AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

Current state-of-the-art review of footwear–ground friction

David REBENDA1,2( )Tomáš SÁHA1
Footwear Research Centre, University Institute, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Bron 61600, Czech Republic
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

The most important role of footwear is to ensure safe, functional walking, and foot protection. For the proper functionality of not only the work shoes, the anti-slip behavior of the shoe under various conditions and environments plays an important role in the prevention of slips, trips, falls, and consequent injuries. This article is intended to review the current understanding of the frictional mechanisms between shoe outsoles and various counterfaces that impact the evaluation of outsole slipperiness. Current research focuses on the mechanisms driving outsole friction on different ground surfaces or the definition and description of parameters that influence outsole friction. Subsequently, the review discusses the effect of various surface contaminants on footwear friction. Lastly, challenges and outlooks in the field of footwear outsoles are briefly mentioned.

References

[1]

Nenonen N. Analysing factors related to slipping, stumbling, and falling accidents at work: Application of data mining methods to Finnish occupational accidents and diseases statistics database. Appl Ergon 44(2): 215–224 (2013)

[2]

Yeoh H T, Lockhart T E, Wu X F. Non-fatal occupational falls on the same level. Ergonomics 56(2): 153–165 (2013)

[3]

Kemmlert K, Lundholm L. Slips, trips and falls in different work groups—With reference to age and from a preventive perspective. Appl Ergon 32(2): 149–153 (2001)

[4]

Chang W R, Courtney T K, Grönqvist R, Redfern M. Measuring Slipperiness: Human Locomotion and Surface Factors. Boca Raton (USA): CRC Press, 2002.

[5]

Leamon T B. The reduction of slip and fall injuries: Part Ⅱ—The scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide. Int J Ind Ergonom 10(1–2): 29–34 (1992)

[6]

Florence C, Haegerich T, Simon T, Zhou C, Luo F J. Estimated lifetime medical and work-loss costs of emergency department-treated nonfatal injuries—United states, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64(38): 1078–1082 (2015)

[7]
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety. Liberty mutual workplace safety index. Hopkinton (USA): Liberty Mutual, 2017.
[8]
U.S. Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nonfatal Occupational Injuires and Illnesses Requiring Days Away From Work, 2015. Washington, D.C. (USA), 2016.
[9]

Courtney T K, Sorock G S, Manning D P, Collins J W, Holbein-Jenny M A. Occupational slip, trip, and fall-related injuries can the contribution of slipperiness be isolated? Ergonomics 44(13): 1118–1137 (2001)

[10]

Strobel C M, Menezes P L, Lovell M R, Beschorner K E. Analysis of the contribution of adhesion and hysteresis to shoe–floor lubricated friction in the boundary lubrication regime. Tribol Lett 47(3): 341–347 (2012)

[11]
Grönqvist R. Slips, trips and falls. In: Biomechanics in Ergonomics. Kumar S, Ed. Boca Raton (USA): CRC Press, 2007
[12]

Yamaguchi T, Hokkirigawa K. “Walking-mode maps” based on slip/non-slip criteria. Ind Health 46(1): 23–31 (2008)

[13]

Winter D A. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 3(4): 193–214 (1995)

[14]

Gao C S, Abeysekera J. A systems perspective of slip and fall accidents on icy and snowy surfaces. Ergonomics 47(5): 573–598 (2004)

[15]

Hanson J P, Redfern M S, Mazumdar M. Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. Ergonomics 42(12): 1619–1633 (1999)

[16]

Brady R A, Pavol M J, Owings T M, Grabiner M D. Foot displacement but not velocity predicts the outcome of a slip induced in young subjects while walking. J Biomech 33(7): 803–808 (2000)

[17]

Beschorner K E, Albert D L, Redfern M S. Required coefficient of friction during level walking is predictive of slipping. Gait Posture 48: 256–260 (2016)

[18]

Blanchette M G, Powers C M. Slip prediction accuracy and bias of the SATRA STM 603 whole shoe tester. J Test Eval 43(3): 491–498 (2015)

[19]

Beschorner K E, Iraqi A, Redfern M S, Cham R, Li Y. Predicting slips based on the STM 603 whole-footwear tribometer under different coefficient of friction testing conditions. Ergonomics 62(5): 668–681 (2019)

[20]

Yamaguchi T, Yano M, Onodera H, Hokkirigawa K. Kinematics of center of mass and center of pressure predict friction requirement at shoe–floor interface during walking. Gait Posture 38(2): 209–214 (2013)

[21]

Fino P, Lockhart T E. Required coefficient of friction during turning at self-selected slow, normal, and fast walking speeds. J Biomech 47(6): 1395–1400 (2014).

