AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Real-time space object tracklet extraction from telescope survey images with machine learning

Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Milano Via La Masa 34, 20156, Milano, Italy
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

In this study, a novel approach based on the U-Net deep neural network for image segmentation is leveraged for real-time extraction of tracklets from optical acquisitions. As in all machine learning (ML) applications, a series of steps is required for a working pipeline: dataset creation, preprocessing, training, testing, and post-processing to refine the trained network output. Online websites usually lack ready-to-use datasets; thus, an in-house application artificially generates 360 labeled images. Particularly, this software tool produces synthetic night-sky shots of transiting objects over a specified location and the corresponding labels: dual-tone pictures with black backgrounds and white tracklets. Second, both images and labels are downscaled in resolution and normalized to accelerate the training phase. To assess the network performance, a set of both synthetic and real images was inputted. After the preprocessing phase, real images were fine-tuned for vignette reduction and background brightness uniformity. Additionally, they are down-converted to eight bits. Once the network outputs labels, post-processing identifies the centroid right ascension and declination of the object. The average processing time per real image is less than 1.2 s; bright tracklets are easily detected with a mean centroid angular error of 0.25 deg in 75% of test cases with a 2 deg field-of-view telescope. These results prove that an ML-based method can be considered a valid choice when dealing with trail reconstruction, leading to acceptable accuracy for a fast image processing pipeline.

References

1
European Space Agency. ESA's Annual Space Environment Report. Technical Report 4.0. ESA Space Debris Office, Darmstadt, Germany, 2020. Available at https://www.sdo.esoc.esa.int/environment_report/Space_Environment_Report_latest.pdf.
2

Bennett, A. A., Schaub, H., Carpenter, R. Assessing debris strikes in spacecraft telemetry: Development and comparison of various techniques. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 181: 516–529.

3

Masias, M., Freixenet, J., Lladó, X., Peracaula, M. A review of source detection approaches in astronomical images. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012, 422(2): 1674–1689.

4
Kim, D. -W. ASTRiDE: Automated streak detection for astronomical images. 2016. Available at https://github.com/dwkim78/ASTRiDE (accessed: 11.03.2021)
5
Du, J., Hu, S., Chen, X., Guo, D. Improved space debris astrometry with template matching. In: Proceedings of the 1st NEO and Debris Detection Conference, 2019.
6
Abay, R., Gupta, K. GEO-FPN: A convolutional neural network for detecting GEO and near-GEO space objects from optical images. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Space Debris (virtual), 2021.
7

Izzo, D., Märtens, M., Pan, B. F. A survey on artificial intelligence trends in spacecraft guidance dynamics and control. Astrodynamics, 2019, 3(4): 287–299.

8

Song, Y., Miao, X. Y., Cheng, L., Gong, S. P. The feasibility criterion of fuel-optimal planetary landing using neural networks. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 116: 106860.

9
Lane, B., Poole, M., Camp, M., Murray-Krezan, J. Using machine learning for advanced anomaly detection and classification. In: Proceedings of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2016.
10
Purpura, G., De Vittori, A., Cipollone, R., Di Lizia, P., Massari, M., Colombo, C., di Cecco, A., Salotti, L. SENSIT: A software suite for observation scheduling and performance assessment of SST sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 72nd International Astronautical Congress, 2021.
11
In-The-Sky. org. Guides to the night sky. Available at https://in-the-sky.org/skymap.php (accessed: 11.03. 2021)
12
Burden, R. L., Faires, J. D. Numerical Analysis, 5th edn. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company, 1993.
13
KZak. keras-unet 0.0.7. Available at https://pypi.org/project/keras-unet/ (accessed: 11.03.2021)
14

Zou, K. H., Warfield, S. K., Bharatha, A., Tempany, C. M. C., Kaus, M. R., Haker, S. J., Wells, W. M. III, Jolesz, F. A., Kikinis, R. Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index1: Scientific reports. Academic Radiology, 2004, 11(2): 178–189.

15
Del Genio, G. M., Paoli, J., Del Grande, E., Dolce, F. Italian air force radar and optical sensor experiments for the detection of space objects in LEO orbit. In: Proceedings of the 16th Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2015.
16
Officina Stellare website. Available at https://www.ofncinastellare.com/ (accessed: 11.03.2021)
17

Yamashita, R., Nishio, M., Do, R. K. G., Togashi, K. Convolutional neural networks: An overview and application in radiology. Insights into Imaging, 2018, 9(4): 611–629.

18
Fukui, H., Yamashita, T., Yamauchi, Y., Fujiyoshi, H., Murase, H. Pedestrian detection based on deep convolutional neural network with ensemble inference network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2015: 223–228.https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2015.7225690
19
Li, F. F., Johnson, J., Yeung, S. Lecture 11: Detection and segmentation. Stanford University, 2018. Available at http://cs231n.stanford.edu/slides/2018/cs231n_2018Jecture11.pdf.
20
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9351. Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W., Frangi, A. Eds. Springer Cham, 2015: 234–241.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
21

Silburt, A., Ali-Dib, M., Zhu, C. C., Jackson, A., Valencia, D., Kissin, Y., Tamayo, D., Menou, K. Lunar crater identification via deep learning. Icarus, 2019, 317: 27–38.

Astrodynamics
Pages 205-218
Cite this article:
Vittori AD, Cipollone R, Lizia PD, et al. Real-time space object tracklet extraction from telescope survey images with machine learning. Astrodynamics, 2022, 6(2): 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-022-0134-4

745

Views

32

Downloads

18

Crossref

15

Web of Science

17

Scopus

1

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 08 October 2021
Accepted: 21 January 2022
Published: 13 April 2022
© The Author(s) 2022

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Return