AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (40.5 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

A review of the bio-tribology of medical devices

Xiaogang ZHANG1, Yali ZHANG1, Zhongmin JIN1,2,3( )
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Numerous medical devices have been applied for the treatment or alleviation of various diseases. Tribological issues widely exist in those medical devices and play vital roles in determining their performance and service life. In this review, the bio-tribological issues involved in commonly used medical devices are identified, including artificial joints, fracture fixation devices, skin-related devices, dental restoration devices, cardiovascular devices, and surgical instruments. The current understanding of the bio-tribological behavior and mechanism involved in those devices is summarized. Recent advances in the improvement of tribological properties are examined. Challenges and future developments for the prospective of bio-tribological performance are highlighted.

Keywords

bio-tribologymedical deviceswearfriction

References

[1]
Information. https://www.who.int/medical_devices/full_deffinition/en/, 2020.
[2]
Information. https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/medical-devices-market, 2020.
[3]
Jin Z M, Zheng J, Li W, Zhou Z R. Tribology of medical devices. Biosurf Biotribol 2(4): 173-192 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Xie D, Leng Y X, Jing F J, Huang N. A brief review of bio- tribology in cardiovascular devices. Biosurf Biotribol 1(4): 249-262 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Dowson D. Bio-tribology. Faraday Discuss 156: 9-30 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Lanza A, Ruggiero A, Sbordone L. Tribology and dentistry: A commentary. Lubricants 7(6): 52 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Sahoo P, Das S K, Davim J P. Tribology of materials for biomedical applications. In Mechanical Behaviour of Biomaterials. Davim J P, Ed. San Diego (USA): Woodhead Publishing, 2019: 1-45.
Crossref
[8]
Meng Y G, Xu J, Jin Z M, Prakash B, Hu Y Z. A review of recent advances in tribology. Friction 8(2): 221-300 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Nam D, Lawrie C M, Salih R, Nahhas C R, Barrack R L, Nunley R M. Cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty of the same modern design: A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101(13): 1185-1192 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Bingley R, Martin A, Manfredi O, Nejadhamzeeigilani M, Oladokun A, Beadling A R, Siddiqui S, Anderson J, Thompson J, Neville A, et al. Fretting-corrosion at the modular tapers interface: Inspection of standard ASTM F1875-98. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H: J Eng Med 232(5): 492-501 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Shahemi N, Liza S, Abbas A A, Merican A M. Long-term wear failure analysis of uhmwpe acetabular cup in total hip replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 87: 1-9 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Popoola O O, Villasenor D A O, Fryman J C, Mimnaugh K, Rufner A. High cycle in vitro hip wear of and in vivo biological response to vitamin E blended highly crosslinked polyethylene. Biotribology 16: 10-16 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
de Steiger R, Lorimer M, Graves S E. Cross-linked polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty markedly reduces revision surgery at 16 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(15): 1281-1288 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Saikko V. Wear and friction of thin, large-diameter acetabular liners made from highly cross-linked, vitamin-E-stabilized UHMWPE against CoCr femoral heads. Wear 432-433: 202948 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Łapaj Ł, Wendland J, Markuszewski J, Mróz A, Wiśniewski T. Retrieval analysis of titanium nitride (TiN) coated prosthetic femoral heads articulating with polyethylene. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 55: 127-139 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Sonntag R, Braun S, Al-Salehi L, Reinders J, Mueller U, Kretzer J P. Three-dimensional friction measurement during hip simulation. PLoS One 12(9): e0184043 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Howard D P, Wall P D H, Fernandez M A, Parsons H, Howard P W. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing fractures in total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of data from the National Joint Registry. Bone Joint J 99-B(8): 1012-1019 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Walter W L, Waters T S, Gillies M, Donohoo S, Kurtz S M, Ranawat A S, Hozack W J, Tuke M A. Squeaking hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4): 102-111 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Cogan A, Nizard R, Sedel L. Occurrence of noise in alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A survey on 284 consecutive hips. Orthop Traumatol: Surg Res 97(2): 206-210 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Siskey R, Ciccarelli L, Lui M K C, Kurtz S M. Are PEEK- on-ceramic bearings an option for total disc arthroplasty? An in vitro tribology study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(11): 2428-2440 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Kurtz S M. Development and clinical performance of PEEK intervertebral cages. In PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. Kurtz S M, Ed. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): William Andrew Publishing, 2019: 263-280.
Crossref
[22]
Kurtz S M, Lanman T. Dynamic stabilization and semirigid PEEK rods for spinal fusion. In PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. Kurtz S M, Ed. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): William Andrew Publishing, 2019: 281-289.
Crossref
[23]
