AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Bayesian inference of a multivariate model in a phase change situation around a cylinder in staggered arrangement

Ravi Pullepudi1( )S. K. Maharana2
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, MVJ College of Engineering, Bangalore-560067, India
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Acharya Institute of Technology, Bangalore-560107, India
Show Author Information

Abstract

The complexity of problem of fluid flow and heat transfer over an array of circular cylinders is common in industrial applications of fluid dynamics. The complex nature of the problem encountered in industry gives rise to certain significant dimensions in fluid dynamics theory. Some of them are fluid flow interaction, interferences in flow and vortex dynamics which are typically found in compact heat exchangers, cooling of electronic equipment, nuclear reactor fuel rods, cooling towers, chimney stacks, offshore structures, hot-wire anemometry, and flow control. The mentioned structures are subjected to air or water flows and therefore, experience flow induced forces which can lead to their failure over a long period of time. Basically, with respect to the free stream direction, the configuration of two cylinders can be classified as tandem, side-by-side, and staggered arrangements. The Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations have been used to compute the flow and Eulerian model has been used to understand phase change situation in a staggered arrangement of cylinders. In the present study, nucleate boiling has been the cause of heat and mass transfer between the phases for different cylinder configurations in staggered arrangement. The study was carried out by keeping cylinders stationary as well as rotating to understand the difference and impact of these situations on VOF. The profound effects of arrangement of cylinders, the location of cylinder surface, surface temperature of the cylinder were investigated. To have a deeper and meaningful insight into the phase change phenomenon of water into water vapor, Bayesian inference of a multivariate model involving certain significant factors such as Nusselt number (Nu), Prandtl number (Pr), and Stanton number (St) along with volume fraction of vapor phase of water was carried out. The posterior probabilities computed from Bayesian inference for two statistically significant and experimentally verified datasets were obtained during the study. Through Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for the multivariate datasets used in the study, it was observed that some factors are positively and negatively correlated and individually contributing towards a meaningful finding from the study.

References

 
P. W. Bearman,, A. J. Wadcock, 1973. The interaction between a pair of circular cylinders normal to a stream. J Fluid Mech, 61: 499-511.
 
J. Deng,, A. Ren,, W. Chen, 2005. Numerical simulation of flow induced vibration on two circular cylinders in tandem arrangement. J Hydrodyn Ser B, 17: 660-666.
 
H. Ding,, C. Shu,, K. S. Yeo,, D. Xu, 2007. Numerical simulation of flows around two circular cylinders by mesh-free least square-based finite difference methods. Int J Numer Meth Fluids, 53: 305-332.
 
T. Farrant,, M. Tan,, W. G. Price, 2001. A cell boundary element method applied to laminar vortex shedding from circular cylinders. Comput Fluids, 30: 211-236.
 
J. W. He,, R. Glowinski,, R. Metcalfe,, A. Nordlander,, J. Periaux, 2000. Active control and drag optimization for flow past a circular cylinder. J Comput Phys, 163: 83-117.
 
R. D. Henderson, 1995. Details of the drag curve near the onset of vortex shedding. Phys Fluids, 7: 2102-2104.
 
T. Kitagawa,, H. Ohta, 2008. Numerical investigation on flow around circular cylinders in tandem arrangement at a subcritical Reynolds number. J Fluid Struct, 24: 680-699.
 
J. Li,, A. Chambarel,, M. Donneaud,, R. Martin, 1991. Numerical study of laminar flow past one and two circular cylinders. Comput Fluids, 19: 155-170.
 
M. N. Linnick,, H. F. Fasel, 2005. A high-order immersed interface method for simulating unsteady incompressible flows on irregular domains. J Comput Phys, 204: 157-192.
 
K. Liu,, D. Ma,, D. Sun,, X. Yin, 2007. Wake patterns of flow past a pair of circular cylinders in side-by-side arrangements at low Reynolds numbers. J Hydrodyn, 19: 690-697.
 
