AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (7.9 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Electrostatic attraction caused by triboelectrification in climbing geckos

Yi SONG, Zhouyi WANG, Yang LI, Zhendong DAI( )
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Adhesion achieved through feet setae is fundamental for gecko agilely maneuvering. Although diverse hypotheses have been proposed, none of them thoroughly explains the setae function, implying a kind of hybrid-mechanism-based adhesion in geckos. In addition to van der Waals interactions and capillary force, the electrostatic attraction that emerges from triboelectrification was suggested as a component of setae adhesion. Nevertheless, the contribution by electrostatic attraction to the total setae attachment is still controversial. In this study, we analyzed the occurrence of electrostatic attraction at gecko setae through experiments and model analyses. By touching the substrates with only ~1/70th of the foot area, freely wall-climbing geckos developed tribocharge at their feet setae with a density of ~277 pC/mm2, generating electrostatic attractions with a strength of ~4.4 mN/mm2. From this perspective, the adhesion driven by triboelectrification could account for about 1% of total adhesion. Model analyses at spatula level indicated a similar result showing that the electrostatic force might account for ~3% of the adhesion that facilitates wall-climbing in geckos. The low contribution of the electrostatic force partly explains why geckos always face difficulty in maneuvering onto those substrates (e.g., teflon) where they could easily develop tribocharge but difficultly generate van der Waals force. However, long-range electrostatic forces may play other roles in a distance range where the van der Waals interaction cannot function. These findings not only add to our understanding of the mechanism of gecko adhesion, but also will help us advance gecko-inspired fibular adhesives.