Lovald S, Berg-Johansen B, Altiok E, Kurtz S M. Polyetheretherketone in trauma. In PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. Kurtz S M, Ed. 2nd ed. Oxford UK: William Andrew Publishing, 2019: 301-317.
Crossref
[24]
Song J, Liao Z H, Shi H Y, Xiang D D, Liu Y H, Liu W Q, Peng Z X. Fretting wear study of PEEK-based composites for bio-implant application. Tribol Lett 65(4): 150 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Kurtz S M, Nevelos J. PEEK bearing materials for total joint replacement. In PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. Kurtz S M, Ed. 2nd ed. Oxford UK: William Andrew Publishing, 2019: 403-418.
Crossref
[26]
Cui W, Bian Y Y, Zeng H K, Zhang X G, Zhang Y L, Weng X S, Xin S X, Jin Z M. Structural and tribological characteristics of ultra-low-wear polyethylene as artificial joint materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 104: 103629 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Choi Y J, Lee K W, Ha J K, Bae J Y, Lee S K, Kim S B, Seo D K. Comparison of revision rates due to aseptic loosening between high-flex and conventional knee prostheses. Knee Surg Relat Res 30(2): 161-166 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Hampton C B, Berliner Z P, Nguyen J T, Mendez L, Smith S S, Joseph A D, Padgett D E, Rodriguez J A. Aseptic loosening at the tibia in total knee arthroplasty: A function of cement mantle quality? J Arthroplasty 35(Suppl 6): S190-S196 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Costales T G, Chapman D M, Dalury D F. The natural history of radiolucencies following uncemented total knee arthroplasty at 9 years. J Arthroplasty 35(1): 127-131 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Sharkey P F, Lichstein P M, Shen C, Tokarski A T, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today-has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty 29(9): 1774-1778 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Meneghini R M, de Beaubien B C. Early failure of cementless porous tantalum monoblock tibial components. J Arthroplasty 28(9): 1505-1508 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Rytter S, Madsen F, Jepsen C F, Stilling M. Implant fracture of the Regenerex® modular metal tibial component: A report of three cases. Knee 26(5): 1143-1151 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Stormont G, Stormont D. Catastrophic failure of regenerex tibial components: A case series. J Knee Surg 30(6): 594-599 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Bragdon C R, Burke D, Lowenstein J D, O'Connor A S D, Ramamurti B, Jasty M, Harris W H. Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion. J Arthroplasty 11(8): 945-951 (1996)
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Cherian J J, Banerjee S, Kapadia B H, Jauregui J J, Harwin S F, Mont M A. Cementless total knee arthroplasty: A review. J Knee Surg 27(3): 193-198 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Arnholt C M, Macdonald D W, Malkani A L, Klein G R, Rimnac C M, Kurtz S M, Implant Research Center Writing Committee, Kocagoz S B, Gilbert J L. Corrosion damage and wear mechanisms in long-term retrieved CoCr femoral components for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(12): 2900-2906 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Arnholt C M, MacDonald D W, Tohfafarosh M, Gilbert J L, Rimnac C M, Kurtz S M, Implant Research Center Writing Committee, Klein G, Mont M A, Parvizi J, et al. Mechanically assisted taper corrosion in modular TKA. J Arthroplasty 29(Suppl 9): 205-208 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Eckert J A, Mueller U, Jaeger S, Panzram B, Kretzer J P. Fretting and corrosion in modular shoulder arthroplasty: A retrieval analysis. BioMed Res Int 2016: 1695906 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Lombardo D J, Siljander M P, Gehrke C K, Moore D D, Karadsheh M S, Baker E A. Fretting and corrosion damage of retrieved dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty systems. J Arthroplasty 34(6): 1273-1278 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Colas S, Allalou A, Poichotte A, Piriou P, Dray-Spira R, Zureik M. Exchangeable femoral neck (dual-modular) THA prostheses have poorer survivorship than other designs: A nationwide cohort of 324, 108 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(8): 2046-2059 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Di Laura A, Hothi H, Henckel J, Skinner J, Hart A. Should all modular-neck hip implants be banned? Orthop Proc 100-B(Suppl 9): 39 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Siljander M P, Baker E A, Baker K C, Salisbury M R, Thor C C, Verner J J. Fretting and corrosion damage in retrieved metal-on-polyethylene modular total hip arthroplasty systems: What is the importance of femoral head size? J Arthroplasty 33(3): 931-938 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Watanabe H, Takahashi K, Takenouchi K, Sato A, Kawaji H, Nakamura H, Takai S. Pseudotumor and deep venous thrombosis due to crevice corrosion of the head-neck junction in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 20(6): 1142-1147 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Hui T T, Kubacki G W, Gilbert J L. Voltage and wear debris from Ti-6Al-4V interact to affect cell viability during in-vitro fretting corrosion. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 106(1): 160-167 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Jacobs J J. Corrosion at the head-neck junction: Why is this happening now? J Arthroplasty 31(7): 1378-1380 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Swaminathan V, Gilbert J L. Fretting corrosion of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V interfaces. Biomaterials 33(22): 5487-5503 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Kurtz S M, Kocagöz S B, Hanzlik J A, Underwood R J, Gilbert J L, MacDonald D W, Lee G C, Mont M A, Kraay M J, Klein G R, et al. Do ceramic femoral heads reduce taper fretting corrosion in hip arthroplasty? A retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(10): 3270-3282 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]
