AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (2.4 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Description of sand–metal friction behavior based on subloading-friction model

Toshiyuki OZAKI1, Yuki YAMAKAWA2( ), Masami UENO3, Koichi HASHIGUCHI4,5
Kyushu Electric Engineering Consultants Inc., Fukuoka 810-0005, Japan
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan
MSC Software Ltd., Tokyo 101-0054, Japan
Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

A subloading-friction model is formulated to describe the smooth transient variation from static friction to kinetic friction, the recovery to static friction after the sliding velocity decreases, and the accumulation of sliding displacement under the cyclic loading of contact stress. In the past relevant studies, however, the model formulation used for simulations is limited to the hypoelastic-based plasticity framework, and the validation of the model is limited to simulations of the test data for metal-to-metal friction. In this study, the formulation of the subloading-friction model based on a hyperelastic-based plasticity framework is adopted. In the fields of civil, geotechnical, agricultural engineering, and terramechanics, the interaction between soils and metals is critical, as reflected in construction and agricultural machinery, foundation piles, and retaining walls. The validity of the model for describing the friction between various sands and metals is verified by simulations of the experimental data under monotonic and cyclic loadings.

Keywords

subloading-friction modelsand–metal frictionmonotonic/cyclic slidingstatic/kinetic friction

References

[1]
Dokos S J. Sliding friction under extreme pressures–I. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 68: A148–A156 (1946)
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Rabinowicz E. The nature of the static and kinetic coefficients of friction. J Appl Phys 22(11): 1373–1379 (1951)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Howe P G, Benton D P, Puddington I E. London–van der Waals attractive forces between glass surfaces. Can J Chem 33(9): 1375–1383 (1955)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Derjaguin B V, Push V E, Tolstoi D M. A theory of stick-slipping of solids. In: Proceedings of the Lubrication and Wear (Inst Mech Eng), London, 1957: 257-268.
[5]
Rabinowicz E. The intrinsic variables affecting the stick-slip process. Proc Phys Soc 71(4): 668–675 (1958)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Brockley C A, Davis H R. The time-dependence of static friction. J Lubr Technol 90(1): 35–41 (1968)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Kato S, Sato N, Matsubayashi T. Some considerations on characteristics of static friction of machine tool slideway. J Lubr Technol 94(3): 234–247 (1972)
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Horowitz F G, Ruina A. Slip patterns in a spatially homogeneous fault model. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 94(B8): 10279–10298 (1989)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Ferrero J F, Barrau J J. Study of dry friction under small displacements and near-zero sliding velocity. Wear 209(1–2): 322–327 (1997)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Bureau L, Baumberger T, Caroli C, Ronsin O. Low-velocity friction between macroscopic solids. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sci Ser IV Phys 2(5): 699–707 (2001)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Bowden F P, Tabor D. The Friction and Lubrication of Solids. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press, 1950.
[12]
Oldroyd J G. On the formulation of rheological equations of state. Proc Royal Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 200(1063): 523–541 (1950)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Dieterich J H. Time-dependent friction in rocks. J Geophys Res 77(20): 3690–3697 (1972)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Dieterich J H. Time-dependent friction and the mechanics of stick-slip. Pure Appl Geophys 116(4–5): 790–806 (1978)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Dieterich J H. Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 84(B5): 2161–2168 (1979)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Ruina A. Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 88(B12): 10359–10370 (1983)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Rice J R, Ruina A L. Stability of steady frictional slipping. J Appl Mech 50(2): 343–349 (1983)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Popova E, Popov V L. The research works of Coulomb and Amontons and generalized laws of friction. Friction 3(2): 183–190 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Michałowski R, Mróz Z. Associated and non-associated sliding rules in contact friction problems. Arch Mech 30(3) 259–276 (1978)
Google Scholar
[20]
