AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (13.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

A correlation analysis method for analyzing tribological states using acoustic emission, frictional coefficient, and contact resistance signals

Pengyi TIANYu TIAN( )Lei SHANYonggang MENGXiangjun ZHANG
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

A multi-physical signal correlation analysis method is proposed to identify the different tribological properties of materials. The acoustic emission (AE), contact resistance, and frictional force behaviors during dry sliding between four metals, 45# carbon steel, YG12 carbide, 2A12 aluminum alloy, and H62 brass, have been studied. Both positive and negative correlations between the root mean square of the amplified AE (AE RMS) signal and the frictional coefficient have been found in the experiments. In addition, the AE RMS signal and the contact resistance changed with changing sliding speed and normal load in different ways. The different correlation behaviors have been attributed to diverse tribological states under different experimental conditions due to different material characteristics. The correlation analysis provides a new method of quantitatively identifying the tribological states and the AE sources during frictional interaction. The observed anomalous correlations between the AE signal and frictional coefficient should be properly considered according to the different material properties during industrial friction condition monitoring using AE technology.

References

[1]
Minewitsch A A. Some developments in triboanalysis of coated machine components. Tribology in Industry 33(4): 153-158(2011)
[2]
Binnig G, Quate C F, Gerber C. Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 56(9): 930 (1986)
[3]
Landman U, Luedtke W D, Burnham N, Colton R J. Atomistic mechanisms and dynamics of adhesion, nanoindentation, and fracture. Science 248(4954): 454-461(1990)
[4]
Burnham N A, Dominguez D D, Mowery R L, Colton R J. Probing the surface forces of monolayer films with an atomic-force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 64(16): 1931 (1990)
[5]
Hsu S, Ying C, Zhao F. The nature of friction: A critical assessment. Friction 2(1): 1-26(2013)
[6]
Mate C M, McClelland G M, Erlandsson R, Chiang S. Atomic-scale friction of a tungsten tip on a graphite surface. Phys Rev Lett 59(1942): 1942-1945(1987)
[7]
Meyer G, Amer N M. Simultaneous measurement of lateral and normal forces with an optical-beam-deflection atomic force microscope. Appl Phys Lett 57(20): 2089-2091(1990)
[8]
Krim J, Widom A. Damping of a crystal oscillator by an adsorbed monolayer and its relation to interfacial viscosity. Phys Rev B 38(17): 12184 (1988)
[9]
Dayo A, Alnasrallah W, Krim J. Superconductivity-dependent sliding friction. Phys Rev Lett 80(8): 1690 (1998)
[10]
Krim J, Solina D H, Chiarello R. Nanotribology of a Kr monolayer: A quartz-crystal microbalance study of atomic-scale friction. Phys Rev Lett 66(2): 181-184(1991)
[11]
Smith K C A, Oatley C W. The scanning electron microscope and its fields of application. Brit J Appl Phys 6(11): 391(1955)
[12]
Schmit J, Creath K, Wyant J C. Surface profilers, multiple wavelength, and white light interferometry. Optical Shop Testing: 667-755(2007)
[13]
Renouf M, Massi F, Fillot N, Saulot A. Numerical tribology of a dry contact. Tribol Int 44(7): 834-844(2011)
[14]
Blok H. The flash temperature concept. Wear 6(6): 483-494(1963)
[15]
Archard J F. The temperature of rubbing surfaces. Wear 2(6): 438-455(1959)
[16]
Ibrahim R A. Friction-induced vibration, chatter, squeal, and chaos—part II: dynamics and modeling. Appl Mech Rev 47(7): 227-253(1994)
[17]
Harper W R. Contact and Frictional Electrification. Laplacian Press, 1967.
[18]
Walton A J. Triboluminescence. Adv Phys 26(6): 887-948(1977)
[19]
Shizhu W, Ping H. Principles of tribology. Beijing (China): Tsinghua University Press, 2008.
[20]
Scruby C B. An introduction to acoustic emission. J Phys E: Sci Instrum 20(8): 946 (1987)
[21]
Ravindra H V, Srinivasa Y G, Krishnamurthy R. Acoustic emission for tool condition monitoring in metal cutting. Wear 212(1): 78-84(1997)
[22]
Douglas R M, Steel J A, Reuben R L. A study of the tribological behaviour of piston ring/cylinder liner interaction in diesel engines using acoustic emission. Tribol Int 39(12): 1634-1642(2006)
[23]
Hase A, Wada M, Mishina H. Correlation of material transfer phenomena and AE signals in adhesive wear. Jpn J Tribol 50(6): 717-726(2005)
[24]
Hase A, Wada M, Mishina H. Correlation of abrasive wear phenomenon and AE signals. Jpn J Tribol 51(5): 639-651(2006)
[25]
Hase A, Wada M, Mishina H. Acoustic emission signals and wear phenomena on severe-mild wear transition. Tribol Onl 3(5): 298-303(2008)
[26]
Hase A, Mishina H, Wada M. Correlation between features of acoustic emission signals and mechanical wear mechanisms. Wear 292: 144-150(2012)
[27]
Fan Y, Gu F, Ball A. Modelling acoustic emissions generated by sliding friction. Wear 268(5): 811-815(2010)
[28]
Baranov V M, Kudryavtsev E M, Sarychev G A. Modelling of the parameters of acoustic emission under sliding friction of solids. Wear 202(2): 125-133(1997)
[29]
Archard J F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8): 981-988(2004)
[30]
Holm R, Holm E. Electric Contacts: Theory and Application. New York (UK): Springer-Verlag, 1967.
[31]
Kogut L, Komvopoulos K. Electrical contact resistance theory for conductive rough surfaces. J Appl Phys 94(5): 3153-3162(2003)
[32]
Greenwood J A. Constriction resistance and the real area of contact. Brit J Appl Phys 17(12): 1621 (1966)
Friction
Pages 36-46
Cite this article:
TIAN P, TIAN Y, SHAN L, et al. A correlation analysis method for analyzing tribological states using acoustic emission, frictional coefficient, and contact resistance signals. Friction, 2015, 3(1): 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-014-0067-x

734

Views

14

Downloads

25

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

32

Scopus

1

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 24 April 2014
Revised: 30 June 2014
Accepted: 27 September 2014
Published: 03 November 2014
© The author(s) 2014

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Return