Goldberg J R, Gilbert J L, Jacobs J J, Bauer T W, Paprosky W, Leurgans S. A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 401: 149-161 (2002)
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]
Nakahara I, Takao M, Bandoh S, Sugano N. Fixation strength of taper connection at head-neck junction in retrieved carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK hip stems. J Artif Organs 17(4): 358-363 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]
Osman K, Panagiotidou A P, Khan M, Blunn G, Haddad F S. Corrosion at the head-neck interface of current designs of modular femoral components. Bone Joint J 98-B(5): 579-584 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]
Haschke H, Falkenberg A, Morlock M M, Huber G. Do SiNx coatings bear the potential to reduce the risk of micromotion in modular taper junctions? Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H: J Eng Med 234(9): 897-908 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Goldstein Z H, Estrera K, Levine B R. Taper failure after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 39(5): e984-e987 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]
Tan S C, Teeter M G, Del Balso C, Howard J L, Lanting B A. Effect of taper design on trunnionosis in metal on polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30(7): 1269-1272 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
Nassif N A, Nawabi D H, Stoner K, Elpers M, Wright T, Padgett D E. Taper design affects failure of large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(2): 564-571 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[55]
Del Balso C, Teeter M G, Tan S C, Lanting B A, Howard J L. Taperosis: Does head length affect fretting and corrosion in total hip arthroplasty? Bone Joint J 97-B(7): 911-916 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]
Higgs G B, MacDonald D W, Gilbert J L, Rimnac C M, Kurtz S M, Implant Research Center Writing Committee. Does taper size have an effect on taper damage in retrieved metal-on-polyethylene total hip devices? J Arthroplasty 31(Suppl 9): 277-281 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]
Munir S, Walter W L, Walsh W R. Variations in the trunnion surface topography between different commercially available hip replacement stems. J Orthop Res 33(1): 98-105 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[58]
Pourzal R, Hall D J, Ha N Q, Urban R M, Levine B R, Jacobs J J, Lundberg H J. Does surface topography play a role in taper damage in head-neck modular junctions? Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(10): 2232-2242 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[59]
Ghanem E, Ward D M, Robbins C E, Nandi S, Bono J V, Talmo C T. Corrosion and adverse local tissue reaction in one type of modular neck stem. J Arthroplasty 30(10): 1787-1793 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[60]
Ho-Shui-Ling A, Bolander J, Rustom L E, Johnson A W, Luyten F P, Picart C. Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives. Biomaterials 180: 143-162 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[61]
Li J L, Qin L, Yang K, Ma Z J, Wang Y X, Cheng L L, Zhao D W. Materials evolution of bone plates for internal fixation of bone fractures: A review. J Mater Sci Technol 36: 190-208 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[62]
Nalbantgil D, Tozlu M, Ozdemir F, Oztoprak M O, Arun T. FEM analysis of a new miniplate: Stress distribution on the plate, screws and the bone. Eur J Dent 6(1): 9-15 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[63]
Al-Tamimi A A, Hernandez M A, Omar A, Morales-Aldana D F, Peach C, Bartolo P. Mechanical, biological and tribological behaviour of fixation plates 3D printed by electron beam and selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109(3): 673-688 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[64]
Bartolomeu F, Buciumeanu M, Pinto E, Alves N, Silva F S, Carvalho O, Miranda G. Wear behavior of Ti6Al4V biomedical alloys processed by selective laser melting, hot pressing and conventional casting. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 27(4): 829-838 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[65]
Zhang Y, Addison O, Yu F, Troconis B C R, Scully J R, Davenport A J. Time-dependent enhanced corrosion of Ti6Al4V in the presence of H2O2 and albumin. Sci Rep 8(1): 3185 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[66]
Wang C C, Zhang G Q, Li Z P, Zeng X Q, Xu Y, Zhao S C, Hu H X, Zhang Y D, Ren T H. Tribological behavior of Ti-6Al-4V against cortical bone in different biolubricants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 90: 460-471 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[67]
Hatem A, Lin J L, Wei R H, Torres R D, Laurindo C, de Souza G B, Soares P. Tribocorrosion behavior of low friction TiSiCN nanocomposite coatings deposited on titanium alloy for biomedical applications. Surf Coat Technol 347: 1-12 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[68]
Pana I, Vladescu A, Constantin L R, Sandu I G, Dinu M, Cotrut C M. In vitro corrosion and tribocorrosion performance of biocompatible carbide coatings. Coatings 10(7): 654 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[69]
Attabi S, Mokhtari M, Taibi Y, Abdel-Rahman I, Hafez B, Elmsellem H. Electrochemical and tribological behavior of surface-treated titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. J Bio-Tribo- Corros 5(1): 2 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[70]
Wang G Q, Wang S R, Yang X F, Yu X C, Wen D S, Chang Z Q, Zhang M Y. Fretting wear and mechanical properties of surface-nanostructural titanium alloy bone plate. Surf Coat Technol 405: 126512 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[71]