Keywords

biotribochargeelectrostatic forcegeckosadhesion

References

[1]
Chen J J, Peattie A M, Autumn K, Full R J. Differential leg function in a sprawled-posture quadrupedal trotter. J Exp Biol 209(2): 249-259 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Autumn K, Hansen W. Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae. J Comp Physiol A 192(11): 1205-1212 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Wang Z Y, Wang J T, Ji A H, Zhang Y Y, Dai Z D. Behavior and dynamics of gecko’s locomotion: The effects of moving directions on a vertical surface. Chinese Sci Bull 56(6): 573-583 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Wang Z Y, Dai Z D, Li W, Ji A H, Wang W B. How do the substrate reaction forces acting on a gecko’s limbs respond to inclines? Sci Nat 102(1): 7 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Song Y, Dai Z D, Wang Z Y, Full R J. Role of multiple, adjustable toes in distributed control shown by sideways wall-running in geckos. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 287: 20200123 (2020).
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Autumn K, Puthoff J. Properties, principles, and parameters of the gecko adhesive system. In Biological Adhesives. Smith A M, Ed. Cham: Springer, 2016: 245-280.
Crossref
[7]
Russell A P, Bauer A M, Laroiya R. Morphological correlates of the secondarily symmetrical pes of gekkotan lizards. J Zool 241(4): 767-790 (1997)
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Russell A P, Stark A Y, Higham T E. The integrative biology of gecko adhesion: historical review, current understanding, and grand challenges. Integr Comp Biol 59(1): 101-116 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Home E. IX. Some account of the feet of those animals whose progressive motion can be carried on in opposition to gravity. Philos Trans R Soc London 106: 149-155 (1816)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Schmidt H. Zur anatomie und physiologie der geckopfote. Jena Z Naturwiss 39: 551-580 (1904)
Google Scholar
[11]
Hora S L. The adhesive apparatus on the toes of certain geckos and tree frogs. J Proc Asiat Soc Bengal 19: 138-145 (1923)
Google Scholar
[12]
Mahendra B C. Contributions to the bionomics, anatomy, reproduction and development of the indian house- gecko, Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel, Part II: The problem of locomotion. Proc Indian Acad Sci Sect B 13(5): 288-306 (1941)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Cartier O. Studien über den feineren Bau der Haut bei den Reptilien. I Die Epidermis der Geckotiden. Arb Zool Inst Würzburg 1: 83-96 (1872)
Google Scholar
[14]
Dellit W D. Zur anatomie und physiologie der Geckozehe. Jena Z Naturwiss 68: 613-656 (1934)
Google Scholar
[15]
Maderson P F A. Keratinized epidermal derivatives as an aid to climbing in Gekkonid Lizards. Nature 203(4946): 780-781 (1964)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang Y A, Peattie A M, Hansen W R, Sponberg S, Kenny T W, Fearing R, Israelachvili J N, Full R J. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(19): 12252-12256 (2002)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Haase A. Untersuchungen über den bau und die entwicklung der haftlappen bei den geckotiden. Arch Naturgesch 66: 321-345 (1900).
Google Scholar
[18]
Hiller U. Untersuchungen zum feinbau und zur funktion der haftborsten von reptilien. Z Morphol Tiere 62(4): 307-362 (1968)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Israelachvili J N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. 3rd edn. Singapore: Elsevier, 2012.
[20]
Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, Zesch W, Chan W P, Kenny T W, Fearing R, Full R J. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405(6787): 681-685 (2000)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Huber G, Mantz H, Spolenak R, Mecke K, Jacobs K, Gorb S N, Arzt E. Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(45): 16293-16296 (2005).
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Puthoff J B, Prowse M S, Wilkinson M, Autumn K. Changes in materials properties explain the effects of humidity on gecko adhesion. J Exp Biol 213(21): 3699-3704 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Prowse M S, Wilkinson M, Puthoff J B, Mayer G, Autumn K. Effects of humidity on the mechanical properties of gecko setae. Acta Biomater 7(2): 733-738 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Chen B, Gao H. An alternative explanation of the effect of humidity in gecko adhesion: Stiffness reduction enhances adhesion on a rough surface. Int J Appl Mech 2(01): 1-9 (2010).
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Alibardi L. Ultrastructural autoradiographic and immunocytochemical analysis of setae formation and keratinization in the digital pads of the gecko Hemidactylus turcicus (Gekkonidae, Reptilia). Tissue Cell 35(4): 288-296 (2003)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Zou H Y, Zhang Y, Guo L T, Wang P H, He X, Dai G Z, Zheng H W, Chen C Y, Wang A C, Xu C, et al. Quantifying the triboelectric series. Nat Commun 10(1): 1427 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Lee B W, Orr D E. The triboelectric series. https://www.alphalabinc.com/triboelectric-series, 2009.
[28]
Wang Z L, Wang A C. On the origin of contact- electrification. Mater Today 30: 34-51 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Lacks D J, Sankaran R M. Contact electrification of insulating materials. J Phys D Appl Phys 44(45): 453001 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Baytekin H T, Patashinski A Z, Branicki M, Baytekin B, Soh S, Grzybowski B A. The mosaic of surface charge in contact electrification. Science 333(6040): 308-312 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Lowell J, Truscott W S. Triboelectrification of identical insulators. II. Theory and further experiments. J Phys D Appl Phys 19(7): 1281 (2000)
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Prevenslik T. Electrostatic gecko mechanism. Tribol Ind 31(1-2): 61-66 (2009)
Google Scholar
[33]
Izadi H, Sarikhani K, Penlidis A. Instabilities of teflon AF thin films in alumina nanochannels and adhesion of bi-level Teflon AF nanopillars. Nanotechnology 24(50): 505306 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Izadi H, Stewart K M E, Penlidis A. Role of contact electrification and electrostatic interactions in gecko adhesion. J Roy Soc Interface 11(98): 20140371 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
The editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Surface tension. https://www.britannica.com/science/surface-tension, 2015.
[36]
Song Y, Wang Z Y, Zhou J, Li Y, Dai Z D. Synchronous measurement of tribocharge and force at the footpads of freely moving animals. Friction 6(1): 75-83 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Eason E V, Hawkes E W, Windheim M, Christensen D L, Libby T, Cutkosky M R. Stress distribution and contact area measurements of a gecko toe using a high-resolution tactile sensor. Bioinspir Biomim 10(1): 016013 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Huber G, Gorb S N, Hosoda N, Spolenak R, Arzt E. Influence of surface roughness on gecko adhesion. Acta Biomater 3(4): 607-610 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Ruibal R, Ernst V. The structure of the digital setae of lizards. J Morphol 117(3): 271-293 (1965)
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Cheng D K. Field and Wave Electromagnetics. 2nd edn. Reading (USA): Prentice Hall, 1989.
[41]
Cutnell J D, Johnson K W, Young D, Stadler S, Young D Sr. Physics. 10th edn. New York (USA): Wiley, 2014.
[42]
Sastri V R. Plastics in Medical Devices: Properties, Requirements, and Applications. New York (USA): Elsevier, 2010.
Crossref
[43]
Huber G, Gorb S N, Spolenak R, Arzt E. Resolving the nanoscale adhesion of individual gecko spatulae by atomic force microscopy. Biol Lett 1(1): 2-4 (2005)
Crossref Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 10 Issue 1,
January 2022
Pages 44-53
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-020-0387-3
Cite this article:
SONG Y, WANG Z, LI Y, et al. Electrostatic attraction caused by triboelectrification in climbing geckos. Friction, 2022, 10(1): 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-020-0387-3

680

Views

22

Downloads

15

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

14

Scopus

1

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 27 November 2019
Revised: 10 February 2020
Accepted: 20 March 2020
Published: 31 October 2020
© The author(s) 2020

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return