of digital light processing 3D printing and leaching method. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 67, 46–51.
Crossref Google Scholar
[96]

Li, Y.; Mao, Q. J.; Yin, J.; Wang, Y. F.; Fu, J. Z.; Huang, Y. Theoretical prediction and experimental validation of the digital light processing (DLP) working curve for photocurable materials. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 37, 101716.
Crossref Google Scholar
[97]

Manapat, J. Z.; Chen, Q. Y.; Ye, P. R.; Advincula, R. C. 3D printing of polymer nanocomposites via stereolithography. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1600553.
Crossref Google Scholar
[98]

Jabari, E.; Liravi, F.; Davoodi, E.; Lin, L. W.; Toyserkani, E. High speed 3D material-jetting additive manufacturing of viscous graphene-based ink with high electrical conductivity. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 35, 101330.
Crossref Google Scholar
[99]

Markandan, K.; Lai, C. Q. Enhanced mechanical properties of 3D printed graphene–polymer composite lattices at very low graphene concentrations. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2020, 129, 105726.
Crossref Google Scholar
[100]

Hwang, S.; Reyes, E. I.; Moon, K. S.; Rumpf, R. C.; Kim, N. S. Thermo-mechanical characterization of metal/polymer composite filaments and printing parameter study for fused deposition modeling in the 3D printing process. J. Electr. Mater. 2015, 44, 771–777.
Crossref Google Scholar
[101]

Valino, A. D.; Dizon, J. R. C.; Espera, A. H.; Chen, Q. Y.; Messman, J.; Advincula, R. C. Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites. Progr. Polym. Sci. 2019, 98, 101162.
Crossref Google Scholar
[102]

Saeed, K.; McIlhagger, A.; Harkin-Jones, E.; Kelly, J.; Archer, E. Predication of the in-plane mechanical properties of continuous carbon fibre reinforced 3D printed polymer composites using classical laminated-plate theory. Compos. Struct. 2021, 259, 113226.
Crossref Google Scholar
[103]

Valvez, S.; Silva, A. P.; Reis, P. N. B.; Berto, F. Annealing effect on mechanical properties of 3D printed composites. Proced. Struct. Integr. 2022, 37, 738–745.
Crossref Google Scholar
[104]

Christiyan, K. G. J.; Chandrasekhar, U.; Venkateswarlu, K. A study on the influence of process parameters on the mechanical properties of 3D printed ABS composite. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 114, 012109.
Crossref Google Scholar
[105]

Wang, S. H.; Ma, Y. B.; Deng, Z. C.; Zhang, S.; Cai, J. X. Effects of fused deposition modeling process parameters on tensile, dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid materials. Polym. Test. 2020, 86, 106483.
Crossref Google Scholar
[106]

Papon, E. A.; Haque, A.; Spear, S. K. Effects of functionalization and annealing in enhancing the interfacial bonding and mechanical properties of 3D printed fiber-reinforced composites. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101365.
Crossref Google Scholar
[107]

Banjo, A. D.; Agrawal, V.; Auad, M. L.; Celestine, A. D. N. Moisture-induced changes in the mechanical behavior of 3D printed polymers. Compos. Part C Open Access 2022, 7, 100243.
Crossref Google Scholar
[108]

Tanveer, Q.; Mishra, G.; Mishra, S.; Sharma, R. Effect of infill pattern and infill density on mechanical behaviour of FDM 3D printed parts—A current review. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 62, 100–108.
Crossref Google Scholar
[109]

Pop, M. A.; Zaharia, S. M.; Chicos, L. A.; Lancea, C.; Stamate, V. M.; Buican, G. R.; Pascariu, I. S. Effect of the infill patterns on the mechanical properties of the carbon fiber 3D printed parts. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 1235, 012006.
Crossref Google Scholar
[110]

Fischer, D.; Eßbach, C.; Schönherr, R.; Dietrich, D.; Nickel, D. Improving inner structure and properties of additive manufactured amorphous plastic parts: The effects of extrusion nozzle diameter and layer height. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 51, 102596.
Crossref Google Scholar
[111]