[22]

Burnfield J M, Tsai Y J, Powers C M. Comparison of utilized coefficient of friction during different walking tasks in persons with and without a disability. Gait Posture 22(1): 82–88 (2005)

[23]

Bellopede R, Marini P, Karaca Z, Gökçe M V. Relationship between slipperiness and other characteristics of stones used as flooring slabs. J Mater Civil Eng 28(8): 04016049 (2016)

[24]
Nagata H, Watanabe H, Inoue Y, Kim I J. Fall risks and validities of various methods to measure frictional properties of slippery floors covered with soapsuds. In: Proceedings of the 17th World Congress on Ergonomics, Beijing, China, 2009.
[25]

Nemire K, Johnson D A, Vidal K. The science behind codes and standards for safe walkways: Changes in level, stairways, stair handrails and slip resistance. Appl Ergon 52: 309–316 (2016)

[26]

Persson B N J, Tartaglino U, Albohr O, Tosatti E. Rubber friction on wet and dry road surfaces: The sealing effect. Phys Rev B 71(3): 035428 (2005)

[27]

Lorenz B, Persson B J, Fortunato G, Giustiniano M, Baldoni F. Rubber friction for tire tread compound on road surfaces. J Phys: Condens Matter 25(9): 095007 (2013)

[28]

Moore D F. The Friction and Lubrication of Elastomers. Oxford (UK): Pergamon Press, 1972.

[29]
Tabor D. Friction, Adhesion and boundary lubrication of polymers. In: Advances in Polymer Friction and Wear. Lee L H, Ed. Berlin: Springer, 1974: 5–30.
[30]

Tiwari A, Miyashita N, Espallargas N, Persson B N J. Rubber friction: The contribution from the area of real contact. J Chem Phys 148(22): 224701 (2018)

[31]

Wriggers P, Reinelt J. Multi-scale approach for frictional contact of elastomers on rough rigid surfaces. Comput Method Appl M 198(21–26): 1996–2008 (2009)

[32]

Mohan R, Das B N, Sundaresan R. Effect of hardness and surface roughness on slip resistance of rubber. J Test Eval 43(6): 1574–1586 (2015)

[33]

Chanda A, Jones T G, Beschorner K E. Generalizability of footwear traction performance across flooring and contaminant conditions. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors 6(2): 98–108 (2018)

[34]

Ido T, Yamaguchi T, Shibata K, Matsuki K, Yumii K, Hokkirigawa K. Sliding friction characteristics of styrene butadiene rubbers with varied surface roughness under water lubrication. Tribol Int 133: 230–235 (2019)

[35]

Maegawa S, Itoigawa F, Nakamura T. Effect of normal load on friction coefficient for sliding contact between rough rubber surface and rigid smooth plane. Tribol Int 92: 335–343 (2015)

[36]

Persson B N J. Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics. J Chem Phys 115(8): 3840–3861 (2001)

[37]

Cowap M J H, Moghaddam S R M, Menezes P L, Beschorner K E. Contributions of adhesion and hysteresis to coefficient of friction between shoe and floor surfaces: Effects of floor roughness and sliding speed. Tribol Mater Surf Interfaces 9(2): 77–84 (2015)

[38]

Moghaddam S R M, Redfern M S, Beschorner K E. A microscopic finite element model of shoe–floor hysteresis and adhesion friction. Tribol Lett 59(3): 42 (2015)

[39]

Zafarmehrabian R, Gangali S T, Ghoreishy M H R, Davallu M. The effects of silica/carbon black ratio on the dynamic properties of the tread compounds in truck tires. J Chem Ny 9(3): 1102–1112 (2012)

[40]

Mokhtari M, Schipper D J, Tolpekina T V. On the friction of carbon black- and silica-reinforced BR and S-SBR elastomers. Tribol Lett 54(3): 297–308 (2014)

[41]

Jones T, Iraqi A, Beschorner K. Performance testing of work shoes labeled as slip resistant. Appl Ergon 68: 304–312 (2018)

