AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Astrodynamics Article
PDF (1.6 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Limits of drag augmentation at spacecraft end-of-mission anda mitigation strategy

Emma Kerr, Malcolm Macdonald( )
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

An increasing number of objects are being launched into low-Earth orbit. Consequently, to avoid the possibility of future in-orbit collisions space object removal techniques are receiving attention. As one of the most developed techniques, drag augmentation is increasingly being considered as an option for end-of-mission removal of objects from low-Earth orbit. This paper highlights a common misconception around drag augmentation: although it can be used to reduce de-orbit time, when used inappropriately it can increase the volume swept by an object and, thus, increase the occurrence risk of collision with another space object. Knowingly ignoring this increased risk of collisions could leave spacecraft operators, and consequently their responsible state party, open to liability risk. By investigating the volume swept and de-orbit lifetime, a strategy of delayed deployment is proposed as a compromise between reducing volume swept and time to de-orbit. However, this increases system complexity and, likely, cost.

Keywords

drag augmentationvolumearea-time-productspace debrisliabilityLearned Hand formulacalculus of negligence

References

[1]
T. S. Kelso, Analysis of the 2007 Chinese ASAT test and the impact of its debris on the space environment. In: Proceedings of the 8th Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2007: 321-330.
[2]
T. S. Kelso, Analysis of the Iridium 33-Cosmos 2251 collision. In: Proceedings of the 19th AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2009: AAS 09-368.
[3]
H. Heidt,, J. Puig-Suari,, A. Moore,, S. Nakasuka,, R. Twiggs, CubeSat: A new generation of picosatellite for education and industry low-cost space experimentation. In: Proceedings of the 14th AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 2000: SSC01-VIIIb-5.
[4]
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Achieving Science with CubeSats: Thinking inside the Box. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2016.
[5]
United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Legal Subcommittee. Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, 1966.
[6]
United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Legal Subcommittee. Convention on international liability for damage caused by space objects, 1971.
[7]
M. MacDonald,, V. Badescu, The International Handbook of Space Technology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014.
Crossref
[8]
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 24113: 2011 space systems—space debris mitigation requirements, 2011.
[9]
Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee. IADC-02-01 Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines, 2007: 1-10.
[10]
E. Kerr,, M. Macdonald,, P. Voigt, Taxonomy and analysis of issues facing post-mission disposal concepts. In: Proceedings of the 68th International Astronautical Congress, 2017: 3735-3744.
[11]
Information on https://www.gov.uk/government/news/threetwo-one-blast-off-dstl-launches-50-million-space-programme (cited 11 July 2017).
Crossref
[12]
K. T. Nock,, K. M. Aaron,, D. McKnight, Removing orbital debris with less risk. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2013, 50(2): 365-379.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
O. R. Stohlman,, V. Lappas, Deorbitsail: a deployable sail for de-orbiting. In: Proceedings of the 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2013: AIAA 2013-1806.
Crossref
[14]
J. M. Fernandez,, G. K. Rose,, C. J. Younger,, G. D. Dean,, J. E. Warren,, O. R. Stohlman,, W. K. Wilkie, NASA’s advanced solar sail propulsion system for low-cost deep space exploration and science missions that uses high performance rollable composite booms. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Solar Sailing, 2017.
Crossref
[15]
L. Visagie,, V. Lappas,, S. Erb, Drag sails for space debris mitigation. Acta Astronautica, 2015, 109: 65-75.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
J. L. Forshaw,, G. S. Aglietti,, N. Navarathinam,, H. Kadhem,, T. Salmon,, A. Pisseloup,, E. Joffre,, T. Chabot,, I. Retat,, R. Axthelm, et al. RemoveDEBRIS: An in-orbit active debris removal demonstration mission. Acta Astronautica, 2016, 127: 448-463.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
J. L. Forshaw,, G. S. Aglietti,, T. Salmon,, I. Retat,, M. Roe,, C. Burgess,, T. Chabot,, A. Pisseloup,, A. Phipps,, C. Bernal,, et al. Final payload test results for the RemoveDebris active debris removal mission. Acta Astronautica 2017, 138: 326-342.
Google Scholar
[18]
D. Guglielmo,, S. Omar,, R. Bevilacqua, Drag de-orbit device: A new standard reentry actuator for CubeSats. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2018, .
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
D Werner,. Drag sails could counter debris. Aerospace America, 2017.
[20]
Information on http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8590103.stm (cited 11 July 2018).
[21]
Information on https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43584070 (cited 11 July 2018).
Crossref
[22]
H. Ahmadloo,, J. Zhang, De-orbiting collision risk assessment and detailed orbital simulation of LEO space debris removal drag sail. In: Proceedings of the 9th Asian-Pacific Conference on Aerospace and Science/the 2nd Asian Joint Symposium on Aerospace Engineering, 2017: 201-215.
[23]
C. Colombo,, A. Rossi,, F. Dalla Vedova,, A. Francesconi,, C. Bombardelli,, M. Trisolini,, J. L. Gonzalo,, P. Di Lizia,, C. Giacomuzzo,, S. B. Khan,, et al. Effects of passive de-orbiting through drag and solar sails and electrodynamic tethers on the space debris environment. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Astronautical Congress, 2018: IAC-18-A6.2.8.
Crossref
[24]
E. Kerr,, M. MacDonald, Incorporating solar activity into general perturbation analysis of atmospheric friction. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2018, 41(6): 1320-1336.
Google Scholar
[25]
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 27852:2016: Space systems—Estimation of orbit lifetime, 2016.
[26]
M. L. Vasile,, E. Minisci,, R. Serra,, J. Beck,, I. Holbrough, Analysis of the de-orbiting and re-entry of space objects with high area to mass ratio. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AIAA, 2016: AIAA 2016-5678.
[27]
H. Walker, UKube-1: operations and lessons learned. In: Proceedings of the 8th European CubeSat Symposium, 2016.
Crossref
[28]
Information on http://celestrak.com/ (cited 11 July 2018).
[29]
B. Cotton,, I. Bennett,, R. E. Zee, On-orbit results from the CanX-7 drag sail deorbit mission. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference, 2017.
[30]
Commitee on Space Research. COSPAR International Reference Atmosphere, 2012.
[31]
P. Z. Grossman,, R. W. Cearley,, D. H. Cole, Uncertainty, insurance and the Learned Hand formula. Law, Probability and Risk, 2006, 5(1): 1-18.
Google Scholar
Astrodynamics
Volume 5 Issue 2,
June 2021
Pages 109-120
DOI: 10.1007/s42064-020-0092-7
Cite this article:
Kerr E, Macdonald M. Limits of drag augmentation at spacecraft end-of-mission anda mitigation strategy. Astrodynamics, 2021, 5(2): 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-020-0092-7

864

Views

57

Downloads

2

Crossref

5

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 06 April 2020
Accepted: 11 August 2020
Published: 02 December 2020
© The Author(s) 2020

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return