AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Ruthenium-lead oxide for acidic oxygen evolution reaction in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis

Feng-Yang Chen1,§Chang Qiu1,§Zhen-Yu Wu1,§Tae-Ung Wi1Y. Zou Finfrock2Haotian Wang1,3,4( )
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
Structural Biology Center, X-ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA
Department of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA

§ Feng-Yang Chen, Chang Qiu, and Zhen-Yu Wu contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

We design a Ru-based oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalyst incorporating Pb as a supporting element, lowering the Ru noble metal loading while delivering a better activity and stability, maintaining up to 300 h of stability in a proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer.

Abstract

Developing an active and stable anode catalyst for the proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer (PEM-WE) is a critical objective to enhance the economic viability of green hydrogen technology. However, the expensive iridium-based electrocatalyst remains the sole practical material with industrial-level stability for the acidic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the anode. Ruthenium-based catalysts have been proposed as more cost-effective alternatives with improved activity, though their stability requires enhancement. The current urgent goal is to reduce costs and noble metal loading of the OER catalyst while maintaining robust activity and stability. In this study, we design a Ru-based OER catalyst incorporating Pb as a supporting element. This electrocatalyst exhibits an OER overpotential of 201 mV at 10 mA·cm−2, simultaneously reducing Ru noble metal loading by ~ 40%. Normalization of the electrochemically active surface area unveils improved intrinsic activity compared to the pristine RuO2 catalyst. During a practical stability test in a PEM-WE setup, our developed catalyst sustains stable performance over 300 h without notable degradation, underscoring its potential for future applications as a reliable anodic catalyst.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
6460_ESM.pdf (2.8 MB)

References

[1]

Seh, Z. W.; Kibsgaard, J.; Dickens, C. F.; Chorkendorff, I.; Nørskov, J. K.; Jaramillo, T. F. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science 2017, 355, eaad4998.

[2]

Jiao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S. Z. Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2060–2086.

[3]

De Luna, P.; Hahn, C.; Higgins, D.; Jaffer, S. A.; Jaramillo, T. F.; Sargent, E. H. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes. Science 2019, 364, eaav3506.

[4]

Chow, J.; Kopp, R. J.; Portney, P. R. Energy resources and global development. Science 2003, 302, 1528–1531.

[5]

Chen, L.; Dong, X. L.; Wang, Y. G.; Xia, Y. Y. Separating hydrogen and oxygen evolution in alkaline water electrolysis using nickel hydroxide. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11741.

[6]

Lei, Z. W.; Wang, T. Y.; Zhao, B. T.; Cai, W. B.; Liu, Y. H.; Jiao, S. H.; Li, Q.; Cao, R. G.; Liu, M. L. Recent progress in electrocatalysts for acidic water oxidation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2000478.

[7]

Carmo, M.; Fritz, D. L.; Mergel, J.; Stolten, D. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 4901–4934.

[8]

An, L.; Wei, C.; Lu, M.; Liu, H. W.; Chen, Y. B.; Scherer, G. G.; Fisher, A. C.; Xi, P. X.; Xu, Z. J.; Yan, C. H. Recent development of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts in acidic environment. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006328.

[9]

Peng, Y. D.; Jiang, K.; Hill, W.; Lu, Z. Y.; Yao, H. B.; Wang, H. T. Large-scale, low-cost, and high-efficiency water-splitting system for clean H2 generation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 3971–3977.

[10]

Lettenmeier, P.; Wang, R.; Abouatallah, R.; Helmly, S.; Morawietz, T.; Hiesgen, R.; Kolb, S.; Burggraf, F.; Kallo, J.; Gago, A. S. et al. Durable membrane electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane electrolyzer systems operating at high current densities. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 210, 502–511.

[11]

King, L. A.; Hubert, M. A.; Capuano, C.; Manco, J.; Danilovic, N.; Valle, E.; Hellstern, T. R.; Ayers, K.; Jaramillo, T. F. A non-precious metal hydrogen catalyst in a commercial polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyser. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 1071–1074.

