AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (2.8 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Finite element analysis and experimental validation of polymer–metal contacts in block-on-ring configuration

K. Y. Eayal AWWAD1( ), Khosro FALLAHNEZHAD2, B. F. YOUSIF3, Ahmad MOSTAFA1, Omar ALAJARMEH3, A. SHALWAN4, Xuesen ZENG3
Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Tafila Technical University, Tafila 66110, Jordan
Medical Device Research Institute, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, South Australia 5042, Australia
Centre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, Australia
Department of Manufacturing Engineering Technology, Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Kuwait 13092, Kuwait
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

The wear profile analysis, obtained by different tribometers, is essential to characterise the wear mechanisms. However, most of the available methods did not take the stress distribution over the wear profile in consideration, which causes inaccurate analysis. In this study, the wear profile of polymer–metal contact, obtained by block-on-ring configuration under dry sliding conditions, was analysed using finite element modelling (FEM) and experimental investigation. Archard’s wear equation was integrated into a developed FORTRAN–UMESHMOTION code linked with Abaqus software. A varying wear coefficient (k) values covering both running-in and steady state regions, and a range of applied loads involving both mild and severe wear regions were measured and implemented in the FEM. The FEM was in good agreement with the experiments. The model reproduced the stress distribution profiles under variable testing conditions, while their values were affected by the sliding direction and maximum wear depth (hmax). The largest area of the wear profile, exposed to the average contact stresses, is defined as the normal zone. Whereas the critical zones were characterized by high stress concentrations reaching up to 10 times of that at the normal zone. The wear profile was mapped to identify the critical zone where the stress concentration is the key point in this definition. The surface features were examined in different regions using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Ultimately, SEM analysis showed severer damage features in the critical zone than that in the normal zone as proven by FEM. However, the literature data presented and considered the wear features the same at any point of the wear profile. In this study, the normal zone was determined at a stress value of about 0.5 MPa, whereas the critical zone was at about 5.5 MPa. The wear behaviour of these two zones showed totally different features from one another.