Al-Tamimi A A, Fernandes P R A, Peach C, Cooper G, Diver C, Bartolo P J. Metallic bone fixation implants: A novel design approach for reducing the stress shielding phenomenon. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(2): 141-151 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[72]
Limbert G, Masen M A, Pond D, Graham H K, Sherratt M J, Jobanputra R, McBride A. Biotribology of the ageing skin—Why we should care. Biotribology 17: 75-90 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[73]
Secretariat M A. Pressure ulcer prevention: An evidence- based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 9(2): 1-104 (2009)
Google Scholar
[74]
Klaassen M. The static friction behavior of skin with relevance to pressure ulcer prevalence. Ph.D Thesis. Enshurd City (The Netherlands): University of Twente, 2018.
[75]
Lenz A L, Johnson K A, Bush T R. A new method to quantify liner deformation within a prosthetic socket for below knee amputees. J Biomech 74: 213-219 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[76]
Mervis J S, Phillips T J. Pressure ulcers: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, presentation. J Am Acad Dermatol 81(4): 881-890 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[77]
Klaassen M, de Vries E G, Masen M A. Friction in the contact between skin and a soft counter material: Effects of hardness and surface finish. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 92: 137-143 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[78]
McInnes E, Bell-Syer S E, Dumville J C, Legood R, Cullum N A. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4): CD001735 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[79]
Gefen A. The bioengineering theory of the key modes of action of a cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant. Int Wound J 17(5): 1396-1404 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[80]
Armentia M, Abasolo M, Coria I, Albizuri J. Fatigue design of dental implant assemblies: A nominal stress approach. Metals 10(6): 744 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[81]
Carvalho A, Pinto P, Madeira S, Silva F S, Carvalho O, Gomes J R. Tribological characterization of dental restorative materials. Biotribology 23: 100140 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[82]
Mörmann W H, Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Sener B, Attin T, Mehl A. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: Two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 20: 113-125 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[83]
Shenoy A, Shenoy N. Dental ceramics: An update. J Conserv Dent 13(4): 195-203 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[84]
Arsecularatne J A, Chung N R, Hoffman M. An in vitro study of the wear behaviour of dental composites. Biosurf Biotribol 2(3): 102-113 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[85]
El Zhawi H, Kaizer M R, Chughtai A, Moraes R R, Zhang Y. Polymer infiltrated ceramic network structures for resistance to fatigue fracture and wear. Dent Mater 32(11): 1352-1361 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[86]
Pratap B, Gupta R K, Bhardwaj B, Nag M. Resin based restorative dental materials: Characteristics and future perspectives. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 55(1): 126-138 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[87]
Pratap B, Gupta R K, Shekhawat D S, Yadav A, Chaabra D, Nag M. Physical and mechanical characterization of nanoalumina filled resin based dental composites. Mater Today: Proc 28: 2171-2173 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[88]
Kruzic J J, Arsecularatne J A, Tanaka C B, Hoffman M J, Cesar P F. Recent advances in understanding the fatigue and wear behavior of dental composites and ceramics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 88: 504-533 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[89]
Nedeljkovic I, Teughels W, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K L. Is secondary caries with composites a material-based problem? Dent Mate 31(11): e247-e277 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[90]
Yadav S, Gangwar S. A critical evaluation of tribological interaction for restorative materials in dentistry. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 68(17): 1005-1019 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[91]
Kumar S R, Patnaik A, Bhat I K. The in vitro wear behavior of nanozirconia-filled dental composite in food slurry condition. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part J: J Eng Tribology 231(1): 23-40 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[92]
Chadda H, Satapathy B K, Patnaik A, Ray A R. Mechanistic interpretations of fracture toughness and correlations to wear behavior of hydroxyapatite and silica/hydroxyapatite filled bis-GMA/TEGDMA micro/hybrid dental restorative composites. Compos Part B: Eng 130: 132-146 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[93]
Choi J W, Song E J, Shin J H, Jeong T S, Huh J B. In vitro investigation of wear of CAD/CAM polymeric materials against primary teeth. Materials 10(12): 1410 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[94]
Xu Z, Yu P, Arola D D, Min J, Gao S S. A comparative study on the wear behavior of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) material and tooth enamel. Dent Mater 33(12): 1351-1361 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[95]
Yu P, Xu Z, Arola D D, Min J, Zhao P, Gao S S. Effect of acidic agents on the wear behavior of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 74: 154-163 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[96]
Corne P, De March P, Cleymand F, Geringer J. Fretting- corrosion behavior on dental implant connection in human saliva. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 94: 86-92 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[97]