Curnier A. A theory of friction. Int J Solids Struct 20(7): 637–647 (1984)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Kikuchi N, Oden J T. Contact Problems in Elasticity: A Study of Variational Inequalities and Finite Element Methods. Philadelphia (USA): Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1988.
Crossref
[22]
Wriggers P. Computational Contact Mechanics. Hoboken (USA): John Wiley, 2002.
[23]
Hashiguchi K, Ozaki S, Okayasu T. Unconventional friction theory based on the subloading surface concept. Int J Solids Struct 42(5–6): 1705–1727 (2005)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Hashiguchi K, Ozaki S. Constitutive equation for friction with transition from static to kinetic friction and recovery of static friction. Int J Plast 24(11): 2102–2124 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Hashiguchi K, Ueno M, Kuwayama T, Suzuki N, Yonemura S, Yoshikawa N. Constitutive equation of friction based on the subloading–surface concept. Proc Royal Soc A 472(2191): 20160212 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Hashiguchi K. Foundation of Elastoplasticity: Subloading Surface Model, 3rd edn. Heidelberg (Germany): Springer Nature, 2017.
Crossref
[27]
Ozaki S, Matsuura T, Maegawa S. Rate-, state-, and pressure-dependent friction model based on the elastoplastic theory. Friction 8(4): 768–783 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Reddy E S, Chapman D N, Sastry V V R N. Direct shear interface test for shaft capacity of piles in sand. Geotech Test J 23(2): 199–205 (2000)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Yang Z X, Jardine R J, Zhu B T, Foray P, Tsuha C H C. Sand grain crushing and interface shearing during displacement pile installation in sand. Géotechnique 60(6): 469–482 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Abuel-Naga H M, Shaia H A. Interface friction evolution of FRP tube confined concrete piles during the driving installation process. Géotechnique Lett 4(1): 52–56 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Liu T F, Chen H R, Buckley R M, Quinteros V S, Jardine R J. Characterisation of sand–steel interface shearing behaviour for the interpretation of driven pile behaviour in sands. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Glasgow, UK, 2019: 92, 13001.
Crossref
[32]
Tatsuoka F, Molenkamp F, Torii T, Hino T. Behavior of lubrication layers of platens in element tests. Soils Found 24(1): 113–128 (1984)
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Ikeda K, Yamakawa Y, Tsutsumi S. Simulation and interpretation of diffuse mode bifurcation of elastoplastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 51(9): 1649–1673 (2003)
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Medina-Cetina Z, Rechenmacher A. Influence of boundary conditions, specimen geometry and material heterogeneity on model calibration from triaxial tests. Int J Numer Anal Met Geomech 34(6): 627–643 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Bekker M G. Theory of Land Locomotion. Ann Arbor (USA): The University of Michigan Press, 1956.
[36]
Bekker M G. Off-the-Road Locomotion. Ann Arbor (USA): The University of Michigan Press, 1960.
[37]
Bekker M G. Introduction to Terrain-vehicle Systems. Ann Arbor (USA): The University of Michigan Press, 1969.
[38]
Nohse Y, Hashiguchi K, Ueno M, Shikanai T, Izumi H, Koyama F A measurement of basic mechanical quantities of off-the-road traveling performance. J Terramechanics 28(4): 359–370 (1991)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Hashiguchi K, Nohse Y, Ueno M, Sumiyoshi K, Uchiyama K, Yoshimaru T. Travelling performance of a wheel on a finite thickness ground. J Terramechanics 31(4): 257–263 (1994)
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Shikanai T, Hashiguchi K, Nohse Y, Ueno M, Okayasu T. Precise measurement of soil deformation and fluctuation in drawbar pull for steel and rubber-coated rigid wheels. J Terramechanics 37(1): 21–39 (2000)
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Fukami K, Ueno M, Hashiguchi K, Okayasu T. Mathematical models for soil displacement under a rigid wheel. J Terramechanics 43(3): 287–301 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Xia K M. Finite element modeling of tire/terrain interaction: Application to predicting soil compaction and tire mobility. J Terramechanics 48(2): 113–123 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Zhao C L, Zang M Y. Analysis of rigid tire traction performance on a sandy soil by 3D finite element–discrete element method. J Terramechanics 55: 29–37 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Ozaki S, Hinata K, Senatore C, Iagnemma K. Finite element analysis of periodic ripple formation under rigid wheels. J Terramechanics 61: 11–22 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Ozaki S, Kondo W. Finite element analysis of tire traveling performance using anisotropic frictional interaction model. J Terramechanics 64: 1–9 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Spektor M, Solomon N, Malkin S. Measurement of frictional interactions at soil–tool interfaces. J Terramechanics 22(2): 73–80 (1985)
