AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (5.7 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Prediction model of volume average diameter and analysis of atomization characteristics in electrostatic atomization minimum quantity lubrication

Dongzhou JIA1,2, Changhe LI1( ), Jiahao LIU2, Yanbin ZHANG3( ), Min YANG1, Teng GAO1, Zafar SAID4, Shubham SHARMA5
School of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China
College of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China
State Key Laboratory of Ultra-precision Machining Technology, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
College of Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates
Mechanical Engineering Department, University Center for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab 144603, India
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) is a relatively efficient and clean alternative to flooding workpiece machining. Electrostatic atomization has the merits of small droplet diameter, high uniformity of droplet size, and strong coating, hence its superiority to pneumatic atomization. However, as the current research hotspot, the influence of jet parameters and electrical parameters on the average diameter of droplets is not clear. First, by observing the shape of the liquid film at the nozzle outlet, the influence law of air pressure and voltage on liquid film thickness (h) and transverse and longitudinal fluctuations are determined. Then, the mathematical model of charged droplet volume average diameter (VAD) is constructed based on three dimensions of the liquid film, namely its thickness, transverse wavelength (λh), and longitudinal wavelength (λz). The model results under different working conditions are obtained by numerical simulation. Comparisons of the model results with the experimental VAD of the droplet confirm the error of the mathematical model to be less than 10%. The droplet diameter distribution span value Rosin–Rammler distribution span (R.S) and percentage concentrations of PM10 (particle size of less than 10 μm)/PM2.5 (particle size of less than 2.5 μm) under different working conditions are further analyzed. The results show that electrostatic atomization not only reduces the diameter distribution span of atomized droplets but also significantly inhibits the formation of PM10 and PM2.5 fine-suspension droplets. When the air pressure is 0.3 MPa, and the voltage is 40 kV, the percentage concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 can be reduced by 80.72% and 92.05%, respectively, compared with that under the pure pneumatic atomization condition at 0.3 MPa.

Keywords

minimum quantity lubrication (MQL)electrostatic atomizationvolume average diameter (VAD)atomization characteristics