[42]

Iraqi A, Vidic N S, Redfern M S, Beschorner K E. Prediction of coefficient of friction based on footwear outsole features. Appl Ergon 82: 102963 (2020)

[43]

Cook A, Hemler S, Sundaram V, Chanda A, Beschorner K. Differences in friction performance between new and worn shoes. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors 8(4): 209–214 (2020)

[44]

Yamaguchi T, Pathomchat P, Shibata K, Nishi T, Tateishi J, Hokkirigawa K. Effects of porosity and SEBS fraction on dry sliding friction of EVA foams for sports shoe sole applications. Tribol T 63(6): 1067–1075 (2020)

[45]

Liu L W, Li K W, Lee Y H, Chen C C, Chen C Y. Friction measurements on “anti-slip” floors under shoe sole, contamination, and inclination conditions. Safety Sci 48(10): 1321–1326 (2010)

[46]

Yu R F, Li K W. A field assessment of floor slipperiness in a student cafeteria. Int J Inj Control Sa 20(3): 245–253 (2013)

[47]

Coşkun G, Sarıışık G. Analysis of slip safety risk by portable floor slipperiness tester in state institutions. J Build Eng 27: 100953 (2020)

[48]

Chang W R, Chang C C. Relationship among several measurements of slipperiness obtained in a laboratory environment. Appl Ergon 68: 117–124 (2018)

[49]

Hsu J, Li Y, Dutta T, Fernie G. Assessing the performance of winter footwear using a new maximum achievable incline method. Appl Ergon 50: 218–225 (2015)

[50]

Hsu J, Shaw R, Novak A, Li Y, Ormerod M, Newton R, Dutta T, Fernie G. Slip resistance of winter footwear on snow and ice measured using maximum achievable incline. Ergonomics 59(5): 717–728 (2016)

[51]

Bagheri Z S, Patel N, Li Y, Morrone K, Fernie G, Dutta T. Slip resistance and wearability of safety footwear used on icy surfaces for outdoor municipal workers. Work 62(1): 37–47 (2019)

[52]

Bagheri Z S, Patel N, Li Y, Rizzi K, Lui K Y G, Holyoke P, Fernie G, Dutta T. Selecting slip resistant winter footwear for personal support workers. Work 64(1): 135–151 (2019)

[53]

Yamaguchi T, Katsurashima Y, Hokkirigawa K. Effect of rubber block height and orientation on the coefficients of friction against smooth steel surface lubricated with glycerol solution. Tribol Int 110: 96–102 (2017)

[54]

Anwer A, Bagheri Z S, Fernie G, Dutta T, Naguib H E. Evolution of the coefficient of friction with surface wear for advanced surface textured composites. Adv Mater Interfaces 4(6): 1600983 (2017)

[55]

Nishi T. Influence of lubricant properties and contacting velocity on real contact formation between rubber and glass in a contact process. Tribol Int 127: 240–244 (2018)

[56]

Nishi T. Influence of curvature radius, elastic modulus, and contact velocity on real contact formation between rubber hemisphere and glass plate during contact process under a water-lubricated condition. Tribol Int 130: 284–288 (2019)

[57]

Hausberger A, Major Z, Theiler G, Gradt T. Observation of the adhesive- and deformation-contribution to the friction and wear behaviour of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Wear 412–413: 14–22 (2018)

[58]

Moore C T, Menezes P L, Lovell M R, Beschorner K E. Analysis of shoe friction during sliding against floor material: Role of fluid contaminant. J Tribol 134(4): 1 (2012)

[59]

Maegawa S, Itoigawa F, Nakamura T. Dynamics in sliding friction of soft adhesive elastomer: Schallamach waves as a stress-relaxation mechanism. Tribol Int 96: 23–30 (2016)

[60]

Nishi T, Yamaguchi T, Hokkirigawa K. Development of high slip-resistant footwear outsole using rubber surface filled with activated carbon/sodium chloride. Sci Rep-UK 12: 267 (2022)

[61]

Maegawa S, Itoigawa F, Nakamura T. A role of friction-induced torque in sliding friction of rubber materials. Tribol Int 93: 182–189 (2016)

[62]

