AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (615.1 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Use of opposite frictional forces by animals to increase their attachment reliability during movement

Zhouyi WANG1,2Yi SONG1,3Zhendong DAI1( )
Institute of Bio-inspired Structure and Surface Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Nanjing, 210016, China
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Nanjing, 210016, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Many animals have the natural ability to move on various surfaces, such as those having different roughness and slope substrates, or even vertical walls and ceilings. Legged animals primarily attach to surfaces using claws, soft and hairy pads, or combinations of them. Recent studies have indicated that the frictional forces generated by these structures not only control the movement of animals but also significantly increase the reliability of their attachment. Moreover, the frictional forces of various animals have opposite characteristics and hierarchical properties from toe-to-toe and leg-to-leg. These opposite frictional forces allow animals to attach securely and stably during movement. The coordination of several attachment (adhesion) modes not only helps animals adhere, which would be impossible in single mode, but also increases the overall stability of the attachment (adhesion) system. These findings can help the design of highly adaptable feet for bionic robots in the near future.

References

[1]
Lu Y X. Significance and progress of bionics. J Bionic Eng 1(1):1-3 (2004)
[2]
Jindrich D L, Full R J. Dynamic stabilization of rapid hexapedal locomotion. J Exp Biol 205:2803-2823 (2002)
[3]
Lammers A R, Earls K D, Biknevicius A R. Locomotor kinetics and kinematics on inclines and declines in the gray short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica. J Exp Biol 209:4154-4166 (2006)
[4]
Lammers A R. Locomotor kinetics on sloped arboreal and terrestrial substrates in a small quadrupedal mammal. Zoology 110:93-103 (2007)
[5]
Zhou Q, He B, Qian M G, Yue J G. Analysis on friction and adhesive force of insects pads. J Uni Shanghai Sci Technol 2(30):143-146 (2008)
[6]
Zhou Q, He B, Qian M G, Yue J G. Testing of wet adhesive forces of ants and ANSYS analysis. J Tongji Uni (Nat Sci) 35:670-673 (2008)
[7]
Chen J J, Peattie A M, Autumn K, Full R G. Differential leg function in a sprawled-posture quadrupedal trotter. J Exp Biol 209:249-259 (2006)
[8]
Wang Z Y, Wang J T, Ji A H, Dai Z D. Locomotion behavior and dynamics of geckos freely moving on the ceiling. Chin Sci Bull 55:3356-3362 (2010)
[9]
Pesika N S, Tian Y, Zhao B X, Rosenberg K, Zeng H, McGuiggan P, Israelachvili J N. Peel-zone model of tape peeling based on the gecko adhesive system. J Adhesion 83:383-401 (2007)
[10]
Chen D H, Tong J, Sun J Y, Ren L Q. Tribological behavior of Gampsocleis gratiosa foot pad against vertical flat surfaces. J Bionic Eng 2(4):187-194 (2005)
[11]
Gorb S N. Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle. Berlin: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
[12]
Gorb S N, Jiao Y, Scherge M. Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol A 186:821-831 (2000)
[13]
Han L B, Wang Z Y, Ji A H, Dai Z D. Grip and detachment of locusts on inverted sandpaper substrates. Bioinspir Biomim 6:386-392 (2011)
[14]
Frantsevich L, Ji A H, Dai Z D, Wang J, Frantsevich L, Gorb S N. Adhesive properties of the arolium of a lantern- fly, Lycorma delicatula (Auchenorrhyncha, Fulgoridae). J Insect Physio 54:818-827 (2008)
[15]
Niederegger S, Gorb S N. Friction and adhesion in the tarsal and metatarsal scopulae of spiders. J Comp Physiol A 192:1223-1232 (2006)
[16]
Wang Z Y, Wang J T, Ji A H, Li H K, Dai Z D. Movement behavior of a spider on a horizontal surface. Chin Sci Bull 56(25):2748-2757 (2011)
[17]
Dickinson M H, Farley C T, Full R J, Koehl M A R, Kram R, Lehman S. How animals move: An Integrative view. Science 288(7):100-106 (2000)
[18]
Dai Z D, Gorb S N and Schwarz U. Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J Exp Biol 205:2479-2488 (2002)
[19]
Dai Z D, Yu M, Ji A H. Study on tribological characteristics of animals’ driving pads and their bionic design (in Chinese). Chin Mech Eng 8:1454-1457 (2005)
[20]
Dai Z D, Gorb S N. A study on contact mechanics of grass- chopper's pad (Insecta: Orthoptera) by finite element methods. Chin Sci Bull 54(4):549-555 (2009)
[21]
Federle W, Riehle M, Curtis A S G, Full R G. An integrative study of insect adhesion: Mechanics and wet adhesion of pretarsal pads in ants. J Integr Comp Biol 42:1100-11061 (2002)
[22]
Jiao Y, Gorb S, Scherge M. Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, insecta). J Exp Biol 203(12) :1887-1895 (2000)
[23]
Gorb S. N. The design of the fly adhesive pad: Distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:747-752 (1998)
[24]
Eisner T, Aneshansley D J. Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea). PNAS 97(12):6568-6573 (2000)
[25]
Autumn K, Majidi C, Groff R E, Dittmore A, Fearing R. Effective elastice modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays. J Exp Biol 209:3558-3568 (2006)
[26]
Autumn K, Dittmore A, Santos D, Spenko M, Cutkosky M. Frictional adhesion: A new angle on gecko attachment. J Exp Biol 209:3569-3579 (2006)
[27]
Zhao B X, Pesika N, Rosenberg K, Tian Y, Zeng H, McGuiggan P, Autumn K, Israelachvili J. Adhesion and friction force coupling of gecko setal arrays: Implication for structured adhesive surfaces. Langmuir 24:1517-1524 (2008)
[28]
Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, Zesch W, Chan W P, Kenny T W, Fearing R, Full R J. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405:681-684 (2000)
[29]
Wang Z Y, Gu W H, Wu Q, Ji A H, Dai Z D. Morphology and reaction force of toes of geckos freely moving on ceilings and walls. Sci China Technol Sci 53:1688-1693 (2010)
[30]
Chen D H, Tong J, Sun J Y, Ren L Q. Tribological behavior of gampsocleis Gratiosa foot pad against vertical flat surfaces. J Bionic Eng 2:187-194 (2005)
[31]
Autumn K, Hsieh S T, Dudek D M, Chen J, Chitaphan C, Full R J. Dynamics of geckos running vertically. J Exp Biol 209:260-272 (2006)
[32]
Wang Z Y, Wang J T, Ji A H, Zhang Y Y, Dai Z D. Behavior and dynamics of gecko locomotion: The effects of moving directions on vertical surface. Chin Sci Bull 56:573-583 (2010)
[33]
Endlein T, Ji A H, Samuel D, Yao N, Wang Z H, Barnes W J, Federle W, Kappl M, Dai Z D. Sticking like sticky tape: Tree frogs use friction forces to enhance attachment on overhanging surfaces. J R Soc Interface 10:1742 (2013)
Friction
Pages 143-149
Cite this article:
WANG Z, SONG Y, DAI Z. Use of opposite frictional forces by animals to increase their attachment reliability during movement. Friction, 2013, 1(2): 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-013-0009-z

658

Views

15

Downloads

5

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 08 January 2013
Revised: 04 March 2013
Accepted: 13 March 2013
Published: 13 June 2013
© The author(s) 2013

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distri- bution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Return