AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Experimental and numerical study of free-falling streams of particles impacting an inclined surface

David Dodds1Abd Alhamid Rafea Sarhan1,2( )Jamal Naser1
Department of Mechanical and Product Design Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria 3010, Australia
Show Author Information

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed experimental and numerical analysis of free-falling particle streams impacting a 45° inclined surface of differing materials. The particles used in this study were glass spheres with average diameters of 136 and 342 µm and a density of 2500 kg/m3. The three mass flow rates considered are 50, 150, and 250 grams per minute (gpm). The effect of wall material on the collision process was also analysed. Special attention was paid to the influence of wall roughness. Therefore, a plate of stainless steel with polished surface, an aluminium sheet, and a Perspex plate with similar properties to those of the rest of the wall sections were used. The experimental data were used to improve and validate a wall collision model in the frame of the Lagrangian approach. A new drag force formula that includes the effects of particle concentration as well as particle Reynolds number was implemented into commercially available codes from CFX4-4 package. It was found that the improved CFD model better predicted the experimental measurements for the particle rebound properties. The rough-wall model in these results showed greater effect on smaller particles than on larger particles. The results also showed that the improved CFD model predicted the velocity changes slightly better than the standard model, and this was confirmed by both the quantitative velocity comparisons and the qualitative concentration plots. Finally, the inclusion of the particle–particle collision was shown to be the dominant factor in providing the dispersion of the particles post collision. Without a sufficient particle–particle collision model, the standard model showed all particles behaving virtually identical, with the main particle stream continuing after the collision process.

References

 
Afshar, S., Nath, S., Demirci, U., Hasan, T., Scarcelli, G., Rizvi, I., Franco, W. 2018. Identification of hydrodynamic forces around 3D surrogates using particle image velocimetry in a microfluidic channel. In: Proceedings of the SPIE 10491, Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems XVI, San Francisco, California, USA: 916.
 
Clift, R., Grace, J. R., Weber, M. E. 1978. Bubbles, Drops and Particles. New York: Academic Press.
 
Dodds, D., Sarhan, A. R., Naser, J. 2020a. Experimental and numerical study of drag forces on particles in clusters. Powder Technology, 371: 195208.
 
Dodds, D., Sarhan, A. R., Naser, J. 2020b. Numerical analysis of dilute gas-solid flows in a horizontal pipe and a 90° bend coupled with a newly developed drag model. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 163: 169181.
 
Kabeel, A. E., Elkelawy, M., Bastawissi, H. A. E., Elbanna, A. M. 2019. An experimental and theoretical study on particles-in-air behavior characterization at different particles loading and turbulence modulation. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58: 451465.
 
Feng, L., Zhang, H., Hu, L., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, H. 2020. Classification performance of model coal mill classifiers with swirling and non-swirling inlets. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 28: 777784.
 
Gondret, P., Lance, M., Petit, L. 2002. Bouncing motion of spherical particles in fluids. Physics of Fluids, 14: 643652.
 
Grant, G., Tabakoff, W. 1975. Erosion prediction in turbomachinery resulting from environmental solid particles. Journal of Aircraft, 12: 471478.
 
Huber, N., Sommerfeld, M. 1998. Modelling and numerical calculation of dilute-phase pneumatic conveying in pipe systems. Powder Technology, 99: 90101.
 
Jain, R., Tschisgale, S., Fröhlich, J. 2019. A collision model for DNS with ellipsoidal particles in viscous fluid. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 120: 103087.
 
Joseph, G. 2003. Collisional dynamics of macroscopic particles in a viscous fluid. California Institute of Technology.
 
Joseph, G. G., Zenit, R., Hunt, M. L., Rosenwinkel, A. M. 2001. Particle–wall collisions in a viscous fluid. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 433: 329346.
 
Kuerten, J. G. M., Vreman, A. W. 2016. Collision frequency and radial distribution function in particle-laden turbulent channel flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 87: 6679.
 
Li, Z., Miao, Z., Zhou, Y., Wen, S., Li, J. 2018. Influence of increased primary air ratio on boiler performance in a 660 MW brown coal boiler. Energy, 152: 804817.
 