Vidakis, N.; Petousis, M.; Kechagias, J. D. A comprehensive investigation of the 3D printing parameters’ effects on the mechanical response of polycarbonate in fused filament fabrication. Progr. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 7, 713–722.
Crossref Google Scholar
[112]

Zhu, Y. W.; Murali, S.; Cai, W. W.; Li, X. S.; Suk, J. W.; Potts, J. R.; Ruoff, R. S. Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924.
Crossref Google Scholar
[113]

Potts, J. R.; Dreyer, D. R.; Bielawski, C. W.; Ruoff, R. S. Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 2011, 52, 5–25.
Crossref Google Scholar
[114]

Chen, Y.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T.; Zhang, L. K.; Meng, F. B. Recent advances in graphene-based films for electromagnetic interference shielding: Review and future prospects. Carbon 2021, 180, 163–184.
Crossref Google Scholar
[115]

Yang, L.; Chen, Y. H.; Wang, M.; Shi, S. H.; Jing, J. J. Fused deposition modeling 3D printing of novel poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene nanocomposite with enhanced mechanical and electromagnetic interference shielding properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 8066–8077.
Crossref Google Scholar
[116]

Wang, Z. Y.; Yang, W. Z.; Liu, R.; Zhang, X. L.; Nie, H. Y.; Liu, Y. Highly stretchable graphene/polydimethylsiloxane composite lattices with tailored structure for strain-tolerant EMI shielding performance. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 206, 108652.
Crossref Google Scholar
[117]

Wajahat, M.; Kim, J. H.; Ahn, J.; Lee, S.; Bae, J.; Pyo, J.; Seol, S. K. 3D printing of Fe3O4 functionalized graphene-polymer (FGP) composite microarchitectures. Carbon 2020, 167, 278–284.
Crossref Google Scholar
[118]

Jing, J. J.; Xiong, Y.; Shi, S. H.; Pei, H. R.; Chen, Y. H.; Lambin, P. Facile fabrication of lightweight porous FDM-printed polyethylene/graphene nanocomposites with enhanced interfacial strength for electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 207, 108732.
Crossref Google Scholar
[119]

Lee, K. P. M.; Baum, T.; Shanks, R.; Daver, F. Graphene-polyamide-6 composite for additive manufacture of multifunctional electromagnetic interference shielding components. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 49909.
Crossref Google Scholar
[120]

Lee, K. P. M.; Baum, T.; Shanks, R.; Daver, F. Electromagnetic interference shielding of 3D-printed graphene-polyamide-6 composites with 3D-printed morphology. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 43, 102020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[121]

Shi, S. H.; Peng, Z. L.; Jing, J. J.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y. H.; Kotsilkova, R.; Ivanov, E. Preparation of highly efficient electromagnetic interference shielding polylactic acid/graphene nanocomposites for fused deposition modeling three-dimensional printing. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 15565–15575.
Crossref Google Scholar
[122]

Li, Y. C.; Huang, X. R.; Zeng, L. J.; Li, R. F.; Tian, H. F.; Fu, X. W.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, W. H. A review of the electrical and mechanical properties of carbon nanofiller-reinforced polymer composites. J. Mater. Sci., 2019, 54, 1036–1076.
Crossref Google Scholar
[123]

Zhu, Y.; Bakis, C. E.; Adair, J. H. Effects of carbon nanofiller functionalization and distribution on interlaminar fracture toughness of multi-scale reinforced polymer composites. Carbon 2012, 50, 1316–1331.
Crossref Google Scholar
[124]

Zhang, R. W.; Moon, K. S.; Lin, W.; Agar, J. C.; Wong, C. P. A simple, low-cost approach to prepare flexible highly conductive polymer composites by in situ reduction of silver carboxylate for flexible electronic applications. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 528–534.
Crossref Google Scholar
[125]

Xu, D. W.; Chen, W. H.; Liu, P. J. Enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding and mechanical properties of segregated polymer/carbon nanotube composite via selective microwave sintering. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2020, 199, 108355.
Crossref Google Scholar
[126]