[12]

Spöri, C.; Kwan, J. T. H.; Bonakdarpour, A.; Wilkinson, D. P.; Strasser, P. The stability challenges of oxygen evolving catalysts: Towards a common fundamental understanding and mitigation of catalyst degradation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 5994–6021.

[13]

Geiger, S.; Kasian, O.; Ledendecker, M.; Pizzutilo, E.; Mingers, A. M.; Fu, W. T.; Diaz-Morales, O.; Li, Z. Z.; Oellers, T.; Fruchter, L. et al. The stability number as a metric for electrocatalyst stability benchmarking. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 508–515.

[14]

Chen, F. Y.; Wu, Z. Y.; Adler, Z.; Wang, H. T. Stability challenges of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction: From mechanistic understanding to reactor design. Joule 2021, 5, 1704–1731.

[15]

Milosevic, M.; Böhm, T.; Körner, A.; Bierling, M.; Winkelmann, L.; Ehelebe, K.; Hutzler, A.; Suermann, M.; Thiele, S.; Cherevko, S. In search of lost iridium: Quantification of anode catalyst layer dissolution in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 2682–2688.

[16]

Diaz-Morales, O.; Raaijman, S.; Kortlever, R.; Kooyman, P. J.; Wezendonk, T.; Gascon, J.; Fu, W. T.; Koper, M. T. M. Iridium-based double perovskites for efficient water oxidation in acid media. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12363.

[17]

Zheng, Y. R.; Vernieres, J.; Wang, Z. B.; Zhang, K.; Hochfilzer, D.; Krempl, K.; Liao, T. W.; Presel, F.; Altantzis, T.; Fatermans, J. et al. Monitoring oxygen production on mass-selected iridium-tantalum oxide electrocatalysts. Nat. Energy 2021, 7, 55–64.

[18]

Yao, Y. C.; Hu, S. L.; Chen, W. X.; Huang, Z. Q.; Wei, W. C.; Yao, T.; Liu, R. R.; Zang, K. T.; Wang, X. Q.; Wu, G. et al. Engineering the electronic structure of single atom Ru sites via compressive strain boosts acidic water oxidation electrocatalysis. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 304–313.

[19]

Wen, Y. Z.; Chen, P. N.; Wang, L.; Li, S. Y.; Wang, Z. Y.; Abed, J.; Mao, X. N.; Min, Y. M.; Dinh, C. T.; De Luna, P. et al. Stabilizing highly active Ru sites by suppressing lattice oxygen participation in acidic water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 6482–6490.

[20]

Jin, H.; Choi, S.; Bang, G. J.; Kwon, T.; Kim, H. S.; Lee, S. J.; Hong, Y. J.; Lee, D. W.; Park, H. S.; Baik, H. et al. Safeguarding the RuO2 phase against lattice oxygen oxidation during acidic water electrooxidation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 1119–1130.

[21]

Retuerto, M.; Pascual, L.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; Ferrer, P.; Gianolio, D.; Pereira, A. G.; García, Á.; Torrero, J.; Fernández-Díaz, M. T.; Bencok, P. et al. Na-doped ruthenium perovskite electrocatalysts with improved oxygen evolution activity and durability in acidic media. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2041.

[22]

Lin, Y. C.; Tian, Z. Q.; Zhang, L. J.; Ma, J. Y.; Jiang, Z.; Deibert, B. J.; Ge, R. X.; Chen, L. Chromium-ruthenium oxide solid solution electrocatalyst for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction in acidic media. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 162.

[23]

Hao, S. Y.; Liu, M.; Pan, J. J.; Liu, X. N.; Tan, X. L.; Xu, N.; He, Y.; Lei, L. C.; Zhang, X. W. Dopants fixation of ruthenium for boosting acidic oxygen evolution stability and activity. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5368.

