AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (12 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Effect of oxide film on nanoscale mechanical removal of pure iron

Jinwei LIU1Liang JIANG1( )Changbang DENG1Wenhao DU2Linmao QIAN1
 Tribology Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
 Institute of Machinery Manufacturing Technology, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In this paper, the properties of an oxide film formed on a pure iron surface after being polished with an H2O2-based acidic slurry were investigated using an atomic force microscope (AFM), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), and angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (AR-XPS) to partly reveal the material removal mechanism of pure iron during chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). The AFM results show that, when rubbed against a cone-shaped diamond tip in vacuum, the material removal depth of the polished pure iron first slowly increases to 0.45 nm with a relatively small slope of 0.11 nm/μN as the applied load increases from 0 to 4 μN, and then rapidly increases with a large slope of 1.98 nm/μN when the applied load further increases to 10 μN. In combination with the AES and AR-XPS results, a layered oxide film with approximately 2 nm thickness (roughly estimated from the sputtering rate) is formed on the pure iron surface. Moreover, the film can be simply divided into two layers, namely, an outer layer and an inner layer. The outer layer primarily consists of FeOOH (most likely α-FeOOH) and possibly Fe2O3 with a film thickness ranging from 0.36 to 0.48 nm (close to the 0.45 nm material removal depth at the 4 μN turning point), while the inner layer primarily consists of Fe3O4. The mechanical strength of the outer layer is much higher than that of the inner layer. Moreover, the mechanical strength of the inner layer is quite close to that of the pure iron substrate. However, when a real CMP process is applied to pure iron, pure mechanical wear by silica particles generates almost no material removal due to the extremely high mechanical strength of the oxide film. This indicates that other mechanisms, such as in-situ chemical corrosion-enhanced mechanical wear, dominate the CMP process.