Alfaro M F, Rossman P K, da Silva Viera Marques I, Dube A, Takoudis C, Shokuhfar T, Mathew M T, Sukotjo C. Interface damage in titanium dental implant due to tribocorrosion: The role of mastication frequencies. J Bio- Tribo-Corros 5(4): 81 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[98]
Apaza-Bedoya K, Tarce M, Benfatti C A M, Henriques B, Mathew M T, Teughels W, Souza J C M. Synergistic interactions between corrosion and wear at titanium-based dental implant connections: A scoping review. J Periodontal Res 52(6): 946-954 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[99]
Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang N P, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 17(3): 244-250 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[100]
Liu X T, Chen S Y, Tsoi J K H, Matinlinna J P. Binary titanium alloys as dental implant materials—a review. Regen Biomater 4(5): 315-323 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[101]
Khodaei M, Nejatidanesh F, Shirani M J, Iyengar S, Sina H, Valanezhad A, Savabi O. Optimum temperature and chlorine ion concentration for hydrogen peroxide treatment of titanium dental implant material. J Mater Res Technol 9(6): 13312-13319 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[102]
Bosshardt D D, Chappuis V, Buser D. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: Current knowledge and open questions. Periodontology 2000 73(1): 22-40 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[103]
Hussein M A, Suryanarayana C, Arumugam M K, Al- Aqeeli N. Effect of sintering parameters on microstructure, mechanical properties and electrochemical behavior of Nb-Zr alloy for biomedical applications. Mater Des 83: 344-351 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[104]
Liu R, Tang Y L, Zeng L L, Zhao Y, Ma Z, Sun Z Q, Xiang L B, Ren L, Yang K. In vitro and in vivo studies of anti-bacterial copper-bearing titanium alloy for dental application. Dent Mater 34(8): 1112-1126 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[105]
Lan C B, Wu Y, Guo L L, Chen H J, Chen F. Microstructure, texture evolution and mechanical properties of cold rolled Ti-32.5Nb-6.8Zr-2.7Sn biomedical beta titanium alloy. J Mater Sci Technol 34(5): 788-792 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[106]
Yan L M, Yuan Y W, Ouyang L J, Li H, Mirzasadeghi A, Li L. Improved mechanical properties of the new Ti-15Ta-xZr alloys fabricated by selective laser melting for biomedical application. J Alloys Compd 688: 156-162 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[107]
Yabutsuka T, Mizuno H, Takai S. Fabrication of bioactive titanium and its alloys by combination of doubled sandblasting process and alkaline simulated body fluid treatment. J Ceram Soc Japan 127(10): 669-677 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[108]
Liu X, Niu Y M, Xie W L, Wei D Q, Du Q. Comparative investigations of in vitro and in vivo bioactivity of titanium vs. Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn alloy before and after sandblasting and acid etching. RSC Adv 10(40): 23582-23591 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[109]
Khodaei M, Alizadeh A, Hosseini H R M. Effect of oxidizing atmosphere on the surface of titanium dental implant material. J Bionic Eng 16(6): 1052-1060 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[110]
Wang F F, Li C J, Zhang S, Liu H C. Tantalum coated on titanium dioxide nanotubes by plasma spraying enhances cytocompatibility for dental implants. Surf Coat Technol 382: 125161 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[111]
An B L, Li Z R, Diao X O, Xin H T, Zhang Q, Jia X R, Wu Y L, Li K, Guo Y Z. In vitro and in vivo studies of ultrafine-grain Ti as dental implant material processed by ECAP. Mater Sci Eng: C 67: 34-41 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[112]
Medvedev A E, Molotnikov A, Lapovok R, Zeller R, Berner S, Habersetzer P, Torre F D. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 62: 384-398 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[113]
Kruk A, Zimowski S, Łukaszczyk A, Cieniek Ł, Moskalewicz T. The influence of heat treatment on the microstructure, surface topography and selected properties of PEEK coatings electrophoretically deposited on the Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Prog Org Coat 133: 180-190 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[114]
Pałka K, Pokrowiecki R. Porous titanium implants: A review. Adv Eng Mater 20(5): 1700648 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[115]
Bose S, Banerjee D, Shivaram A, Tarafder S, Bandyopadhyay A. Calcium phosphate coated 3D printed porous titanium with nanoscale surface modification for orthopedic and dental applications. Mater Des 151: 102-112 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[116]
Edelmann A R, Patel D, Allen R K, Gibson C J, Best A M, Bencharit S. Retrospective analysis of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 121(3): 404-410 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[117]
Kuo T Y, Chin W H, Chien C S, Hsieh Y H. Mechanical and biological properties of graded porous tantalum coatings deposited on titanium alloy implants by vacuum plasma spraying. Surf Coat Technol 372: 399-409 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[118]
Zhao D F, Seco M, Wu J J, Edelman J B, Wilson M K, Vallely M P, Byrom M J, Bannon P G. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in middle-aged adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 102(1): 315-327 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[119]
Zilla P, Brink J, Human P, Bezuidenhout D. Prosthetic heart valves: Catering for the few. Biomaterials 29(4): 385-406 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[120]
