PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Research Article | Open Access

Analytical solution to logarithmic spiral trajectories with circumferential thrust and mission applications

Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa Ⅰ-56122, Italy
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

View original image Download original image

Abstract

This study made use of a shape-based method to analyze the orbital dynamics of a spacecraft subject to a continuous propulsive acceleration acting along the circumferential direction. Under the assumption of a logarithmic spiral trajectory, an exact solution to the equations of motion exists, which allows the spacecraft state variables and flight time to be expressed as a function of the angular coordinate. There is also a case characterized by specific initial conditions in which the time evolution of the state variables may be analytically determined. In this context, the presented solution is used to analyze circle-to-circle trajectories, where the combination of two impulsive maneuvers and a logarithmic spiral path are used to accomplish the transfer. The determined results are then applied to the achievement of the Earth–Mars and the Earth–Venus transfers using actual data from a recent thruster developed by NASA.

References

1

Circi, C. Mars and Mercury missions using solar sails and solar electric propulsion. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2004, 27(3): 496–498.

2

Del Monte, M., Meles, R., Circi, C. Optimization of interplanetary trajectories using the colliding bodies optimization algorithm. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020: 9437378.

3
Markopoulos, N. Analytically exact non-Keplerian motion for orbital transfers. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 1994: AIAA-94-3758-CP.
4
Petropoulos, A. E., Sims, J. A. A review of some exact solutions to the planar equations of motion of a thrusting spacecraft. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Low-Thrust Trajectory, Toulouse, France, 2002.
5

McInnes, C. R. Orbits in a generalized two-body problem. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2003, 26(5): 743–749.

6

Tsien, H. S. Take-off from satellite orbit. Journal of the American Rocket Society, 1953, 23(4): 233–236.

7

Benney, D. J. Escape from a circular orbit using tangential thrust. Journal of Jet Propulsion, 1958, 28(3): 167–169.

8

Boltz, F. W. Orbital motion under continuous tangential thrust. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1992, 15(6): 1503–1507.

9
Battin, R. H. An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics, revised edn. Reston, VA, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 1999.
10

Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G. Analysis of spacecraft motion under constant circumferential propulsive acceleration. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 105(1): 278–284.

11

Roa, J., Peláez, J., Senent, J. New analytic solution with continuous thrust: Generalized logarithmic spirals. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 39(10): 2336–2351.

12

Niccolai, L., Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G. Orbital motion approximation with constant circumferential acceleration. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2018, 41(8): 1783–1789.

13

Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G., Caruso, A. Optimal circle-to-rectilinear orbit transfer with circumferential thrust. Astrodynamics, 2019, 3(1): 31–43.

14

Bassetto, M., Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G., Cipolla, V. Trajectory analysis of a Sun-facing solar sail with optical degradation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2020, 43(9): 1727–1732.

15

Bassetto, M., Boni, L., Mengali, G., Quarta, A. A. Electric sail phasing maneuvers with radial thrust. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 179: 99–104.

16

Bassetto, M., Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G. Trajectory approximation of a passively actuated solar balloon in near-Earth mission scenarios. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 188: 451–462.

17

Bacon, R. H. Logarithmic spiral: An ideal trajectory for the interplanetary vehicle with engines of low sustained thrust. American Journal of Physics, 1959, 27(3): 164–165.

18

Tsu, T. C. Interplanetary travel by solar sail. ARS Journal, 1959, 29(6): 422–427.

19
McInnes, C. R. Chapter 4, Solar sail orbital dynamics. In: Solar Sailing: Technology, Dynamics and Mission Applications. London: Springer, 1999: 129–136.
20

Petropoulos, A. E., Longuski, J. M. Shape-based algorithm for the automated design of low-thrust, gravity assist trajectories. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2004, 41(5): 787–796.

21

Taheri, E., Abdelkhalik, O. Shape based approximation of constrained low-thrust space trajectories using Fourier series. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2012, 49(3): 535–546.

22

Bassetto, M., Niccolai, L., Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G. Logarithmic spiral trajectories generated by solar sails. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2018, 130(2): 18.

23

Gong, S. P., Macdonald, M. Review on solar sail technology. Astrodynamics, 2019, 3(2): 93–125.

24

Bassetto, M., Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G., Cipolla, V. Spiral trajectories induced by radial thrust with applications to generalized sails. Astrodynamics, 2021, 5(2): 121–137.

25
Andrews, G. E, Askey, R., Roy, R. The hypergeometric functions. In: Special Functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 61–123.
26

Forbes, G. F. The trajectory of a powered rocket in space. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 1950, 9(2): 75–79.

27

Li, X. Y., Qiao, D., Chen, H. B. Interplanetary transfer optimization using cost function with variable coefficients. Astrodynamics, 2019, 3(2): 173–188.

28

Caruso, A., Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G. Comparison between direct and indirect approach to solar sail circle-to-circle orbit raising optimization. Astrodynamics, 2019, 3(3): 273–284.

29

Alfano, S., Thorne J, D. Circle-to-circle constant-thrust orbit raising. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 1994, 42(1): 35–45.

30
Vallado, D. A. Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, 2001: 358–374.
31

Quarta, A. A., Mengali, G. Semi-analytical method for the analysis of solar sail heliocentric orbit raising. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 35(1): 330–335.

32

Luo, Z. F., Topputo, F. Mars orbit insertion via ballistic capture and aerobraking. Astrodynamics, 2021, 5(2): 167–181.

33
Patterson, M., Haag, T., Foster, J., Rawlin, V., Roman, R., Soulas, G. Development status of a 5/10-kW class ion engine. In: Proceedings of the 37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2001: AIAA 2001-3489.
34
Patterson, M., Benson, S. NEXT ion propulsion system development status and performance. In: Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2007: AIAA 2007-5199.
35

Quarta, A. A., Izzo, D., Vasile, M. Time-optimal trajectories to circumsolar space using solar electric propulsion. Advances in Space Research, 2013, 51(3): 411–422.

36

Mereta, A., Izzo, D. Target selection for a small low-thrust mission to near-Earth asteroids. Astrodynamics, 2018, 2(3): 249–263.

Astrodynamics
Pages 413-427
Cite this article:
Bassetto M, Quarta AA, Mengali G. Analytical solution to logarithmic spiral trajectories with circumferential thrust and mission applications. Astrodynamics, 2022, 6(4): 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-022-0135-3
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return