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Uesugi M, Kishida H. Influential factors of friction between steel and dry sands. Soils Found 26(2): 33–46 (1986)
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]
Uesugi M, Kishida H. Frictional resistance at yield between dry sand and mild steel. Soils Found 26(4): 139–149 (1986)
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]
Kishida H, Uesugi M. Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus. Géotechnique 37(1): 45–52 (1987)
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]
Uesugi M, Kishida H, Tsubakihara Y. Friction between sand and steel under repeated loading. Soils Found 29(3): 127–137 (1989)
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]
Porcino D, Fioravante V, Ghionna V N, Pedroni S. Interface behavior of sands from constant normal stiffness direct shear tests. Geotech Test J 26(3): 289–301 (2003)
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Ho T Y K, Jardine R J, Anh-Minh N. Large-displacement interface shear between steel and granular media. Géotechnique 61(3): 221–234 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]
Zhou W J, Guo Z, Wang L Z, Li J H, Rui S J. Sand–steel interface behaviour under large-displacement and cyclic shear. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 138: 106352 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
Butterfield R, Andrawes K Z. On the angles of friction betweens sand and plane surfaces. J Terramechanics 8(4): 15–23 (1972)
Crossref Google Scholar
[55]
Yao Y S, Zeng D C. Investigation of the relationship between soil–metal friction and sliding speed. J Terramechanics 27(4): 283–290 (1990)
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]
McKyes E. Investigation of the relationship between soil–metal friction and sliding speed: Yao Yusu and Zeng Dechao, J. Terramechanics 27(4), 283–290 (1990). J Terramechanics 29(2): 281–282 (1992)
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]
Han F, Ganju E, Salgado R, Prezzi M. Effects of interface roughness, particle geometry, and gradation on the sand–steel interface friction angle. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 144(12): 04018096 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[58]
Sandeep C S, Senetakis K. Micromechanical experiments using a new inter-granule loading apparatus on gravel to ballast-sized materials. Friction 8(1): 70–82 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[59]
Zhang H J, Liu S H, Xiao H P. Sliding friction of shale rock on dry quartz sand particles. Friction 7(4): 307–315 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[60]
Zhang X J, Sun W, Wang W, Liu K. Experimental investigation of granular friction behaviors during reciprocating sliding. Friction 10(5): 732–747 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[61]
Truesdell C. The simplest rate theory of pure elasticity. Commun Pure Appl Math 8(1): 123–132 (1955)
Crossref Google Scholar
[62]
Truesdell C, Noll W. The Non-linear Field Theories of Mechanics. Berlin: Springer Nature, 1965.
Crossref
[63]
Simo J C, Hughes T J R. Computational Inelasticity. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 1998.
[64]
De Souza Neto E A, Perić D, Owen D R J. Computational Methods for Plasticity: Theory and Applications. Chichester (UK): John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2008.
Crossref
[65]
Kojić M, Bathe K J. Studies of finite element procedures— Stress solution of a closed elastic strain path with stretching and shearing using the updated Lagrangian Jaumann formulation. Comput Struct 26(1–2): 175–179 (1987)
Crossref Google Scholar
[66]
Brepols T, Vladimirov I N, Reese S. Numerical comparison of isotropic hypo- and hyperelastic-based plasticity models with application to industrial forming processes. Int J Plast 63: 18–48 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[67]
Perić D. On consistent stress rates in solid mechanics: Computational implications. Int J Numer Methods Eng 33(4): 799–817 (1992)
Crossref Google Scholar
[68]
Yoshimi Y, Kishida T. A ring torsion apparatus for evaluating friction between soil and metal surfaces. Geotech Test J 4(4): 145–152 (1981)
Crossref Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 10 Issue 10,
October 2022
Pages 1660-1675
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-021-0580-7
Cite this article:
OZAKI T, YAMAKAWA Y, UENO M, et al. Description of sand–metal friction behavior based on subloading-friction model. Friction, 2022, 10(10): 1660-1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-021-0580-7

870

Views

31

Downloads

2

Crossref

3

Web of Science

4

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 08 June 2021
Revised: 19 October 2021
Accepted: 01 December 2021
Published: 02 May 2022
© The author(s) 2021.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return