Feng, D.; Wang, Q. Q.; Xu, D. W.; Liu, P. J. Microwave assisted sinter molding of polyetherimide/carbon nanotubes composites with segregated structure for high-performance EMI shielding applications. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 182, 107753.
Crossref Google Scholar
[127]

Sun, X.; He, J. P.; Li, G. X.; Tang, J.; Guo, Y. X.; Xue, H. R. Laminated magnetic graphene with enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption properties. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 765–777.
Crossref Google Scholar
[128]

Zhan, Y. H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, K. Y.; Li, Y. C.; Meng, Y. Y.; Yan, N.; Wei, W. K.; Peng, F. B.; Xia, H. S. Fabrication of a flexible electromagnetic interference shielding Fe3O4@reduced graphene oxide/natural rubber composite with segregated network. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 344, 184–193.
Crossref Google Scholar
[129]

Fei, Y.; Liang, M.; Chen, Y.; Zou, H. W. Sandwich-like magnetic graphene papers prepared with MOF-derived Fe3O4-C for absorption-dominated electromagnetic interference shielding. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 154–165.
Crossref Google Scholar
[130]

Zhu, S. M.; Guo, J. J.; Dong, J. P.; Cui, Z. W.; Lu, T.; Zhu, C. L.; Zhang, D.; Ma, J. Sonochemical fabrication of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide for biosensors. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2013, 20, 872–880.
Crossref Google Scholar
[131]

He, C. N.; Wu, S.; Zhao, N. Q.; Shi, C. S.; Liu, E. Z.; Li, J. J. Carbon-encapsulated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a high-rate lithium ion battery anode material. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4459–4469.
Crossref Google Scholar
[132]

Liu, Y. J.; Song, D.; Wu, C. X.; Leng, J. S. EMI shielding performance of nanocomposites with MWCNTs, nanosized Fe3O4 and Fe. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 63, 34–40.
Crossref Google Scholar
[133]

Tang, X.; Jia, R. Y.; Zhai, T.; Xia, H. Hierarchical Fe3O4@Fe2O3 core–shell nanorod arrays as high-performance anodes for asymmetric supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 27518–27525.
Crossref Google Scholar
[134]

Li, H. C.; Yang, S. Q.; Hui, D.; Hong, R. Y. Progress in magnetic Fe3O4 nanomaterials in magnetic resonance imaging. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2020, 9, 1265–1283.
Crossref Google Scholar
[135]

Liu, X. M.; Huang, Z. D.; Oh, S. W.; Zhang, B.; Ma, P. C.; Yuen, M. M. F.; Kim, J. K. Carbon nanotube (CNT)-based composites as electrode material for rechargeable Li-ion batteries: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 121–144.
Crossref Google Scholar
[136]

Soni, S. K.; Thomas, B.; Kar, V. R. A comprehensive review on CNTs and CNT-reinforced composites: Syntheses, characteristics and applications. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101546.
Crossref Google Scholar
[137]

Ma, C. P.; Siddiqui, N. A.; Marom, G.; Kim, J. K. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: A review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 1345–1367.
Crossref Google Scholar
[138]

Spitalsky, Z.; Tasis, D.; Papagelis, K.; Galiotis, C. Carbon nanotube-polymer composites: Chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties. Progr. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 357–401.
Crossref Google Scholar
[139]

Chizari, K.; Arjmand, M.; Liu, Z.; Sundararaj, U.; Therriault, D. Three-dimensional printing of highly conductive polymer nanocomposites for EMI shielding applications. Mater. Today Commun. 2017, 11, 112–118.
Crossref Google Scholar
[140]

Wang, Y.; Fan, Z. W.; Zhang, H.; Guo, J.; Yan, D. X.; Wang, S. F.; Dai, K.; Li, Z. M. 3D-printing of segregated carbon nanotube/polylactic acid composite with enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding and mechanical performance. Mater. Des. 2021, 197, 109222.
Crossref Google Scholar
[141]

Verma, P.; Bansala, T.; Chauhan, S. S.; Kumar, D.; Deveci, S.; Kumar, S. Electromagnetic interference shielding performance of carbon nanostructure reinforced, 3D printed polymer composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 11769–11788.
Crossref Google Scholar
[142]

