AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

On sharp surface force model: Effect of sharpening coefficient

Kurian J. Vachaparambil( )Kristian Etienne Einarsrud
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Show Author Information

Abstract

Amongst the multitude of approaches available in literature to reduce spurious velocities in Volume of Fluid approach, the Sharp Surface Force (SSF) model is increasingly being used due to its relative ease to implement. The SSF approach relies on a user-defined parameter, the sharpening coefficient, which determines the extent of the smeared nature of interface used to determine the surface tension force. In this paper, we use the SSF model implemented in OpenFOAM® to investigate the effect of this sharpening coefficient on spurious velocities and accuracy of dynamic, i.e., capillary rise, and static bubble simulations. Results show that increasing the sharpening coefficient generally reduces the spurious velocities in both static and dynamic cases. Although static millimeter sized bubbles were simulated with the whole range of sharpening coefficients, sub-millimeter sized bubbles show nonphysical behavior for values larger than 0.3. The accuracy of the capillary rise simulations has been observed to change non-linearly with the sharpening coefficient. This work illustrates the importance of using an optimized value of the sharpening coefficient with respect to spurious velocities and accuracy of the simulation.

References

 
J. U. Brackbill,, D. B. Kothe,, C. Zemach, 1992. A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J Comput Phys, 100: 335-354.
 
J. W. Bullard,, E. J. Garboczi, 2009. Capillary rise between planar surfaces. Phys Rev E, 79: 011604.
 
P. Cifani,, W. R. Michalek,, G. J. M. Priems,, J. G. M. Kuerten,, C. W. M. van der Geld,, B. J. Geurts, 2016. A comparison between the surface compression method and an interface reconstruction method for the VOF approach. Comput Fluids, 136: 421-435.
 
S. S. Deshpande,, L. Anumolu,, M. F. Trujillo, 2012. Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interFoam. Comput Sci Disc, 5: 014016.
 
C. J. Greenshields, 2019. OpenFOAM User Guide version 7. OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd.
 
J. Maes,, C. Soulaine, 2018. A new compressive scheme to simulate species transfer across fluid interfaces using the Volume-Of- Fluid method. Chem Eng Sci, 190: 405-418.
 
S. Pavuluri,, J. Maes,, F. Doster, 2018. Spontaneous imbibition in a microchannel: Analytical solution and assessment of volume of fluid formulations. Microfluid Nanofluid, 22: 90.
 
S. Popinet, 2018. Numerical models of surface tension. Ann Rev Fluid Mech, 50: 49-75.
 
A. Q. Raeini,, M. J. Blunt,, B. Bijeljic, 2012. Modelling two-phase flow in porous media at the pore scale using the volume-of-fluid method. J Comput Phys, 231: 5653-5668.
 
N. Samkhaniani,, M. Ansari, 2016. Numerical simulation of bubble condensation using CF-VOF. Prog Nucl Energy, 89: 120-131.
 
A. Saufi,, A. Frassoldati,, T. Faravelli,, A. Cuoci, 2019. DropletSMOKE++: A comprehensive multiphase CFD framework for the evaporation of multidimensional fuel droplets. Int J Heat Mass Trans, 131: 836-853.
 
G. Y. Soh,, G. H. Yeoh,, V. Timchenko, 2016. Numerical investigation on the velocity fields during droplet formation in a microuidic T-junction. Chem Eng Sci, 139: 99-108.
 
K. J. Vachaparambil,, K. E. Einarsrud, 2019a. Comparison of surface tension models for the volume of fluid method. Processes, 7: 542.
 
K. J. Vachaparambil,, K. E. Einarsrud, 2019b. Spurious velocities in the volume of fluid method: Modeling a sub-millimeter bubble. In: Proceedings of the 17th Multiphase Flow Conference & Short Course.
 
K. J. Vachaparambil,, K. E. Einarsrud, 2020. Numerical simulation of bubble growth in a supersaturated solution. Appl Math Model, 81: 690-710.
 
T. Yamamoto,, Y. Okano,, S. Dost, 2017. Validation of the S-CLSVOF method with the density-scaled balanced continuum surface force model in multiphase systems coupled with thermocapillary flows. Int J Numer Method Fluids, 83: 223-244.
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Pages 226-232
Cite this article:
Vachaparambil KJ, Einarsrud KE. On sharp surface force model: Effect of sharpening coefficient. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2021, 3(3): 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-020-0063-5

739

Views

38

Downloads

6

Crossref

7

Web of Science

6

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 06 January 2020
Revised: 06 March 2020
Accepted: 07 March 2020
Published: 16 June 2020
© The Author(s) 2020

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return