References

[1]
Tang L Z, Zhang Y B, Li C H, Zhou Z M, Nie X L, Chen Y, Cao H J, Liu B, Zhang N Q, Said Z, et al. Biological stability of water-based cutting fluids: Progress and application. Chin J Mech Eng 35(1): 3 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Duan Z J, Li C H, Zhang Y B, Dong L, Bai X F, Yang M, Jia D Z, Li R Z, Cao H J, Xu X F. Milling surface roughness for 7050 aluminum alloy cavity influenced by nozzle position of nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Chin J Aeronaut 34(6): 33–53 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Ni J, Feng K, He L H, Liu X F, Meng Z. Assessment of water-based cutting fluids with green additives in broaching. Friction 8(6): 1051–1062 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Liu M Z, Li C H, Zhang Y B, An Q L, Yang M, Gao T, Mao C, Liu B, Cao H J, Xu X F, et al. Cryogenic minimum quantity lubrication machining: From mechanism to application. Front Mech Eng 16(4): 649–697 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Gupta M K, Sood P K. Surface roughness measurements in NFMQL assisted turning of titanium alloys: An optimization approach. Friction 5(2): 155–170 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Yang M, Li C H, Luo L, Li R Z, Long Y Z. Predictive model of convective heat transfer coefficient in bone micro-grinding using nanofluid aerosol cooling. Int Commun Heat Mass 125: 105317 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Sharma A K, Katiyar J K, Bhaumik S, Roy S. Influence of alumina/MWCNT hybrid nanoparticle additives on tribological properties of lubricants in turning operations. Friction 7(2): 153–168 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Zhang Y B, Li H N, Li C H, Huang C Z, Ali H M, Xu X F, Mao C, Ding W F, Cui X, Yang M, et al. Nano-enhanced biolubricant in sustainable manufacturing: From processability to mechanisms. Friction 10(6): 803–841 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Gao T, Li C H, Wang Y Q, Liu X S, An Q L, Li H N, Zhang Y B, Cao H J, Liu B, Wang D Z, et al. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer in drilling: From damage mechanisms to suppression. Compos Struct 286: 115232 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Xu M, Yu X, Ni J. Penetration and lubrication evaluation of vegetable oil with nanographite particles for broaching process. Friction 9(6): 1406–1419 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Wang X M, Li C H, Zhang Y B, Said Z, Debnath S, Sharma S, Yang M, Gao T. Influence of texture shape and arrangement on nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication turning. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 119(1–2): 631–646 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Pratap A, Patra K. Combined effects of tool surface texturing, cutting parameters and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) pressure on micro-grinding of BK7 glass. J Manuf Process 54: 374–392 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Yang M, Li C H, Said Z, Zhang Y B, Li R Z, Debnath S, Ali H M, Gao T, Long Y Z. Semiempirical heat flux model of hard-brittle bone material in ductile microgrinding. J Manuf Process 71: 501–514 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Zhang Z C, Sui M H, Li C H, Zhou Z M, Liu B, Chen Y, Said Z, Debnath S, Sharma S. Residual stress of grinding cemented carbide using MoS2 nano-lubricant. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 119(9): 5671–5685 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Duan Z J, Li C H, Zhang Y B, Yang M, Gao T, Liu X, Li R Z, Said Z, Debnath S, Sharma S. Mechanical behavior and semiempirical force model of aerospace aluminum alloy milling using nano biological lubricant. Front Mech Eng 18(1): 4 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Cui X, Li C H, Zhang Y B, Ding W F, An Q L, Liu B, Li H N, Said Z, Sharma S, Li R Z, et al. Comparative assessment of force, temperature, and wheel wear in sustainable grinding aerospace alloy using biolubricant. Front Mech Eng 18(1): 3 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Yang Y Y, Yang M, Li C H, Li R Z, Said Z, Ali H M, Sharma S. Machinability of ultrasonic vibration assisted micro-grinding in biological bone using nanolubricant. Front Mech Eng 18(1): 1 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Inamura T, Katagata N, Nishikawa H, Okabe T, Fumoto K. Effects of prefilmer edge thickness on spray characteristics in prefilming airblast atomization. Int J Multiphas Flow 121: 103117 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Brend M A, Barker A G, Carrotte J F. Measurements of fuel thickness for prefilming atomisers at elevated pressure. Int J Multiphas Flow 131: 103313 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Shanmugadas K P, Manuprasad E S, Chiranthan R N, Chakravarthy S R. Fuel placement and atomization inside a gas-turbine fuel injector at realistic operating conditions. P Combust Inst 38(2): 3261–3268 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Chaussonnet G, Gepperth S, Holz S, Koch R, Bauer H J. Influence of the ambient pressure on the liquid accumulation and on the primary spray in prefilming airblast atomization. Int J Multiphas Flow 125: 