Zhang H B, Deng X Y, Cianciulli T F, Zhang Z, Chappard D, Lax J A, Saccheri M C, Redruello H J, Jordana J L, Prezioso H A, et al. Pivoting system fracture in a bileaflet mechanical valve: A case report. J Biomed Mate Res - Part B Appl Biomater 90B(2): 952-961 (2009)
Crossref Google Scholar
[121]
Sundareswaran K S, Reichenbach S H, Masterson K B, Butler K C, Farrar D J. Low bearing wear in explanted HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices after chronic clinical support. ASAIO J 59(1): 41-45 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[122]
Moazami N, Fukamachi K, Kobayashi M, Smedira N G, Hoercher K J, Massiello A, Lee S, Horvath D J, Starling R C. Axial and centrifugal continuous-flow rotary pumps: A translation from pump mechanics to clinical practice. J Heart Lung Transplant 32(1): 1-11 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[123]
da Silva B U, da Fonseca J W G, Leal E B, Cardoso J R, Biscegli J F, de Andrade A J P. Apical aortic blood pump preclinical assessment for long-term use: Durability test and stator topology to reduce wear in the bearing system. Artif Organs 44(8): 779-784 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[124]
Wagner R M F, Maiti R, Carré M J, Perrault C M, Evans P C, Lewis R. Bio-tribology of vascular devices: A review of tissue/device friction research. Biotribology 25: 100169 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[125]
Cornelissen A, Vogt F J. The effects of stenting on coronary endothelium from a molecular biological view: Time for improvement? J Cell Mol Med 23(1): 39-46 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[126]
Krsmanovic D, Koncar I, Petrovic D, Milasinovic D, Davidovic L, Filipovic N. Computer modelling of maximal displacement forces in endoluminal thoracic aortic stent graft. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 17(9): 1012-1020 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[127]
Wang J, Giridharan V, Shanov V, Xu Z G, Collins B, White L, Jang Y, Sankar J, Huang N, Yun Y. Flow-induced corrosion behavior of absorbable magnesium-based stents. Acta Biomater 10(12): 5213-5223 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[128]
Chen T H, Lancaster M, Lin D S Y, Doyle M G, Forbes T L, Amon C H. Measurement of frictional properties of aortic stent grafts and their delivery systems. J Med Devices 13(2): 021008 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[129]
McGee O M, Sun W, McNamara L M. An in vitro model quantifying the effect of calcification on the tissue-stent interaction in a stenosed aortic root. J Biomech 82: 109-115 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[130]
Kapnisis K K, Halwani D O, Brott B C, Anderson P G, Lemons J E, Anayiotos A S. Stent overlapping and geometric curvature influence the structural integrity and surface characteristics of coronary nitinol stents. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 20: 227-236 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[131]
Weiss D, Gefen A, Einav S. Modelling catheter-vein biomechanical interactions during an intravenous procedure. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 19(3): 330-339 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[132]
Lin C X, Wan H P, Kaper H J, Sharma P K. A hyaluronic acid based lubricious coating for cardiovascular catheters. Tribol Int 151: 106495 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[133]
Takahashi T, Murayama R, Abe-Doi M, Miyahara-Kaneko M, Kanno C, Nakamura M, Mizuno M, Komiyama C, Sanada H. Preventing peripheral intravenous catheter failure by reducing mechanical irritation. Sci Rep 10(1): 1550 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[134]
Mohammadzadegan A F, Ashrafzadeh F, Moodi H. Hybrid force and position control of a 4DOF surgical robot with disturbance observer. In Proceedings of 2019 27th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering, Yazd, Iran, 2019: 1052-1057.
Crossref
[135]
Sahlabadi M, Khodaei S, Jezler K, Hutapea P. Insertion mechanics of bioinspired needles into soft tissues. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 27(5): 284-291 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[136]
Gao D D, Lei Y, Lian B, Yao B. Modeling and simulation of flexible needle insertion into soft tissue using modified local constraints. J Manuf Sci Eng 138(12): 121012 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[137]
Abolhassani N, Patel R, Moallem M. Needle insertion into soft tissue: A survey. Med Eng Phys 29(4): 413-431 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[138]
Tan L, Jones J A, Barnett A C, Zhang H, Moore J Z, Zhang Q. Force model for ultrasonic needle insertion. Exp Tech 42(5): 499-508 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[139]
Ramezanpour H, Yousefi H, Rezaei M, Rostami M. Effects of rotational motion in robotic needle insertion. J Biomed Phys Eng 5(4): 207-216 (2015)
Google Scholar
[140]
DiMaio S P, Salcudean S E. Interactive simulation of needle insertion models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(7): 1167-1179 (2005)
Crossref Google Scholar
[141]
Rossa C, Lehmann T, Sloboda R, Usmani N, Tavakoli M. A data-driven soft sensor for needle deflection in heterogeneous tissue using just-in-time modelling. Med Biol Eng Comput 55(8): 1401-1414 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[142]
Rajeswari N R, Malliga P. Analytical approach for optimization design of MEMS based microneedles in drug delivery system. J Mech Sc Technol 29(8): 3405-3415 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[143]
Chentanez N, Alterovitz R, Ritchie D, Cho L, Hauser K K, Goldberg K, Shewchuk J R, O'Brien J F. Interactive simulation of surgical needle insertion and steering. ACM Trans Graph 28(3): 88 (2009)
Crossref Google Scholar
[144]
Mo Z L, Mao X J, Hicks K O, Xu W L. In-vivo tissue identification on mice using a fiber optical tip force sensing needle. IEEE Sens J 18(15): 6352-6359 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[145]
