AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (2.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Effect of contact geometry on the friction of acrylamide hydrogels with different surface structures

Wenrui LIU1,2Rok SIMIČ2( )Yuhong LIU1( )Nicholas D. SPENCER2
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Laboratory for Surface Science and Technology, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Show Author Information

Abstract

Polyacrylamide (PAAm) hydrogels with brush-covered or crosslinked surfaces were produced and their tribological behavior was studied over a wide range of sliding speeds for two different contact geometries: sphere-on-flat and flat-pin-on-flat. Irrespective of the contact geometry, the brushy hydrogel surfaces displayed up to an order of magnitude lower coefficients of friction µ (COF) compared to the crosslinked surfaces, even achieving superlubricity (µ < 0.01). In general, a hydrogel sphere showed a lower coefficient of friction than a flat hydrogel pin at a similar contact pressure over the entire range of sliding speeds. However, after normalizing the friction force by the contact area, the shear stress of hydrogels with either crosslinked or brushy surfaces was found to be similar for both contact geometries at low speeds, indicating that hydrogel friction is unaffected by the contact geometry at these speeds. At high sliding speeds, the shear stress was found to be lower for a sphere-on-flat configuration compared to a flat-pin-on-flat configuration. This can be attributed to the larger equivalent hydrodynamic thickness due to the convergent inlet zone ahead of the sphere-on-flat contact, which presumably enhances the water supply in the contact, promotes rehydration, and thus reduces the friction at high sliding speeds compared to that measured for the flat-pin-on-flat contact.