103229 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Qin L Z, Yi R, Yang L J. Theoretical breakup model in the planar liquid sheets exposed to high-speed gas and droplet size prediction. Int J Multiphas Flow 98: 158–167 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Schillaci E, Antepara O, Balcázar N, Serrano J R, Oliva A. A numerical study of liquid atomization regimes by means of conservative level-set simulations. Comput Fluids 179: 137–149 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Déjean B, Berthoumieu P, Gajan P. Experimental study on the influence of liquid and air boundary conditions on a planar air-blasted liquid sheet, Part I: Liquid and air thicknesses. Int J Multiphas Flow 79: 202–213 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Lilan H Q, Qian J B, Pan N. Study on atomization particle size characteristics of two-phase flow nozzle. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40(4): 7837–7847 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Pillai A L, Nagao J, Awane R, Kurose R. Influences of liquid fuel atomization and flow rate fluctuations on spray combustion instabilities in a backward-facing step combustor. Combust Flame 220: 337–356 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Zhang Y, Yu N J, Tian H, Li W D, Feng H. Experimental and numerical investigations on flow field characteristics of pintle injector. Aerosp Sci Technol 103: 105924 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Dafsari R A, Lee H J, Han J, Lee J. Evaluation of the atomization characteristics of aviation fuels with different viscosities using a pressure swirl atomizer. Int J Heat Mass Tran 145: 118704 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Bravo L, Kim D, Ham F, Powell C, Kastengren A. Effects of fuel viscosity on the primary breakup dynamics of a high-speed liquid jet with comparison to X-ray radiography. P Combust Inst 37(3): 3245–3253 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Gupta K, Laubscher R F, Davim J P, Jain N K. Recent developments in sustainable manufacturing of gears: A review. J Clean Prod 112(4): 3320–3330 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Lv T, Xu X F, Yu A B, Niu C C, Hu X D. Ambient air quantity and cutting performances of water-based Fe3O4 nanofluid in magnetic minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 115(5): 1711–1722 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Krolczyk G M, Maruda R W, Krolczyk J B, Wojciechowski S, Mia M, Nieslony P, Budzik G. Ecological trends in machining as a key factor in sustainable production—A review. J Clean Prod 218: 601–615 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Zhai S R, Albritton D. Airborne particles from cooking oils: Emission test and analysis on chemical and health implications. Sustain Cities Soc 52: 101845 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Lee T, Gany F. Cooking oil fumes and lung cancer: A review of the literature in the context of the U.S. population. J Immigr Minor Healt 15(3): 646–652 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Chen B, Gao D R, Li Y B, Chen C Q, Yuan X M, Wang Z S, Sun P. Investigation of the droplet characteristics and size distribution during the collaborative atomization process of a twin-fluid nozzle. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 107(3): 1625–1639 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Bhise D K, Patil B T, Shaikh V A. Air assisted atomization characterization of biodegradable fluid using microlubrication technique. Mater Sci Forum 1019: 211–217 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Li C H, Jia D Z, Yang M, Zhang Y B, Dong L, Hou Y L. Micro lubrication grinding system of controlled jet by electrostatic atomization of nanofluids. CN. Patent CN103072084B, Sep. 2015. (in Chinese)
[38]
Mishra R R, Bag R, Panda A, Kumar R, Sahoo A K. Effectiveness of multi position, electrostatic and nanofluid based minimum quantity lubrication: A brief review. Mater Today Proc 26(2): 1099–1102 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Jia D Z, Zhang Y B, Li C H, Yang M, Gao T, Said Z, Sharma S. Lubrication-enhanced mechanisms of titanium alloy grinding using lecithin biolubricant. Tribol Int 169: 107461 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Jia D Z, Li C H, Zhang Y B, Yang M, Cao H J, Liu B, Zhou Z M. Grinding performance and surface morphology evaluation of titanium alloy using electric traction bio micro lubricant. J Mech Eng 58(5): 198–211 (2022) (in Chinese)
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Xu W H, Li C H, Zhang Y B, Ali H M, Sharma S, Li R Z, Yang M, Gao T, Liu M Z, Wang X M, et al. Electrostatic atomization minimum quantity lubrication machining: From mechanism to application. Int J Extrem Manuf 4(4): 042003 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Huang S Q, Lv T, Wang M H, Xu X F. Effects of machining and oil mist parameters on electrostatic minimum quantity lubrication—EMQL turning process. Int J Pr Eng Man-GT 5(2): 317–326 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Lv T, Xu X F, Yu A B, Hu X D. Oil mist concentration and machining characteristics of SiO2 water-based nano-lubricants in electrostatic minimum quantity lubrication—EMQL milling. J Mater Process Technol 290: 116964 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Shah P, Gadkari A, Sharma A, Shokrani A, Khanna N. Comparison of machining performance under MQL and ultra-high voltage EMQL conditions based on tribological properties. Tribol Int 153: 106595 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Su Y, Gong L, Cao H, Chen D D. Optimization of electrostatic atomization cutting using 3D FE simulation of electrostatic field. Key Eng Mater 693: 1255–1262 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