Elgezua I, Kobayashi Y, Fujie M G. Estimation of needle tissue interaction based on non-linear elastic modulus and friction force patterns. In Proceedings of 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Chicago, USA, 2014: 4315-4320.
Crossref
[146]
Okamura A M, Simone C, O’Leary M D. Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51(10): 1707-1716 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[147]
Asadian A, Kermani M R, Patel R V. A compact dynamic force model for needle-tissue interaction. In Proceedings of 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2010: 2292-2295.
Crossref
[148]
Roesthuis R J, Van Veen Y R J, Jahya A, Misra S. Mechanics of needle-tissue interaction. In Proceedings of 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, USA, 2011: 2557-2563.
Crossref
[149]
Yang C J, Xie Y, Liu S, Sun D. Force modeling, identification, feedback control of robot-assisted needle insertion: A survey of the literature. Sensors 18(2): 561 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[150]
Mahvash M, Dupont P E. Mechanics of dynamic needle insertion into a biological material. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(4): 934-943 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[151]
Chen H C, Shaw J S, Lee J F, Wu S F. Study on fast needle puncture to reduce pain. In Proceedings of 2019 IEEE International Conference on Architecture, Construction, Environment and Hydraulics, Xiamen, China, 2019: 128-132.
Crossref
[152]
Khadem M, Rossa C, Sloboda R S, Usmani N, Tavakoli M. Mechanics of tissue cutting during needle insertion in biological tissue. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 1(2): 800-807 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[153]
Mahvash M, Dupont P E. Fast needle insertion to minimize tissue deformation and damage. In Proceedings of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan, 2009: 3097-3102.
Crossref
[154]
Tsumura R, Takishita Y, Fukushima Y, Iwata H. Histological evaluation of tissue damage caused by rotational needle insertion. In Proceedings of 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Orlando, USA, 2016: 5120-5123.
Crossref
[155]
Abolhassani N, Patel R V, Ayazi F. Minimization of needle deflection in robot-assisted percutaneous therapy. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 3(2): 140-148 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[156]
Zwimpfer T A, Fellmann-Fischer B, Oehler R, Schötzau A, Kind A B. A crossover study on the advantage of an additional rotation function in a needle holder compared to a conventional needle holder in a pelvitrainer model. Laparosc Surg 4(10): 1-9 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[157]
Yen C J. Huang Y A, Lin C L. Using simulation to study cutting force in biopsy needle insertion with bi-directional rotation. J Mech Med Biol 19(2): 1940020 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[158]
Tsumura R, Shitashima K, Iwata H. Insertion method for minimizing fine needle deflection in bowel insertion based on experimental analysis. In Proceedings of 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 2017: 187-192.
Crossref
[159]
Wang Y, Fu Z, Zhao Z F, Shen Y, Zhang T F, Shi W Y, Fei J, Chen G B. Experimental study of the optimum puncture pattern of robot-assisted needle insertion into hyperelastic materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H: J Eng Med 235(1): 28-43 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[160]
Moore J Z, Zhang Q H, McGill C S, Zheng H J, McLaughlin P W, Shih A J. Modeling cutting edge geometry for plane and curved needle tips. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 226(5): 861-869 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[161]
Lee J, Wang J, Park W. Efficient mechanism design and systematic operation planning for tube-wire flexible needles. J Mech Robot 10(6): 065001 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[162]
Dehghan E, Wen X, Zahiri-Azar R, Marchal M, Salcudean S E. Modeling of needle-tissue interaction using ultrasound- based motion estimation. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 10(Pt 1): 709-716 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[163]
Sprang T, Breedveld P, Dodou D. Wasp-inspired needle insertion with low net push force. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems, Edinburgh, UK, 2016: 307-318.
Crossref
[164]
Moore J Z, Malukhin K, Shih A J, Ehmann K F. Hollow needle tissue insertion force model. CIRP Ann 60(1): 157-160 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[165]
Moore J Z, Shih A J. Tissue oblique cutting flow angle and needle insertion contact length. Trans NAMRI/SME 38: 711-718 (2010)
Google Scholar
[166]
Moore J Z, McLaughlin P W, Shih A J. Novel needle cutting edge geometry for end-cut biopsy. Med Phys 39(1): 99-108 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[167]
Wang Y C, Chen R K, Tai B L, Xu K, Shih A J. Study of insertion force and deformation for suturing with precurved NiTi guidewire. J Biomech Eng 137(4): 041004 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[168]
Præstmark K A, Jensen M L, Madsen N B, Kildegaard J, Stallknecht B M. Pen needle design influences ease of insertion, pain, skin trauma in subjects with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 4(1): e000266 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[169]
Patel D S, Singh A, Jain V K, Ramkumar J, Shrivastava A. Investigations into insertion force of electrochemically micro-textured hypodermic needles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(5-8): 1311-1326 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[170]
Kasem H, Shriki H, Ganon L, Mizrahi M, Abd-Rbo K, Domb A J. Rubber plunger surface texturing for friction reduction in medical syringes. Friction 7(4): 351-358 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[171]