M. Liu,, L. Lu,, B. Teng,, M. Zhao,, G. Tang, 2014. Re-examination of laminar flow over twin circular cylinders in tandem arrangement. Fluid Dyn Res, 46: 025501.
 
L. Ljungkrona,, C. Norberg,, B. Sundén, 1991. Free-stream turbulence and tube spacing effects on surface pressure fluctuations for two tubes in an in-line arrangement. J Fluid Struct, 5: 701-727.
 
N. Mahír,, Z. Altaç, 2008. Numerical investigation of convective heat transfer in unsteady flow past two cylinders in tandem arrangements. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 29: 1309-1318.
 
J. R. Meneghini,, F. Saltara,, C. L. R. Siqueira,, J. A. Ferrari Jr., 2001. Numerical simulation of flow interference between two circular cylinders in tandem and side-by-side arrangements. J Fluid Struct 15: 327-350.
 
S. Mittal,, V. Kumar,, A. Raghuvanshi, 1997. Unsteady incompressible flows past two cylinders in tandem and staggered arrangements. Int J Numer Meth Fluids, 25: 1315-1344.
 
M. Moriya,, M. Alam,, K. Takai,, H. Sakamoto, 2002. Fluctuating fluid forces of two circular cylinders in tandem arrangement at close spacing. T Jpn Soc Mech Eng Ser B, 68: 1400-1406.
 
R. Pullepudi,, S. K. Maharana, 2019. Numerical investigation on effect of orientation and rotation on liquid-vapor phase change around a cylinder in staggered arrangement. Int J Appl Eng Res, 14: 220-227.
 
B. N. Rajani,, A. Kandasamy,, S. Majumdar, 2009. Numerical simulation of laminar flow past a circular cylinder. Appl Math Model, 33: 1228-1247.
 
J. Rocca, 2019. Bayesian inference problem, MCMC and variational inference, towards data science. Available at https://towardsdatascience.com/bayesian-inference-problem-mcmc-and-variational-inference-25a8aa9bce29.
 
S. Ryu,, S.-B. Lee,, B.-H. Lee,, J.-C. Park, 2009. Estimation of hydrodynamic coefficients for flow around cylinders in side-by-side arrangement with variation in separation gap. Ocean Eng, 36: 672-680.
 
S. Singha,, K. P. Sinhamahapatra, 2010. High-resolution numerical simulation of low Reynolds number incompressible flow about two cylinders in tandem. J Fluid Eng, 132: 011101.
 
Z. L. Wang,, J. Fan,, K. Cen, 2009. Immersed boundary method for the simulation of 2D viscous flow based on vorticity-velocity formulations. J Comput Phys, 228: 1504-1520.
 
M. M. Zdravkovich, 1997a. Flow around Circular Cylinders. Vol. 1. Fundamentals. Oxford University Press.
 
M. M. Zdravkovich, 1997b. Review of flow interference between two circular cylinders in various arrangements. J Fluids Eng, 37: 993-1010.
 
M. M. Zdravkovich, 2003. Flow around Circular Cylinders. Vol. 1. Fundamentals. Oxford University Press.
 
H. Zhang,, W. H. Melbourne, 1992. Interference between two circular cylinders in tandem in turbulent flow. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod, 41: 589-600.
 
X. Zhang,, S. Ni,, G. W. He, 2008. A pressure-correction method and its applications on an unstructured Chimera grid. Comput Fluids, 37: 993-1010.
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Pages 113-123
Cite this article:
Pullepudi R, Maharana SK. Bayesian inference of a multivariate model in a phase change situation around a cylinder in staggered arrangement. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2021, 3(2): 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-020-0060-8

826

Views

6

Crossref

8

Web of Science

7

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 05 November 2019
Revised: 12 February 2020
Accepted: 14 February 2020
Published: 23 May 2020
© Tsinghua University Press 2020
Return