Yamaguchi T, Sugawara T, Takahashi M, Shibata K, Moriyasu K, Nishiwaki T, Hokkirigawa K. Effect of porosity and normal load on dry sliding friction of polymer foam blocks. Tribol Lett 66(1): 34 (2018)

[63]

Nečas D, Jaroš T, Dočkal K, Šperka P, Vrbka M, Křupka I, Hartl M. The effect of kinematic conditions on film thickness in compliant lubricated contact. J Tribol 140(5): 051501 (2018)

[64]

Iraqi A, Cham R, Redfern M S, Beschorner K E. Coefficient of friction testing parameters influence the prediction of human slips. Appl Ergon 70: 118–126 (2018)

[65]

Blanchette M G, Powers C M. The influence of footwear tread groove parameters on available friction. Appl Ergon 50: 237–241 (2015)

[66]

Yamaguchi T, Hokkirigawa K. Development of a high slip-resistant footwear outsole using a hybrid rubber surface pattern. Ind Health 52(5): 414–423 (2014)

[67]
ISO 13287: 2019. Personal protective equipment–footwear–test method for slip resistance. ISO, 2019.
[68]
ASTM F2913-19. Standard test method for measuring the coefficient of friction for evaluation of slip performance of foot wear ant test surface/flooring using a whole shoe tester. ASTM International, 2019.
[69]
NFSI B101.7-2021. Standard test method for lab measurement of footwear heel outsole material coefficient of friction on liquid-contaminated floor surfaces. NFSI, 2021.
[70]

Choi S K, Kudoh R, Koga J, Mikami T, Yokoyama Y, Takahashi H, Ono H. A comparative evaluation of floor slip resistance test methods. Constr Build Mater 94: 737–745 (2015)

[71]

Sudoł E, Szewczak E, Małek M. Comparative analysis of slip resistance test methods for granite floors. Materials 14(5): 1108 (2021)

[72]
DIN 51130: 2014. Testing of floor coverings–determination of the anti-slip property–workrooms and fields of activities with slip danger–walking method–Ramp test. DIN, 2014.
[73]
United Kingdom Slip Resistance Group. The Assessment of Floor Slip ResistanceThe UK Slip Resistance Group Guidelines Issue 5.0. The United Kingdom Slip Resistance Group, 2016.
[74]
ASTM E303-22. Standard test method for measuring surface frictional properties using the british pendulum tester. ASTM International, 2022.
[75]
EN 13036-4: 2011. Road and airfield surface characteristics–test methods–Part 4: Method for measurement of slip/skid resistance of a surface: The pendulum test. CEN, 2011.
[76]
SA HB 198: 2014. Guide to the specification and testing of slip resistance of pedestrian surfaces. Australia Standards, 2014.
[77]
NFSI B101.3-2020. Test method for measuring the wet DCOF of hard surface walkways. NFSI, 2020.
[78]
ANSI A137.1: 2021. American national standard specifications for ceramic tile. ANSI, 2021.
[79]

Derler S, Kausch F, Huber R. Analysis of factors influencing the friction coefficients of shoe sole materials. Safety Sci 46(5): 822–832 (2008)

[80]

Li K W, Meng F X, Zhang W. Friction between footwear and floor covered with solid particles under dry and wet conditions. Int J Occup Saf Ergo 20(1): 43–53 (2014)

[81]

Chang W R, Matz S, Chang C C. The stochastic distribution of available coefficient of friction for human locomotion of five different floor surfaces. Appl Ergon 45(3): 811–815 (2014)

[82]
ASTM F1677-05. Standard test method for using a portable inclineable articulated strut slip tester (PIAST). ASTM International, 2005.
[83]

Beschorner K E, Chanda A, Moyer B E, Reasinger A, Griffin S C, Johnston I M. Validating the ability of a portable shoe–floor friction testing device, NextSTEPS, to predict human slips. Appl Ergon 106: 103854 (2023)

[84]

Gupta S, Malviya A, Chatterjee S, Chanda A. Development of a portable device for surface traction characterization at the shoe–floor interface. Surfaces 5(4): 504–520 (2022)

[85]

Chang W R, Grönqvist R, Leclercq S, Brungraber R J, Mattke U, Strandberg L, Thorpe S C, Myung R, Makkonen L, Courtney T K. The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices. Ergonomics 44(13): 1233–1261 (2001)

[86]