Lei, D. D.; Liu, N. S.; Su, T. Y.; Zhang, Q. X.; Wang, L. X.; Ren, Z. Q.; Gao, Y. H. Roles of MXene in pressure sensing: Preparation, composite structure design, and mechanism. Adv. Mater. 2022, 2110608.
Crossref Google Scholar
[143]

Halim, J.; Kota, S.; Lukatskaya, M. R.; Naguib, M.; Zhao, M. Q.; Moon, E. J.; Pitock, J.; Nanda, J.; May, S. J.; Gogotsi, Y. et al. Synthesis and characterization of 2D molybdenum carbide (MXene). Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 3118–3127.
Crossref Google Scholar
[144]

Shuck, C. E.; Sarycheva, A.; Anayee, M.; Levitt, A.; Zhu, Y. Z.; Uzun, S.; Balitskiy, V.; Zahorodna, V.; Gogotsi, O.; Gogotsi, Y. Scalable synthesis of Ti3C2Tx MXene. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2020, 22, 1901241.
Crossref Google Scholar
[145]

Ma, C.; Ma, M. G.; Si, C. L.; Ji, X. X.; Wan, P. B. Flexible MXene-based composites for wearable devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2009524.
Crossref Google Scholar
[146]

Yang, J.; Bao, W. Z.; Jaumaux, P.; Zhang, S. T.; Wang, C. Y.; Wang, G. X. MXene-based composites: Synthesis and applications in rechargeable batteries and supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1802004.
Crossref Google Scholar
[147]

Gong, K. L.; Zhou, K. Q.; Qian, X. D.; Shi, C. L.; Yu, B. MXene as emerging nanofillers for high-performance polymer composites: A review. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 217, 108867.
Crossref Google Scholar
[148]

Riazi, H.; Taghizadeh, G.; Soroush, M. MXene-based nanocomposite sensors. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 11103–11112.
Crossref Google Scholar
[149]

Wang, Y. X.; Yue, Y.; Cheng, F.; Cheng, Y. F.; Ge, B. H.; Liu, N. S.; Gao, Y. H. Ti3C2Tx MXene-based flexible piezoresistive physical sensors. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 1734–1758.
Crossref Google Scholar
[150]

Iravani, S.; Varma, R. S. MXenes and MXene-based materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Recent advances. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 2906–2917.
Crossref Google Scholar
[151]

Liu, H. J.; Dong, B. Recent advances and prospects of MXene-based materials for electrocatalysis and energy storage. Mater. Today Phys. 2021, 20, 100469.
Crossref Google Scholar
[152]

Hong, S. Y.; Sun, Y.; Lee, J.; Ma, Y. F.; Wang, M.; Nam, J. D.; Suhr, J. 3D printing of free-standing Ti3C2Tx/PEO architecture for electromagnetic interference shielding. Polymer 2021, 236, 124312.
Crossref Google Scholar
[153]

Shi, H.; Liu, C. C.; Jiang, Q. L.; Xu, J. K. Effective approaches to improve the electrical conductivity of PEDOT:PSS: A review. Adv. Electr. Mater. 2015, 1, 1500017.
Crossref Google Scholar
[154]

Fan, Z.; Ouyang, J. Y. Thermoelectric properties of PEDOT:PSS. Adv. Electr. Mater. 2019, 5, 1800769.
Crossref Google Scholar
[155]

Xia, Y. J.; Dai, S. Y. Review on applications of PEDOTs and PEDOT:PSS in perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electr. 2021, 32, 12746–12757.
Crossref Google Scholar
[156]

Manjakkal, L.; Pullanchiyodan, A.; Yogeswaran, N.; Hosseini, E. S.; Dahiya, R. A wearable supercapacitor based on conductive PEDOT:PSS-coated cloth and a sweat electrolyte. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907254.
Crossref Google Scholar
[157]