References

[1]
Gong J P. Friction and lubrication of hydrogels—Its richness and complexity. Soft Matter 2(7):544-552 (2006)
[2]
Ganji F, Vasheghani-Farahani S, Vasheghani-Farahani E. Theoretical description of hydrogel swelling: A review. Iran Polym J 19(5):375-398 (2010)
[3]
Mahinroosta M, Farsangi Z J, Allahverdi A, Shakoori Z. Hydrogels as intelligent materials: a brief review of synthesis, properties and applications. Mater Today Chem 8:42-55 (2018)
[4]
Lin C H, Hsu S H, Su J M, Chen C W. Surface modification of poly (ε-caprolactone) porous scaffolds using gelatin hydrogel as the tracheal replacement. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 5(2):156-162 (2011)
[5]
Fu R M, Tu L J, Zhou Y H, Fan L, Zhang F M, Wang Z G, Xing J, Chen D F, Deng C L, Tan G X, et al. A tough and self-powered hydrogel for artificial skin. Chem Mater 31(23):9850-9860 (2019)
[6]
Yu Y, Yuk H, Parada G A, Wu Y, Liu X Y, Nabzdyk C S, Youcef-Toumi K, Zang J F, Zhao X H. Multifunctional “hydrogel skins” on diverse polymers with arbitrary shapes. Adv Mater 31(7):1807101 (2019)
[7]
Kosukegawa H, Mamada K, Kuroki K, Liu L, Inoue K, Hayase T, Ohta M. Measurements of dynamic viscoelasticity of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel for the development of blood vessel biomodeling. J Fluid Sci Technol 3(4):533-543 (2008)
[8]
Gong J P, Iwasaki Y, Osada Y, Kurihara K, Hamai Y. Friction of gels. 3. Friction on solid surfaces. J Phys Chem B 103(29):6001-6006 (1999)
[9]
Gong J P, Kagata G, Iwasaki Y, Osada Y. Surface friction of polymer gels: 1. Effect of interfacial interaction. Wear 251(1-12):1183-1187 (2001)
[10]
Gong J P, Kurokawa T, Narita T, Kagata G, Osada Y, Nishimura G, Kinjo M. Synthesis of hydrogels with extremely low surface friction. J Am Chem Soc 123(23):5582-5583 (2001)
[11]
Kagata G, Gong J P, Osada Y. Friction of gels. 6. Effects of sliding velocity and viscoelastic responses of the network. J Phys Chem B 106(18):4596-4601 (2002)
[12]
Gong J P, Osada Y. Gel friction: a model based on surface repulsion and adsorption. J Chem Phys 109(18):8062-8068 (1998)
[13]
Nonoyama T, Gong J P. Double-network hydrogel and its potential biomedical application: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 229(12):853-863 (2015)
[14]
Ohsedo Y, Takashina R, Gong J P, Osada Y. Surface friction of hydrogels with well-defined polyelectrolyte brushes. Langmuir 20(16):6549-6555 (2004)
[15]
Kii A, Xu J, Gong J P, Osada Y, Zhang X M. Heterogeneous polymerization of hydrogels on hydrophobic substrate. J Phys Chem B 105(20):4565-4571 (2001)
[16]
Rennie A C, Dickrell P L, Sawyer W G. Friction coefficient of soft contact lenses: Measurements and modeling. Tribol Lett 18(4):499-504 (2005)
[17]
Urueña J M, McGhee E O, Angelini T E, Dowson D, Sawyer W G, Pitenis A A. Normal load scaling of friction in gemini hydrogels. Biotribology 13:30-35 (2018)
[18]
Pitenis A A, Urueña J M, Schulze K D, Nixon R M, Dunn A C, Krick B A, Sawyer W G, Angelini T E. Polymer fluctuation lubrication in hydrogel gemini interfaces. Soft Matter 10(44):8955-8962 (2014)
[19]
Urueña J M, Pitenis A A, Nixon R M, Schulze K D, Angelini T E, Sawyer W G. Mesh size control of polymer fluctuation lubrication in gemini hydrogels. Biotribology 1-2:24-29 (2015)
[20]
Reale E R, Dunn A C. Poroelasticity-driven lubrication in hydrogel interfaces. Soft Matter 13(2):428-435 (2017)
[21]
Pitenis A A, Sawyer W G. Lubricity of high water content aqueous gels. Tribol Lett 66(3):113 (2018)
[22]
Meier Y A, Zhang K H, Spencer N D, Simič R. Linking friction and surface properties of hydrogels molded against materials of different surface energies. Langmuir 35(48):15805-15812 (2019)
[23]
Simič R, Yetkin M, Zhang K H, Spencer N D. Importance of hydration and surface structure for friction of acrylamide hydrogels. Tribol Lett 68(2):64 (2020)
[24]
Klein J. Hydration lubrication. Friction 1(1):1-23 (2013)
[25]
Jiang C K, Jiang H, Zhang J W, Kang G Z. Analytical model of friction behavior during polymer scratching with conical tip. Friction 7(5):466-478 (2019)
[26]
Popov V L, Pohrt R, Li Q. Strength of adhesive contacts: influence of contact geometry and material gradients. Friction 5(3):308-325 (2017)
[27]
Moore A C, Burris D L. Tribological rehydration of cartilage and its potential role in preserving joint health. Osteoarthr Cartil 25(1):99-107 (2017)
[28]
Zhang K H, Simič R, Yan W Q, Spencer N D. Creating an interface: rendering a double-network hydrogel lubricious via spontaneous delamination. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(28):25427-25435 (2019)
[29]
Fairbanks B D, Schwartz M P, Bowman C N, Anseth K S. Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. Biomater- ials 30(35):6702-6707 (2009)
[30]
Majima T, Schnabel W, Weber W. Phenyl-2,4,6-trimethy- lbenzoylphosphinates as water-soluble photoinitiators. Generation and reactivity of O=Ṗ(C6H5)(O-) radical anions. Die Makromol Chem 192(10):2307-2315 (1991)
[31]
Sader J E, Chon J W M, Mulvaney P. Calibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum 70(10):3967-3969 (1999)
[32]
Cannara R J, Eglin M, Carpick R W. Lateral force calibration in atomic force microscopy: A new lateral force calibration method and general guidelines for optimization. Rev Sci Instrum 77(5):053701 (2006)
[33]
Hertz H. On the contact of elastic solids. J für die Reine und Angew Math 92:156-171 (1881)
[34]
Johnson K L. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[35]
Delavoipière J, Tran Y, Verneuil E, Heurtefeu B, Hui C Y, Chateauminois A. Friction of poroelastic contacts with thin hydrogel films. Langmuir 34(33):9617-9626 (2018)
[36]
Martin A, Clain J, Buguin A, Brochard-Wyart F. Wetting transitions at soft, sliding interfaces. Phys Rev E 65(3):031605 (2002)
[37]
Kurokawa T, Tominaga T, Katsuyama Y, Kuwabara R, Furukawa H, Osada Y, Gong J P. Elastic-hydrodynamic transition of gel friction. Langmuir 21(19):8643-8648 (2005)
[38]
Hamrock B J, Dowson D. Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of elliptical contacts for materials of low elastic modulus I—Fully flooded conjunction. J Lubr Technol 100(2):236-245 (1978)
[39]
Raviv U, Laurat P, Klein J. Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films. Nature 413(6851):51-54 (2001)
Friction
Pages 360-373
Cite this article:
LIU W, SIMIČ R, LIU Y, et al. Effect of contact geometry on the friction of acrylamide hydrogels with different surface structures. Friction, 2022, 10(3): 360-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-020-0458-0

798

Views

44

Downloads

17

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

16

Scopus

2

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 27 July 2020
Revised: 14 September 2020
Accepted: 25 September 2020
Published: 23 November 2020
© The author(s) 2020

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return