References

[1]
Kong J X, Deng F, Zhao W, He N. Effects of cooling/ lubrication conditions on surface integrity of pure iron materials during turning. (in Chinese). Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition) 43(6):89–95(2015)
[2]
Kong J X, Hu K, Xia Z H, Li L. Effects of tool wear on surface integrity of pure iron material under finish turning. (in Chinese). Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition) 44(2):74–80(2016)
[3]
Li W-B, Wang X-M, Zhou H. Effect of the liner material on the shape of dual mode penetrators. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves 51(3):387–394(2015)
[4]
Pérez Escobar D, Miñambres C, Duprez L, Verbeken K, Verhaege M. Internal and surface damage of multiphase steels and pure iron after electrochemical hydrogen charging. Corros Sci 53(10):3166–3176(2011)
[5]
Jia W, Zhang Q, Bai Z, Ma S, Yao D, Wang Y. Progress on manufacturing techniques of shaped charge liners. (in Chineses). Rare Metal Materials and Engineering 36(9):1511–1516(2007)
[6]
Massarelli L, Marchionni M. Morphology of spark-affected surface layers produced on pure iron and steels by electro- discharge machining. Metals Technology 4(1):100–105(1977)
[7]
Li J, Liu Y H, Dai Y J, Yue D C, Lu X C, Luo J B. Achievement of a near-perfect smooth silicon surface. Science China Technological Sciences 56(11):2847–2853(2013)
[8]
Li Y. Microelectronic Applications of Chemical Mechanical Planarization. Wiley-Interscience, USA, 2007.
[9]
Babu S. Advances in Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP). Woodhead Publishing, 2016.
[10]
Jiang L, Lan Y, He Y, Li Y, Luo J. Functions of Trilon® P as a polyamine in copper chemical mechanical polishing. Appl Surf Sci 288:265–274(2014)
[11]
Jiang L, He Y, Luo J. Effects of pH and oxidizer on chemical mechanical polishing of AISI 1045 steel. Tribol Lett 56(2):327–335(2014)
[12]
Jiang L, He Y, Luo J. Chemical mechanical polishing of steel substrate using colloidal silica-based slurries. Appl Surf Sci 330:487–495(2015)
[13]
Jiang L, He Y, Yang Y, Luo J. Chemical mechanical polishing of stainless steel as solar cell substrate. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology 4(5):P162–P170(2015)
[14]
Du T, Desai V. Chemical mechanical planarization of copper: pH effect. J Mater Sci Lett 22(22):1623–1625(2003)
[15]
Bhargava G, Gouzman I, Chun C M, Ramanarayanan T A, Bernasek S L. Characterization of the “native” surface thin film on pure polycrystalline iron: A high resolution XPS and TEM study. Appl Surf Sci 253(9):4322–4329(2007)
[16]
Grosvenor A P, Kobe B A, McIntyre N S, Tougaard S, Lennard W N. Use of QUASES™/XPS measurements to determine the oxide composition and thickness on an iron substrate. Surf Interface Anal 36(7):632–639(2004)
[17]
Lin T-C, Seshadri G, Kelber J A. A consistent method for quantitative XPS peak analysis of thin oxide films on clean polycrystalline iron surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 119(1):83–92(1997)
[18]
Mathieu H J, Datta M, Landolt D. Thickness of natural oxide films determined by AES and XPS with/without sputtering. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 3(2):331–335(1985)
[19]
Stambouli V, Palacio C, Mathieu H J, Landolt D. Comparison of in-situ low-pressure oxidation of pure iron at room temperature in O2 and in O2/H2O mixtures using XPS. Appl Surf Sci 70–71:240–244(1993)
[20]
Dong J, Dong J, Han E, Liu C, Ke W. Rusting evolvement of mild steel under wet/dry cyclic condition with pH 4.00 NaHSO3 solution. (in Chinese). Corrosion Science and Protection Technology 21(1):1–4(2009)
[21]
Miyazawa T, Terachi T, Uchida S, Satoh T, Tsukada T, Satoh Y, Wada Y, Hosokawa H. Effects of hydrogen peroxide on corrosion of stainless steel, (V) characterization of oxide film with multilateral surface analyses. J Nucl Sci Technol 43(8):884–895(2006)
[22]
Wang J J, Guo X D, Zheng W L, Chen J G, Wu J S. Analysis of the corrosion rust on weathering steel and carbon steel exposed in marine atmosphere for three years. (in Chinese). Corrosion & Protection 23(7):288–291(2002)
[23]
Junhua D, Wei K. The accelerated test of simulated atmospheric corrosion and the rust evolution of low carbon steel. (in Chinese). Electrochemistry 15(2):170–178(2009)
[24]
Chao Y, Huixia Z, Weimin G, Yubin F. Effects of H2O2 addition on corrosion behavior of high-strength low-alloy steel in seawater. (in Chinese). Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection33(003):205–210(2013)
[25]
Brundle C R, Evans C A, Wilson S. Encyclopedia of Materials Characterization: Surfaces, Interfaces, Thin Films. Gulf Professional Publishing, 1992.
[26]
Baer D R, Engelhard M H, Gaspar D J, Matson D W, Pecher K H, Williams J R, Wang C M. Challenges in applying surface analysis methods to nanoparticles and nanostructured materials. Journal of Surface Analysis 12(2):101–108(2005)
[27]
Baera D R, Engelhard M H, Lea A S, Nachimuthu P. Comparison of the sputter rates of oxide films relative to the sputter rate of SiO2. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 28(5):1060–1072(2010)
[28]
Chicot D, Mendoza J, Zaoui A, Louis G, Lepingle V, Roudet F, Lesage J. Mechanical properties of magnetite (Fe3O4), hematite (α-Fe2O3) and goethite (α-FeO·OH) by instrumented indentation and molecular dynamics analysis. Mater Chem Phys 129(3):862–870(2011)
[29]
Kao M J, Hsu F C, Peng D X. Synthesis and characterization of SiO2 nanoparticles and their efficacy in chemical mechanical polishing steel substrate. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2014:1–8(2014)
Friction
Pages 307-315
Cite this article:
LIU J, JIANG L, DENG C, et al. Effect of oxide film on nanoscale mechanical removal of pure iron. Friction, 2018, 6(3): 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-018-0238-2

601

Views

19

Downloads

9

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

10

Scopus

4

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 09 May 2018
Revised: 30 July 2018
Accepted: 02 August 2018
Published: 06 September 2018
© The author(s) 2018

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Open Access: The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Return