Xu, S. D.; Hong, M.; Shi, X. L.; Wang, Y.; Ge, L.; Bai, Y.; Wang, L. Z.; Dargusch, M.; Zou, J.; Chen, Z. G. High-performance PEDOT:PSS flexible thermoelectric materials and their devices by triple post-treatments. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 5238–5244.
Crossref Google Scholar
[158]

Salar-Garcia, M. J.; Montilla, F.; Quijada, C.; Morallon, E.; Ieropoulos, I. Improving the power performance of urine-fed microbial fuel cells using PEDOT-PSS modified anodes. Appl. Energy 2020, 278, 115528.
Crossref Google Scholar
[159]

Kayser, L. V.; Lipomi, D. J. Stretchable conductive polymers and composites based on PEDOT and PEDOT:PSS. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1806133.
Crossref Google Scholar
[160]

Liu, J.; Mckeon, L.; Garcia, J.; Pinilla, S.; Barwich, S.; Möbius, M.; Stamenov, P.; Coleman, J. N.; Nicolosi, V. Additive manufacturing of Ti3C2-MXene-functionalized conductive polymer hydrogels for electromagnetic-interference shielding. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2106253.
Crossref Google Scholar
[161]

Yang, Y.; Deng, H.; Fu, Q. Recent progress on PEDOT:PSS based polymer blends and composites for flexible electronics and thermoelectric devices. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 3130–3152.
Crossref Google Scholar
[162]

Chen, J. W.; Li, H.; Yu, Q. Z.; Hu, Y. M.; Cui, X. H.; Zhu, Y. T.; Jiang, W. Strain sensing behaviors of stretchable conductive polymer composites loaded with different dimensional conductive fillers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 168, 388–396.
Crossref Google Scholar
[163]

Luo, X. L.; Yang, G. D.; Schubert, D. W. Electrically conductive polymer composite containing hybrid graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes: Synergistic effect and tunable conductivity anisotropy. Adv. Compos. Hybr. Mater. 2022, 5, 250–262.
Crossref Google Scholar
[164]

Shi, S. H.; Peng, Z. L.; Jing, J. J.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y. H. 3D printing of delicately controllable cellular nanocomposites based on polylactic acid incorporating graphene/carbon nanotube hybrids for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 7962–7972.
Crossref Google Scholar
[165]

Ecco, L. G.; Dul, S.; Schmitz, D. P.; Barra, G. M. D. O.; Soares, B. G.; Fambri, L.; Pegoretti, A. Rapid prototyping of efficient electromagnetic interference shielding polymer composites via fused deposition modeling. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 37.
Crossref Google Scholar
[166]

Schmitz, D. P.; Ecco, L. G.; Dul, S.; Pereira, E. C. L.; Soares, B. G.; Barra, G. M. O.; Pegoretti, A. Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of ABS carbon-based composites manufactured via fused deposition modelling. Mater. Today Commun. 2018, 15, 70–80.
Crossref Google Scholar
[167]

Wang, Z. Y.; Ren, J.; Liu, R.; Sun, X. H.; Huang, D. D.; Xu, W.; Jiang, J.; Ma, K. X.; Liu, Y. Three dimensional core–shell structured liquid metal/elastomer composite via coaxial direct ink writing for electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2020, 136, 105957.
Crossref Google Scholar
[168]

Lee, J. W. 3D nanoprinting technologies for tissue engineering applications. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 213521.
Crossref Google Scholar
[169]

Pattison, T. G.; Wang, S.; Miller, R. D.; Liu, G. Y.; Qiao, G. G. 3D nanoprinting via spatially controlled assembly and polymerization. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1941.
Crossref Google Scholar
Nano Research
Volume 16 Issue 1,
January 2023
Pages 1-17
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-5053-4
Cite this article:
Jalali A, Zhang R, Rahmati R, et al. Recent progress and perspective in additive manufacturing of EMI shielding functional polymer nanocomposites. Nano Research, 2023, 16(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-5053-4
Topics:
CarbonFabrication
Part of a topical collection:
EM Wave Functional Materials

4637

Views

40

Crossref

26

Web of Science

32

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 01 July 2022
Revised: 28 August 2022
Accepted: 14 September 2022
Published: 14 November 2022
© Tsinghua University Press 2022
Return