AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow Article
PDF (7.5 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

State-of-the-art in plant component flow-induced vibration (FIV)

Shuichiro Miwa1( ), Takashi Hibiki2
Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Kita 13 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, 400 Central Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2017, USA
Show Author Information
An erratum to this article is available online at:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-020-0096-9

Abstract

Flow-induced vibration (FIV) continues to be a critical phenomenon for plant safety. Notably, the understanding of FIV generated by multiphase flow is still immature, and various accidents and troubles have been reported for the plant components including a steam generator, natural gas lines, piping systems, and so on. It is because FIV is complicated to be predicted during the plant’s design stage, and usually is first noticed in the operation stage. Hence, a practical solution for new types of FIV has been through post-processing by conducting the laboratory-scale experiment to simulate the prototype. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a powerful tool to assess FIV, but the approach is still under development for multiphase flow case. It is partly due to the lack of experimental data, incomplete interfacial transfer terms included in the two-fluid model, as well as the difficulty to couple two-phase flow dynamics and structural dynamics in the simulation stage. Additionally, inadequate FIV database for the simulation benchmark also needs to be resolved for the advancement of CFD and finite-element-method (FEM) models. The present review summarizes fundamentals of FIV caused by gas-liquid two-phase flow, and recent FIV research activities ranging from experiment to simulation.

Keywords

two-phase flowslug flowflow-induced vibration (FIV)fluid-structure interaction

References

 
Al-Khalifa, H. A., Oshinowo, L., Al-Saif, O. A. 2016. Transient multiphase simulation in separator vessel internals design in Saudi Aramco. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2016-65250.
Crossref
 
Álvarez-Briceño, R., Kanizawa, F. T., Ribatski, G., de Oliveira, L. P. R. 2018. Validation of turbulence induced vibration design guidelines in a normal triangular tube bundle during two-phase crossflow. J Fluid Struct, 76: 301-318.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 1998. ASME boiler and pressure vessel code Section III, Nonmandatory Appendix N, Subarticle N-1300, Flow-Induced Vibration of Tubes and Tube Banks 1998 with 2000 Addendum.
 
Belfroid, S. P. C., Nennie, E., Lewis, M. 2016. Multiphase forces on bends—Large scale 6-inch experiments. In: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-181604-MS.
Crossref
 
Blevins, R. D. 1990. Flow-Induced Vibration, 2nd edn. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
 
Blevins, R. D. 2018. Nonproprietary flow-induced vibration analysis of San Onofre nuclear generating station replacement steam generators to ASME code section III appendix N. J Pressure Vessel Technol, 140: 034502.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Cabrera-Miranda, J. M., Paik, J. K. 2019. Two-phase flow induced vibrations in a marine riser conveying a fluid with rectangular pulse train mass. Ocean Eng, 174: 71-83.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Da Silva, B. L., dos Santos, C. M., Bianchi, P., Henry, N., Meier, F., Oliveira, E., Martiganoni, W. P. 2016. Flow simulations solve WHRSG vibration issues. Oil Gas J, 114: 72.
Google Scholar
 
Diwakar, P., Prakash, A., Thomas, C. 2017. Flow induced vibration of equipment internals in a two-phase gas/liquid flow. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2017-65812.
Crossref
 
Giraudeau, M., Mureithi, N. W., Pettigrew, M. J. 2013. Two-phase flow-induced forces on piping in vertical upward flow: Excitation mechanisms and correlation models. J Pressure Vessel Technol, 135: 030907.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Ishii, M., Hibiki, T. 2010. Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow. Springer Science & Business Media.
Crossref
 
Ishii, M., Mishima, K. 1980. Study of two-fluid model and interfacial area. NUREG/CR-1873; ANL-80-111. Argonne National Lab., IL, USA.
 
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSME). 2018. Flow Induced Vibrations—Classification and Lessons from Practical Experiences, 3rd edn. Tokyo: Gihodo Publishing Co.
 
Li, F., Cao, J., Duan, M., An, C., Su, J. 2016. Two-phase flow induced vibration of subsea span pipeline. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE-I-16-333.
 
