AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (3.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Using fused filament fabrication to improve the tribocorrosion behaviour of 17-4 PH SS in comparison to other metal forming techniques

Cristina GARCÍA-CABEZÓN1( )Juan Alfonso NARANJO2Celia GARCÍA-HERNÁNDEZ1Cristina BERGES2Gemma HERRANZ2( )Fernando MARTÍN-PEDROSA1
Materials Engineering, E.I.I., Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid 47011, Spain
INEI-Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Industrial (ETSII), Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Castilla-La Mancha 13071, Spain
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the additive manufacturing processes which has gained more interest because of its simplicity and low-cost. This technology is similar to the conventional metal injection moulding (MIM) process, consisting of the feedstock preparation of metal powder and polymer binders, followed by layer-by-layer 3D printing (FFF) or injection (MIM) to create green parts and, finally, debinding and sintering. Moreover, both technologies provide near-dense parts. This work presents an in-depth study of the processing method’s influence. The porosity, microstructure, hardness, corrosion, and tribocorrosion behaviour are compared for 17-4 PH SS samples processed from powder by additive manufacturing using FFF and MIM, as well as conventional powder metallurgy (PM) samples. MIM samples exhibited the highest macro and microhardness, while corrosion behaviour was similar for both MIM and FFF samples, but superior in comparison to conventional PM samples. However, the FFF-as fabricated samples displayed a significant improvement in tribocorrosion resistance that could be explained by the higher proportion of delta ferrite and retained austenite in their microstructure.

References

[1]

Wu Y X, German R M, Blaine D, Marx B, Schlaefer C. Effects of residual carbon content on sintering shrinkage, microstructure and mechanical properties of injection molded 17-4 PH stainless steel. J Mater Sci 37(17): 3573–3583 (2002)

[2]

Shen S C, Li X F, Zhang P, Nan Y L, Yang G X, Song X L. Effect of solution-treated temperature on hydrogen embrittlement of 17-4 PH stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 703: 413–421 (2017)

[3]

Abe Y, Kurose T, Santos M, Kanaya Y, Ishigami A, Tanaka S, Ito H. Effect of layer directions on internal structures and tensile properties of 17-4PH stainless steel parts fabricated by fused deposition of metals. Materials 14(2): 243 (2021)

[4]

Mutlu I, Oktay E. Influence of fluoride content of artificial saliva on metal release from 17-4 PH stainless steel foam for dental implant applications. J Mater Sci Technol 29(6): 582–588 (2013)

[5]

Torralba J M. Handbook of metal injection molding. Sawston (UK): Woodhead Publishing, 2012.

[6]

Machaka R. Metal injection moulding of a 17-4 PH stainless steel: A comparative study of mechanical properties. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 430: 012033 (2018)

[7]
Reinshagen J H, Witsberger J C. Properties of Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steel Processed by Conventional Powder Metallurgy Techniques. In Advances in Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials. Princeton (USA): Metal Powder Industries Federation, 1994(7): 313–323.
[8]

Chen L, He Y, Yang Y X, Niu S W, Ren H T. The research status and development trend of additive manufacturing technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9): 3651–3660 (2017)

[9]

Murr L E, Gaytan S M, Ramirez D A, Martinez E, Hernandez J, Amato K N, Shindo P W, Medina F R, Wicker R B. Metal fabrication by additive manufacturing using laser and electron beam melting technologies. J Mater Sci Technol 28(1): 1–14 (2012)

[10]

DebRoy T, Wei H L, Zuback J S, Mukherjee T, Elmer J W, Milewski J O, Beese A M, Wilson-Heid A, De A, Zhang W. Additive manufacturing of metallic components–Process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 92: 112–224 (2018)

[11]
Riecker S, Clouse J, Studnitzky T, et al. Fused deposition modeling—Opportunities for cheap metal AM. In Proceedings of the World PM2016 Congress & Exhibition, Hamburg, Germany, 2016: 9–13.
[12]

Gong H J, Snelling D, Kardel K, Carrano A. Comparison of stainless steel 316L parts made by FDM- and SLM-based additive manufacturing processes. JOM 71(3): 880–885 (2019)

[13]

Tlegenov Y, Hong G S, Lu W F. Nozzle condition monitoring in 3D printing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 54: 45–55 (2018)

[14]

Ye H Z, Liu X Y, Hong H P. Sintering of 17-4PH stainless steel feedstock for metal injection molding. Mater Lett 62(19): 3334–3336 (2008)

[15]

