AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (6 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Development of wet adhesion of honeybee arolium incorporated polygonal structure with three-phase composite interfaces

Lulu LIANG1, Jieliang ZHAO1( ), Qun NIU1, Li YU1, Xiangbing WU1, Wenzhong WANG1( ), Shaoze YAN2, Zhenglei YU3
School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Division of Intelligent and Biomechanical Systems, State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Key of Bionic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Inspired by the dynamic wet adhesive systems in nature, various artificial adhesive surfaces have been developed but still face different challenges. Crucially, the theoretical mechanics of wet adhesives has never been sufficiently revealed. Here, we develop a novel adhesive mechanism for governing wet adhesion and investigate the biological models of honeybee arolium for reproducing the natural wet adhesive systems. Micro-nano structures of honeybee arolium and arolium-prints were observed by Cryogenic scanning electron microscopy (Cryo-SEM), and the air pockets were found in the contact interface notably. Subsequently, the adhesive models with a three-phase composite interface (including air pockets, liquid secretion, and hexagonal frames of arolium), were formed to analyze the wet adhesion of honeybee arolium. The results of theoretical calculations and experiments indicated an enhanced adhesive mechanism of the honeybee by liquid self-sucking effects and air-embolism effects. Under these effects, normal and shear adhesion can be adjusted by controlling the proportion of liquid secretion and air pockets in the contact zone. Notably, the air-embolism effects contribute to the optimal coupling of smaller normal adhesion with greater shear adhesion, which is beneficial for the high stride frequency of honeybees. These works can provide a fresh perspective on the development of bio-inspired wet adhesive surfaces.

Keywords

honeybee aroliumair pocketswet adhesiona three-phase interfaceself-sucking effectsair-embolism effects

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
40544_0743_ESM.pdf (2.3 MB)

