AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (4.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Chemically-induced active micro-nano bubbles assisting chemical mechanical polishing: Modeling and experiments

Lei XU1,2,3Kihong PARK2Hong LEI1,3( )Pengzhan LIU2Eungchul KIM2Yeongkwang CHO2Taesung KIM2,4( )Chuandong CHEN5
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Gyeonggi-do 16419, Republic of Korea
Research Center of Nano Science and Technology, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
SKKU Advanced Institute of Nanotechnology, Sungkyunkwan University, Gyeonggi-do 16419, Republic of Korea
Baotou Research Institute of Rare Earths, Baotou 014030, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

The material loss caused by bubble collapse during the micro-nano bubbles auxiliary chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process cannot be ignored. In this study, the material removal mechanism of cavitation in the polishing process was investigated in detail. Based on the mixed lubrication or thin film lubrication, bubble–wafer plastic deformation, spherical indentation theory, Johnson–Cook (J–C) constitutive model, and the assumption of periodic distribution of pad asperities, a new model suitable for micro-nano bubble auxiliary material removal in CMP was developed. The model integrates many parameters, including the reactant concentration, wafer hardness, polishing pad roughness, strain hardening, strain rate, micro-jet radius, and bubble radius. The model reflects the influence of active bubbles on material removal. A new and simple chemical reaction method was used to form a controllable number of micro-nano bubbles during the polishing process to assist in polishing silicon oxide wafers. The experimental results show that micro-nano bubbles can greatly increase the material removal rate (MRR) by about 400% and result in a lower surface roughness of 0.17 nm. The experimental results are consistent with the established model. In the process of verifying the model, a better understanding of the material removal mechanism involved in micro-nano bubbles in CMP was obtained.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
40544_0668_ESM.pdf (974.6 KB)