Ponnusamy P, Sharma B, Masood S H, Rahman Rashid R A, Rashid R, Palanisamy S, Ruan D. A study of tensile behavior of SLM processed 17-4 PH stainless steel. Mater Today Proc 45: 4531–4534 (2021)

[16]

Hemmasian Ettefagh A, Guo S M, Raush J. Corrosion performance of additively manufactured stainless steel parts: A review. Addit Manuf 37: 101689 (2021)

[17]

Schaller R F, Taylor J M, Rodelas J, Schindelholz E J. Corrosion properties of powder bed fusion additively manufactured 17-4 PH stainless steel. Corrosion 73(7): 796–807 (2017)

[18]

Forcellese P, Mancia T, Simoncini M, Bellezze T. Investigation on corrosion resistance properties of 17-4 PH bound metal deposition As-sintered specimens with different build-up orientations. Metals 12(4): 588 (2022)

[19]

Stoudt M R, Ricker R E, Lass E A, Levine L E. Influence of postbuild microstructure on the electrochemical behavior of additively manufactured 17-4 PH stainless steel. JOM 69(3): 506–515 (2017)

[20]

Shoemaker T K, Harris Z D, Burns J T. Comparing stress corrosion cracking behavior of additively manufactured and wrought 17-4PH stainless steel. Corrosion 78(6): 528–546 (2022)

[21]

Garcia-Cabezon C, Castro-Sastre M A, Fernandez-Abia A I, Rodriguez-Mendez M L, Martin-Pedrosa F. Microstructure–hardness–corrosion performance of 17–4 precipitation hardening stainless steels processed by selective laser melting in comparison with commercial alloy. Met Mater Int 28(11): 2652–2667 (2022)

[22]

Naim M, Chemkhi M, Alhussein A, Retraint D. Effect of post-treatments on the tribological and corrosion behavior of 17–4PH stainless steel processed via fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf Lett 7: 100158 (2023)

[23]
Naranjo J A. Avances en la Fabricación por Filamento Fundido de componentes metálicos mediante nuevos sistemas ligantes, análisis reológico y caracterización mecánica. Ph.D. Thesis. Castilla-La Mancha (Spain): Castilla-La Mancha University, 2022.
[24]

ASTM Standard G5-94. Standard reference test method for making potentiostatic and potentiodynamic anodic polarization measurements. ASTM, 2004.

[25]

ASTM Standard G99-05. Standard test method for wear testing with a pin-on-disk apparatus. ASTM, 2000.

[26]

German R, Bose A. Injection molding of metals and ceramics. Princeton (USA): Metal Powder Industries Federation, 1997.

[27]
Samal P K, Nandivada N. Properties of 17–4 PH Stainless Steel Produced Via Press and Sinter Route. In Proceedings of PM2008 World Congress, Washington, USA, 2008.
[28]

German R, Kubish D. Evaluation of injection molded 17-4 PH stainless steel using water atomized powder. Int J Powder Metall 29: 47–62 (1993)

[29]

Sung H J, Ha T K, Ahn S, Chang Y W. Powder injection molding of a 17-4 PH stainless steel and the effect of sintering temperature on its microstructure and mechanical properties. J Mater Process Technol 130–131: 321–327 (2002)

[30]

Wu M W, Huang Z K, Tseng C F, Hwang K S. Microstructures, mechanical properties, and fracture behaviors of metal-injection molded 17-4PH stainless steel. Met Mater Int 21(3): 531–537 (2015)

[31]

Gülsoy H Ö, Özbek S, Baykara T. Microstructural and mechanical properties of injection moulded gas and water atomised 17-4 PH stainless steel powder. Powder Metall 50(2): 120–126 (2007)

[32]

Alnajjar M, Christien F, Barnier V, Bosch C, Wolski K, Fortes A D, Telling M. Influence of microstructure and manganese sulfides on corrosion resistance of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel in acidic chloride medium. Corros Sci 168: 108585 (2020)

[33]

German R M. MIM 17-4 PH stainless steel: Processing, properties and best practice. Powder lnject Mould Jnt 12: 49–76 (2018)

[34]
Blaine D C, Park S J, German R M, et al. Verifying the Master Sintering Curve on an Industrial Furnace. In Advances in Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials. Princeton (USA): Metal Powder Industries Federation, 2005: 1.13–1.19.
[35]
Murray K, Coleman A J, Tingskog T A, et al. Effect of Particle Size Distribution on Processing and Properties of MIM 17-4 PH. In Advances in Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials., Princeton (USA): Metal Powder Industries Federation, 2010: 4.18–4.27.
[36]
Julien B, Ste-Marie M, Pelletier R, et al. Parametric Modeling of MIM As-Sintered Properties of Stainless Steel 17-4 PH and 316L Using a Statistical Model. In Advances in Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials. Princeton (USA): Metal Powder Industries Federation, 2010: 4.1–4.10.
[37]