References

[1]
Baik S, Kim D W, Park Y, Lee T, Ho Bhang S, Pang C. A wet-tolerant adhesive patch inspired by protuberances in suction cups of octopi. Nature 546(7658): 396–400 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Xue L, Sanz B, Luo A, Turner K T, Wang X, Tan D, Zhang R, Du H, Steinhart M, Mijangos C, Guttmann M, Kappl M, Del Campo A. Hybrid surface patterns mimicking the design of the adhesive toe pad of tree frog. ACS Nano 11(10): 9711–9719 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Wang X, Yang B, Tan D, Li Q, Song B, Wu Z, Del Campo A, Kappl M, Wang Z, Gorb S N, Liu S, Xue L. Bioinspired footed soft robot with unidirectional all-terrain mobility. Mater Today 35(42–49) (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Yang Y, Xu T, Bei H P, Zhao Y, Zhao X. Sculpting bio-inspired surface textures: An adhesive janus periosteum. Adv Funct Mater 31(37): 2104636 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Hwang G W, Lee H J, Kim D W, Yang T H, Pang C. Soft microdenticles on artificial octopus sucker enable extraordinary adaptability and wet adhesion on diverse nonflat surfaces. Adv Sci 9(31): 2202978 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Lee J, Lee B S, Baik S, Kim D, Park N J, Lee J W, Bong S K, Lee S H, Kim S N, Song J H, et al. Ultra-intimate hydrogel hybrid skin patch with asymmetric elastomeric spatula-like cylinders. Chem Eng J 444: 136581 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Baik S, Lee J, Jeon E J, Park B Y, Kim D W, Song J H, Lee H J, Han S Y, Cho S W, Pang C. Diving beetle-like miniaturized plungers with reversible, rapid biofluid capturing for machine learning-based care of skin disease. Sci Adv 7(25): 5695 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Xue B, Gu J, Li L, Yu W, Yin S, Qin M, Jiang Q, Wang W, Cao Y. Hydrogel tapes for fault-tolerant strong wet adhesion. Nat Commun 12(1): 7156 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Baik S, Hwang G W, Jang S, Jeong S, Kim K H, Yang T, Pang C. Bioinspired microsphere-embedded adhesive architectures for an electrothermally actuating transport device of dry/wet pliable surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Inter 13(5): 6930–6940 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Choi D S, Bae J W, Lee S H, Song J H, Choi S, Pang C, Kim S Y. Emotion-interactive empathetic transparent skin cushion with tailored frequency-dependent hydrogel–plasticized nonionic polyvinyl chloride interconnections. Chem Eng J 442:136142 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Min H, Baik S, Lee J, Song J H, Kim K H, Kim M S, Pang C. Enhanced biocompatibility and multidirectional wet adhesion of insect-like synergistic wrinkled pillars with microcavities. Chem Eng J 429: 132467 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Lee H, Um D, Lee Y, Lim S, Kim H, Ko H. Octopus-inspired smart adhesive pads for transfer printing of semiconducting nanomembranes. Adv Mater 28(34): 7457–7465 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Liu Q, Meng F, Wang X, Yang B, Tan D, Li Q, Shi Z, Shi K, Chen W, Liu S, Lei Y, Xue L. Tree frog-inspired micropillar arrays with nanopits on the surface for enhanced adhesion under wet conditions. ACS Appl Mater Inter 12(16): 19116–19122 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Zhao Y, Wu Y, Wang L, Zhang M, Chen X, Liu M, Fan J, Liu J, Zhou F, Wang Z. Bio-inspired reversible underwater adhesive. Nat Commun 8(1): 2218 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Federle W, Labonte D. Dynamic biological adhesion: Mechanisms for controlling attachment during locomotion. Phil Trans R Soc B 374(1784): 20190199 (2019).
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Shin D, Choi W T, Lin H, Qu Z, Breedveld V, Meredith J C. Humidity-tolerant rate-dependent capillary viscous adhesion of bee-collected pollen fluids. Nat Commun 10(1): 1379 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Cai S, Bhushan B. Meniscus and viscous forces during separation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic smooth/rough surfaces with symmetric and asymmetric contact angles. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 366(1870): 1627–1647 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Gu Z, Li S, Zhang F, Wang S. Understanding surface adhesion in nature: A peeling model. Adv Sci 3(7): 1500327 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Chen Y, Meng J, Gu Z, Wan X, Jiang L, Wang S. Bioinspired multiscale wet adhesive surfaces: Structures and controlled adhesion. Adv Funct Mater 30(5): 1905287 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Labonte D, Federle W. Rate-dependence of 'wet' biological adhesives and the function of the pad secretion in insects. Soft Matter 11(44): 8661–8673 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Gorb S N. Smooth attachment devices in insects: Functional morphology and biomechanics. Adv in Insect Physiol 34: 81–115 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Gilet T, Heepe L, Lambert P, Compère P, Gorb S N. Liquid secretion and setal compliance: The beetle's winning combination for a robust and reversible adhesion. Curr Opin Insect Sci 30: 19–25 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Stork N E, Experimental analysis of adhesion of chrysolina polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a variety of surfaces. J Exp Bio 88(1): 91–108 (1980)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Gernay S, Federle W, Lambert P, Gilet T. Elasto-capillarity in insect fibrillar adhesion. J R Soc Interface 13(121): 20160371 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Gorb S N. The design of the fly adhesive pad: Distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion. Proc R Soc B 265(1398): 747–752 (1998)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Dirks J H, Federle W. Fluid-based adhesion in insects–principles and challenges. Soft Matter 7(23): 11047–11053 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Scholz I, Baumgartner W, Federle W. Micromechanics of smooth adhesive organs in stick insects: pads are mechanically anisotropic and softer towards the adhesive surface. J Comp Physiol A 194(4): 373–384 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Labonte D, Struecker M Y, Birn-Jeffery A V, Federle W. Shear-sensitive adhesion enables size-independent adhesive performance in stick insects. Proc R Soc B 286(1913): 20191327(2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Dirks J, Federle W. Mechanisms of fluid production in smooth adhesive pads of insects. J R Soc Interface 8(60): 952–960 (2011)