Kim J. Comparison of three different slip meters under various contaminated conditions. Saf Health Work 3(1): 22–30 (2012)

[87]

Fekr A R, Li Y, Gauvin C, Wong G, Cheng W, Fernie G, Dutta T. Evaluation of winter footwear: Comparison of test methods to determine footwear slip resistance on ice surfaces. Int J Env Res Pub He 18(2): 405 (2021)

[88]
Beschorner K E, Li Y S, Yamaguchi T, Ells W, Bowman R. The Future of Footwear Friction. In: Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, 2021: 841–855.
[89]

Iraqi A, Cham R, Redfern M S, Vidic N S, Beschorner K E. Kinematics and kinetics of the shoe during human slips. J Biomech 74: 57–63 (2018)

[90]

Moriyasu K, Nishiwaki T, Yamaguchi T, Hokkirigawa K. Experimental analysis of the distribution of traction coefficient in the shoe–ground contact area during running. Tribol Online 7(4): 267–273 (2012)

[91]

Yamaguchi T. Distribution of the local required coefficient of friction in the shoe–floor contact area during straight walking: A pilot study. Biotribology 19: 100101 (2019)

[92]

Grönqvist R, Matz S, Hirvonen M. Assessment of shoe–floor slipperiness with respect to contact-time-related variation in friction during heel strike. Occup Ergon 3(4): 197–208 (2003)

[93]

Kim A R, Cholewinski A, Mitra S K, Zhao B X. Viscoelastic tribopairs in dry and lubricated sliding friction. Soft Matter 16(32): 7447–7457 (2020)

[94]

Sadowski P, Stupkiewicz S. Friction in lubricated soft-on-hard, hard-on-soft and soft-on-soft sliding contacts. Tribol Int 129: 246–256 (2019)

[95]

Hemler S L, Charbonneau D N, Iraqi A, Redfern M S, Haight J M, Moyer B E, Beschorner K E. Changes in under-shoe traction and fluid drainage for progressively worn shoe tread. Appl Ergon 80: 35–42 (2019).

[96]

Kim I J. Wear observation of shoe surfaces: Application for slip and fall safety assessments. Tribol T 58(3): 407–417 (2015)

[97]

Mills R, Dwyer-Joyce R S, Loo-Morrey M. The mechanisms of pedestrian slip on flooring contaminated with solid particles. Tribol Int 42(3): 403–412 (2009)

[98]

Albert D, Moyer B, Beschorner K E. Three-dimensional shoe kinematics during unexpected slips: Implications for shoe–floor friction testing. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors 5(1): 1–11 (2017)

[99]

Chang W R, Grönqvist R, Leclercq S, Myung R, Makkonen L, Strandberg L, Brungraber R J, Mattke U, Thorpe S C. The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 1: Friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions. Ergonomics 44(13): 1217–1232 (2001)

[100]

Irzmańska E. Protective footwear and the risk of slipping in older workers—Definitions, achievements, recommendations. Autex Res J 15(3): 181–190 (2015)

[101]

Yamaguchi T, Sugawara T, Takahashi M, Shibata K, Moriyasu K, Nishiwaki T, Hokkirigawa K. Dry sliding friction of ethylene vinyl acetate blocks: Effect of the porosity. Tribol Int 116: 264–271 (2017)

[102]

Yang C, Persson B N J. Contact mechanics: Contact Area and interfacial separation from small contact to full contact. J Phys: Condens Matter 20(21): 215214 (2008)

[103]

Kim I J. Identifying shoe wear mechanisms and associated tribological characteristics: Importance for slip resistance evaluation. Wear 360–361: 77–86 (2016)

[104]

Elleuch R, Elleuch K, Ben Abdelounis H, Zahouani H. Surface roughness effect on friction behaviour of elastomeric material. Mat Sci Eng A 465(1–2): 8–12 (2007)

[105]

Li K W, Chang W R, Leamon T B, Chen C J. Floor slipperiness measurement: Friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditions. Safety Sci 42(6): 547–565 (2004)

[106]

Chang W R. The effect of surface roughness and contaminant on the dynamic friction of porcelain tile. Appl Ergon 32(2): 173–184 (2001)

[107]

Li K W, Chen C J. Effects of tread groove orientation and width of the footwear pads on measured friction coefficients. Safety Sci 43(7): 391–405 (2005)

[108]