Rafi H K, Pal D, Patil N, Starr T L, Stucker B E. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of 17-4 precipitation hardenable steel processed by selective laser melting. J Mater Eng Perform 23(12): 4421–4428 (2014)

[38]

Seerane M N, Machaka R. Metal injection moulding of 17-4PH stainless steel: Effects of porosity on the mechanical properties of the sintered products. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 655(1): 012033 (2019)

[39]

Martin F, García C, Blanco Y, Aparicio M L. Tribocorrosion behaviour of powder metallurgy duplex stainless steels sintered in nitrogen. Tribol Int 57: 76–85 (2013)

[40]

Szewczyk-Nykiel A, Kazior J. Effect of aging temperature on corrosion behavior of sintered 17-4 PH stainless steel in dilute sulfuric acid solution. J Mater Eng Perform 26(7): 3450–3456 (2017)

[41]

Garcia-Cabezon C, Garcia-Hernandez C, Rodriguez-Mendez M L, Martin-Pedrosa F. A new strategy for corrosion protection of porous stainless steel using polypyrrole films. J Mater Sci Technol 37: 85–95 (2020)

[42]

Gonzalez-Rodriguez J G, Lucio-García M A, Nicho M E, Cruz-Silva R, Casales M, Valenzuela E. Improvement on the corrosion protection of conductive polymers in pemfc environmets by adhesives. J Power Sources 168(1): 184–190 (2007)

[43]

Johnson J L. Corrosion resistant medical instruments produced by metal injection molding. Med Device Mater Proc Mater Process Med Devices Conf 2003: 408–413 (2003)

[44]

Costa I, Franco C V, Kunioshi C T, Rossi J L. Corrosion resistance of injection-molded 17-4PH steel in sodium chloride solution. Corrosion 62(4): 357–365 (2006)

[45]

Landolt D. Electrochemical and materials aspects of tribocorrosion systems. J Phys D: Appl Phys 39(15): 3121–3127 (2006)

[46]

Huttunen-Saarivirta E, Kilpi L, Hakala T J, Carpen L, Ronkainen H. Tribocorrosion study of martensitic and austenitic stainless steels in 0.01M NaCl solution. Tribol Int 95: 358–371 (2016)

[47]

Martin F, García C, Blanco Y, Aparicio M L. Tribocorrosion behaviour of powder metallurgy duplex stainless steels sintered in nitrogen. Tribol Int 57: 76–85 (2013)

[48]

Garcia-Cabezón C, Rodríguez-Méndez M L, Borrás V A, Bayón R, Salvo-Comino C, Garcia-Hernandez C, Martin-Pedrosa F. Improvements in tribological and anticorrosion performance of porous Ti-6Al-4V via PEO coating. Friction 9(5): 1303–1318 (2021)

[49]

Esfandiari M, Dong H. The corrosion and corrosion–wear behaviour of plasma nitrided 17-4PH precipitation hardening stainless steel. Surf Coat Technol 202(3): 466–478 (2007)

[50]

Stachowiak A, Zwierzycki W. Tribocorrosion modeling of stainless steel in a sliding pair of pin-on-plate type. Tribol Int 44(10): 1216–1224 (2011)

[51]
Mischler S, Munoz A I. Tribocorrosion. Encyclopedia of Interfacial Chemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018: 504–514.
[52]

Suryawanshi J, Baskaran T, Prakash O, Arya S B, Ramamurty U. On the corrosion resistance of some selective laser melted alloys. Materialia 3: 153–161 (2018)

[53]
Mischler S. Sliding tribo-corrosion of passive metals: Mechanisms and modeling. Tribo-Corrosion: Research, Testing, and Applications. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959: ASTM International, 2013: 1–18.
Friction
Pages 2325-2343
Cite this article:
GARCÍA-CABEZÓN C, NARANJO JA, GARCÍA-HERNÁNDEZ C, et al. Using fused filament fabrication to improve the tribocorrosion behaviour of 17-4 PH SS in comparison to other metal forming techniques. Friction, 2024, 12(10): 2325-2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-024-0885-4

175

Views

7

Downloads

3

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 04 December 2022
Revised: 19 May 2023
Accepted: 13 February 2024
Published: 28 June 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return