[24]

Wu, Z. Y.; Chen, F. Y.; Li, B. Y.; Yu, S. W.; Finfrock, Y. Z.; Meira, D. M.; Yan, Q. Q.; Zhu, P.; Chen, M. X.; Song, T. W. et al. Non-iridium-based electrocatalyst for durable acidic oxygen evolution reaction in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Nat. Mater. 2023, 22, 100–108.

[25]

Shi, Z. P.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. B.; Liu, S. W.; Zhu, J. B.; Yang, J. H.; Wang, X.; Ni, J.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L. J. et al. Customized reaction route for ruthenium oxide towards stabilized water oxidation in high-performance PEM electrolyzers. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 843.

[26]

Jin, H. Y.; Liu, X. Y.; An, P. F.; Tang, C.; Yu, H. M.; Zhang, Q. H.; Peng, H. J.; Gu, L.; Zheng, Y.; Song, T. et al. Dynamic rhenium dopant boosts ruthenium oxide for durable oxygen evolution. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 354.

[27]

Lin, C.; Li, J. L.; Li, X. P.; Yang, S.; Luo, W.; Zhang, Y. J.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, D. H.; Shinde, S. S.; Li, Y. F. et al. In- situ reconstructed Ru atom array on α-MnO2 with enhanced performance for acidic water oxidation. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 1012–1023.

[28]

Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, J. J.; Li, M. X.; Sendeku, M. G.; Wang, X.; Wu, H. Y.; Li, Y. P.; Ge, J. J.; Zhuang, Z. B. et al. Eliminating over-oxidation of ruthenium oxides by niobium for highly stable electrocatalytic oxygen evolution in acidic media. Joule 2023, 7, 558–573.

[29]

Cui, X. J.; Ren, P. J.; Ma, C.; Zhao, J.; Chen, R. X.; Chen, S. M.; Rajan, N. P.; Li, H. B.; Yu, L.; Tian, Z. Q. et al. Robust interface Ru centers for high-performance acidic oxygen evolution. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1908126.

[30]

Li, N.; Keane, T. P.; Veroneau, S. S.; Hadt, R. G.; Hayes, D.; Chen, L. X.; Nocera, D. G. Template-stabilized oxidic nickel oxygen evolution catalysts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 16187–16192.

[31]

Huynh, M.; Ozel, T.; Liu, C.; Lau, E. C.; Nocera, D. G. Design of template-stabilized active and earth-abundant oxygen evolution catalysts in acid. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4779–4794.

[32]

Wu, T. Z.; Sun, S. N.; Song, J. J.; Xi, S. B.; Du, Y. H.; Chen, B.; Sasangka, W. A.; Liao, H. B.; Gan, C. L.; Scherer, G. G. et al. Iron-facilitated dynamic active-site generation on spinel CoAl2O4 with self-termination of surface reconstruction for water oxidation. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 763–772.

[33]

Liu, J. Z.; Hu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Fan, X. Y.; Liu, L. M.; Guo, L. Achieving delafossite analog by in situ electrochemical self-reconstruction as an oxygen-evolving catalyst. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 21906–21913.

[34]

Pederson, L. R. Two-dimensional chemical-state plot for lead using XPS. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1982, 28, 203–209.

[35]

Morgan, W. E.; Van Wazer, J. R. Binding energy shifts in the x-ray photoelectron spectra of a series of related Group IVa compounds. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 964–969.

Nano Research
Pages 8671-8677
Cite this article:
Chen F-Y, Qiu C, Wu Z-Y, et al. Ruthenium-lead oxide for acidic oxygen evolution reaction in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Nano Research, 2024, 17(10): 8671-8677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-024-6460-5
Topics:
Part of a topical collection:

1518

Views

4

Crossref

3

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 16 October 2023
Revised: 12 December 2023
Accepted: 28 December 2023
Published: 08 February 2024
© Tsinghua University Press 2024
Return