Home Friction Article
PDF (1 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Research Article | Open Access

Rate-, state-, and pressure-dependent friction model based on the elastoplastic theory

Shingo OZAKI1(), Takeru MATSUURA1, Satoru MAEGAWA2
Division of System Research, Yokohama National University, Tokiwadai 79-5, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan
Department of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
Show Author Information

Abstract

Adhesion is one of essences with respect to rubber friction because the magnitude of the friction force is closely related to the magnitude of adhesion on a real contact area. However, the real contact area during sliding depends on the state and history of the contact surface. Therefore, the friction force occasionally exhibits rate-, state-, and pressure dependency. In this study, to rationally describe friction and simulate boundary value problems, a rate-, state-, and pressure-dependent friction model based on the elastoplastic theory was formulated. First, the evolution law for the friction coefficient was prescribed. Next, a nonlinear sliding surface (frictional criterion) was adopted, and several other evolution laws for internal state variables were prescribed. Subsequently, the typical response characteristics of the proposed friction model were demonstrated, and its validity was verified by comparing the obtained results with those of experiments conducted considering the contact surface between a rough rubber hemisphere and smooth acrylic plate.

Keywords

adhesionfriction modelelastoplastic theorycontact surfacestick-slip

References

[1]
F P Bowden, D Tabor. The Friction and Lubrication of Solids. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press, 1950.
Crossref
[2]
J T Oden, J A C Martins. Models and computational methods for dynamic friction phenomena. Comput Meths Appl Mech Eng 52(1-3): 527-634 (1986)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
C H Scholz. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting. 2nd ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Crossref
[4]
T Baumberger, F Heslot, B Perrin. Crossover from creep to inertial motion in friction dynamics. Nature 367(6463): 544-546 (1994)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
S M Rubinstein, G Cohen, J Fineberg. Detachment fronts and the onset of dynamic friction. Nature 430(7003): 1005-1009 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
T Baumberger, C Caroli. Solid friction from stick-slip down to pinning and aging. Adv Phys 55(3-4): 279-348 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
O Ben-David, J Fineberg. Static friction coefficient is not a material constant. Phys Rev Lett 106(25): 254301 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
S Maegawa, A Suzuki, K Nakano. Precursors of global slip in a longitudinal line contact under non-uniform normal loading. Tribol Lett 38(3): 313-323 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
S Ozaki, C Inanobe, K Nakano. Finite element analysis of precursors to macroscopic stick-slip motion in elastic materials: Analysis of friction test as a boundary value problem. Tribol Lett 55(1): 151-163 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
J H Dieterich. Time-dependent friction in rocks. J Geophys Res 77(20): 3690-3697 (1972)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
J H Dieterich. Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 84(B5): 2161-2168 (1979)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
A Ruina. Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 88(B12): 10359-10370 (1983)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
J R Rice, A L Ruina. Stability of steady frictional slipping. J Appl Mech 50(2): 343-349 (1983)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
J H Dieterich, B D Kilgore. Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties. Pure Appl Geophys 143(1-3): 283-302 (1994)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
V L Popov, B Grzemba, J Starcevic, M Popov. Rate and state dependent friction laws and the prediction of earthquakes: What can we learn from laboratory models? Tectonophysics 532-535: 291-300 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
B Grzemba. New experimental investigations on the Dieterich- Ruina friction law. Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng 13(1): 11-20 (2015)
Google Scholar
[17]
N Kikuchi, J T Oden. Contact Problems in Elasticity: A Study of Variational Inequalities and Finite Element Methods. Philadelphia (USA): SIAM, 1988.
Crossref
[18]
T A Laursen. Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics: Fundamentals of Modeling Interfacial Phenomena in Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis. New York (USA): Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2003.
[19]
P Wriggers. Computational Contact Mechanics. Hoboken (USA): John Wiley, 2002.
[20]
K Hashiguchi, S Ozaki. Constitutive equation for friction with transition from static to kinetic friction and recovery of static friction. Int J Plast 24(11): 2102-2124 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
S Ozaki, K Hashiguchi,. Numerical analysis of stick-slip instability by a rate-dependent elastoplastic formulation for friction. Tribol Int 43(11): 2120-2133 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
S Ozaki, C Ito, K Hashiguchi. Experimental verification of rate-dependent elastoplastic analogy friction model and its application to FE analysis. Tribol Int 64: 164-177 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
S Ozaki, K Hikida, K Hashiguchi. Elastoplastic formulation for friction with orthotropic anisotropy and rotational hardening. Int J Solids Struct 49(3-4): 648-657 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
K L Johnson, J A Greenwood, J G Higginson. The contact of elastic regular wavy surfaces. Int J Mech Sci 27(6): 383-396 (1985)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
W Manners. Pressure required to flatten an elastic random rough profile. Int J Mech Sci 42(12): 2321-2336 (2000)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
S Hyun, L Pei, J F Molinari, M O Robbins. Finite-element analysis of contact between elastic self-affine surfaces. Phys Rev E 70(2): 026117 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
P N J Persson, F Bucher, B Chiaia. Elastic contact between randomly rough surfaces: Comparison of theory with numerical results. Phys Rev B 65(18): 184106 (2002)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
C Yang, P N J Persson. Contact mechanics: Contact area and interfacial separation from small contact to full contact. J Phys: Condens Matter 20(21): 215214 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
S Maegawa, F Itoigawa, T Nakamura. Effect of normal load on friction coefficient for sliding contact between rough rubber surface and rigid smooth plane. Tribol Int 92: 335-343 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
G P Ostermeyer. On the dynamics of the friction coefficient. Wear 254(9): 852-858 (2003)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
B Lorenz, B N J Persson, S Dieluweit, T Tada. Rubber friction: Comparison of theory with experiment. Eur Phys J E 34(12): 129 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
K Hashiguchi. Foundations of Elastoplasticity: Subloading Surface Model. Cham (Germany): Springer, 2017.
Crossref
[33]
V L Popov, M Heß. Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction. Berlin (Germany): Springer, 2015.
Crossref
[34]
E Teidelt. Oscillating contact: Friction induced motion and control of friction. Ph.D. Thesis. Berlin (Germany): Technical University of Berlin, 2015.
[35]
H X Nguyen, E Teidelt, V L Popov, S Fatikow. Modeling and waveform optimization of stick-slip micro-drives using the method of dimensionality reduction. Arch Appl Mech 86(10): 1771-1785 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
L Bureau, T Baumberger, C Caroli. Rheological aging and rejuvenation in solid friction contacts. Eur Phys J E 8(3): 331-337 (2002)
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
K L Johnson. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[38]
S Maegawa, K Nakano. Dynamic behaviors of contact surfaces in the sliding friction of a soft material. J Adv Mech Des, Syst, Manuf 1(4): 553-561 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
J E Mark. Polymer Data Handbook. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press, 1999.
Friction
Volume 8 Issue 4,
August 2020
Pages 768-783
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-019-0321-3
Cite this article:
OZAKI S, MATSUURA T, MAEGAWA S. Rate-, state-, and pressure-dependent friction model based on the elastoplastic theory. Friction, 2020, 8(4): 768-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-019-0321-3
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return