AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (7.8 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Prediction of contact resistance of electrical contact wear using different machine learning algorithms

Zhen-bing CAI1( ), Chun-lin LI1, Lei YOU1, Xu-dong CHEN1, Li-ping HE1, Zhong-qing CAO1, Zhi-nan ZHANG2( )
Tribology Research Institute, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

H62 brass material is one of the important materials in the process of electrical energy transmission and signal transmission, and has excellent performance in all aspects. Since the wear behavior of electrical contact pairs is particularly complex when they are in service, we evaluated the effects of load, sliding velocity, displacement amplitude, current intensity, and surface roughness on the changes in contact resistance. Machine learning (ML) algorithms were used to predict the electrical contact performance of different factors after wear to determine the correlation between different factors and contact resistance. Random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR) and BP neural network (BPNN) algorithms were used to establish RF, SVR and BPNN models, respectively, and the experimental data were trained and tested. It was proved that BP neural network model could better predict the stable mean resistance of H62 brass alloy after wear. Characteristic analysis shows that the load and current have great influence on the predicted electrical contact properties. The wear behavior of electrical contacts is influenced by factors such as load, sliding speed, displacement amplitude, current intensity, and surface roughness during operation. Machine learning algorithms can predict the electrical contact performance after wear caused by these factors. Experimental results indicate that an increase in load, current, and surface roughness leads to a decrease in stable mean resistance, while an increase in displacement amplitude and frequency results in an increase in stable mean resistance, leading to a decline in electrical contact performance. To reduce testing time and costs and quickly obtain the electrical contact performance of H62 brass alloy after wear caused by different factors, three algorithms (random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and BP neural network (BPNN)) were used to train and test experimental results, resulting in a machine learning model suitable for predicting the stable mean resistance of H62 brass alloy after wear. The prediction results showed that the BPNN model performed better in predicting the electrical contact performance compared to the RF and SVR models.

