AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (473.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Protocol | Open Access

Radioligand saturation binding for quantitative analysis of ligand-receptor interactions

Chengyan Dong1Zhaofei Liu2Fan Wang1,2( )
Interdisciplinary Laboratory, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Medical Isotopes Research Center and Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

The reversible combination of a ligand with specific sites on the surface of a receptor is one of the most important processes in biochemistry. A classic equation with a useful simple graphical method was introduced to obtain the equilibrium constant,Kd, and the maximum density of receptors,Bmax. The entire125I-labeled ligand binding experiment includes three parts: the radiolabeling, cell saturation binding assays and the data analysis. The assay format described here is quick, simple, inexpensive, and effective, and provides a gold standard for the quantification of ligand-receptor interactions. Although the binding assays and quantitative analysis have not changed dramatically compared to the original methods, we integrate all the parts to calculate the parameters in one concise protocol and adjust many details according to our experience. In every step, several optional methods are provided to accommodate different experimental conditions. All these refinements make the whole protocol more understandable and user-friendly. In general, the experiment takes one person less than 8 h to complete, and the data analysis could be accomplished within 2 h.

References

 

Anderson AJ, (1994) A simple competitive protein-binding experiment.J Chem Educ 71:994

 
Bailey GS (1996) The Iodogen method for radiolabeling protein. In: Walker JM (ed) The protein protocols handbook. Humana Press, New York, pp 673–674
 

Bylund DB, Toews ML, (1993) Radioligand binding methods: practical guide and tips.Am J Physiol 265:L421-L429

 

Cai W, Chen X, (2008) Preparation of peptide-conjugated quantum dots for tumor vasculature-targeted imaging.Nat Protoc 3:89-96

 
Carpenter JW, Laethem C, Hubbard FR, Eckols TK, Baez M, McClure D, Nelson DLG, Johnston PA (2002) Configuring radioligand receptor binding assays for HTS using scintillation proximity assay technology. In: Janzen WP (ed) Methods in molecular biology, vol. 190: high throughput screening: methods and protocols. Humana Press, New York, pp 31–49
 

Hollemans HJ, Bertina RM, (1975) Scatchard plot and heterogeneity in binding affinity of labeled and unlabeled ligand.Clin Chem 21:1769-1773

 
Hunter R (1970) Standardization of the chloramine-T method of protein iodination. In: Proceedings of the society for experimental biology and medicine society for experimental biology and medicine, New York, vol 133, pp 989–992
 
Keen M (1995) The problems and pitfalls of radioligand binding. In: Davis L (ed) Methods in molecular biology, vol 41. Humana Press Inc, Clifton, pp 1–16
 

Klotz IM, (1985) ligand-receptor interactions: facts and fantasies.Q Rev Biophys 18:227-259

 
Maguire JJ, Kuc RE, Davenport AP (2012) Radioligand binding assays and their analysis. In: Davis L (ed) Methods in molecular biology, vol 897. Humana Press Inc, Clifton, pp 31–77
 
Williams M, Jacobson KA (1990) Radioligand binding assays for adenosine receptors. In: Williams M (ed) Adenosine and adenosine receptors, vol 2. Humana Press, New York, pp 17–55
 
Motulsky H (1996) The GraphPad guide to analyzing radioligand binding data. GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego
 

Opresko L, Wiley HS, Wallace RA, (1980) Proteins iodinated by the chloramine-T method appear to be degraded at an abnormally rapid rate after endocytosis.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:1556-1560

 
Tallarida RJ, Raffa RB, McGonigle P (eds) (1988) Radiolabeled binding. In: Principles in general pharmacology, vol 9. Springer, New York, p 199
 

Rovati GE, (1993) Rational experimental design and data analysis for ligand binding studies: tricks, tips and pitfalls.Pharmacol Res 28:277-299

 

Rovati GE, (1998) Ligand-binding studies: old beliefs and new strategies.Trends Pharmacol Sci 19:365-369

 
Davenport AP, Russell FD (1996) Radioligand binding assays: theory and practice. In: Mather SJ (ed) Current directions in radiopharmaceutical research and development. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 169–179
 
Wilkinson KD (2004) Quantitative analysis of protein–protein interactions. In: Fu H (ed) Protein–protein interactions, vol 2. Humana Press, New York, pp 15–31
Biophysics Reports
Pages 148-155
Cite this article:
Dong C, Liu Z, Wang F. Radioligand saturation binding for quantitative analysis of ligand-receptor interactions. Biophysics Reports, 2015, 1(3): 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41048-016-0016-5

387

Views

6

Downloads

23

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 10 November 2015
Accepted: 20 December 2015
Published: 14 February 2016
© The Author(s) 2016

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Return