Luo, K., Zhang, H., Luo, M., Wu, X., Fan, J. 2019. Effects of solid particles and wall roughness on turbulent boundary layer in a two-phase horizontal channel flow. Powder Technology, 353: 4856.
 
Manjula, E. V. P. J., Ariyaratne, W. K. H., Ratnayake, C., Melaaen, M. C. 2017. A review of CFD modelling studies on pneumatic conveying and challenges in modelling offshore drill cuttings transport. Powder Technology, 305: 782793.
 
Matsumoto, S., Saito, S. 1970. Monte Carlo simulation of horizontal pneumatic conveying based on the rough wall model. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 3: 223230.
 
Miao, Z., Kuang, S., Zughbi, H., Yu, A. 2019. CFD simulation of dilute-phase pneumatic conveying of powders. Powder Technology, 349: 7083.
 
Muhammad, A., Zhang, N., Wang, W. 2019. CFD simulations of a full-loop CFB reactor using coarse-grained Eulerian–Lagrangian dense discrete phase model: Effects of modelling parameters. Powder Technology, 354: 615629.
 
Raghav, V., Sastry, S., Saikrishnan, N. 2018. Experimental assessment of flow fields associated with heart valve prostheses using particle image velocimetry (PIV): Recommendations for best practices. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, 9: 273287.
 
Ruiz-Angulo, A., Roshankhah, S., Hunt, M. L. 2019. Surface deformation and rebound for normal single-particle collisions in a surrounding fluid. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 871: 10441066.
 
Shuen, J. S., Solomon, A. S. P., Zhang, Q. F., Faeth, G. M. 1985. Structure of particle-laden jets—Measurements and predictions. AIAA Journal, 23: 396404.
 
Sommerfeld, M. 1992. Modelling of particle–wall collisions in confined gas-particle flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 18: 905926.
 
Sommerfeld, M. 2001. Validation of a stochastic Lagrangian modelling approach for inter-particle collisions in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 27: 18291858.
 
Sommerfeld, M. 2009. Kinetic simulations for analysing the wall collision process of non-spherical particles. In: Proceedings of ASME 2002 Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Division Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002: 539547.
 
Sommerfeld, M. 2003. Analysis of collision effects for turbulent gas-particle flow in a horizontal channel: Part I. Particle transport. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 29: 675699.
 
Sommerfeld, M., Huber, N. 1999. Experimental analysis and modelling of particle-wall collisions. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 25: 14571489.
 
Sommerfeld, M., Huber, N., Wächter, P. 1993. Particle-wall collisions: Experimental studies and numerical models. ASME-PUBLICATIONS-FED, 166: 183183.
 
Sommerfeld, M., Kussin, J. 2003. Analysis of collision effects for turbulent gas-particle flow in a horizontal channel. Part II. Integral properties and validation. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 29: 701718.
 
Sommerfeld, M., Kussin, J. 2004. Wall roughness effects on pneumatic conveying of spherical particles in a narrow horizontal channel. Powder Technology, 142: 180192.
 
Tsuji, Y., Morikawa, Y., Tanaka, T., Nakatsukasa, N., Nakatani, M. 1987. Numerical simulation of gas–solid two-phase flow in a two-dimensional horizontal channel. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 13: 671684.
 
Tsuji, Y., Oshima, T., Morikawa, Y. 1985. Numerical simulation of pneumatic conveying in a horizontal pipe. KONA Powder and Particle Journal, 3: 3851.
 
Varaksin, A. Y. 2019. Collision of particles and droplets in turbulent two-phase flows. High Temperature, 57: 555572.
 
Westerweel, J. 1997. Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry. Measurement Science and Technology, 8: 13791392.
 
Zhu, Y., Chen, Y., Xu, Z., Jin, H., Fan, J. 2019. Numerical simulation of gas-particle dense flow with LES/VFDF/SC model. Computers & Fluids, 183: 4352.
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Pages 381-395
Cite this article:
Dodds D, Sarhan AAR, Naser J. Experimental and numerical study of free-falling streams of particles impacting an inclined surface. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2023, 5(4): 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-022-0144-8

461

Views

16

Downloads

9

Crossref

11

Web of Science

12

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 11 January 2022
Revised: 06 August 2022
Accepted: 15 August 2022
Published: 21 January 2023
© The Author(s) 2022

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return