Keywords

wear modelpolymer-to-metal contactblock-on-ringwear profile

References

[1]
Friedrich, K. Polymer composites for tribological applications. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 1: 3–39 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Hegadekatte V, Huber N, Kraft O. Finite element based simulation of dry sliding wear. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 13: 57 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Hegadekatte V, Hilgert J, Kraft O, Huber N. Multi time scale simulations for wear prediction in micro-gears. Wear 268: 316–324 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Bose K K, Ramkumar P. Finite element method based sliding wear prediction of steel-on-steel contacts using extrapolation techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 233: 1446–1463 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Nirmal U, Hashim J, Megat Ahmad M M H. A review on tribological performance of natural fibre polymeric composites. Tribol Int 83: 77–104 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Meng H C, Ludema K C. Wear models and predictive equations: Their form and content. Wear 181: 443–457 (1995)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Archard J F. Wear theory and mechanisms. In Wear Control Handbook. Peterson M B, Winer W O, Ed. New York: ASME, 1980, 35–80.
[8]
Sarkar A D. Friction and Wear. London (UK): Elsevier, 1982.
[9]
Sarkar A D. Friction and Wear. New York (USA): CRC press, 1980.
[10]
Liu R, Li D Y. Modification of archard’s equation by taking account of elastic/pseudoelastic properties of materials. Wear 251: 956–964 (2001)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Bortoleto E M, Rovani A C, Seriacopi V, Profito F J, Zachariadis D C, Machado I F, Sinatora A, de Souza R M. Experimental and numerical analysis of dry contact in the pin on disc test. Wear 301: 19–26 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Fallahnezhad K, Oskouei R H, Badnava H, Taylor M. An adaptive finite element simulation of fretting wear damage at the head-neck taper junction of total hip replacement: The role of taper angle mismatch. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 75: 58–67 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Hegadekatte V, Kurzenhäuser S, Huber N, Kraft O A. Predictive modeling scheme for wear in tribometers. Tribol Int 41: 1020–1031 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Martinez F J, Canales M, Izquierdo S, Jimenez M A, Martinez M A. Finite element implementation and validation of wear modelling in sliding polymer–metal contacts. Wear 284: 52–64 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Hegadekatte V, Huber N, Kraft O. Modeling and simulation of wear in a pin on disc tribometer. Tribol Lett 24: 51 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Arjmandi M, Ramezani M, Giordano M, Schmid S. Finite element modelling of sliding wear in three-dimensional woven textiles. Tribol Int 115: 452–460 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Fallahnezhad K, Oskouei R H, Taylor M. Development of a fretting corrosion model for metallic interfaces using adaptive finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 148: 38–47 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Benabdallah H, Olender D. Finite element simulation of the wear of polyoxymethylene in pin-on-disc configuration. Wear 261: 1213–1224 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Yue T, Abdel Wahab M. A numerical study on the effect of debris layer on fretting wear. Materials (Basel) 9: 597 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Fallahnezhad K, Oskouei R H, Badnava H, Taylor M. An adaptive finite element simulation of fretting wear damage at the head-neck taper junction of total hip replacement: The role of taper angle mismatch. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 75: 58–67 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
English R, Ashkanfar A, Rothwell G. A computational approach to fretting wear prediction at the head–stem taper junction of total hip replacements. Wear 338–339: 210–220 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Prasad V, Suresh D, Joseph M A, Sekar K, Ali M. Development of flax fibre reinforced epoxy composite with nano TiO2 addition into matrix to enhance mechanical properties. Mater Today Proc 5: 11569–11575 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Eayal Awwad K Y, Yousif B F, Fallahnezhad K, Saleh K, Zeng X. Influence of graphene nanoplatelets on mechanical properties and adhesive wear performance of epoxy-based composites. Friction 9(4): 856–875 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Awwad K E, Yousif B, Mostafa A, Alajarmeh O, Zeng X. Tribological and mechanical performances of newly developed eco-epoxy composites incorporating flax fibres and graphene nanoplatelets. J Reinf Plast Compos 073168442211434 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Briscoe B J, Sinha S K. Tribological applications of polymers and their composites—Past, present and future prospects. In Tribology of Polymeric Nanocomposites. Briscoe B J, Ed. Amsterdam (Holland): Elsevier, 2013: 1–22.
Crossref
[26]
US-ASTM. ASTM D974-2014 Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM, 2014.
[27]
US-ASTM. ASTM D2240-2005 Standard test method for t rubber property–durometer hardness 1. ASTM, 2005.
[28]
US-ASTM. ASTM G77-2017 Standard test method for ranking resistance of materials to sliding wear using block-on-ring wear test. ASTM, 2017.
[29]
Volume of a partial right cylinder calculator—High accuracy calculation. https://www.mathopenref.com/cylindervolpartial.html, 2023.
[30]
Archard J F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24: 981–988 (1953)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Chattopadhyay R. Green Tribology, Green Surface Engineering, and Global Warming. Ohio (USA): ASM International, 2014.
[32]
Khader I, Renz A, Kailer A. A wear model for silicon nitride in dry sliding contact against a nickel-base alloy. Wear 376: 352–362 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Bitter T, Khan I, Marriott T, Lovelady E, Verdonschot N, Janssen D. Finite element wear prediction using adaptive meshing at the modular taper interface of hip implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77: 616–623 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Yousif B F, Nirmal U, Wong K J. Three-body abrasion on wear and frictional performance of treated betelnut fibre reinforced epoxy (t-bfre) composite. Mater Des 31: 4514–4521 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Shalwan A, Yousif B F. Influence of date palm fibre and graphite filler on mechanical and wear characteristics of epoxy composites. Mater Des 59: 264–273 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Stainless Steel-Grade 304, Atlas Steel Australia, 2019: 1–3.
[37]
Valentini L, Di Schino A, Kenny J M, Gerbig Y, Haefke H. Influence of grain size and film composition on wear resistance of ultra fine grained AISI 304 stainless steel coated with amorphous carbon films. Wear 253: 458–464 (2002)
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Li P, Zheng Y, Li M, Shi T, Li D, Zhang A. Enhanced toughness and glass transition temperature of epoxy nanocomposites filled with solvent-free liquid-like nanocrystal-functionalized graphene oxide. Mater Des 89: 653–659 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Nirmal U, Hashim J, Low K O. Adhesive wear and frictional performance of bamboo fibres reinforced epoxy composite. Tribol Int 47: 122–133 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Nirmal U, Yousif B F, Rilling D, Brevern P V. Effect of betelnut fibres treatment and contact conditions on adhesive wear and frictional performance of polyester composites. Wear 268: 1354–1370 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Dos Reis J M L. Effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of polymer mortars. Mater Res 15: 645–649 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Done V, Kesavan D, Krishna R M, Chaise T, Nelias D. Semi analytical fretting wear simulation including wear debris. Tribol Int 109: 1–9 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Warmuth A R, Pearson S R, Shipway P H, Sun W. The effect of contact geometry on fretting wear rates and mechanisms for a high strengthsteel. Wear 301: 491–500 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Yıldırım Ç V, Sarıkaya M, Kıvak T, Şirin Ş. The effect of addition of hbn nanoparticles to nanofluid-mql on tool wear patterns, tool life, roughness and temperature in turning of Ni-based inconel 625. Tribol Int 134: 443–456 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Bajpai P K, Singh I, Madaan J. Tribological behavior of natural fiber reinforced PLA composites. Wear 297: 829–840 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Mostafa A O. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of aluminum grain refined by Ti and Ti+B. Int J Surf Eng Interdiscip Mater Sci 7: 1–19 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Akpan E I, Wetzel B, Friedrich K. A fully biobased tribology material based on acrylic resin and short wood fibres. Tribol Int 120: 381–390 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]
Yousif B F, El-Tayeb N S M. Wear characteristics of thermoset composite under high stress three-body abrasive. Tribol Int 43: 2365–2371 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]
Chand N, Dwivedi U K. Influence of fiber orientation on high stress wear behavior of sisal fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. Polym Compos 28: 437–441 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]
Omrani E, Menezes P L, Rohatgi P K. State of the art on tribological behavior of polymer matrix composites reinforced with natural fibers in the green materials world. Eng Sci Technol an Int J 19: 717–736 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 12 Issue 3,
March 2024
Pages 554-568
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-023-0795-x
Cite this article:
AWWAD KYE, FALLAHNEZHAD K, YOUSIF BF, et al. Finite element analysis and experimental validation of polymer–metal contacts in block-on-ring configuration. Friction, 2024, 12(3): 554-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-023-0795-x

390

Views

26

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 21 March 2023
Revised: 22 May 2023
Accepted: 02 July 2023
Published: 04 December 2023
© The author(s) 2023.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return