AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Smart dust option for geomagnetic tail exploration

Alessandro A. Quarta( )Giovanni MengaliLorenzo Niccolai
Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa I-56122, Italy
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

In-situ measurements are necessary for a long-term analysis of the spatial structure of the geomagnetic tail. This type of mission requires the use of a propellantless propulsion system, such as a classical solar sail, to continuously rotate the design orbit apse line such that it remains parallel to the Sun-Earth direction. To reduce the mission costs, this paper suggests the employment of Sun-pointing smart dusts, which are here investigated in terms of propulsive acceleration level necessary to guarantee a mission’s feasibility. A Sun-pointing smart dust can be thought of as a millimeter-scale solar sail, whose geometric configuration allows it to passively maintain an alignment with the Sun-spacecraft line. The smart dust external surface is coated with an electrochromic reflective film in such a way that it may change, within some limits, its propulsive acceleration magnitude. A suitable control law is necessary for the smart dust to enable an artificial precession of its Earth-centred orbit, similar to what happens in the GeoSail mission. This paper analyzes the required control law using an optimal approach. In particular, the proposed mathematical model provides a set of approximate equations that allow a simple and effective tradeoff analysis between the propulsive requirements, in terms of the smart dust acceleration, and the characteristics of the design orbit.

References

[1]
Kivelson, M. G., Bagenal, F. Planetary mag-netospheres. In: Encyclopedia of the Solar System 3rd edn. Spohn, T., Breuer, D., Johnson, T. V. Eds. Boston: Elsevier, 2014: 137-157.
[2]
Macdonald, M., McInnes, C. R., Alexander, D., Sandman, A. GeoSail: Exploring the magnetosphere using a low-cost solar sail. Acta Astronautica, 2006, 59(8-11): 757-767.
[3]
McInnes, C. R., MacDonald, M., Angelopolous, V., Alexander, D. GEOSAIL: exploring the geomagnetic tail using a small solar sail. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2001, 38(4): 622-629.
[4]
Falkner, P. Executive summary of the GeoSail study. European Space Agency, Technology Reference Study SCI-A/2006/005/GS, 2007.
[5]
Lappas, V., Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A., Gil-Fernandez, J., Schmidt, T., Wie, B. Practical systems design for an earth-magnetotail-monitoring solar sail mission. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2009, 46(2): 381-393.
[6]
Wright, J. L. Space Sailing. Philadelphia: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1992: 223.
[7]
Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A., Lappas, V. J. Optimal steering law for the GeoSail mission. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(3): 876-879.
[8]
Colombo, C., McInnes, C. R. Orbital dynamics of “Smart-Dust” devices with solar radiation pressure and drag.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2011, 34(6): 1613-1631.
[9]
Colombo, C., Lücking, C., McInnes, C. R. Orbital dynamics of high area-to-mass ratio spacecraft with J2 and solar radiation pressure for novel Earth observation and communication services. Acta Astronautica, 2012, 81(1): 137-150.
[10]
Colombo, C., McInnes, C. R. Orbit design for future SpaceChip swarm missions in a planetary atmosphere. Acta Astronautica, 2012, 75: 25-41.
[11]
Colombo, C., Lücking, C., McInnes, C. R. Orbit evolution, maintenance and disposal of SpaceChip swarms through electro-chromic control. ActaAstronautica, 2013, 82(1): 25-37.
[12]
Atchison, J. A., Peck, M. A. A passive, sun-pointing, millimeter-scale solar sail. Acta Astronautica, 2010, 67(1-2): 108-121.
[13]
Niccolai, L., Bassetto, M., Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G. A review of Smart Dust architecture, dynamics, and mission applications. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 106: 1-14.
[14]
Lücking, C., Colombo, C., McInnes, C. R. Orbit control of high area-to-mass ratio spacecraft using electrochromic coating. In: Proceedings of the 61st International Astronautical Congress, 2010: 1923-1937.
[15]
Lücking, C., Colombo, C., McInnes, C. R. Electro-chromic orbit control for smart-dust devices. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 35(5): 1548-1558.
[16]
Manchester, Z., Peck, M., Filo, A. KickSat: A crowd-funded mission to demonstrate the world’s smallest spacecraft. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 2013: SSC13-IX-5.
[17]
Fortescue, P., Swinerd, G., Stark, J. Spacecraft Systems Engineering, 4th edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011: 93-95.
[18]
Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A. Heliocentric trajectory analysis of sun-pointing smart dust with electrochromic control. Advances in Space Research, 2016, 57(4): 991-1001.
[19]
Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G., Denti, E. Optimal in-orbit repositioning of sun-pointing smart dust. Acta Astronautica, 2019, 154: 278-285.
[20]
Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A., Denti, E. Relative motion of sun-pointing smart dust in circular heliocentric orbits. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2018, 41(4): 1009-1014.
[21]
McInnes, C. R. Solar Sailing: Technology, Dynamics and Mission Applications. London: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1999: 46-51.
[22]
Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A., Circi, C., Dachwald, B. Rened solar sail force model with mission application. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(2): 512-520.
[23]
Alexander, D., McInnes, C. R., Angelopoulos, V., Sandman, A. W., Macdonald, M. GeoSail: A novel solar sail mission concept for geospace. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2002, 608(1): 305-312.
[24]
Bryson, A. E., Ho, Y. C. Applied Optimal Control. Washington, D. C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation. 1975: 71-89.
[25]
Stengel, R. F. Optimal Control and Estimation. New York: Dover Publications. 1994: 222-254.
[26]
Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G., Caruso, A. Optimal circle-to-rectilinear orbit transfer with circumferential thrust. Astrodynamics, 2019, 3(1): 31-43.
[27]
Shampine, L. F., Gordon, M. K. Computer Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations: the Initial Value Pro-blem. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. 1975.
[28]
Shampine, L. F., Reichelt, M. W. The MATLAB ODE suite. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1997, 18(1): 1-22.
[29]
Dachwald, B., Seboldt, W., MacDonald, M., Mengali, G., Quarta, A., McInnes, C., Rios-Reyes, L., Scheeres, D., Wie, B., Görlich, M. et al. Potential solar sail degradation effects on trajectory and attitude control. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2005: AIAA 2005-6172.
[30]
Dachwald, B., Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A., Macdonald, M. Parametric model and optimal control of solar sails with optical degradation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2006, 29(5): 1170-1178.
[31]
Dachwald, B., Macdonald, M., McInnes, C. R., Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A. Impact of optical degradation on solar sail mission performance. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2007, 44(4): 740-749.
[32]
Mathews, J. H., Fink, K. D. Numerical Methods Using MATLAB, 4th edn. New York: Pearson, 2004: 392-399.
[33]
Prussing, J. E., Conway, B. A. Orbital Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993: 26-32.
[34]
Aliasi, G., Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A. Artificial Lagrange points for solar sail with electrochromic material panels. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2013, 36(5): 1544-1550.
Astrodynamics
Pages 217-230
Cite this article:
Quarta AA, Mengali G, Niccolai L. Smart dust option for geomagnetic tail exploration. Astrodynamics, 2019, 3(3): 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-019-0048-3

740

Views

9

Crossref

8

Web of Science

9

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 15 December 2018
Accepted: 05 February 2019
Published: 13 August 2019
© Tsinghua University Press 2019
Return