Keywords

electrical contact wearcontact resistancemachine learning (ML)neural network

References

[1]
Tian H, Saka N, Rabinowicz E. Friction and failure of electroplated sliding contacts. Wear 142(1): 57–85 (1991)
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
He J F, Cai Z B, Ren Y P, Peng J F, Liu J H, Zhu M H. Optimization of several surface treatment processes for alleviating fretting damage of a locking pin. Friction 10(8): 1217–1233 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Cai Z B, Chen Z Q, Sun Y, Jin J Y, Peng J F, Zhu M H. Development of a novel cycling impact-sliding wear rig to investigate the complex friction motion. Friction 7(1): 32–43 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Cao Z Q, Yu Y Q, He L P, Nie Y C, Gong C Y, Liu X H. Electrical contact performance of Cu alloy under vibration condition and acetal glue environment. Materials 15(5): 1881 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Fadin V V, Aleutdinova M I, Kolubaev A V. Effect of high-density electric current on wear and average temperature of steel/steel triboelectric contact. J Frict Wear 39(4): 294–298 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Vikram A, Chowdhury P R, Phillips R K, Hoorfar M. Measurement of effective bulk and contact resistance of gas diffusion layer under inhomogeneous compression–Part I: Electrical conductivity. J Power Sources 320: 274–285 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Li H Y, Wang X H, Liang Y, Fei Y, Zhang H. Effect of electrical contact mode on the arc-erosion behavior of titanium diboride-nickel co-reinforced and nickel-enhanced silver-based electrical contact materials. J Electron Mater 51(3): 1137–1147 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Crinon E, Evans J T. The effect of surface roughness, oxide film thickness and interfacial sliding on the electrical contact resistance of aluminium. Mater Sci Eng A 242(1–2): 121–128 (1998)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Nagasawa H, Kato K. Wear mechanism of copper alloy wire sliding against iron-base strip under electric current. Wear 216(2): 179–183 (1998)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Swingler J. Reliability optimisation for the multi-contact connector system under fretting conditions. Electr Eng 99(1): 1–8 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Wei P S, Wu T H. Electrical contact resistance effect on resistance spot welding. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55(11–12): 3316–3324 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Meilakh A G, Kontsevoy Y V, Gilev I O, Shubin A B. Two-layer copper-based powder electrocontact. Inorg Mater Appl Res 13(3): 818–822 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Xiao J K, Liu L M, Zhang C, Zhang L, Zhou K C. Sliding electrical contact behavior of brass fiber brush against coin-silver and Au plating. Wear 368–369: 461–469 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Cheng G, Wang H, Wang Y X, Sui H T, Yan P F, Yan B. The wear resistance of Al–Si–Re alloys for electrical contact applications. Int J Mod Phys B 36(9n11): 2240036 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Zhang C, Zhao Z E, Ren W B. Simulation and experimental investigation of contact spot temperature for electrical contact components. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 1207(1): 012021 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Zhang X H, Zhang Y, Tian B H, Jia Y L, Liu Y, Song K X, Volinsky A A, Xue H H. Cr effects on the electrical contact properties of the Al2O3-Cu/15W composites. Nanotechnol Rev 8(1): 128–135 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Ardeshiri Lordejani A, Vitali L, Guagliano M, Bagherifard S. Estimating deposition efficiency and chemical composition variation along thickness for cold spraying of composite feedstocks. Surf Coat Technol 436: 128239 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Shen P C, Su C, Lin Y X, Chou A S, Cheng C C, Park J H, Chiu M H, Lu A Y, Tang H L, Tavakoli M M, et al. Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors. Nature 593(7858): 211–217 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Zhou T, Zhao Y J, Rao Z H. Fundamental and estimation of thermal contact resistance between polymer matrix composites: A review. Int J Heat Mass Transf 189: 122701 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Wang Y, Kim J C, Wu R J, Martinez J, Song X J, Yang J, Zhao F, Mkhoyan A, Jeong H Y, Chhowalla M. Van der Waals contacts between three-dimensional metals and two-dimensional semiconductors. Nature 568(7750): 70–74 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Liu X L, Cai Z B, xiao Q, Shen M X, Yang W B, Chen D Y. Fretting wear behavior of brass/copper-graphite composites as a contactor material under electrical contact. Int J Mech Sci 184: 105703 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Chen H C, Cao Z Q, Chen G Y, Wang B, Gong C Y, Zhang Z X, Cai Z B. Design and construction of a novel instrument for high-frequency micro-force electrical sliding friction testing. Rev Sci Instrum 90(9): 095103 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Park Y W, Joo H G, Lee K Y. Effect of intermittent fretting on corrosion behavior in electrical contact. Wear 268(3–4): 353–360 (2010)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Aleutdinova M I, Fadin V V. Special features of deterioration and structure of the surface layers of molybdenum and metal materials under dry sliding with electric current. Russ Phys J 63(7): 1157–1162 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Xue D Z, Xue D Q, Yuan R H, Zhou Y M, Balachandran P V, Ding X D, Sun J, Lookman T. An informatics approach to transformation temperatures of NiTi-based shape memory alloys. Acta Mater 125: 532–541 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Ren F, Ward L, Williams T, Laws K J, Wolverton C, Hattrick-Simpers J, Mehta A. Accelerated discovery of metallic glasses through iteration of machine learning and high-throughput experiments. Sci Adv 4(4): eaaq1566 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Ling J L, Hutchinson M, Antono E, Paradiso S, Meredig B. High-dimensional materials and process optimization using data-driven experimental design with well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6(3): 207–217 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Liu R Q, Kumar A, Chen Z