Li K W, Wu H H, Lin Y C. The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different tread groove widths, floors and contaminants. Appl Ergon 37(6): 743–748 (2006)

[109]

Maegawa S, Itoigawa F, Nakamura T. A role of friction-induced torque in sliding friction of rubber materials. Tribol Int 93: 182–189 (2016)

[110]

Beschorner K E, Albert D L, Chambers A J, Redfern M S. Fluid pressures at the shoe–floor–contaminant interface during slips: Effects of tread & implications on slip severity. J Biomech 47(2): 458–463 (2014)

[111]

Beschorner K, Lovell M, Higgs III C F, Redfern M S. Modeling mixed-lubrication of a shoe–floor interface applied to a pin-on-disk apparatus. Tribol T 52(4): 560–568 (2009)

[112]

Li K W, Chen C J. The effect of shoe soling tread groove width on the coefficient of friction with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants. Appl Ergon 35(6): 499–507 (2004)

[113]

Sundaram V H, Hemler S L, Chanda A, Haight J M, Redfern M S, Beschorner K E. Worn region size of shoe outsole impacts human slips: Testing a mechanistic model. J Biomech 105: 109797 (2020)

[114]

Hausberger A, Major Z, Theiler G, Gradt T. Observation of the adhesive- and deformation-contribution to the friction and wear behaviour of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Wear 412–413: 14–22 (2018)

[115]

Sato S, Yamaguchi T, Shibata K, Nishi T, Moriyasu K, Harano K, Hokkirigawa K. Dry sliding friction and wear behavior of thermoplastic polyurethane against abrasive paper. Biotribology 23: 100130 (2020)

[116]

Pan X D, Kelley E D, Hayes M W. Bulk viscoelastic contribution to the wet-sliding friction of rubber compounds. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 41(8): 757–771 (2003)

[117]

Nishi T, Moriyasu K, Harano K, Nishiwaki T. Influence of dewettability on rubber friction properties with different surface roughness under water/ethanol/glycerol lubricated conditions. Tribol Online 11(5): 601–607 (2016)

[118]
Bhushan B. Introduction to Tribology. Hoboken (USA): John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[119]

Rosenberg R. Why is ice slippery? Phys Today 58(12): 50–54 (2005)

[120]

Dash J G, Rempel A W, Wettlaufer J S. The physics of premelted ice and its geophysical consequences. Rev Mod Phys 78(3): 695–741 (2006)

[121]

Li Y M, Somorjai G A. Surface premelting of ice. J Phys Chem C 111(27): 9631–9637 (2007)

[122]

Bagheri Z S, Anwer A O, Fernie G, Naguib H E, Dutta T. Effects of multi-functional surface-texturing on the ice friction and abrasion characteristics of hybrid composite materials for footwear. Wear 418–419: 253–264 (2019)

[123]

Yamaguchi T, Hsu J, Li Y, Maki B E. Efficacy of a rubber outsole with a hybrid surface pattern for preventing slips on icy surfaces. Appl Ergon 51: 9–17 (2015)

[124]

Rizvi R, Naguib H, Fernie G, Dutta T. High friction on ice provided by elastomeric fiber composites with textured surfaces. Appl Phys Lett 106(11): 111601 (2015)

[125]
World Footwear. World Footwear 2022 Yearbook. Porto (Portugal): APICCAPS, 2022.
[126]

Gupta S, Chatterjee S, Chanda A. Effect of footwear material wear on slips and falls. Mater Today Proc 62: 3508–3515 (2022)

[127]

Walter P J, Tushak C M, Hemler S L, Beschorner K E. Effect of tread design and hardness on interfacial fluid force and friction in artificially worn shoes. Footwear Sci 13(3): 245–254 (2021)

[128]

Ishizako A, Tomosada M, Hokkirigawa K, Yamaguchi T. Impact of rubber block end-face corner radius on the friction coefficient between rubber blocks and a glass plate under dry and lubrication conditions. Tribol Int 174: 107705 (2022)

Friction
Pages 2188-2204
Cite this article:
REBENDA D, SÁHA T. Current state-of-the-art review of footwear–ground friction. Friction, 2024, 12(10): 2188-2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-024-0905-4

116

Views

10

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 05 October 2022
Revised: 18 January 2023
Accepted: 10 April 2024
Published: 14 August 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return