AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (1.1 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Morphology-influenced wetting model of nanopore structures

Sunghan KIM†, Hyunho CHOI, Andreas A. POLYCARPOU, Hong LIANG( )
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3123, USA
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta 30332, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Understanding the wetting behavior of nanostructures is important for surface design. The present study examined the intrinsic wettability of nanopore structures, and proposed a theoretical wetting model. Using this model, it was found that the wetting behavior of nanopore structures depends on the morphology of a surface. To accurately predict the wetting behavior of nanopore structures, correction factors were introduced. As a result, the proposed wetting model can be used to predict the wettability of nanopore structures for various engineering purposes.

Keywords

nanopore structureswetting modelwettabilitycontact angle

References

[1]
Squires T M, Quake S R. Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev Mod Phys 77: 977–1026 (2005)
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Fürstner R, Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Walzel P. Wetting and self-cleaning properties of artificial superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 21: 956–961 (2005)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Rossi A M, Wang L, Reipa V, Murphy TE. Porous silicon biosensor for detection of viruses. Biosens Bioelectron 23: 741–745 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Bao S, Tang K, Kvithyld A, Engh T, Tangstad M. Wetting of pure aluminium on graphite, SiC and Al2O3 in aluminium filtration. T Nonferr Metal Soc 22: 1930–1938 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Cao L, Jones A K, Sikka V K, Wu J, Gao D. Anti-icing superhydrophobic coatings. Langmuir 25: 12444–12448 (2009)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Cao L, Price T P, Weiss M, Gao D. Super water-and oil-repellent surfaces on intrinsically hydrophilic and oleophilic porous silicon films. Langmuir 24: 1640–1643 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Haeberle S, Zengerle R. Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab on a Chip 7: 1094–1110 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Nguyen D D, Tai N-H, Lee S-B, Kuo W-S. Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic properties of graphene-based sponges fabricated using a facile dip coating method. Energ Environ Sci 5: 7908–7912 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Lai Y, Tang Y, Gong J, Gong D, Chi L, Lin C, Chen Z. Transparent superhydrophobic/superhydrophilic TiO2-based coatings for self-cleaning and anti-fogging. J Mater Chem 22: 7420–7426 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Kim S, Zhou Y, Cirillo J D, Polycarpou A A, Liang H. Bacteria repelling on highly-ordered alumina-nanopore structures. J Appl Phys 117: 155302 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Choi H, Liang H. Wettability and spontaneous penetration of a water drop into hydrophobic pores. J Colloid Interf Sci 477: 176−180 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Blossey R. Self-cleaning surfaces–Virtual realities. Nat Mater 2: 301–306 (2003)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Fujii T, Sato H, Tsuji E, Aoki Y, Habazaki H. Important role of nanopore morphology in superoleophobic hierarchical surfaces. J Phys Chem C 116: 23308–23314 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Young T. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos T R Soc London 95: 65–87 (1805)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Cassie A B D, Baxter S. Wettability of porous surfaces. T Faraday Soc 40: 546–551 (1944)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Wenzel R N. Surface roughness and contact angle. J Phys Colloid Chem 53: 1466–1467 (1949)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Kim D, Kim J, Hwang W. Prediction of contact angle on a microline patterned surface. Surf Sci 600: L301–L304 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Han T-Y, Shr J-F, Wu C-F, Hsieh C-T. A modified Wenzel model for hydrophobic behavior of nanostructured surfaces. Thin Solid Film 515: 4666–4669 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Ran C, Ding G, Liu W, Deng Y, Hou W. Wetting on nanoporous alumina surface: transition between Wenzel and Cassie states controlled by surface structure. Langmuir 24: 9952–9955 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Leese H, Bhurtun V, Lee K P, Mattia D. Wetting behaviour of hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanostructured porous anodic alumina. Colloid Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 420: 53–58 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Buijnsters J G, Zhong R, Tsyntsaru N, Celis J-P. Surface wettability of macroporous anodized aluminum oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5: 3224–3233 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Kim S, Polycarpou A A, Liang H. Electrical-potential induced surface wettability of porous metallic nanostructures. Appl Surf Sci 351: 460–465 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Yang J, Wang J, Wang C-W, He X, Li Y, Chen J-B, Zhou F. Intermediate wetting states on nanoporous structures of anodic aluminum oxide surfaces. Thin Solid Film 562: 353–360 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Raspal V, Awitor K, Massard C, Feschet-Chassot E, Bokalawela R, Johnson M. Nanoporous surface wetting behavior: The line tension influence. Langmuir 28: 11064–11071 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
McHale G. Cassie and Wenzel: Were they really so wrong? Langmuir 23: 8200–8205 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Gao L, McCarthy T J. How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23: 3762–3765 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Luo B, Shum P W, Zhou Z, Li K. Surface geometrical model modification and contact angle prediction for the laser patterned steel surface. Surf Coat Technol 205: 2597–2604 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Kim S, Lee S, Choi D, Lee K, Park H, Hwang W. Fabrication of metal nanohoneycomb structures and their tribological behavior. Adv Compos Mater 17: 101–110 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Johnson R E Jr, Dettre R H. Contact angle hysteresis. III. Study of an idealized heterogeneous surface. J Physl Chem 68: 1744–1750 (1964)
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Zu Y, Yan Y, Li J, Han Z. Wetting behaviours of a single droplet on biomimetic micro structured surfaces. J Bionic Eng 7: 191–198 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Choi D, Lee P, Hwang W, Lee K, Park H. Measurement of the pore sizes for anodic aluminum oxide (AAO). Current Appl Phys 6: e125-e129 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Li Z, Wang J, Zhang Y, Wang J, Jiang L, Song Y. Closed-air induced composite wetting on hydrophilic ordered nanoporous anodic alumina. Appl Phys Lett 97: 233107 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 4 Issue 3,
September 2016
Pages 249-256
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-016-0122-x
Cite this article:
KIM S, CHOI H, POLYCARPOU AA, et al. Morphology-influenced wetting model of nanopore structures. Friction, 2016, 4(3): 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-016-0122-x

785

Views

23

Downloads

8

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

9

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 06 March 2016
Revised: 07 June 2016
Accepted: 14 July 2016
Published: 09 September 2016
© The author(s) 2016

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Open Access: The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Return