Z, Agrawal A, Sundararaghavan V, Choudhary A. A predictive machine learning approach for microstructure optimization and materials design. Sci Rep 5: 11551 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Sun Y T, Bai H Y, Li M Z, Wang W H. Machine learning approach for prediction and understanding of glass-forming ability. J Phys Chem Lett 8(14): 3434–3439 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Altay O, Gurgenc T, Ulas M, Özel C. Prediction of wear loss quantities of ferro-alloy coating using different machine learning algorithms. Friction 8(1): 107–114 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Guan W, Zhao Y H, Liu Y C, Kang S, Wang D P, Cui L. Force data-driven machine learning for defects in friction stir welding. Scr Mater 217: 114765 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Marian M, Mursak J, Bartz M, Profito F J, Rosenkranz A, Wartzack S. Predicting EHL film thickness parameters by machine learning approaches. Friction 11(6): 992–1013 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Marian M, Tremmel S. Current trends and applications of machine learning in tribology—A review. Lubricants 9(9): 86 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Zhang Z N, Yin N, Chen S, Liu C L. Tribo-informatics: Concept, architecture, and case study. Friction 9(3): 642–655 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Yin N, Xing Z G, He K, Zhang Z N. Tribo-informatics approaches in tribology research: A review. Friction 11(1): 1–22 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Vakis A I, Yastrebov V A, Scheibert J, Nicola L, Dini D, Minfray C, Almqvist A, Paggi M, Lee S, Limbert G, et al. Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: An overview. Tribol Int 125: 169–199 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Pan S H, Zhang Z N. Fundamental theories and basic principles of triboelectric effect: A review. Friction 7(1): 2–17 (2019)
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Aydin F, Durgut R. Estimation of wear performance of AZ91 alloy under dry sliding conditions using machine learning methods. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 31(1): 125–137 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Hasan M S, Kordijazi A, Rohatgi P K, Nosonovsky M. Machine learning models of the transition from solid to liquid lubricated friction and wear in aluminum–graphite composites. Tribol Int 165: 107326 (2022)
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Blanton T N, Huang T C, Toraya H, Hubbard C R, Robie S B, Louër D, Göbel H E, Will G, Gilles R, Raftery T. JCPDS—International Centre for Diffraction Data round robin study of silver behenate. A possible low-angle X-ray diffraction calibration standard. Powder Diffr 10(2): 91–95 (1995)
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Li Y Z, Zhou M, Zhang Y, Zhu H J, Zheng X H, Liang S L, Tang S L, Tian B H, Liu Y, Li X, et al. Effect of Y2O3 on the electrical contact behavior of Al2O3-Cu/MoTa composites. Coatings 13(2): 252 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Wong-Ng W, McMurdie H F, Hubbard C R, Mighell A D. JCPDS-ICDD Research Associateship (cooperative program with NBS/NIST). J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 106(6): 1013 (2001)
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Liu X L, Hu M J, Li Z H, Zhou C W, Xiao Q, Yang W B, Chen D Y. Effect of copper contents on the current-carrying wear properties of carbon brush under different temperatures conditions. J Mater Res Technol 15: 3110–3121 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
McBride J W, Sharkh S M A. The effect of contact opening velocity and the moment of contact opening on the AC erosion of Ag/CdO contacts. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology: Part A 17(1): 2–7 (1994)
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Joo H G, Jang Y H, Choi H S. Electrical contact resistance for a conductive Velcro system. Tribol Int 80: 115–121 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Larsson E, Andersson A M, Kassman Rudolphi Å. Grease lubricated fretting of silver coated copper electrical contacts. Wear 376–377: 634–642 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Sung I H, Kim J W, Noh H J, Jang H. Effect of displacement and humidity on contact resistance of copper electrical contacts. Tribol Int 95: 256–261 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]
Wang W G, Dong A P, Wu G N, Gao G Q, Zhou L J, Wang B, Cui Y, Liu D L, Li D J, Li T Z. (2011) Study on characterization of electrical contact between pantograph and catenary. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 57th Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (Holm), Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2011: 1–6.
Crossref
[49]
Fang X Y, Gong J N, Yu Y Q, Yu S J. Zhou L C, Zhang Z W, Cai Z B. Optics & Laser Technology 170: 110301 (2024)
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]
Liu H, Yang B M, Wang C, Han Y S, Liu D M. The mechanisms and applications of friction energy dissipation. Friction 11(6): 839–864 (2023)
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]
Li Z Y, Guo X W, Yang Z B. Cai Z B, Jiao Y J. Effect of ultrasonic surface rolling process on the microstructure and corrosion behavior of zirconium alloy in high-temperature water condition. Materials Chemistry and Physics 311: 128546 (2024)
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Cai Z B, Li Z Y, Yin M G, Zhu M H, Zhou Z R. A review of fretting study on nuclear power equipment. Tribology International 144: 106095 (2020)
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]
Zhang Z N, Yin N, Chen S, Liu C L. Tribo-informatics: Concept, architecture, and case study. Friction 9: 642–655 (2021)
Crossref Google Scholar
Friction
Volume 12 Issue 6,
June 2024
Pages 1250-1271
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-023-0810-2
Cite this article:
CAI Z-b, LI C-l, YOU L, et al. Prediction of contact resistance of electrical contact wear using different machine learning algorithms. Friction, 2024, 12(6): 1250-1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-023-0810-2

468

Views

20

Downloads

2

Crossref

5

Web of Science

6

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 19 March 2023
Revised: 02 July 2023
Accepted: 02 August 2023
Published: 10 January 2024
© The author(s) 2023.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return