Gidde S T R, Ciuciu A, Devaravar N, Doracio R, Kianzad K, Hutapea P. Effect of vibration on insertion force and deflection of bioinspired needle in tissues. Bioinspir Biomim 15(5): 054001 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[172]
Arata J, Kogiso S, Sakaguchi M, Nakadate R, Oguri S, Uemura M, Byunghyun C, Akahoshi T, Ikeda T, Hashizume M. Articulated minimally invasive surgical instrument based on compliant mechanism. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(11): 1837-1843 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[173]
Sun Y Y, Liu H B, Wang S X, Back J, Zuo S Y, Bernth J E, Zhang G K, Wang G H, Li J M. A variable-dimension overtube for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. IEEE Access 8: 42720-42733 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[174]
Gao M Y, Hu C Z, Chen Z Z, Zhang H H, Liu S. Design and fabrication of a magnetic propulsion system for self- propelled capsule endoscope. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(12): 2891-2902 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[175]
Goldbart O, Elianov O, Shumalinsky D, Lobik L, Cytron S, Rosentsveig R, Wagner H D, Tenne R. Study of urological devices coated with fullerene-like nanoparticles. Nanoscale 5(18): 8526-8532 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[176]
Goldbart O, Sedova A, Yadgarov L, Rosentsveig R, Shumalinsky D, Lobik L, Wagner H D, Tenne R. Lubricating medical devices with fullerene-like nanoparticles. Tribol Lett 55(1): 103-109 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[177]
Thiong’o G M, Luzzio C, Albright A L. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt perforations of the gastrointestinal tract. J Neurosurg Pediatr 16(1): 36-41 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[178]
Lin C X, Liu W, Xie J Y, Li W, Zhou Z R. The lubricating function of mucin at the gastroscope device-esophagus interface. Tribol Lett 68(3): 82 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[179]
Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Srinivasa S, Bissett I P, Hill A G. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery. Ann Surg 253(1): 35-43 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[180]
Barrie J. Next generation of atraumatic laparoscopic instruments through analysis of the instrument-tissue interface. Ph.D Thesis. Leeds (UK): University of Leeds, 2017.
[181]
Bos J, Doornebosch E W L J, Engbers J G, Nyhuis O, Dodou D. Methods for reducing peak pressure in laparoscopic grasping. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part, H: J Eng Med 227(12): 1292-1300 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[182]
Marucci D D, Cartmill J A, Martin C J, Walsh W R. A compliant tip reduces the peak pressure of laparoscopic graspers. ANZ J Surg 72(7): 476-478 (2002)
Crossref Google Scholar
[183]
Lee H J, Box G N, Abraham J B A, Elchico E R, Panah R A, Taylor M B, Moskowitz R, Deane L A, McDougall E M, Clayman R V. Laboratory evaluation of laparoscopic vascular clamps using a load-cell device—are all clamps the same? J Urol 180(4): 1267-1272 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[184]
Heijnsdijk E A M, Kragten G A, Mugge W, Dankelman J, Gouma D J. Fenestrations in the jaws of laparoscopic graspers. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14(1): 45-48 (2005)
Crossref Google Scholar
[185]
Brown A W, Brown S I, Mclean D, Wang Z G, Cuschieri A. Impact of fenestrations and surface profiling on the holding of tissue by parallel occlusion laparoscopic graspers. Surg Endosc 28(4): 1277-1283 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[186]
Cheng L, Hannaford B. Evaluation of liver tissue damage and grasp stability using finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 19(1): 31-40 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[187]
Wils K S, Devasahayam S R, Manivannan M, Mathew G. Force model for laparoscopic graspers: implications for virtual simulator design. Minima Invasive Ther Allied Technol 26(2): 97-103 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[188]
Sakaguchi Y, Sato T, Yutaka Y, Muranishi Y, Komatsu T, Yoshizawa A, Nakajima N, Nakamura T, Date H. Development of novel force-limiting grasping forceps with a simple mechanism. European J Cardio-Thorac Surg 54(6): 1004-1012 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[189]
Xue R F, Du Z J, Yan Z Y, Ren B Y. An estimation method of grasping force for laparoscope surgical robot based on the model of a cable-pulley system. Mech Mach Theory 134: 440-454 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[190]
Li C S, Gu X Y, Ren H L. A cable-driven flexible robotic grasper with lego-like modular and reconfigurable joints. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech 22(6): 2757-2767 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[191]
Ly H H, Tanaka Y, Fukuda T, Sano A. Grasper having tactile sensing function using acoustic reflection for laparoscopic surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(8): 1333-1343 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[192]
Alleblas C C J, Vleugels M P H, Stommel M W J, Nieboer T E. Performance of a haptic feedback grasper in laparoscopic surgery: A randomized pilot comparison with conventional graspers in a porcine model. Surg Innov 26(5): 573-580 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 10 Issue 1,
January 2022
Pages 4-30
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-021-0512-6
Cite this article:
ZHANG X, ZHANG Y, JIN Z. A review of the bio-tribology of medical devices. Friction, 2022, 10(1): 4-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-021-0512-6

834

Views

116

Downloads

48

Crossref

55

Web of Science

53

Scopus

4

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 01 January 2021
Revised: 18 March 2021
Accepted: 23 March 2021
Published: 09 June 2021
© The author(s) 2021

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return