Graphical Abstract
![](https://wqketang.oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com/zip-unzip/zip-77f801d3-9b72-435e-a20b-451f55a1b62c/astrodynamics-8-2-247/files/astrodynamics-8-2-247-FE1.jpg?Expires=1725756393&OSSAccessKeyId=STS.NSssK71aLjDMY9SbRgGRGskMT&Signature=VrRRjval1ZAwFVf%2FbPhQ9ZPMYUs%3D&security-token=CAISywJ1q6Ft5B2yfSjIr5DGOPGD3L5t3YamWx%2FihlIyS91rnK7mtjz2IHtKenhsBOsbtfk1mG5W5%2FgZlqJ9SptIAEfJa9d99Myjb%2F9FltCT1fau5Jko1beHewHKeTOZsebWZ%2BLmNqC%2FHt6md1HDkAJq3LL%2Bbk%2FMdle5MJqP%2B%2FUFB5ZtKWveVzddA8pMLQZPsdITMWCrVcygKRn3mGHdfiEK00he8TouufTinpHMskGA1Aell7Mvyt6vcsT%2BXa5FJ4xiVtq55utye5fa3TRYgxowr%2Fwo0v0YpGya5YzHXwcPskvdKZbo78UqLQlla6w%2BGqFJqvPxr%2Fp8t%2Fx5fWJKAezhVgs8cVM8JOjIqKOscIsixo262SmqFV55c8Fdm%2BgUooJVgIMhTnduUfAPJAGOxzJitP%2BUVGGphr60TEnBL4rB5MUctfzRpwT64j3UTzDnGoABhFRSspTLrn9GrEN9pQYzC6eepGdfWDQh3fr5hA1VnwVUJMCz%2BNQEDWKceF%2FnEjWVMtfbvqYxuyhSCmIMMyh5bEREEKEiD%2BFVv4ZfsqnV7hQy5w6HhIkN8kZzP6L0zPvPgkBLOtdMDeDxhf8dVPrCSG4etXHjxcwUaRVb3ZR7Yu8gAA%3D%3D)
Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Spinning electrodynamic tether systems (SEDTs) have promising potential for the active removal of space debris, the construction of observation platforms, and the formation of artificial gravity. However, owing to the survivability problem of long tethers, designing collision-avoidance strategies for SEDTs with space debris is an urgent issue. This study focuses on the design of collision-avoidance strategies for SEDTs with an electrodynamic force (Ampere force). The relative distance between the debris and the SEDT is first derived, and then two collision-avoidance strategies are proposed according to the two different cases. When debris collides closer to a lighter subsatellite, a stationary avoidance strategy is proposed to change the spatial position of the subsatellite by adjusting only the angular motion of the tether, which maintains the original orbit of the SEDT. When debris collides closer to a heavier main spacecraft, a comprehensive avoidance strategy is proposed to change the spatial position of the SEDT by slightly modifying the orbital height and changing the tether angular motion simultaneously. The numerical results illustrate that the proposed strategies promptly avoid potential collisions of an SEDT with space debris without significant changes in the orbital parameters of the SEDT.
Lu, H., Zabolotnov, Y., Li, A. Impact analysis and orbit reboost of payload tossing using spinning electrodynamic tether system. International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation, 2020, 11(4): 176–185.
Tian, H., Li, A., Wang, C. Finite time non-singular sliding mode control for spinning tether system with prescribed performance under artificial gravity mission. Advances in Space Research, 2023, 71(5): 2467–2480.
Levin, E. M. Dynamic Analysis of Space Tether Missions, 2nd edn. San Diego, California, USA: Univelt Incorporated, 2006: 112–118.
Linskens, H. T. K., Mooij, E. Tether dynamics analysis and guidance and control design for active space-debris removal. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 39(6): 1232–1243.
Sun, J., Chen, E., Chen, T., Jin, D. Spin dynamics of a long tethered sub-satellite system in geostationary orbit. Acta Astronautica, 2022, 195: 12–26.
Cosmo, M. L., Lorenzini, E. C. Tethers in Space Handbook, 3rd edn. Huntsville, Alabama, USA: NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, 1997: 179–180.
Patera, R. P. Method for calculating collision probability between a satellite and a space tether. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2002, 25(5): 940–945.
Anselmo, L., Pardini, C. The survivability of space tether systems in orbit around the Earth. Acta Astronautica, 2005, 56(3): 391–396.
Liu, J., Li, G., Zhu, Z., Liu, M., Zhan, X. Automatic orbital maneuver for mega-constellations maintenance with electrodynamic tethers. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 105: 105910.
Gonzalo, J. L., Colombo, C., Di Lizia, P. Analytical framework for space debris collision avoidance maneuver design. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2021, 44(3): 469–487.
Khan, S. B., Sanmartin, J. R. Survival probability of round and tape tethers against debris impact. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2013, 50(3): 603–608.
Lu, H., Li, A., Wang, C., Zabolotnov, Y. M. Stability analysis and motion control of spinning electrodynamic tether system during transition into spin. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 177: 871–881.
Lu, H., Zabolotnov, Y. M., Li, A. Application of spinning electrodynamic tether system in changing system orbital parameters. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, 1368(4): 042002.
Montenbruck, O., Gill, E. Lutze, F. Satellite orbits: Models, methods and applications. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2022, 55(2): B27–B28.
Rao, A. V., Patterson, M. A. GPOPS-Ⅱ: A MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive Gaussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 2014, 41(1): 1–37.
Voevodin, P. S., Zabolotnov, Y. M. Stabilizing the motion of a low-orbit electrodynamic tether system. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 2019, 58(2): 270–285.