References

[1]
Zantye P B, Kumar A, Sikder A K. Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 45(3–6): 89220 (2004)
[2]
Moore G E. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Proc IEEE 86(1): 8285 (1998)
[3]
Xu W H, Lu X C, Pan G S, Lei Y Z, Luo J B. Ultrasonic flexural vibration assisted chemical mechanical polishing for sapphire substrate. Appl Surf Sci 256(12): 39363940 (2010)
[4]
Xu W H, Lu X C, Pan G S, Lei Y Z, Luo J B. Effects of the ultrasonic flexural vibration on the interaction between the abrasive particles; pad and sapphire substrate during chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). Appl Surf Sci 257(7): 29052911 (2011)
[5]
Sun R Y, Yang X, Arima K, Kawai K, Yamamura K. High-quality plasma-assisted polishing of aluminum nitride ceramic. CIRP Ann 69(1): 301304 (2020)
[6]
Wang W T, Zhang B G, Shi Y H, Ma T D, Zhou J K, Wang R, Wang H X, Zeng N Y. Improvement in chemical mechanical polishing of 4H-SiC wafer by activating persulfate through the synergistic effect of UV and TiO2. J Mater Process Technol 295: 117150 (2021)
[7]
Yu X, Zhang B G, Wang R, Kao Z X, Yang S H, Wei W. Effect of photocatalysts on electrochemical properties and chemical mechanical polishing rate of GaN. Mater Sci Semicond Process 121: 105387 (2021)
[8]
Aida H, Kim S W, Ikejiri K, Doi T, Yamazaki T, Seshimo K, Koyama K, Takeda H, Aota N. Precise mechanical polishing of brittle materials with free diamond abrasives dispersed in micro-nano-bubble water. Precis Eng 40: 8186 (2015)
[9]
Uneda M, Fujii K. Highly efficient chemical mechanical polishing method for SiC substrates using enhanced slurry containing bubbles of ozone gas. Precis Eng 64: 9197 (2020)
[10]
Li L, He Q, Zheng M, Ren Y, Li X L. Improvement in polishing effect of silicon wafer due to low-amplitude megasonic vibration assisting chemical–mechanical polishing. J Mater Process Technol 263: 330335 (2019)
[11]
Bai L X, Yan J C, Zeng Z J, Ma Y H. Cavitation in thin liquid layer: A review. Ultrason Sonochem 66: 105092 (2020)
[12]
Benjamin T B, Ellis A T. The collapse of cavitation bubbles and the pressure thereby produced againist solid boundaries. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond A 260(1110): 221240 (1966)
[13]
Sreedhar B K, Albert S K, Pandit A B. Cavitation damage: Theory and measurements—A review. Wear 372–373: 177196 (2017)
[14]
Xin J, Cai W, Tichy J A. A fundamental model proposed for material removal in chemical–mechanical polishing. Wear 268(5–6): 837844 (2010)
[15]
Brack P, Dann S E, Wijayantha K G U. Heterogeneous and homogenous catalysts for hydrogen generation by hydrolysis of aqueous sodium borohydride (NaBH4) solutions. Energy Sci Eng 3(3): 174188 (2015)
[16]
Zhang J S, Fisher T S, Gore J P, Hazra D, Ramachandran P V. Heat of reaction measurements of sodium borohydride alcoholysis and hydrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energ 31(15): 22922298 (2006)
[17]
Prasad A, Fotou G, Li S T. The effect of polymer hardness, pore size, and porosity on the performance of thermoplastic polyurethane-based chemical mechanical polishing pads. J Mater Res 28(17): 23802393 (2013)
[18]
Luo J F, Dornfeld D A. Material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing: Theory and modeling. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 14(2): 112133 (2001)
[19]
Luo J F, Dornfeld D A. Effects of abrasive size distribution in chemical mechanical planarization: Modeling and verification. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 16(3): 469476 (2003)
[20]
Luo J F, Dornfeld D A. Material removal regions in chemical mechanical planarization for submicron integrated circuit fabrication: Coupling effects of slurry chemicals, abrasive size distribution, and wafer-pad contact area. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 16(1): 4556 (2003)
[21]
Shan L, Levert J, Meade L, Tichy J, Danyluk S. Interfacial fluid mechanics and pressure prediction in chemical mechanical polishing. J Tribol 122(3): 539543 (2000)
[22]
Lortz W, Menzel F, Brandes R, Klaessig F, Knothe T, Shibasaki T. News from the M in CMP—Viscosity of CMP slurries, a constant? MRS Proc 767: F1.7 (2003)
[23]
Ye L Z, Zhu X J. Analysis of the effect of impact of near-wall acoustic bubble collapse micro-jet on Al1060. Ultrason Sonochem 36: 507516 (2017)
[24]
Roy S C, Franc J P, Pellone C, Fivel M. Determination of cavitation load spectra—Part 1: Static finite element approach. Wear 344–345: 110119 (2015)
[25]
Ye L Z, Zhu X J, He Y, Wei X M. Ultrasonic cavitation damage characteristics of materials and a prediction model of cavitation impact load based on size effect. Ultrason Sonochem 66: 105115 (2020)
[26]
Zhu S S, Liu J, Deng X. Modification of strain rate strengthening coefficient for Johnson–Cook constitutive model of Ti6Al4V alloy. Mater Today Commun 26: 102016 (2021)
[27]
Francis H A. Phenomenological analysis of plastic spherical indentation. J Eng Mater Technol 98(3): 272281 (1976)
[28]
Lee J, Shin H, Choi K S, Lee J, Choi J Y, Yu H K. Carbon layer supported nickel catalyst for sodium borohydride (NaBH4) dehydrogenation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 44(5): 29432950 (2019)
[29]
Rayleigh L. VIII. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 34(200): 9498 (1917)
[30]
Plesset M S. The dynamics of cavitation bubbles. J Appl Mech 16(3): 277282 (1949)
[31]
Takahashi M, Chiba K, Li P. Free-radical generation from collapsing microbubbles in the absence of a dynamic stimulus. J Phys Chem B 111(6): 13431347 (2007)
[32]
Xu L, Liu P Z, Lei H, Park K, Kim E, Cho Y, Lee J, Park S, Kim T. Auxiliary mechanism of in-situ micro-nano bubbles in oxide chemical mechanical polishing. Precis Eng 74: 2035 (2022)
[33]
Endo K, Okada T, Nakashima M. A study of erosion between two parallel surfaces oscillating at close proximity in liquids. J Lubr Tech 89(3): 229236 (1967)
[34]
Bai L X, Chen X G, Zhu G, Xu W L, Lin W J, Wu P F, Li C, Xu D L, Yan J C. Surface tension and quasi-emulsion of cavitation bubble cloud. Ultrason Sonochem 35: 405414 (2017)
[35]
Hong S, Han D, Jang K S. Zeta potential-tunable silica abrasives and fluorinated surfactants in chemical mechanical polishing slurries. Wear 466–467: 203590 (2021)
[36]
Wang C, Zhou J W, Luo C, Wang C W, Zhang X. Synergist effect of potassium periodate and potassium persulfate on improving removal rate of Ruthenium during chemical mechanical polishing. Mater Sci Eng B 262: 114764 (2020)
[37]
Korkmaz M E, Günay M, Verleysen P. Investigation of tensile Johnson–Cook model parameters for Nimonic 80A superalloy. J Alloys Compd 801: 542549 (2019)
[38]
Chowdhury S C, Haque B Z (Gama), Gillespie J W Jr. Molecular dynamics simulations of the structure and mechanical properties of silica glass using ReaxFF. J Mater Sci 51(22): 1013910159 (2016)
[39]
Hung A J, Tsai S F, Hsu Y Y, Ku J R, Chen Y H, Yu C C. Kinetics of sodium borohydride hydrolysis reaction for hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 33(21): 62056215 (2008)
[40]
Aida H, Takeda H, Doi T. Analysis of mechanically induced subsurface damage and its removal by chemical mechanical polishing for gallium nitride substrate. Precis Eng 67: 350358 (2021)
[41]
Zhang L X, Chen P, An T, Dai Y W, Qin F. Analytical prediction for depth of subsurface damage in silicon wafer due to self-rotating grinding process. Curr Appl Phys 19(5): 570581 (2019)
Friction
Pages 1624-1640
Cite this article:
XU L, PARK K, LEI H, et al. Chemically-induced active micro-nano bubbles assisting chemical mechanical polishing: Modeling and experiments. Friction, 2023, 11(9): 1624-1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-022-0668-8

672

Views

23

Downloads

7

Crossref

6

Web of Science

8

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 21 May 2021
Revised: 13 December 2021
Accepted: 16 June 2022
Published: 25 March 2023
© The author(s) 2022.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return