Liu, Y., Miwa, S., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Morita, H., Kondoh, Y., Tanimoto, K. 2012. Experimental study of internal two-phase flow induced fluctuating force on a 90° elbow. Chem Eng Sci, 76: 173-187.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Mishima, K., Ishii, M. 1984. Flow regime transition criteria for upward two-phase flow in vertical tubes. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 27: 723-737.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Miwa, S., Hibiki, T., Mori, M. 2016. Analysis of flow-induced vibration due to stratified wavy two-phase flow. J Fluid Eng, 138: 091302.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Miwa, S., Liu, Y., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Kondo, Y., Morita, H., Tanimoto, K. 2014a. Study of unsteady gas-liquid two-phase flow induced force fluctuation (Part 2: Horizontal-downward two-phase flow). Trans JSME, 80: TEP0046. (in Japanese)
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Miwa, S., Liu, Y., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Kondo, Y., Morita, H., Tanimoto, K. 2014b. Study of unsteady gas-liquid two-phase flow induced force fluctuation (Part 1: Evaluation and modeling of two-phase flow induced force fluctuation). Trans JSME, 80: FE0005. (in Japanese)
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Miwa, S., Mori, M., Hibiki, T. 2015. Two-phase flow induced vibration in piping systems. Prog Nucl Energ, 78: 270-284.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Miwa, S., Yamamoto, Y., Chiba, G. 2018. Research activities on nuclear reactor physics and thermal-hydraulics in Japan after Fukushima-Daiichi accident. J Nucl Sci Technol, 55: 575-598.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Nakamura, T., Shiraishi, T., Ishitani, Y., Watakabe, H., Sago, H., Fujii, T., Konomura, M. 2005. Flow-induced vibration of a large-diameter elbow piping based on random force measurement caused by conveying fluid (visualization test results). In: Proceedings of the ASME 2005 Pressure Vessel and Piping, PVP2005-71277.
Crossref
 
Olala, S., Mureithi, N. W., Sawadogo, T., Pettigrew, M. J. 2014. Streamwise fluidelastic forces in tube arrays subjected to two-phase flows. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2014-28153.
Crossref
 
Ong, Z. C., Eng, H. C., Noroozi, S. 2017. Non-destructive testing and assessment of a piping system with excessive vibration and recurrence crack issue: An industrial case study. Eng Fail Anal, 82: 280-297.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Ortiz-Vidal, L. E., Mureithi, N. W., Rodriguez, O. M. H. 2017. Vibration response of a pipe subjected to two-phase flow: Analytical formulations and experiments. Nucl Eng Des, 313: 214-224.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Ozar, B., Dixit, A., Chen, S. W., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M. 2012. Interfacial area concentration in gas-liquid bubbly to churn-turbulent flow regime. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 38: 168-179.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Paidoussis, M. P. 1970. Dynamics of tubular cantilevers conveying fluid. J Mech Eng Sci, 12: 85-103.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Pettigrew, M. J., Besner, B., Mureithi, N. W., Lafrance, T., Patrick, J. M. 2014. Development of fiber-optic probes to measure two-phase flow dynamic parameters in support of flow-induced vibration studies. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2014-28106.
Crossref
 
Saito, Y., Torisaki, S., Miwa, S. 2018. Two-phase flow regime identification using fluctuating force signals under machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2018 26th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE26-81288.
Crossref
 
Schulkes, R. 2011. Slug frequency revisited. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology, BHR-2011-H1.
 
Setyawan, A., Indarto, Deendarlianto. 2016. The effect of the fluid properties on the wave velocity and wave frequency of gas-liquid annular two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 71: 25-41.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Wang, L., Yang, Y. R., Li, Y. X., Wang, Y. T. 2018a. Dynamic behaviours of horizontal gas-liquid pipes subjected to hydrodynamic slug flow: Modelling and experiments. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 161: 50-57.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Wang, L., Yang, Y. R., Li, Y. X., Wang, Y. T. 2018b. Resonance analyses of a pipeline-riser system conveying gas-liquid two-phase flow with flow-pattern evolution. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 161: 22-32.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Wang, L., Yang, Y. R., Liu, C., Li, Y. X., Hu, Q. H. 2018c. Numerical investigation of dynamic response of a pipeline-riser system caused by severe slugging flow. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 159: 15-27.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Xu, X. P., Liu, M. Y., Ma, Y., An, M. 2016. Effects of fluidized solid particles on vibration behaviors of a graphite tube evaporator with an internal vapor-liquid flow. Appl Therm Eng, 100: 1229-1244.
Crossref Google Scholar
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Volume 2 Issue 1,
March 2020
Pages 1-12
DOI: 10.1007/s42757-019-0030-1
Cite this article:
Miwa S, Hibiki T. State-of-the-art in plant component flow-induced vibration (FIV). Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2020, 2(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-019-0030-1

708

Views

17

Downloads

7

Crossref

9

Web of Science

7

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 31 March 2019
Revised: 30 April 2019
Accepted: 30 April 2019
Published: 20 August 2019
© Tsinghua University Press 2019
Return