De Bartolomeis A, Newman S T, Shokrani A. Initial investigation on surface integrity when machining Inconel 718 with conventional and electrostatic lubrication. Procedia CIRP 87: 65–70 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Kim J Y, Lee S Y. Dependence of spraying performance on the internal flow pattern in effervescent atomizers. Atomization Spray 11(6): 735–756 (2001)
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]
Cherdantsev A V, Markovich D M. Evolution of views on the wavy structure of a liquid film in annular dispersed gas–liquid flow. J Appl Mech Tech Ph 61(3): 331–342 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]
Guan X Y, Jia B Q, Yang L J, Fu Q F. Linear instability of an annular liquid jet with gas velocity oscillations. Phys Fluids 33(5): 054110 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]
Isaenkov S V, Cherdantsev A V, Vozhakov I S, Cherdantsev M V, Arkhipov D G, Markovich D M. Study of primary instability of thick liquid films under strong gas shear. Int J Multiphas Flow 111: 62–81 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]
Wang M, Tian B, Sun Y, Zhang Z. Lump, mixed lump–stripe and rogue wave–stripe solutions of a (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear wave equation for a liquid with gas bubbles. Comput Math Appl 79(3): 576–587 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Zhang Q, Yang F Z, Li C C, Wang X, Cao T T, Li C H, Liu Q. Numerical study on the breakup mechanisms and characteristics of liquid sheets. Energ Source Part A (2020).
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]
Daskiran C, Xue X Z, Cui F D, Katz J, Boufadel M C. Large eddy simulation and experiment of shear breakup in liquid–liquid jet: Formation of ligaments and droplets. Int J Heat Fluid Fl 89: 108810 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
Vadivukkarasan M, Panchagnula M V. Helical modes in combined Rayleigh–Taylor and Kelvin–Helmholtz instability of a cylindrical interface. Int J Spray Combust 8(4): 219–234 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[55]
Jin X, Shen C B, Lin S, Zhou R. Experimental study on the spray characteristics of a gas–liquid pintle injector element. J Visual 25(3): 467–481 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]
Li F, Yin X Y, Yin X Z. Instability analysis of an inner-driving coaxial jet inside a coaxial electrode for the non-equipotential case. J Electrostat 66(1–2): 58–70 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]
Grigor’ev A I, Shiryaeva S O. Electrostatic instability of the higher-order azimuthal modes of a charged jet. Fluid Dynam 56(3): 353–360 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[58]
Bang B H, Kim M W, Kim Y I, Yoon S S. Growth rate and oscillation frequency of electrified jet and droplet: Effects of charge and electric field. Aerosol Sci Tech 52(9): 1070–1082 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[59]
Yin P T, Han X S, Bi D, Duan T X, Hu B. Experimental studies on liquid producing plasma of high voltage electrostatic atomization. Telecom Power Technol 31(3): 68–70 (2014) (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
[60]
Chu W, Li X Q, Tong Y H, Nie W S, Jiang C J, Ren Y J. Numerical study on breakup characteristics of liquid film of liquid-centered swirl coaxial injectors. Journal of Propulsion Technology 42(7): 1522–1533 (2021) (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
[61]
Shen Q G, Fang Y, Zhou Z C, Wang D Z. High Voltage Technology, 4th edn. Beijing (China): China Electric Power Press, 2012. (in Chinese)
[62]
CN-GB. GB/T 17095-1997 Hygienic standard for inhalable particulate matter in indoor air. CN-GB, 1997. (in Chinese)
[63]
Jia D Z, Zhang N Q, Liu B, Zhou Z M, Wang X P, Zhang Y B, Mao C, Li C H. Particle size distribution characteristics of electrostatic minimum quantity lubrication and grinding surface quality evaluation. Diam Abrasives Eng 41(3): 89–95 (2021) (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 11 Issue 11,
November 2023
Pages 2107-2131
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-022-0734-2
Cite this article:
JIA D, LI C, LIU J, et al. Prediction model of volume average diameter and analysis of atomization characteristics in electrostatic atomization minimum quantity lubrication. Friction, 2023, 11(11): 2107-2131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-022-0734-2

550

Views

11

Downloads

65

Crossref

65

Web of Science

70

Scopus

3

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 16 July 2021
Revised: 05 November 2021
Accepted: 20 December 2022
Published: 18 February 2023
© The author(s) 2022.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return