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Peng Z, Wang C, Chen S. The microstructure morphology on ant footpads and its effect on ant adhesion. Acta Mechanica 227(7): 2025–2037 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Federle W, Riehle M, Curtis A S G, Full R J. An integrative study of insect adhesion: mechanics and wet adhesion of pretarsal pads in ants. Inte Comp Bio 42(6): 1100–1106 (2002)
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Persson B N J. Wet adhesion with application to tree frog adhesive toe pads and tires. J Phys Condens Matter 19(37): 376110 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Kappl M, Kaveh F, Barnes W J P. Nanoscale friction and adhesion of tree frog toe pads. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics 11(3): 035003(2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Zhang L, Chen H, Guo Y, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Zhang D, Ma L, Luo J, Jiang L. Micro-nano hierarchical structure enhanced strong wet friction surface inspired by tree frogs. Adv Sci 7(20): 2001125 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Li M, Shi L, Wang X. Physical mechanisms behind the wet adhesion: From amphibian toe-pad to biomimetics. Colloids Surf B 199: 111531 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Xiao Z, Zhao Q, Niu Y, Zhao D. Adhesion advances: From nanomaterials to biomimetic adhesion and applications. Soft Matter 18(18): 3447–3464 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Barnes W J P, Baum M, Peisker H, Gorb S N. Comparative Cryo-SEM and AFM studies of hylid and rhacophorid tree frog toe pads. J Morphol 274(12): 1384–1396 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Wang M, Chen W, Zhao J, Yu L, Yan S. Hairy-layer friction reduction mechanism in the honeybee abdomen. ACS Appl Mater Inter 13(21): 24524–24531 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Sample C S, Xu A K, Swartz S M, Gibson L J. Nanomechanical properties of wing membrane layers in the house cricket (Acheta domesticus Linnaeus). J Insect Physiol 74: 10–15 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Bennemann M, Backhaus S, Scholz I, Park D, Mayer J, Baumgartner W. Determination of the Young's modulus of the epicuticle of the smooth adhesive organs of carausius morosus using tensile testing. J Exp Biol 217(20): 3677–3687(2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Federle W, Brainerd E L, McMahon T A, Holldobler B. Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(11): 6215–6220 (2001)
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Kendall K. Thin-film peeling-the elastic term. J Phys D: Appl Phys 8(13): 1449–1452 (1975)
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Thomas T, Tiwari G. Crushing behavior of honeycomb structure: A review. Int J Crashworthiness 24(5): 555–579 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Dirks J, Clemente C J, Federle W. Insect tricks: Two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping. J R Soc Interface 7(45): 587–593 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Barr V A, Bunnell S C. Interference reflection microscopy. Current Protocols in Cell Biology 45(1): 4–23 (2009)
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Liu B, Sheng G, Lim S T. Meniscus force modeling and study on the fluctuation of stiction/friction force in CSS test process. IEEE Trans Magn 33(5): 3121–3123 (1997)
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Timoshenko S, Woinowsky-Krieger S. Theory of Plates and Shells. New York (USA): McGraw-hill, 1959.
[48]
Gennes P, Brochard-Wyart F, Quéré D, Reisinger A, Widom B. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Bubbles, pearls, waves. New York (USA): Springer, 2004.
Crossref
[49]
Greenwood J A, Williamson J B P. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A 295 (1442): 300–319 (1966)
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]
De Souza E J, Brinkmann M, Mohrdieck C, Crosby A, Arzt E. Capillary forces between chemically different substrates. Langmuir 24(18): 10161–10168 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]
Lorenz B, Oh Y R, Nam S K, Jeon S H, Persson B N J. Rubber friction on road surfaces: Experiment and theory for low sliding speeds. J Chem Phys 142(19): 194701 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Xue L, Kovalev A, Eichler-Volf A, Steinhart M, Gorb S N. Humidity-enhanced wet adhesion on insect-inspired fibrillar adhesive pads. Nat Commun 6(1): 6621 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]
Chen Y, Zhao H, Mao J, Chirarattananon P, Helbling E F, Hyun N P, Clarke D R, Wood R J. Controlled flight of a microrobot powered by soft artificial muscles. Nature 575(7782): 324–329 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
Bao Y W, Wang W, Zhou Y C. Investigation of the relationship between elastic modulus and hardness based on depth-sensing indentation measurements. Acta Mater 52(18): 5397–5404 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 12 Issue 2,
February 2024
Pages 215-230
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-023-0743-0
Cite this article:
LIANG L, ZHAO J, NIU Q, et al. Development of wet adhesion of honeybee arolium incorporated polygonal structure with three-phase composite interfaces. Friction, 2024, 12(2): 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-023-0743-0

504

Views

20

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 31 July 2022
Revised: 25 November 2022
Accepted: 23 January 2023
Published: 29 November 2023
© The author(s) 2023.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return